| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
Exodus Chapter
Four
Exodus 4
Chapter Contents
God gives Moses power to work miracles. (1-9) Moses is
loth to be sent
Aaron is to assist him. (10-17) Moses leaves Midian
God's
message to Pharaoh. (18-23) God's displeasure against Moses
Aaron meets him
The people believe them. (24-31)
Commentary on Exodus 4:1-9
(Read Exodus 4:1-9)
Moses objects
that the people would not take his word
unless he showed them some sign. God gives him power to work miracles. But
those who are now employed to deliver God's messages to men
need not the power
to work miracles: their character and their doctrines are to be tried by that
word of God to which they appeal. These miracles especially referred to the
miracles of the Lord Jesus Christ. It belonged to Him only
to cast the power
of the devil out of the soul
and to heal the soul of the leprosy of sin; and
so it was for Him first to cast the devil out of the body
and to heal the
leprosy of the body.
Commentary on Exodus 4:10-17
(Read Exodus 4:10-17)
Moses continued backward to the work God designed him
for; there was much of cowardice
slothfulness
and unbelief in him. We must
not judge of men by the readiness of their discourse. A great deal of wisdom
and true worth may be with a slow tongue. God sometimes makes choice of those
as his messengers
who have the least of the advantages of art or nature
that
his grace in them may appear the more glorious. Christ's disciples were no
orators
till the Holy Spirit made them such. God condescends to answer the
excuse of Moses. Even self-diffidence
when it hinders us from duty
or clogs
us in duty
is very displeasing to the Lord. But while we blame Moses for
shrinking from this dangerous service
let us ask our own hearts if we are not
neglecting duties more easy
and less perilous. The tongue of Aaron
with the
head and heart of Moses
would make one completely fit for this errand. God
promises
I will be with thy mouth
and with his mouth. Even Aaron
who could
speak well
yet could not speak to purpose
unless God gave constant teaching
and help; for without the constant aid of Divine grace
the best gifts will
fail.
Commentary on Exodus 4:18-23
(Read Exodus 4:18-23)
After God had appeared in the bush
he often spake to
Moses. Pharaoh had hardened his own heart against the groans and cries of the
oppressed Israelites; and now God
in the way of righteous judgment
hardens
his heart against the teaching of the miracles
and the terror of the plagues.
But whether Pharaoh will hear
or whether he will forbear
Moses must tell him
Thus saith the Lord. He must demand a discharge for Israel
Let my son go; not
only my servant
whom thou hast no right to detain
but my son. It is my son
that serves me
and therefore must be spared
must be pleaded for. In case of
refusal I will slay thy son
even thy first-born. As men deal with God's
people
let them expect so to be dealt with.
Commentary on Exodus 4:24-31
(Read Exodus 4:24-31)
God met Moses in anger. The Lord threatened him with
death or sent sickness upon him
as the punishment of his having neglected to
circumcise his son. When God discovers to us what is amiss in our lives
we
must give all diligence to amend it speedily. This is the voice of every rod;
it calls us to return to Him that smites us. God sent Aaron to meet Moses. The
more they saw of God's bringing them together
the more pleasant their
interview was. The elders of Israel met them in faith
and were ready to obey
them. It often happens
that less difficulty is found than was expected
in
such undertakings as are according to the will of God
and for his glory. Let
us but arise and try at our proper work
the Lord will be with us and prosper
us. If Israel welcomed the tidings of their deliverance
and worshipped the
Lord
how should we welcome the glad tidings of redemption
embrace it in
faith
and adore the Redeemer!
¢w¢w Matthew Henry¡mConcise Commentary on Exodus¡n
Exodus 4
Verse 1
[1] And
Moses answered and said
But
behold
they will not believe me
nor hearken
unto my voice: for they will say
The LORD hath not appeared unto thee.
They will not hearken to my voice-That is
they would not take his bare word
unless he shewed them some sign. He
remembered how they had once rejected him
and feared it would be so again.
Verse 2
[2] And the LORD said unto him
What is that in thine hand? And he said
A
rod.
A rod ¡X Or
staff.
Verse 5
[5] That
they may believe that the LORD God of their fathers
the God of Abraham
the
God of Isaac
and the God of Jacob
hath appeared unto thee.
That they may believe ¡X An imperfect sentence to be thus compleated
This thou shalt do
before
them
that they may believe.
Verse 6
[6] And
the LORD said furthermore unto him
Put now thine hand into thy bosom. And he
put his hand into his bosom: and when he took it out
behold
his hand was
leprous as snow.
His hand was leprous
as snow ¡X For whiteness. This signified
That Moses
by the power of God
should
bring sore diseases upon Egypt
that at his prayer they should be removed. And
that whereas the Israelites in Egypt were become leprous
polluted by sin
and
almost consumed by oppression
by being taken into the bosom of Moses they
should be cleansed and cured.
Verse 8
[8] And it shall come to pass
if they will not believe thee
neither hearken
to the voice of the first sign
that they will believe the voice of the latter
sign.
The voice of the first sign ¡X God's works have a voice to speak to us
which we must diligently
observe.
Verse 10
[10] And
Moses said unto the LORD
O my Lord
I am not eloquent
neither heretofore
nor
since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I am slow of speech
and of a slow
tongue.
O my Lord
I am not eloquent ¡X He was a great philosopher
statesman
and divine
and yet no orator; a
man of a clear head
great thought and solid judgment
but had not a voluble
tongue
nor ready utterance; and therefore he thought himself unfit to speak
before great men
and about great affairs. Moses was mighty in word
Acts 7:22
and yet not eloquent: what he said
was strong and nervous
and to the purpose
and distilled as the dew
Deuteronomy 32:2
though he did not deliver
himself with that readiness
ease and fineness that some do.
Verse 13
[13] And
he said
O my Lord
send
I pray thee
by the hand of him whom thou wilt send.
Send by whom thou wilt send ¡X By any but me.
Verse 14
[14] And
the anger of the LORD was kindled against Moses
and he said
Is not Aaron the
Levite thy brother? I know that he can speak well. And also
behold
he cometh
forth to meet thee: and when he seeth thee
he will be glad in his heart.
And the anger of the Lord was kindled against
him ¡X Even self-diffidence when it grows into an
extreme
when it either hinders us from duty
or clogs us in duty
is very
displeasing to him.
Verse 15
[15] And
thou shalt speak unto him
and put words in his mouth: and I will be with thy
mouth
and with his mouth
and will teach you what ye shall do.
I will be with thy mouth and with his mouth ¡X Even Aaron that could speak well
yet could not speak to purpose
unless
God were with his mouth; without the constant aids of divine grace
the best
gifts will fail.
Verse 16
[16] And
he shall be thy spokesman unto the people: and he shall be
even he shall be to
thee instead of a mouth
and thou shalt be to him instead of God.
Instead of God ¡X To
teach and to command him.
Verse 17
[17] And
thou shalt take this rod in thine hand
wherewith thou shalt do signs.
Take this rod ¡X
The staff or crook he carried as a shepherd
that he might not be ashamed of
that mean condition out of which God called him. This rod must be his staff of
authority
and must be to him instead
both of sword and sceptre.
Verse 19
[19] And
the LORD said unto Moses in Midian
Go
return into Egypt: for all the men are
dead which sought thy life.
The Lord said unto Moses ¡X This seems to have been a second vision
whereby God calls him to the
present execution of the command given before.
Verse 20
[20] And
Moses took his wife and his sons
and set them upon an ass
and he returned to
the land of Egypt: and Moses took the rod of God in his hand.
The rod of God ¡X
His shepherd's crook so called
as it was God's instrument in so many glorious
works.
Verse 21
[21] And
the LORD said unto Moses
When thou goest to return into Egypt
see that thou
do all those wonders before Pharaoh
which I have put in thine hand: but I will
harden his heart
that he shall not let the people go.
In thy hand ¡X in
thy power: I will harden his heart - After he has frequently harden'd it
himself
wilfully shutting his eyes against the light
I will at last permit
Satan to harden it effectually.
Verse 22
[22] And
thou shalt say unto Pharaoh
Thus saith the LORD
Israel is my son
even my
firstborn:
Thus saith the Lord ¡X
This is the first time that preface is used by any man
which afterwards is
used so frequently by all the prophets: Israel is my son
my first-born -
Precious in my sight
honourable
and dear to me.
Verse 23
[23] And
I say unto thee
Let my son go
that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let
him go
behold
I will slay thy son
even thy firstborn.
Let my son go ¡X
Not only my servant whom thou hast no right to detain
but my son whose liberty
and honour I am jealous for.
If thou refuse
I will slay thy son
even thy
first-born ¡X As men deal with God's people
let them
expect to be themselves dealt with.
Verse 24
[24] And
it came to pass by the way in the inn
that the LORD met him
and sought to
kill him.
It seems the sin of Moses
was neglecting to
circumcise his son
which perhaps was the effect of his being unequally yoked
with a Midianite
who was too indulgent of her child
and Moses so of her. The
Lord met him
and
probably
by a sword in an angel's hand
sought to kill him
- This was a great change. Very lately God was conversing with him as a friend
and now coming forth against him as an enemy. In this case of necessity
Zipporah herself circumcised the child without delay; whether with passionate
words
expressing the dislike of the ordinance itself
or at least the
administration of it to so young a child.
Verse 26
[26] So
he let him go: then she said
A bloody husband thou art
because of the
circumcision.
So he let him go ¡X
The destroying angel withdrew. But still Zipporah cannot forget
but will
unreasonably call Moses a bloody husband
because he obliged her to circumcise
the child; and upon this occasion
(it is probable) he sent them back to his
father-in-law
that they might not create him any farther uneasiness. When we
have any special service to do for God
we should remove that as far from us as
we can
which is likely to be our hindrance: let the dead bury their dead
but
follow thou me.
Verse 27
[27] And
the LORD said to Aaron
Go into the wilderness to meet Moses. And he went
and
met him in the mount of God
and kissed him.
In the mount of God ¡X
That is
the place where God had met with him.
Verse 28
[28] And
Moses told Aaron all the words of the LORD who had sent him
and all the signs
which he had commanded him.
Moses told Aaron all ¡X Those that are fellow-servants to God in the same work
should use a
mutual freedom
and endeavour
rightly and fully to understand one another.
Verse 30
[30] And
Aaron spake all the words which the LORD had spoken unto Moses
and did the
signs in the sight of the people.
Aaron did the signs ¡X By
the direction of Moses.
¢w¢w
John Wesley¡mExplanatory Notes on Exodus¡n
04 Chapter 4
Verse 1
But
behold
they will not believe me.
Moses¡¦ temptation to shrink from
the contest
Our duty to our Lord in this world requires that we should do
somewhat more than live a life of obedience to Him. Our obedience must be
acknowledged obedience. We must never be loth to say
¡§Whose we are
and Whom
we serve.¡¨ We may read this lesson writ large in the history of God¡¦s sending
Moses to deliver His people. Moses went through a trial on Mount Horeb
the
exact opposite of the trial of Christ.
I. Moses was
tempted to decline the contest with the world altogether
to shrink from action
and from prominence
when God called him. Christ was tempted to take the world
by storm
to overwhelm it with conviction.
II. Moses was full
of sympathy for the poor
full of a desire to see God¡¦s ancient promises
realized; but when the time came
and God said
¡§Now go
¡¨ then
for the first
time
it flashed upon Moses that he was unfit to carry out what he had so
aspired to be trusted with. His eighty years of life had been given him that in
its vast experience he might learn that God was all
man was nothing. He had
very nearly learned it in truth; the crust or chrysalis of self was very nearly
ready to drop off; it needed just this interview with God to rid him of it
entirely. He had seen the miraculous powers with which he had been endowed
but
he had not fully understood them
and therefore his will was pausing still.
III. The voice of
God within him and without him waxed more imperious. God sternly pointed out
that such eloquence as he longed for was but a secondary qualification. ¡§Thy
brother
I know that he can speak well¡¨; the legislator need not be the orator.
There is not one of us who ever complained to God of insufficient strength
without finding his complaint answered either by ministration of grace or
disappearance of difficulties.
IV. What interests
trembled in the balance while Moses was debating! It is not for ourselves only
that we shall be responsible if we debate till the time is gone
(Archbishop
Benson.)
God¡¦s call and man¡¦s duty
I. God proposes
great things to men. In proportion as any call in life is great
let the heart
pause and consider whether its very greatness is not a proof of its divinity.
II. We are not to
look at what we are
but at what God is. When He calls
He qualifies for the
work
III. What is right
in itself may be perverted and abused. Timidity is right in itself; but when
pushed into cowardice
it is wrong. Self-distrust is right in itself; but if it
degenerates into atheism
then it is the plague and destruction of the soul.
IV. God¡¦s call to
faith is the greatest call to his universe. Our duty is to go forward to the
unknown and the invisible
and live by faith. (J. Parker
D. D.)
The mission of Moses
I. The nature of
the mission.
1. Its difficulty and danger.
2. It was divinely appointed.
II. Moses was
trained specially for it.
1. The school of providence.
2. Our need of discipline.
III. Moses was
sufficiently equipped. The rod.
1. The use of little things.
2. The use of present means. Use ¡§what is in thy hand.¡¨
IV. Moses shrank
from his mission. Modesty and self-distrust generally go with true greatness
and exalted virtue. (P. S. Henson
D. D.)
The lament of the pulpit
I. The preacher
has frequently to lament the scepticism
of his congregation. Practical unbelief.
II. The preacher
has frequently to lament the inattention of his congregation. Nothing worse
than disobedience to the messages of God.
III. the preacher
has frequently to lament the querulous spirit of his congregation. They
question inspiration
preparation
qualification of teacher. And often in
unkind
factious spirit. Should rather welcome him as from God
sent to achieve
their moral freedom.
IV. That this
conduct on the part of congregations has a most depressing influence on the
minds of ministers. He needs the attention
sympathy
prayers
help of those
whom he seeks to free from the tyranny of sin. He has enough to contend with
external hindrances
with the opposition of Pharaoh
without having added to it
that of the slave whose fetter he seeks to break. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Why did Moses imagine that the Israelites would not believe him
1. Because he knew that they were a stiff-necked people.
2. Because he considered himself of insufficient authority to command
their respect.
3. Because the power and tyranny of Pharaoh would deter them from
believing him.
4. Because they would think it unlikely that God
who had never been
seen by man
should appear to him. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Human distrust
Human distrust is a difficulty which every preacher
teacher
and
holy labourer has to encounter. All great movements are carried by consent of
parties. God Himself cannot re-establish moral order without the concurrence of
the powers that have rebelled against His rule. After all
the spiritual
labourer has less to do with the unbelief of his hearers than with the instruction
and authority of God. We have to ascertain what God the Lord would have us to
say
and then to speak it simply and lovingly
whether men will hear or whether
they will forbear. The preacher must prepare himself for having doubts thrown
upon his authority; and he must take care that his answer to such doubts be as
complete as the authority itself. God alone can give the true answer to human
doubt. We are not to encounter scepticism with merely ingenious replies and
clever arguments
but in the power and grace of the living God. (J.
Parker
D. D.)
Ministerial duty in spite of discouragement
Dr. Stevens narrates how an eminent minister was very much
depressed by the unbelief of his congregation
and how his spirit of depression
was shaken off. He dreamed that he was working with a pick-axe on the top of a
basaltic rock
which remained non-riven in spite of repeated strokes of his arm
of muscle. When about to give up in despair
a stranger of solemn and dignified
demeanour appeared on the scene
who reminded him that as a servant he was
bound to go on whether the rock yielded or not. ¡§Work is your duty; leave the
results to God
¡¨ were the last words of his strange visitor. The result was
that the discouraged pastor resumed his work
and was abundantly rewarded by
¡§the shattering of the rock of unbelief and indifference¡¨ among his flock.
Frailty invested with divinity
If we pause for a moment and consider the almost insurmountable
difficulties which stood in the way of Israel¡¦s redemption from Egypt
we can
readily appreciate the hesitation on the part of Moses before undertaking this
herculean task. Egypt at that time was one of the most powerful of nations. It
was not that Egypt desired simply to hold Israel in subjection
that such a
strict and powerful sovereignty was exercised; hut the Israelites had become
the servants
the slaves of the Egyptians
and as such were almost necessary to the vigour of
the nation. Besides
four centuries of oppression had left their deep and
degrading mark upon the children of Israel. They had become in a measure
satisfied with their condition. Hope had taken to itself wings. Ambition had
died within them. There native fire and energy had wasted away. To redeem a
people who do not care to be redeemed
to set free a nation which is content with
captivity
is a work well-nigh impossible. And then
to add to the difficulty
of the case
supposing even that they were free
where will they go? Their own
land
the land promised to their father Abraham
is already occupied. Warlike
tribes have come down from the north and strongly entrenched themselves within
its borders. ¡§Who and what am I
¡¨ said Moses
¡§that I should go upon this great
mission? What proofs can I bring to assure the people that I am come from God?
They will not believe my word
and they will ask
Where is the God of our
fathers and what is His name? What sign have I to convince them? What power
have I to display¡¨? At length God answers
What is that in thy hand? And he
said a rod. He was told to cast it upon the ground
when all at once it became
a writhing serpent. You will notice all through the Scriptures in the dealings
of God with His people
that in almost every instance He proceeds upon the
principle contained in our text. When any great work is to be done
when any
special mission is to be undertaken
God does not bring down to the
accomplishment of His purpose strange or wonderful agencies
but He rather
takes the simple
things that lie about common life
and makes them achieve the Divine will. God
seems to take the most exquisite pleasure in clothing human frailty with Divine
strength and beauty
and imparting to the most ordinary and trivial things
heavenly meaning and significance. Indeed
God¡¦s constant purpose seems to have
been to unite this world with another one
to blend this life with a life
infinitely higher and grander. Life is robbed of all its harmony
all its
grace
all its impressiveness if we ever allow it to become separated from the
Divine and the eternal
and the little boat which is unswung from the davits
and carried off by a huge billow from its place on the ocean steamer
is no
more helpless as it rolls in the trough of the sea
and is no more pitiable in
its desolation
than the life which is adrift from God out upon the great
waters of human experience and distress. To many life is a weary drudgery all
the way from the cradle to the grave. It is nothing but work and eat and sleep.
Once in a great while there is a little change
but not often. The great bulk
of life is a sad monotony
and millions look forward to the quiet and rest of
the grave. And why are these people in this dismal plight? Simply because their
life is not connected with the Divine life
because this world is not made a
part of the heavenly world
and like a car which has become detached from the
swift express and flung out upon a siding
it stands helpless and forsaken in
the dark and dismal night. Suppose that here are three plates of common glass a
foot square
an eighth or a quarter of an inch in thickness
and suppose that
they are given to three men to dispose of them as they please. One takes his
and he covers it with black enamel
and on the ebonized surface he paints a
human face
or some lovely flowers. Another takes his and he spreads upon it a
solution of quicksilver and it becomes a mirror throwing back to the beholder
his own face and expression. But the third takes his to the best room in his
house
he inserts it in the window which has the most commanding view
and then
carefully removing all the dust and finger-marks
he looks through its open
substance and sees the skies in their morning beauty
the fields in living
green or glistening white
and thus brings heaven and earth within the circle
of that room. Now these are the ways in which most of us live. We take our life
and we enamel or ebonize it. We make it opaque. We cannot see through it to
anything that lies beyond; and though we paint it
and try to adorn it
yet we
in no wise remove the mystery; the darkness in the sad background which even
the flowers will not hide away. Some use the coating of mercury
and make their
life nothing but a mirror which reflects themselves. Self is the image ever
rising before their eyes. But the wise man makes this life simply a
transparency through which he can see the life of God. There are three forms of
power by which the machinery of clocks is kept in motion. The first and the one
of the oldest date is that of the weight suspended upon a chain or rope. The
bulk and heaviness of the weight was always in proportion to the size of the
clock
and the wheels were literally driven by the sheer force of the big
weights as they slowly descended. The second is that of the spring
the band of
steel coiled within its cylinder spending its strength in expansion
and
forcing the wheels to revolve in its great desire to get free. The third is
that of electricity
where the current is carried along the wire from the
central battery. Silently
but almost irresistibly
the mysterious force
operates upon the machinery
ensuring an accuracy and faithfulness which can be
gained in no other way. And in these we have illustrations of how human life is
carried on. Many of us go by weight. We are dragged down by heaviness and toil
and compelled by the demands of circumstances to go our weary round. Others go
through by the sheer force of their own energy. They have power and strength in
themselves to propel them around the dial-plate of common existence
and in
this way they fulfil the measure of their days. But some have an electric
current. The wires of their thought are in connection with the great battery of
God. Life to them is not a mere drag. Life to them is not merely an expenditure
of vital force. Life to them means heavenly communion
Divine fellowship
holy
enjoyment
and the days of their pilgrimage are accomplished in simple
dependence upon the Almighty will. Now
what seems to be the very plain
the
very obvious meaning of this rod? Is it not this: that the most common things
within our possession
and under our control
can be so wrought upon by Divine
influence
and so charged with Divine power
as to accomplish the most strange
and glorious results? St. Paul tells us in the Epistle to the Corinthians that
God has a strange choice in the selection of His instrumentalities: ¡§Not many wise
men after the flesh
not many mighty
not many noble are called: but God hath
chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise.¡¨ And if you will
go down the lines of history you will see that God has carried out this principle in its integrity.
And this ought not to strike us as either strange or remarkable
because we do
just the same ourselves. We take the most common things that we can find
and
we unite them with other things until we finally develop the most potential
forces of our time. A few gallons of water
a few pieces of coal are enough to
send the mad steam hissing through the pipes
eager to turn yon giant engine
or send the train of
cars thundering along the line. A few drops of vitriol
a few pieces of
prepared zinc
a single thread of wire
and lo
the electric force flashes as
light around our world. A few grains of charcoal and sulphur mixed with nitre
are sufficient to give us the dreadful gunpowder which sends iron giants
swinging in the air that beat into ruin walls and parapets of stone. We take
the most common rods that Nature has in her hand
and we breathe upon them
and
they become instinct with life; we give them of our genius and our strength; we
lift them up out of their low estate. We take the iron and the coal from the
mines
we dig out the metals that are in the hills
we dignify them and ennoble
them until at length they become our most valued agents and servants. But we
must always remember that the rod of itself will be valueless unless it have
with it the presence and favour of God. Of what worth was the mere rod which
Moses held in his
hand that day as he stood before the burning bush? In all probability it was
only the shepherd¡¦s crook which he used while attending the flocks of Jethro.
The rod itself was almost of no value whatever. And so exactly with our life.
Before we can be really useful
before we can accomplish any great work
before
we can live up to the measure of our power
we must first of all meet with God.
We must stand before the burning bush; we must listen to the Divine voice; we
must receive the heavenly commission; we must accept the Divine command. Until
this is done our life is nothing but a rod--a rod without any special use or
intrinsic value
and which will one day break in our hands
and be cast into
the fire and be destroyed. Look how this is illustrated: What is that in thy
hand? ¡§A sling
¡¨ said David. ¡§It
is enough; go up against the giant¡¨; and the great Goliath fell
before the shepherd-boy. What is that in thy hand? ¡§A sword
¡¨ answered
Jonathan. ¡§It is enough
¡¨ and the brave youth
followed by his armour-bearer
goes up against an army
and the Philistines are defeated by these twain. What
is that in thy hand? ¡§A piece of parchment
¡¨ answered Luther. It is enough
and
he proceeds to nail his famous protest upon the doors of the Roman Church and
the era of the Reformation broke upon darkened Europe. What is that in thy
hand? ¡§A pen
¡¨ said Bunyan
as he spoke from under the arches of Bedford jail.
It is enough
and he
wrote the story of the ¡§Pilgrim¡¦s Progress
¡¨ which will live while the world
endures. Men and women
with common
simple things about them
have heard the
voice of God
and doing just what their hand found to do
they made their life
memorable in the history of the Church and accomplished the Divine will. What
is that in your hand? ¡§Only a rod
¡¨ answers the mother from beside the cradle
the workman standing at the bench
the clerk behind the counter
the man of
business at his desk. Only a rod
and is that all? Oh
there is something of
far greater value than you now suppose. Ask that honest farmer in a few weeks
from now standing in the open furrows
what is that in his hand
and he will
answer
only a few grains of seed. But is that all? Far from it. Those grains
of seed contain the germs of the great harvest which will fill our lands with
plenty
and crowd the threshing-floors with abundance. Then say not ¡§Only a
rod.¡¨ There is no such word as ¡§only¡¨ about human life. Every part of it is
invested with mysterious grandeur and possibility. We cannot tell how far the
most simple thing will reach. A word dropped from our lips
a hand clasped
within ours
something apparently trifling done and then forgotten
will go on
long after we have passed away
and a life which throws its shadows all down
eternity cannot have anything but which is of value. (J. W. Johnston.)
What is that in thine hand?
A trivial possession
I. God frequently makes
inquiry about the most trivial possessions of men.
1. Have they been honourably gained?
2. Are they being put to their proper use?
3. Are they in a line with Divine power?
II. God frequently
makes the most trivial possessions of men teach great truths.
1. This shows the Divine adaptability to the circumstances of men.
2. This shows the Divine wisdom in making insignificant things teach
Divine truth.
3. This shows the Divine simplicity of the plans and purposes of
Heaven.
III. That the most
trivial possessions are useful to others as well as those to whom they belong.
IV. That the most
trivial possessions of men prove
after all
the most useful
and ought
therefore to awaken human gratitude. (J. W. Johnston.)
A rod
1. The subject of Divine inquiry.
2. The token of a shepherd¡¦s office.
3. The symbol of a leader¡¦s power.
4. The prophecy of a nation¡¦s freedom. (J. W. Johnston.)
The rod
When God installed Moses into his great trust
He gave him a wand
or staff of office as its badge. But it was not the baton of a general nor the
sceptre of a king. It was only the shepherd¡¦s rod. In Moses¡¦ hand it became
what no jewelled crosier ever has been or will be. This stick was to be not
only the ensign of his power
but its instrument. And in this simplicity
indeed
lay its special fitness for its office; because all men who looked upon it
could see that its power was not in itself
not inherent; not in the rod
but
effectual only by a self-imposed law of God¡¦s action
and conditioned in its success upon His
fidelity to His own rule. In this
as afterwards of the yet humbler symbol of
the cross
--in this
the symbol of his simplicity
of his exile
of his
lowliness
the world was to be conquered.
1. I remark in regard to this rod
that it had no natural aptitude
for its work. There was nothing in its natural qualities to distinguish it from
any other rod
and its appointment to be Moses¡¦ staff of office and instrument
of miracle wrought in it no physical change whatever. It was still mere wood.
Sufficient force would break it. A sharp tool would cut it. And it was
according to the analogy of His ways: and so St. Paul broadly states it. ¡§Base
things of the world
and things which are despised
hath God chosen
yea
and
things which are not
to bring to nought things that are.¡¨ It is God¡¦s way to
do great things by weak means. That is the Divine philosophy of action
the
opposite of man¡¦s.
2. Notice
again
that God in doing His great works does not need any
instruments
but uses them simply of His own sovereign will; and this appears
in their obvious inadequacy in themselves to the results which they
nevertheless
produce. Moses was not indispensable to God
nor his rod to
Moses
but by God¡¦s determination. If we look at our Lord¡¦s miracles when He
was upon earth
we shall see this truth strikingly illustrated. In the variety
of their methods they are so exhibited as at once to show His independence of
all means
and His sovereign power in appointing and employing them. So this
wonder-working rod of Moses answered simply the purpose of forming a visible
link between the Divine will and the effect that was produced. The rod did not
do the miracle
but a Power that worked by it; and that showed itself able to
dispense with it by employing in its work an instrument so manifestly incapable
of contributing anything to the proposed result. A word brings Lazarus from the
grave; a touch of the bier awakens the widow¡¦s son. And thus we come to the
philosophy of means in the system of grace. They are visible signs of God¡¦s
working
such signs as cannot work except as God works in them; and to us they
are tests of obedience and trials of faith. There is nothing quite so
irrational as rationalism. To obey God is the most rational of things. And to
stand arguing and questioning about a thing
debating its propriety and
efficacy when God has told us to do it
is eminently irrational. Moses might
have stood and said
This wooden stick cannot divide the waters
or turn the
dust to flies
or make the heavens dark
or draw water out of a rock; and he
would have said nothing but the truth. And yet
if Moses had thrown away his
rod
he could never have invented anything else that would have done these
things
and the things would have remained undone. There is a supernatural
working in the world that the world does not take knowledge of. And it works by
a class of instrument talities that the world regards as childish and impotent.
The reliance some people place upon them it counts superstition
and derides as
futile and delusive. To expect any benefit from them they consider irrational.
The measure of their belief is their reason. So they eliminate all miracle from
the Scriptures
and all that is supernatural from the Church of God; and out of
the poor residue they construct what they call rational Christianity
and a
very mean Christianity it is. And so they illustrate very well the apostle¡¦s
saying
¡§Professing themselves wise
they became fools.¡¨ And there are too many
Christians who
without going such lengths
are quite too ready to criticise God¡¦s
appointments
and either hold them of light obligation
or greatly underrate
their value and efficacy. But there is a supernatural element in the Church of
Christ
and God in it works invisibly by means. ¡§Water
¡¨ say they
¡§cannot
cleanse the soul
nor bread and wine nourish it. The touch of a prelate can
have no power to convey the influences of the Spirit to ministers in
Ordination
or to lay people in Confirmation.¡¨ Men may see that the ten
commandments are right and salutary
and may observe them on that account.
Their reason pronounces them proper
and therefore they regard them. They would
regard them if they had found them in the Koran
or the Books of Confucius.
There is much of this sort of virtue
and it is respectable and useful to its
possessor and to society. But it is not obedience
it is not religion. Faith
does not underlie it. The love of God is not its life. Moses took his rod in
his hand and with it he did wonders. He believed in it
because he believed in
God
and in God¡¦s assignment of it to him as an instrument of power. And then
it was an instrument of power
a wonder staff
before which impediments
vanished and foes fled away. (R. A. Hallam
D. D.)
A talk with children-¡§What is that in thine hand?¡¨
This was a question which astonished Moses. It was a surprising
thing to him that God should think anything of a shepherd¡¦s crook. It would not
have astonished him to hear God speak about sceptres
but that He should call
special attention to an old rod that he had carried as a shepherd a thousand
times was more than he could have ever expected. But God now began to show
Moses that he could turn that rod to higher use than he had ever done hitherto.
There are many things put into the hands of little children the full use of
which they do not yet know.
1. For instance
when at first you are taught to write a pen is
placed in your hand. What an amount of trouble you have before you learn even
how to hold that pen! For a long time you do not exactly know how to hold the
gift that is given you; and for a still longer time you little know what use
you may yet make of it. When the apostle Paul was a boy in school
and had to
learn how to use the stylus
or pen
he little knew what use he would be able
to make of his pen in writing his Epistles. So with regard to the apostle John.
So also with reference to John Bunyan. When he was at school
a poor boy
he
was not taught much
since he was only to be a tinker. But a pen was put into
his hand
and it is wonderful what use he made of it in later years in writing
the ¡§Pilgrim¡¦s Progress.¡¨ Who knows? perhaps there is a child here to-day who
has only just learnt how to use the pen
and yet thousands may yet thank God
for what he will write.
2. Again
some of you have recently been on a journey by train. Had
you looked at the engine before you started you might have seen a man laying
hold of a handle
or lever. You might well have asked him
¡§What is that in
thine hand?¡¨ Had you done so
he would have replied
¡§This is the lever by
which I have power over the engine and make it to go fast or slow
or by which
I stop it.¡¨ Thus
by holding just that little piece of iron
the engine-driver
is perfect master of theft huge and powerful engine.
3. Again
you go with your father to a telegraph office. He wants to
send a message to America. The clerk looks at the message and lays hold of a
small handle by which he sends those words along the cable through the depths
of the Atlantic Ocean
and they are read in a few seconds in New York.
4. Again
in times of war
when ships draw near a port
you may find
a man in a small room
or shed
who watches until a ship comes to a certain
point. He then touches a little button and the ship is blown up in an instant.
There is a connection between that little button and a mine of explosives which
is hidden in the water beneath the ship; and although that mine may be many
miles away from that little telegraph office
a touch of the button by a man¡¦s
hand at once explodes the mine and works terrible destruction. When an Arab
baby-boy is born
his parents put a little ant into his right hand
and closing
the hand upon it say
¡§May the child be as busy and clever as the little ant.¡¨
That is the best wish they can utter for their children. But we would put
something better than an ant in your little hands. We would have you hold
firmly the Bible
and remember all that it tells you of the Saviour¡¦s love. We
would have you study prayerfully that Book
and live according to its teaching. (D.
Davies.)
Work for all
The subject that I desire to bring before your attention is that
of appointed instrumentality. God accomplishes the purposes of His grace by
instrumentality. Blessed are they who are enabled to give themselves up with all that they have
and all that they are to be employed in the Lord¡¦s service. We are not employed
to be writers of God¡¦s revealed will
nor to be leaders of God¡¦s people
nor to
be in other respects what Moses was. But he was a pattern to believers in
Christ
as far as instrumentality
went
in the work to which he was called.
I. Now consider
preparation for usefulness. In the case of Moses we see very remarkably a
course of preparation going forward for many years
both as respects the
dealing of God¡¦s providence with him
and also as respects the blessing of
God¡¦s grace bestowed upon him.
II. But this brings
me now to the second particular
namely
encouragement in God¡¦s service as his
instruments
You will observe our text brings Moses before us
after all this
lengthened preparation and when God was calling him to begin his work
as one
who was making excuses and objections. As if he had said
¡¥¡§Well
but what good
can I do? There is no use in my going on this errand; I am not fit for it.¡¨ If
you read the remaining part of this chapter
you will see that this conviction
of his mind was expressed again and again. And here we may observe
by the way
that there is such a thing as false humility. Humility
when it is genuine
the
work of God¡¦s Spirit
cannot be overprized. But there may be what looks like
humility
that is not the fruit of God¡¦s Spirit. If God calls me or you to any
particular service
and we think that we are very humble and say
¡§No
I cannot
attempt that service
I am not fit for it
¡¨ this is false humility
because God
never gives work without giving strength and wisdom to do it. God never brings
a trial upon us without providing grace to enable us to bear the trial; so that
believers in Christ may say
under all circumstances
¡§All is well.¡¨ But
without dwelling further upon this
the point I wish to notice is
how God
removed Moses¡¦ objection. ¡§The Lord said unto him
What is that in thine hand?
And he said
A rod. And the Lord said
Cast it on the ground.¡¨ He did so
and
then the circumstances occurred which you will read in the following verses.
Observe
Moses had but a simple rod in his hand when he came to that point in
his history on which the Lord was telling him to enter upon the special work
for which he had been prepared. And yet if Moses¡¦ heart were right with God
he
had that in his hand which might be useful in God¡¦s service
though it was only
a rod. Man¡¦s wisdom is here utterly at fault. If man had been asked
¡§Now
what
means should be used in order to deliver out of the iron bondage of a powerful
monarch a nation such as Israel?¡¨ man would have formed some plan by which an
army might be raised
and furnished with suitable weapons of war
and a
suitable opportunity taken in order to throw off the yoke of Pharaoh¡¦s
government and rule. But here was Moses
God¡¦s instrument
and he had neither sword
nor spear
nor army; he had a simple rod
a shepherd¡¦s rod in his hand.
Observe
God does not require of Moses
when He tells him to go to His work
that which Moses has not. He does not require of Moses sword
and spear
and
shield
and armies
in order to go forth to be a deliverer of Israel. The
question is not to him
¡§What canst thou do? Canst thou Obtain those who will
go forth under thy command to fight a battle of loyalty and for liberty? Canst
thou get together
ammunition and other things which they will need for their
warfare. Moses might have then said with truth he could not engage in the work.
But all that God said to him was
¡§Moses
what is that in thine hand?¡¨--not
¡§What canst thou get?¡¨ but
¡§What hast thou got?¡¨ Now
we learn from this
that
God can use any instrument which He pleases for His work
and that those are
altogether wrong who suppose that they are not called upon to do anything in
the service of God because
perhaps
they are not distinguished as others of
their fellow-creatures--have not so much money
not so much influence
not so
great learning
not so much time on their hands
and so on. It is not to be
looked at in this way
as if God demanded of us that which we have not
but
simply that He requires of us that which we have. Observe
next
the Lord said
unto Moses
¡§Cast it on the ground¡¨; and upon its being cast on the ground
the
rod
we are told
¡§became a serpent.¡¨ Afterwards he was told to put forth his
hand
and ¡§it became a rod in his hand.¡¨ God
by this double miracle
laid hold
of that rod of Moses as His rod; it was no longer the rod of Moses only; it was
the rod of God. (W. Cadman
M. A.)
What is that in thine hand
I. A question for
moses. Well--what had he? A rod. That is
as I suppose
a shepherd¡¦s crook: a
stout sapling
curved at one end
to help him in caring for his flock. But how
could this help him in caring for Israel? Who can turn it into a talisman to
draw their hearts to him? It is enough to tell of the Being and the power and
the skill of the Creator; but not enough to prove a Divine commission. There
was need of some further revelation--and this further revelation was not
withheld. What was Moses told to do with the rod? ¡§Cast it on the ground¡¨; as
though God had said
¡§You can do nothing with it
see what I can
do.¡¨ ¡§And it became a serpent.¡¨ Now here we are confronted with the
supernatural
the miraculous; for there is no natural evolution of vegetable
out of animal
or animal
out of vegetable. God can do it--and do it quite as easily as He can bring the
sturdy staff out of the feeble bud; but it is not in His ordinary course of
action. He will only resort to it when some extraordinary end is in view. But
was there not a lesson in this miracle? Was it not a symbol of the great things
God was about to do?
II. A question for
Christians.
1. Is there not work for every one of us?--and work not unlike that
to which Moses was called. The state of the world at large is described in this
volume under many figures
very sad and very affecting; and one of the saddest
and most affecting is that of slavery. Slaves of appetite--slaves of
covetousness--slaves of fashion: we hear their sighs--their groans
sometimes.
For the lust of the flesh
and the lust of the eyes
and the pride of life are
hard taskmasters; they will give their bondsmen no rest or peace: there is no
slavery like that of sin! And therefore the cry of the gospel
is--¡§Emancipation!¡¨ ¡§If the Son shall make you free
ye shall be free indeed.¡¨
2. But what good can we hope to do? There are as many difficulties in
our way as in the way of Moses. Our fellow-men are so accustomed to slavery
that they won¡¦t believe in freedom. Ay--and they are so accustomed to all kinds
of folly and imposture that they won¡¦t believe that our message comes from God.
How then can we succeed? Now comes the question of the text
¡§What is that in
thine hand¡¨? What power of influence has God given you? Now see whether that
power may not be used for Him. ¡§Oh
but
¡¨ you say
¡§my influence is a very
insignificant thing¡¨! And so is a shepherd¡¦s crook. But see what a shepherd¡¦s
crook became in the hand of Moses; and remember that God may ¡§choose weak
things to confound the mighty
and foolish things to confound the wise.¡¨
3. And so the question comes to us--¡§What is that in thine hand?¡¨
Not--what would you like to have there
or hope to have there? but--what have
you? Be it the three hundred pence
or be it the two mites--use it for God
and
see what God will make of it! Certainly nothing will recommend the gospel to
those around us like the personal exertion of those who advocate it. (F.
Tucker
B. A.)
Great things from small
God often does His greatest works by the humblest means. The great
forces of nature are not the earthquake which tumbles cities into ruins. This
power passes in a moment; the soft silent light
the warm summer rain
the
stars whose voice is not heard--these are the majestic mighty forces which fill
the earth with riches
and control the worlds which constitute the wide
universe of God. So in Providence. Not the great Church organization
excellent
and proper as it is. Martin Luther
a poor monk who had difficulty in getting
bread to eat
shook the world; Linnaeus
with eight shillings in his pocket
began to study botany; Columbus had no grand steamer to carry him across the
wide Atlantic. He wearied his life
and at last got from the rulers of his time
a reluctant permission to embark with a hundred and fifty men only
and in
three small ships. The founders of the United States of America were humble
pious men. The Pilgrim Fathers sought only a place to rest the soles of their
feet where they could worship God in peace. The founders of Christianity were
fishermen. Christ Himself the Carpenter
the Nazarene
despised and crucified
was the wisdom and the power of God. For
did He not say--¡§I
if I be lifted
up
will draw all men unto Me¡¨? So in the text--¡§What is that in thine hand? A
rod¡¨--the emblem
the tool of his daily work. With this Moses was to do mighty
deeds
Rabbinical tradition has it that Moses was an excellent shepherd. He
followed a lamb across the wilderness
plucked it with his rod from a precipice
amid the rocks
and carried it in his bosom; whereupon God said--¡§Let us make
this Moses the shepherd of Israel.¡¨ He
a stranger
a fugitive
a humble shepherd
becomes the lawgiver
the leader
the deliverer of his people. The lesson of
the text is plain. God still meets every man
and asks the old question--¡§What
is that in thine hand?¡¨ Is it the tool of an ordinary trade?--with that God
will be served. The artisan where he is
in his humble workshop
by using the
rod which is in his hand
the merchant in his business
are in the place where
they are now; all are called upon to do service. Few have rank
or wealth
or
power
or eloquence. Let those illustrious few use their ten talents; but let
us
the obscure millions
use the simple duties of life--the rod that is in our
hand. A smile
like a little rushlight
may cheer a sick man tossing on his
bed. Happiness-givers are the true representatives of Christ; to shed abroad in
home and social circles the joy and the charity of Christ is the true work of
Christ¡¦s followers; and in this blessed happiness-giving all
exalted and
lowly
may alike engage. (J. Cameron Lees
D. D.)
Splendid instruments not necessary
A rod: probably the shepherd¡¦s crook
the symbol of his
present condition. Among the Arabs a long staff with a curved head
varying
from three to six feet in length
is used for this purpose. This rod was made
the subject of a double miracle. From the story of Moses¡¦ rod the poets
invented fables of the thyrsus of Bacchus and the caducaeus of Mercury. Homer
represents Mercury as taking his rod to work miracles
precisely in the same
way as God commanded Moses to take his. God takes the weakest instruments to
accomplish His mightiest ends. ¡§A rod
¡¨ ¡§a ram¡¦s horn
¡¨ ¡§a cake of barley
meal
¡¨ ¡§an earthen pitcher
¡¨ ¡§a shepherd¡¦s sling
¡¨ anything
in short
when
used of God
will do His appointed work. Men imagine that splendid ends can
only be reached by splendid means
but such is not God¡¦s way. He can use a
crawling worm as well as a scorching sun
a gourd as well as a vehement east
wind. (A. Nevin
D. D.)
The rod as a symbol
The staff was the shepherd¡¦s crook
with which he had
hitherto conducted the flock of Jethro. Hence it represented his vocation as a
shepherd. This he was to throw away
i.e.
he was to give up his
calling and follow a new one. But the staff which he had thrown away became a
serpent
and Moses fled before it. His vocation hitherto had been a poor and
despised one; but it was also quiet
peaceful
and free from danger. When this
was given up
he was to be exposed to dangers of such magnitude
that even his
life would be threatened. Moses could foresee all this
and hence the obstinacy
with which he refused to enter upon his new vocation. But at the word of God he
laid hold of the snake
and it became a staff in his hand once more. This
showed that
by the power of God
he would be able to overcome the dangers that
would surround him
when he relinquished his present calling. By overpowering
the snake he recovered his staff
but it was no longer his staff; it was the
rod of God (verse 20)
and with the staff thus altered he was to perform the
work entrusted to him (verse 17). It was still a shepherd¡¦s staff
and his new
vocation was a shepherd¡¦s calling. From being a shepherd of Jethro¡¦s sheep he
was to become the shepherd of God¡¦s sheep
the leader and lawgiver of the
people of God. And he became so
by overcoming the dangers which intervened between
these two different employments. We must also observe
that this was the rod
with which he was to bring the plagues upon Egypt; and therefore it was the
retributory counterpart to the rod with which the Egyptian taskmasters had
beaten the Israelites (verse 14). As soon
then
as Moses appeared before the
people and performed this sign
it showed them
first
that the dangers to
which the mission of Moses would expose them--dangers which they soon
experienced (chap. 5.)--would be overcome; and secondly
that the staff of
shepherd and ruler
with which Moses was to lead and govern them
was not
assumed without authority
but given to him by God
and therefore the question
could not be asked
as it was before
¡§Who made thee a prince and a judge over
us?¡¨ (Exodus 2:14). He afterwards performed the
same miracle in the presence of Pharaoh (Exodus 7:10
etc.). (J. H. Kurtz
D.
D.)
The symbol of a consecrated life
I believe the rod cast down
and taken up again
typifies the
entire consecration of the Christian¡¦s life to God. The rod was the ordinary
sign and instrument of Moses¡¦ daily occupation. That cast down
and taken up
became filled with power; and by it he proved to Israel and to Pharaoh that he
had seen Jehovah. We are commanded in 1 Corinthians 7:24 to abide in the
calling ¡§wherein we are called.¡¨ I suppose we may understand from this that we
do not need to change our station and calling (supposing it to be an honest
one) in order to serve God. Are we shepherds
carpenters
merchants
lawyers
doctors
teachers
servants
or what not
we may serve God in that calling
quite as efficiently as in any other. So He can
and will
make you mighty in
the use of your calling
be it what it may
high or low
learned or mechanical
the calling of a master or a servant
a mistress or a maid. Only cast it down
at the feet of Jesus
in humble and holy consecration; and then take it up
again to use it and pursue it for Him. What God needs to-day in this world is a
host of men and women
in every walk of life
who are living for God
and
serving Him in their calling
using it as a means of illustrating God¡¦s
righteousness. He wants some merchants to do business for Him
that the world
may know what God¡¦s thought of righteousness in trade is. The banker may serve
God in the same way. The medical man has a calling in which he may leave the
testimony of God¡¦s tenderness in the sick room; and by his ministry of healing
exercised on the body he has an opportunity
such as is afforded to no other
man in the world
to point his patients to the great Physician and Healer of
souls. As it is
alas that so many Christian physicians fail to cast down their
rods at the feet of Christ! The lawyer at the bar
and the judge on the bench
may be God¡¦s witnesses in their profession. The teacher with the children (a most difficult
position) may also cast his or her rod down. The governess
the nurse
and the
mother may be consecrated to God for those to whom God has sent them
or whom
He has given them. The servant in the house--both the maid-servant and the
man-servant--every one
in his or her place
may throw down the rod of their
calling at the feet of Jesus
and take it up again in power. (G. F.
Pentecost
D. D.)
Verse 6-7
Leprous as snow.
Leprosy as emblematical of doubt
I. That as leprosy
was the worst disease that could have been permitted to the hand of Moses
so
doubt of the divine word is the most hurtful that can overtake the human mind.
1. Both are small in their commencements.
2. Both are progressive in their developments.
3. Both are gloomy in their forebodings.
4. Both are isolating in their tendency.
5. Both are paralysing in their influence.
6. Both are deadly in their result.
II. That as leprosy
comes upon men unexpectedly
so does doubt upon the human mind. The germ of
scepticism often remains long concealed in the human mind; its workings are
subtle
and we know not what will be the extent of its future harvest.
III. That as leprosy
could only be removed. By the Divine touch
so human doubt can only be removed
by communion with God. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Various suppositions as to the meaning of this miracle
1. Some give it a moral signification--as that the leprous hand of
Moses showeth the works of the law that justifieth not.
2. Some give it a mystical signification--that the leprous hand of
the synagogue of the Jews was cast off as the leprous person out of the house
and the hand restored betokeneth the Gentile Church adopted instead of the
Jewish.
3. Some refer it to Christ
that He being the Hand
that is
the
power of His Father
by taking our nature upon Him
became as it were leprous
that is
deformed
by His sufferings and passion
but by His resurrection and
ascension His glory appeareth.
4. Some give it an historical signification--by the leprous hand they
understand the miserable state of the Hebrews in the time of their cruel
servitude
who in their deliverance received their former liberty.
5. Some think that the leprous hand signifieth the pollutions of
Egypt
wherewith Israel was defiled
who being delivered were restored to the
true worship of God.
6. That the first sending of Moses to the Israelites brought upon
them more cruel treatment
but his after ministry brought them joy and
deliverance.
7. That the hand being the instrument of working
betokeneth the
ministry and authority of Moses
and that God would use a weak instrument to
effect His will
Moses having lived a long time in banishment seemed a thing
leprous and vile
yet God should in this His service make him a glorious vessel
and instrument.
8. That as the leprosy is only cured by God
so their deliverance was
only God¡¦s work
and to humble Moses by the remembrance of his own infirmity.
9. As far as the intrinsic significancy of the sign is concerned
it
was evidently calculated to teach that whatever is new
vigorous
vital
and
flourishing
may at once be withered at the word of Omnipotence; and again with
equal facility restored to its pristine condition. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Ability for God¡¦s service
1. Human hands weak and unfit for service.
2. Sanctified power is only attained from God.
3. Hence the worker must be humble
but not impotent or paralytic in
hand. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Soul-instruction
I. As undertaken
by a Divine teacher. There are lessons for every man to learn
which heaven
only can teach.
II. As employing
the most impressive symbolism. The Divine teaching is always suggestive
never
exhaustive.
III. As occupying
but a short space of time. An eternal lesson may be learnt in a moment.
IV. As preparing
for important duty. Divine instruction is never aimless. Designed not merely to
make men clever
but to give them the power of moral emancipation. (J. S.
Exell
M. A.)
The leprous hand restored
That which happened to the hand of Moses was a picture of what had
happened
and was still to happen
to the people of Israel. By going down to
Egypt
the Israelites had been preserved from the injurious influence of
Canaanitish customs. Through the favour of the first Pharaohs
Egypt was
undoubtedly a hiding-place
in which the family of Jacob had been cherished and
preserved
when it was distressed both in body and mind. But there had been a
change in both the men and the times
and Israel was enslaved
despised
and
held in abomination in the land of Egypt. When Israel departed from Egypt
he
was like a homeless leper. But Jehovah led him once more to a hiding-place
where he was cleansed from the leprosy which he had brought with him from
Egypt
and where he was set apart as a holy people and a priestly nation (Exodus 19:6). It is very easy to explain
why this sign was not exhibited before Pharaoh as well as the others (chap.
7.). The thing signified was of too internal and spiritual a nature
it was too
closely connected with the counsel of God concerning His people to be
appropriately displayed to Pharaoh. (J. H. Kurtz
D. D.)
Verse 8-9
They will believe the voice of the latter sign.
The paralysis of doubt
A man needs not to be a thorough unbeliever
overtly
renouncing all allegiance to revealed truth
in order to become useless in the
pulpit and religiously powerless in society. He needs only to put a note of
interrogation after some of the articles of his creed. That is enough
without
absolutely erasing them. The hesitant is as impotent for spiritual good as the
heretic. The man who is shooting for the Queen¡¦s cup may as well attempt to hold
his rifle with a paralysed arm as take aim with a trembling hand. That tremor
will be fatal to success in hitting the mark. Truth uttered questioningly and
apologetically will prove an arrow of conviction to no man¡¦s soul. This
it
seems to me
rather than absolute and pronounced infidelity
is the bane and
weakness of the age. It pervades the pulpit and the pew. From the former
doctrines may be still
propounded with logical accuracy
with great precision of definition
with much
beauty and felicity of illustration
but with not enough of conviction to drive
them forcibly home. The rifle is a beautiful piece of mechanism
but there is
something amiss with the powder. (J. Halsey.)
The Divine treatment of human doubt
I. The Divine
being recognizes the probability that men will not welcome the truth upon its
first presentation to them. Yet the message proclaimed by Moses was--
1. Adapted to their condition Announcing freedom. The tendency of all
unbelief is to intensify slavery of moral nature.
2. Wonderfully simple.
3. Divinely authenticated. Miracles will not convince a sceptic.
II. The Divine
being mercifully makes provision for the conviction and persuasion of men in
reference to the reality of the truth proclaimed
notwithstanding their
confirmed unbelief. This method of treatment is--
1. Considerate. Every facility given for complete investigation.
2. Merciful. Sign after sign.
3. Condescending.
III. The persistent
unbelief of men is likely to awaken evidences of truth indicative of the divine
displeasure (Exodus 4:9).
1. Evidences that recall past sorrows. Reminding of murder of
children in river.
2. Evidences prophetic of future woe. Indicating a strange and
unhappy change in their condition
if they embraced not the message of Moses. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
The voice of the first sign
1. It speaks of the thraldom of man.
2. It speaks of the inability of man to liberate himself therefrom.
3. It speaks of the agency that God has provided for the freedom of
man.
4. It speaks of the strange unwillingness of man to credit the
tidings of freedom. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Miracles
1. Miracles at first may miss their end
and not persuade men to
faith.
2. Second miracles may do that which the first failed to effect.
3. God¡¦s word and promise alone can make miracles themselves
effectual means of faith.
4. Miracles have voices which should command faith and obedience. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Ministers exposed to unbelief
That a true minister
notwithstanding--
1. His call.
2. His spiritual preparation.
3. His knowledge of the Divine name.
4. His supreme moral power
and--
5. Intimate communion with God--is exposed to the unbelief of those
whom he seeks to benefit. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
The obstinacy of unbelief
It will reject the truth.
1. In opposition to the word of him by whom it is brought.
2. In opposition to the Divine power by which it is accompanied.
3. In opposition to the benevolent design it contemplates.
4. In opposition to accumulative demonstration. (J. S. Exell
M.
A.)
The folly of rejecting the gospel of emancipation
One can hardly conceive a poor wayworn wretch
as he lies on the
arid waste
punting with blackened lips and swollen tongue
striking the kind
traveller¡¦s flask from his hand
and spilling the precious water among the
blistering sands. The slave boy--now an African bishop--exulted gleefully when
a British cruiser snapped the fetters from his youthful limbs and bore him to
free Liberia. Can folly surpass that insensate madness which makes the sinner
spurn the clear
cool
crystal drops of life
and perversely traverse the wilds
of sin? Can madness outrival that supreme folly which leads the hapless
bondsman of sin to hug the chains of condemnation
and obstinately kiss the
fetters of wrath?
Verses 10-13
O my Lord
I am not eloquent.
The objections made to religious service
I. These
objections were made after God had given him a full insight into the nature of
the service required.
1. The insight given into the nature of this service was infallible.
2. It was forceful.
3. It was sympathetic.
II. These
objections frequently arise from an undue consciousness of self.
1. From a consciousness of natural infirmity. This ought to inspire
within them a more thorough determination to seek Divine help. Silence is often
more eloquent and valuable than speech.
2. From a supposition of moral incapacity. The call of God is
calculated to educate all the sublime tendencies of the soul
and renders men
fit for the toil allotted to them.
3. That
rather than self
God must be the supreme idea of the soul
when about to enter upon religious service. Our hearts should be a temple in
which every act of service should be rendered to the infinite.
III. These
objections do not sufficiently regard the efficacy of the Divine help that is
promised in the service. ¡§Now therefore go
and I will be with thy mouth
and
teach thee what thou shalt say.¡¨
1. The Divine help is adapted to our natural infirmity. It is far
better to have God joined to our infirmity
than to have the eloquent tongue
without Him. Thus there are times when an infirmity may be an inestimable
advantage to a Christian worker.
2. The Divine help is adapted to our full requirement. God did not
merely promise to aid the speech of Moses
but also to teach him what he should
say. So in the Christian service of to-day
good men are not merely aided in
the line of their natural infirmity
but also along the entire line of their
requirement.
IV. These
objections are a reflection on the propriety of the Divine selection for the
service. ¡§And the Lord said unto him
who hath made man¡¦s mouth
¡¨ etc.
1. This method of conduct is ungrateful.
2. Irreverent.
V. These
objections do not sufficiently recognize the dignity and honour the service
will command.
1. There was the honour of achieving the freedom of a vast nation.
2. There was the honour of conquering a tyrant king.
3. There was the honour of becoming the lawgiver of the world.
VI. These
objections are liable to awaken the divine displeasure. ¡§And the anger of the
Lord was kindled against Moses.¡¨
1. This anger may be manifested in our removal from the service.
2. This anger may be manifested by the positive infliction of penalty.
3. This anger may occasion our eternal moral ruin.
Learn:
1. Good men ought to know better than to object to the service of
God.
2. That in the service of God men find the highest reward.
3. That in the service of God men attain the truest immortality. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Uselessness of mere words
I am tormented with the desire of writing better than I can. I am
tormented
say I
with the desire of preaching better than I can. But I have no
wish to make fine
pretty sermons. Prettiness is well enough when prettiness is
in place. I like to see a pretty child
a pretty flower; but in sermons
prettiness is out of place. To my ear
it would be anything but commendation
should it be said to me
¡§You have given us a pretty sermon.¡¨ If I were put
upon trial for my life
and my advocate should amuse the jury with tropes and
figures
or bury his arguments beneath a profusion of flowers of his rhetoric
I would say to him
¡§Tut
man
you care more for your vanity
than for my
hanging. Put yourself in my place--speak in view of the gallows--and you will
tell your story plainly and earnestly.¡¨ I have no objections to a lady winding
a sword with ribbons
and studding it with roses as she presents it to her
hero-lover; but in the hour of battle he will tear away the ornaments
and use
the naked edge on the enemy. (Robert Hall.)
The art of the orator undesirable in a preacher
Hipponicus
intending to dedicate a costly statue
was advised by
a friend to employ Policletus
a famous workman
in the making of it; but he
being anxious that his great expense should be the admiration of all men
said
that ¡§he would not make use of a workman whose art would be more regarded than
his own cost.¡¨ When in preaching the great truths of gospel salvation the
enticing words which man¡¦s wisdom teacheth are so much sought out that the art
of the orator is more regarded by the hearers than the value of the truth
spoken
it is no wonder that the Lord refuses to grant His blessing. He will
have it seen that the excellency of the power lies not in our speech
but in
His gospel. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Eloquence
¡§I am not eloquent.¡¨
I. Then true
eloquence may have its use.
1. To explain Divine truth.
2. To inspire men with the thought of freedom.
3. To manifest the perfection of the gift of speech.
II. Then do not
condemn men who are.
III. Then do not
envy those who are acknowledgod to be so. If we have not eloquence
we have
some other equally valuable talent in its place.
IV. Then the Lord
can use a feeble instrumentality. This will enhance the Divine glory.
V. Then words are
not the chief conditions of service. Ideas
thoughts
emotions
and spiritual
influences
occupy a more prominent place.
VI. Then do not
grumble
but seek the Divine aid in your infirmity. He will help and bless work
done for Him. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Slowness of speech
I. An infirmity.
II. A discretion.
III. A discipline. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Why was Moses not gifted with eloquence?
It might certainly be asked with propriety
why Moses
who was
singled out by Providence as the great medium for bringing the wisdom of heaven
down to the earth
for ever substituting Divine truth instead of human error
and who was gifted with such uncommon perfection of the mind and intellect
was
denied the power of eloquence
apparently so indispensable for his
extraordinary vocation. But it was an act of the sublime wisdom of the Almighty
to withhold from Moses just the gift of persuasion
lest it should appear that
he owed the triumph over the obstinacy of Pharaoh and the disbelief of the Israelites
not to the miracles of God and the intrinsic worth of the Law
but to the
artifices and subtleties of oratory
which too often procure
even to fallacies
and sophisms
an ephemeral victory. It was wisely designed that the power of
God should the more gloriously shine through a humble and imperfect instrument.
This is a remarkable and deeply interesting difference between the legislator
of Israel and the founders of almost all other religions
to whom
uniformly
no quality is ascribed in a higher degree than the gift of eloquence. (M. M.
Kalisch
Ph. D.)
Self-consciousness
Moses has now descended from the high level of the argument
and
narrowed the case into one of mere human personality. He has forgotten the
promise
¡§Certainly I will be with thee.¡¨ The moment we get away from Divine
promise and forget great principles
we narrow all controversy and degrade all
service. Self-consciousness is the ruin of all vocations. Let a man look into
himself
and measure his work by himself
and the movement of his life will
be downward and exhaustive. Let him look away from himself to the Inspirer of
his life
and the Divine reward of his labours
and he will not so much as see
the difficulties which may stand ever so thickly in his way. Think of Moses
turning his great mission into a question which involved his own eloquence! All
such reasoning admits of being turned round upon the speaker as a charge of
foolish
if not of profane
vanity. See how the argument stands: ¡§I am not
eloquent
and therefore the mission cannot succeed in my hands
¡¨ is equivalent
to saying
¡§I am an eloquent man
and therefore
this undertaking must be
crowned with signal success.¡¨ The work had nothing whatever to do with the
eloquence or ineloquence of Moses. It was not to be measured or determined by
his personal gifts: the moment
therefore
that he turned to his individual
talents
he lost sight of the great end which he was called instrumentally to
accomplish. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Fluency in speech
Moses was a thinker rather than a speaker. Fluency was not his
forte. He saw too much in a moment to be able to give utterance to it all at
once; and so his lack of readiness in the use of language was the result of the
richness of his thought
rather than of its poverty. When the bottle is full
its contents flow out less freely by far than when it is two parts empty. So
very often
the fluency of one speaker is due to the fact that he sees only one
side of a subject; while the hesitancy of another is the consequence of his
taking in at a glance all the bearings of his theme
and of his desire to say
nothing on it that will imperil other great principles with which it is really
but not to all minds visibly
connected. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
I will be with thy mouth.
Natural infirmities in relation to moral service
I. That God does
not always see fit to remove natural infirmities from those who are
commissioned to important service.
1. They keep us humble.
2. They remind us of God.
3. They prompt us to prayer.
II. That God
renders natural impediments effective to the clear manifestation of His power
and glory.
1. Should win our submission.
2. Should gain our confidence.
3. Should inspire our praise.
III. That God so far
compassionates our natural infirmities as to relieve them by congenial and efficient
help.
1. Fraternal.
2. Adapted to need.
3. Constant. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
The Divine Creatorship
I. Should silence
the voice of complaint under natural infirmities.
II. Should become
an argument for the ready performance of any mission on which we may be
divinely sent.
III. Should lean us
reverently to acknowledge the sovereignty of God in the varied allotments of
life. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
Lessons
I. The Divine
commission.
II. The Divine
companionship.
III. The Divine
instruction. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
Speech
or dumbness
from God
I. Language is of
Divine original. You may have been accustomed to consider it just as natural to
man to speak as to walk; but this is a mistake. A child left to itself may
learn to walk
but a child left to itself would never learn to speak; it would
utter sounds
but it would never connect sounds with thoughts--it would never
that is
learn to express certain thoughts by certain sounds. It might invent
some jargon of its own
but as to anything which should at all resemble even
the elements of a language
and a system of sounds by which everything around
us should be classified and defined
you will never think that this could be
found in the accidental babblings of infancy; and however you may seek to
account upon natural principles for the origin of language
we still venture to
say
that unless you receive the Mosaic account of the Creation
there is no
phenomenon so hopelessly inexplicable as language. Unless it be supposed that
God formed man at first
and gave him the organs of speech
ay
and then taught
him their use
and furnished him with words by which ideas should be expressed
language is the most unintelligible of prodigies; and you may search the
universe and find nothing which you may not account for without God
if you can
shut out His agency from the introduction of speech. And there is scriptural
evidence of the fact
that God taught man language
or that the language first
spoken was Divine in its origin. You will observe
that so soon as man was created
God spake unto him; and thus the first use of words was to communicate the
thoughts of God. But the thoughts of God must have been communicated in the
words of God
and man could not have understood God¡¦s words
unless he had been
first taught them of God; so that when on the very outset of human existence
you find conversation held between man and his Maker
you are forced to
conclude
that since on no supposition could man in such a brief space have
invented a language
the employed language must have been Divine
and Adam must
have received from God the earliest intimations of speech.
II. Every case of
inability to speak is of Divine appointment. God has meted out to us our every
endowment
whether of body or of mind; we are indebted for nothing to chance
for everything to Providence; and though it were beside our purpose to inquire
into the reasons which may induce God to deny to one man the sense of sight
and to another the sense of hearing
we are as much bound to recognise His
appointment in these bodily defects as in the splendid gifts of a capacious
memory
a rich imagination and a sound judgment
which procure for their
possessor admiration and influence. And when there shall come the grand
clearing up of the mysteries and discrepancies of the present dispensation
we
nothing doubt that the Almighty will show that there was a design to be
answered by every deformed limb
and every sightless eyeball
and every
speechless tongue
and that in regard both to the individual himself and to
numbers with whom he stood associated
there has been a distinct reference to
the noblest and most glorious of ends
in the closing up of the inlets of the
senses
or in the yielding the members to disease or contraction. The deaf and
dumb child shall be proved to have acted a part in the furtherance of the
purposes of God
which it could never have performed
had it delighted its
parents by hearkening to their counsels and pouring forth the music of its
speech; the blind man and the cripple shall be shown to have been so placed in
their pilgrimage through life
that they should have been decidedly
disadvantaged
the one by sight
the other by strength. ¡§Who maketh
¡¨ then
¡§the dumb
or deaf
or the seeing or the blind? have not I the Lord?¡¨ Thine
O
God
is the allowing upon earth the melancholy assemblage of those who seem but
fractions of men; but wise and good
though unsearchable and past finding out
are all Thy ways
and all Thy permissions.
III. And there are
two inferences which you should draw from the facts thus established
and which
we would press with all earnestness on your attention.
1. You discern
first of all
the extreme sinfulness of looking
slightingly or with contempt on those who are afflicted with any bodily defect
or deformity. Ridicule in such case
however disguised and softened down
is
ridicule of an appointment of God; and to despise in the least degree a man
because he possesses not the full measure of senses and powers
is to revile
the Creator
who alone ordered the abstraction.
2. If we are indebted to God for every sense and every faculty
are
we not laid under a mighty obligation to present our bodies a living sacrifice
to our Maker? (H. Melvill
B. D.)
Gifts other than eloquence an element in leadership
Probably Moses stammered
as he said he was slow of speech; and
was not fluent in speaking
notwithstanding all his learning. A man may be a
philosopher
a statesman
may have a clear head and a strong will
a solid
judgment and a great mind
and yet be destitute of any talent for speaking. It
was the same with St. Paul (see 1 Corinthians 2:1-4; 2 Corinthians 10:10)
who was so
full of wisdom and¡¨ zeal and love
but had no eloquence. (Prof. Gaussen.)
Inspiration better than education
Speaking of art-training
Mr. Ruskin says: ¡§Until a man has passed
through a course of academy studentship
and can draw in an improved manner
with French chalk
and knows foreshortening
and perspective
and something of
anatomy
we do not think he can possibly be an artist. What is worse
we are
very apt to think that we can make him an artist by teaching him anatomy
and
how to draw with French chalk: whereas the real gift in him is utterly
independent of all such accomplishments.¡¨ So the highest powers of the teacher
or preacher
the power of interpreting the Scriptures with spiritual insight
of moving the hearers to earnest worship and decision
may exist with or
without the culture of the schools. Learned Pharisees are impotent failures
compared with a rough fisherman Peter anointed with the Holy Ghost. Inspiration
is more than education. (H. O. Mackey.)
Strength not always appropriate
Professor Tyndall states as a most remarkable fact
that the waves
which have up to this time been most effectual in shaking asunder the atoms of
compound molecules are those of least mechanical power. ¡§Billows
¡¨ he
instructively adds
¡§are incompetent to produce effects which are easily
produced by ripples.¡¨ It is so with us. Often the greatest of us cannot do
things that the smallest and weakest can. God sends power from on high to them
and it should be our prayer that God will endue us with power from on high that
we may do His work
even though we be the weakest and humblest of His servants.
God can make use of poor material
The meek Moses lost sight of the fact that God does not of
necessity require good material. The paper manufacturer is not nice in the
choice of his materials. He does not
writes Arnot
reject a torn or filthy
piece as unfit for his purpose. All come alike to him; for he knows what he can
make of them. The filthy rags can be made serviceable. So God needed not a man
highly endowed with mental gifts and intellectual energies
with commanding
presence and persuasive eloquence. His providence and grace could prepare Moses
for his mission.
God¡¦s biddings are enablings
The missionary John Williams once said that there were two little
words which were able to make the most lofty mountains melt: ¡§Try¡¨ and ¡§Trust.¡¨
Moses had yet to learn the use of
these words. God taught him. The sailor has to be taught that he must not look
on the dark and troubled waters
but at the clear blue heavens where shines the
pole-star. Moses was gazing at the surging sea of Egyptian wrath
and God
taught him to direct his gaze heavenward; then to try and trust
for greater is
He that is with you than all that be against you. As an early Christian writer
enjoins
let us not forget--as Moses did at first--that all God¡¦s biddings are
enablings
and that it is for us not to ask the reason but to obey.
Verse 13
Send
I pray Thee
by the hand of him whom Thou wilt send.
An evasion of spiritual work
I. Moses
recognized the necessity that the work should be accomplished.
II. He manifested a
disposition to shrink from achieving the work himself.
III. He expressed a
desire that some other person
should be called to
and entrusted with
the work.
IV. He was in
danger of losing the honour of the work to which he was called. (J. S.
Exell
M. A.)
The joy of being used by God
I have a letter from a dear Christian lady in this city who
refused to speak to an inquirer when I asked her to
on the ground that she
could not talk to an inquirer. The next day she was deeply humiliated to think
that she had refused to speak to an anxious soul; and the question even of her
own acceptance with God came up for discussion in her own mind. ¡§Can I be a
child of God
if I am not willing to speak to an anxious soul about Jesus?¡¨ She
was led by this to cast herself down in consecration to God to be used of Him
in any way
and especially in speaking to the anxious. Here is an extract from
a letter just received. ¡§I am constrained to tell you that He allowed me on
Sunday Night
for the first time
the intense joy of helping to lead a dear
soul to Himself. Oh
the rest
and joy
and peace to my own heart
is more than
tongue can tell! To think that after being His child for seventeen years
and
being cold and useless all that wasted time
He should then be so loving and
gracious as to use me
such a worthless cumberer. Oh
it is wonderful! Praise
His dear name.¡¨ Dear friend
would you not like to have a similar experience? (G.
F. Pentecost
D. D.)
The inventiveness of reluctance
Man excusing himself from duty is a familiar picture. It is
not a picture indeed; it is a personal experience. How inventive we are in
finding excuses for not doing the will of God! How falsely modest we can
become! depreciating ourselves
and putting ourselves before God in a light in
which we could never consent to be put before society by the criticism of
others. Is not this a revelation of the human heart to itself? We only want to
walk in paths that are made beautiful with flowers
and to wander by streams
that lull us by their own tranquillity. Nerve
and pluck
and force we seem to
have lost. In place of the inventiveness of love we have the inventiveness of
reluctance or distaste. It should be our supreme delight to find reasons for
co-operating with God
and to fortify ourselves by such interpretations of
circumstances as will plainly show us that we are in the right battle
fighting
on the right side
and wielding the right weapon. The possibility of
self-deception is one of the most solemn of all subjects. I cannot question the
sincerity of Moses in enumerating and massing all the difficulties of his side
of the case. He meant every word that he said. It is not enough to be sincere;
we must have intelligence and conscience enlightened and enlarged. Mistakes are
made about this matter of sincerity; the thing forgotten being that sincerity
is nothing in itself
everything depending upon the motive by which it is actuated
and the object towards which it is directed. The Church is to-day afflicted
with the spirit of self-excusing:--it cannot give
because of the depression of
the times; it cannot go upon its mighty errands
because of its dainty
delicateness; it cannot engage in active beneficence
because its charity
should begin at home; it cannot enter into ardent controversy
because it
prefers the comfort of inaction. Churches should not tell lies to themselves.
The first great thing to be done is for a man to be faithful to his own heart
to look himself boldly in the face
and speak the clear truth emphatically to
his own consciousness. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Verses 14-17
He shall be thy spokesman.
Mutual aid in religious work
I. That sometimes
great men are called to undertake a work against the performance of which they
imagine themselves to have a natural impediment.
1. Men should be certain that their so-called impediment will be a
real hindrance in the service to which they are sent. In these days
when
people are called to work
they at once refer to their infirmity and unfitness
for it; but their real infirmity is not so much their slowness of speech
as
their unbelief
and unwillingness to follow the Divine command. They have not
the rectal courage to encounter difficulty.
2. But we admit that sometimes men are called to religious work
against the performance of which they have a true natural impediment. And why
this apparent anomaly?
II. That at such
times good men require the aid of others whose talents compensate for their
infirmities.
1. This help was adapted to the infirmity of Moses. ¡§Is not Aaron the
Levite thy brother? I know that he can speak well.¡¨ So there are a variety of
gifts and talents in the Church. The one is the complement of the other.
2. This help was arranged by the Providence of God. ¡§And also
behold
he cometh forth to meet thee.¡¨
3. This help was founded upon
and rendered welcome by
family relationship.
¡§Thy brother.¡¨
III. That such
co-operation renders religious work much more jubilant and successful.
1. It is happy. It is adapted to our weak condition of faith.
2. It is sympathetic.
3. It is hopeful. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Moses and Aaron
I. The certificated
ambassador. Moses.
1. His hesitation. Caused by
2. His certificate. Power to work sundry miracles is given.
3. His unbelief. Moses seems
at this time
to rely too much on human
qualities. His lack of eloquence
he thinks
will be great hindrance.
II. The gracious
compensation. Moses and Aaron the complement of each other. The man of words
and the man of action. Human qualities are mercifully distributed. No one man perfect.
Each needs the help and talents of others. Providence designs that men should
not be independent of one another. ¡§Two heads better than one.¡¨ Opposites often
found in one family. Moses and Aaron--brothers. Different qualities and talents
in a household to be used
and combined
for the service of God. Let none envy
the gifts of others
but cultivate his own.
III. The brothers¡¦
meeting.
1. In the wilderness. Place of brotherly meeting a garden in the
desert of life. How great the joy of meeting each other where all around is
paradise
and no separation or toll in prospect.
2. Marked by affection. They ¡§kissed¡¨ each other. Mutual respect and
love.
3. Their intercourse. Chief matter in hand was Moses¡¦s commission.
Aaron
the elder
Cheerfully takes the second place. Is indebted for even that
to the humility of Moses. They journey on together
and at once address
themselves to their work.
Learn--
1. God¡¦s witnesses are witnessed to. Seals to their ministry.
2. Humbly to regard
ourselves
but do any work to which Providence calls us.
3. Rejoice in others¡¦ powers
and cheerfully unite for common ends.
4. Thank God for our meeting on earth
and prepare for the better
one.
5. Christ
our elder Brother
meets us in the wilderness
salutes us
with the kiss of love
and goes with us to all our holy labours. (J. C.
Gray.)
Mutual service
In the valley of Chamounix there stands a very interesting
monument; it presents two figures--Saussure
the great scientist
and Balmat
the guide
who was the very first to stand on the summit of Mont Blanc.
Saussure on the summit of the mighty mountain could do what the poor guide
could not do
he could observe the structure of the rocks
take observations of
barometrical variations
note the intensity of the solar rays
the mode of
formation of clouds
and he could describe the superb scenery unfolded to his view
with the feeling of an artist and the pen of a poet. Balmat could do nothing of
all this but had it not been for his skill and daring
Saussure had never
scaled the glorious height. So on the monument both are immortalized
the lowly
guide
the famous philosopher
for by their mutuality they triumphed and gave
mankind a new world of science and poetry. So it ever is in the Church. In
Christian fellowship all souls serve one another. (W. L. Watkinson.)
Life and service interdependent
In the great honey industries of South California the bees play a
most important and valuable part. But they cannot pierce the skins of the
apricots until the lady-bug has made a hole for them. It must have been an
accidental thing at the outset
the first bee joining a lady-bug at her feast
of apricot
but they have now become necessary to the honey-crop of the
district. All life and service is interdependent--Timothy is necessary to Paul;
the least essential to the great. (H. O. Mackey.)
The Divine anger
1. Often righteously provoked.
2. Often gentle in its reproof.
3. Truly benevolent in its disposition. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
I know that he can speak well
I. Then God takes
knowledge of the varied talents of men.
II. Then God will
hold men responsible for their talents.
III. Then the
talents of men cannot be better employed than in the service of the Church. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Christian workers more ready to rely on man than on God
We have noted the timidity and hesitation of Moses
notwithstanding the varied promises and assurances with which Divine grace had
furnished him. And now
although there was nothing gained in the way of real
power
although there was no more virtue or efficacy in one mouth than in
another
although it was Moses
after all
who was to speak unto Aaron
yet
Moses was quite ready to go when assured of the presence and co-operation of a
poor feeble mortal like himself
whereas he could not go when assured again and
again that Jehovah would be with him. How his case
like a mirror
reflects our
own hearts! We are more ready to trust anything than the living God. How deeply
should it humble us before the Lord that
though we move along with bold
decision when we possess the countenance and support of a poor frail mortal
like ourselves
yet we falter
hesitate
and demur when we have the light of
the Master¡¦s countenance and the strength of His omnipotent arm to support us.
(A. Nevin
D. D.)
Verse 18
Let me go
I pray thee.
A true recognition of filial duty
I. It consists
in a true recognition of parental authority.
1. Moses was animated by honesty.
2. Moses was related by marriage.
3. Moses was obliged by kindness.
II. It is
compatible with silence in reference to the inner experiences of our spiritual
life and work. Moses only asked the consent of his father-in-law to visit his
brethren in Egypt; he did not name the primary object of his journey. This was
quite consistent
under the circumstances
with a true recognition of filial
duty.
1. Silence is not necessarily cunning.
2. Silence may be discreet.
3. Silence may be self-protective.
Many toils of Christian workers have been brought to nought by the
lack of precautionary measures on the part of those who have been entrusted with
them.
III. It should
awaken kindly and judicious parental consideration and response. ¡§And Jethro
said to Moses
Go in peace.¡¨
1. Sometimes the request should be granted.
2. Always goodwill should be expressed. ¡§Go in peace.¡¨
3. Supremely should self be forgotten. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
The compulsion of service
This case of Moses reminds us that our best lifework is that on
which we enter under a feeling that it is absolutely essential that we should
do it. Moses tried in every way to put away from him the office to which God
called him. But still it came back
upon him. He felt that he must go; and when that irrepressible must shaped
itself in his soul
he went
and carried all before him. It is the
irrepressible in a man that makes him great. So long as the work he undertakes
is performed because he must do something
there is nothing remarkable either
about him or about it; but when he enters upon it because it is something that he
must do
then prepare yourself for something noble. Is it not just in this
that the quality which we call genius peculiarly resides? If a man thinks that
he would like to write in verse
or to paint something
or to make a speech
or
what not
his work will never be
heard of. But if there is in him a song which insists on singing itself out
or
a painting which will not let him rest until he has put it on the canvas
or a
truth
the utterance of which he cannot hold back
then he is sure to be at
length a poet
an artist
or an orator. That was a wise old minister who
on
being consulted by a youth who desired to become a preacher of the gospel
said
to him
¡§Young man
don¡¦t become a minister if you can help it.¡¨ It is the man
who cannot help being a preacher who will be most effective always in the
pulpit. The work which we can help doing is not for us. If Moses could have
successfully excused himself
he would have been no fit man for the great
crusade on which he entered. But it was because
in spite of all his
reluctance
there was within him the overmastering sense that God had called
him to be Israel¡¦s deliverer that he was at length so successful. Ah! have we
not here the cause of so many failures in moral and religious enterprises? The
men who have inaugurated them have done so for personal eclat or
pecuniary profit
and not because of this inner compulsion. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
Domestic sympathy in duty
Moses tells Jethro of his commission from Jehovah
and asks
permission to carry out the Lord¡¦s will. This request is at once granted. It is
most encouraging to be thus cordially seconded by those of our own house in our
purpose to serve the Lord
whether in public or private ministry. We also
whether we are called into the public or private service of God
ought to
communicate with those of our own household. My advice is always to a young
convert
to go at once to those at home
to whom they naturally owe confidence
and tell them what the Lord has done for them
and that He has called them to
service. If it is son or daughter
go to mother or father; if it is wife or husband
then to husband or wife. Seek not to keep your conversion
or your consecration
to God
a secret from those of your own household. It sometimes happens that
one must stand alone in one¡¦s house. This is often very hard to do. Once Paul
was compelled to stand alone. ¡§At my first answer no man stood with me
but all
forsook me:. . . notwithstanding the Lord stood with me
and strengthened me.¡¨
This we can always count on; and no one is alone with whom the Lord stands. I
once knew a husband and wife
each of whom
afraid of the other
had sought the
Lord in one of our meetings
apart from the other
each being afraid that the
other would ridicule. They had both of them been open and scoffing unbelievers.
Now both had found the Lord; but each was afraid to confess it to the other
and yet each of them noticed a change in the other. At last the wife summoned
courage to tell her husband
that she had been so burdened with a sense of her sin
that
having no rest
she had sought the Lord and found Him. To her unspeakable joy the husband
caught her in his arms
and confessed the same for himself to her. Let us
always first go home and tell our friends how great things the Lord hath done
for us
and saved our souls; and then shall we have a free course to serve the
Lord. Otherwise our hands will be tied; and we shall be hindered in every way
from faithful service. I think there will always be some one at home who will
be glad that we have met with the Lord; either for the first time
or in a way
that means an entire consecration to Him and His service. And as Jethro said to
Moses
so will they say to us: ¡§Go in peace.¡¨ (G. F. Pentecost
D. D.)
Verse 19
All the men are dead which sought thy life.
The death of enemies
1. In a world like this
the greater the man the more enemies he will
have.
2. Death in this world is constantly sweeping away our enemies as
well as friends.
I. The death of
our enemies should restrain resentment. Were it not wrong to return evil for
evil
to revile those who revile us
it would scarcely be wise. While we are
preparing our retaliating machinery
death is doing his work with them. Our
blows will scarcely reach them before they fall
and then
when they are gone
they can do us no harm. But if we have retaliated
the memory of the
retaliation will give us pain.
II. The death of
our enemies should stimulate us to overcome evil by good. The sublimest
conquest is not that which will crush the body or wound the feelings
but that
which will subdue the enmity and win the hostile soul to friendship and love. (Homilist.)
The Divine precaution for the safety of Christian workers
I. It is sometimes
manifested by removing good men and great workers from dangerous associations.
1. Christian workers are sometimes removed from the pride of high
society.
2. Christian workers are sometimes removed from the contamination of
great sin.
3. Christian workers are sometimes removed from the pedantry of great
learning.
4. Christian workers are sometimes removed from physical evil.
II. It is sometimes
manifested by informing good men and great workers of the removal of danger.
Time aids the enterprises of heaven. Death subdues the hatred and passion of
men.
III. The divine
precaution does not allow an abandonment of the work committed to the good. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Death of enemies
Hearing a whole choir of birds chirping merrily together
my
curiosity was excited to inquire into the occasion of their convocation and
merriment
when I quickly perceived a dead hawk in the bush
about which they
made such a noise
seeming to triumph at the death of an enemy. I could not
blame them for singing the knell of one who
like a cannibal
was wont to feed
upon their living bodies
tearing them limb from limb
and scaring them with
his frightful appearance. Over this bird
which was so formidable when alive
the most timid wren or titmouse did not now fear to chirp and hop. This
occurrence brought to my mind the case of tyrants and oppressors. When living
they are the terror of mankind; but when dead
they are the objects of general
contempt and scorn. ¡§When the wicked perish
there is shouting¡¨ (Proverbs 11:10).
Verse 20
Returned to the land of Egypt.
The journey to Egypt
I. That a good man
journeying on the service of God should take his family with him. Never go on
any good errand without your family; teach the youthful feet to walk in
obedience to God.
II. That a good man
journeying on the service of God should take his rod with him. Never go on a
journey of moral service without God. Especially if you are a minister of the
gospel
take the rod on your journey to Egypt.
1. It will keep you humble. It will remind you of your humble
occupation in the desert
when you are tempted to pride
in the great service
to which God has called you. Every Christian worker needs to have something
within his soul to inspire humility.
2. It will make you happy. When you are desponding and sad
when the
work does not open up to your effort as you would wish
the rod will remind you
of the vision at the bush
and of the miracles wrought at the commencement of
the mission. The reason why there are so many unhappy workers in the Church
is
because they have left the rod at home.
3. It will make you powerful. With this rod Moses was to work
miracles. So if Christian workers had the rod of God in their hand
they would
be able to show to the world much more effectively than they do
the holy
tokens of their mission. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Verse 21
See that thou do all these wonders before Pharaoh.
Moses before Pharaoh
Israel was under the sovereign control of the King of Egypt. He
had property in them. Moses in the name of the Lord suddenly asked Pharaoh to
give Israel their freedom. He was startled. He did not acknowledge the Lord. A
political petition was presented to him
and he dealt with it on political
grounds. It was not a spiritual question which was proposed to Pharaoh. It was
exclusively a political question. It was therefore within this sphere that the
Divine action was taken
and that action is fitly described in the text as a
hardening of Pharaoh¡¦s heart. The question will then arise
what the meaning of
that hardening was
and what useful results accrued from a process which
appears to us to be so mysterious. The hardening of Pharaoh¡¦s heart
as
involving the development of a merely political scheme
may amount in effect to
no more than this
¡§I will delay the process
this request shall not be granted
at once; and I will prolong the process in order that I may bring out lessons
for Pharaoh himself
for the children of Israel
and for mankind at large; were
Pharaoh to let the children of Israel escape from him at once
the result would
be mischievous to themselves; therefore in mercy
not in anger
I will harden
Pharaoh¡¦s heart.¡¨ So far
the question is not a moral one
except in the degree
in which all questions have more or less of a moral bearing. It has been
supposed by some that in the case of this exercise of Divine sovereignty
the
sum total of Pharaoh¡¦s wickedness was increased. Not so. There is the greatest
difference between wickedness being localized and wickedness being increased.
As the history proceeds
we see that the political situation enlarges itself
into a spiritual problem. Pharaoh made a promise to Moses
which he did not
keep. Thus he hardened his own heart. Applying these lessons to ourselves as
sinners
I have now to teach that Jesus Christ tasted death for every man
and
that whosoever will may avail himself of the blessings secured by the mediation
of the Saviour. If any man excuses himself on the ground that God has hardened
his heart
that man is trusting to an excuse in the most solemn affairs of his
being which he would not for a moment tolerate in the region of his family life
or commercial relations. We must not be sensible in ordinary affairs and insane
in higher concerns. Were a servant to tell her mistress that she is fated to be
unclean in her habits
that mistress would instantly and justly treat her with
angry contempt. Were a clerk to tell a banker that he was fated to come late
every morning
and go away early every afternoon
the statement would be
received as a proof of selfishness or insanity. Were a travelling companion to
tell you to make no attempt to be in time for the steamboat or train
because
if you were fated to catch it there would be no fear of your losing it
you
would treat his suggestion as it deserved to be treated. Yet men who can act in
a common-sense manner in all such little affairs
sometimes profess that they
will not make any attempt in a religious direction
because they believe in the
doctrine of predestination or fatalism. Wicked and slothful servants
they
shall be condemned out of their own mouth! ¡§Come unto Me
all ye that labour
and are heavy laden
and I will give you rest.¡¨ ¡§Whosoever will
let him come.¡¨
¡§Him that cometh to Me
I will in no wise cast out.¡¨ ¡§How often would I have
gathered you
as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings
and ye would
not!¡¨ In presence of such statements as these
it must be the very consummation
of blasphemy to turn round upon God and say
¡§I wanted to be saved
but Thou
didst harden my heart and condemn me to hell.¡¨ (J. Parker
D. D.)
Verse 22-23
Israel is My son
even My firstborn.
The primogeniture of the good
I. That the good
have a Divine father.
1. He is merciful to the children.
2. He vindicates the children from their foes.
II. That the good
have heavenly privileges. AS the sons of God.
1. They have the privilege of high birth. Only they who are the
subjects of this new birth know the privileges it confers upon them. Nor can
the meanest ancestry of earth be excluded therefrom.
2. They have the privilege of good moral culture. In God¡¦s family all
the children are well disciplined. This culture of our moral nature is designed
to fit us more thoroughly for the high relationship into which we arc called
that we may be responsive to all its duties
and in harmony with its sacred destinies.
III. That the good
have inspiring hopes.
1. The hope of a happy death.
2. The hope of a vast inheritance.
3. The hope of a sublime future.
Christians are the sons of God. Lessons:
1. Live worthy of your great Parent.
2. Act worthy of your noble ancestry.
3. Embrace your glorious privileges.
4. Let nothing dim your bright hopes. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Let My son go
that he may
serve Me.
The Divine intention in the moral freedom of man
I. That God has a
definite purpose in the moral freedom of men. His great aim is to bring men
from the tyranny of passion
pride
covetousness and self
into the freedom of
a tranquil
humble
and self-denying service. Hence the Divine preparation that
is given to the varied agencies that are to achieve this freedom.
II. That the
purpose of God in the moral freedom of men is that they should serve him.
1. That we should serve Him in our business.
2. That we should serve Him in our social life.
3. That we should serve Him with all our energies.
Why should we serve Him?
The great Emancipator
I. Let us
endeavour to fix our thoughts upon the voice of God
which was a real power to
bring up His people out of Egypt. That voice was threefold; asserting His
proprietorship in them
demanding their freedom
and ordaining their destiny.
II. Now here was
the voice of man. What a come-down it seems to be. ¡§Thou shalt say unto
Pharaoh
Thus saith the Lord
Let My son go.¡¨ Why did not the Lord say it
Himself? Why did He need to pick up a Moses and send him to say it? Well
had
the Lord said it Himself to Pharaoh
it would have been very startling
and
Pharaoh must have yielded ultimately to the Divine fiat: but do you not see the
deeper marvel in the milder proceeding
when Jehovah
as it were
hides His
power and cloaks it in weakness? Instead of appealing to Pharaoh with that
voice which breaks the cedars of Lebanon
and makes the hinds to calve
He
speaks to him by one who was slow of speech and of a stammering tongue. Now
if
God¡¦s voice can vanquish Pharaoh when it masks itself behind the feebleness of
a stammering Moses
it will be more glorious than it would have been if it had
used no instrumentality whatever. Go on with steady perseverance. Be ye sure of
this
ye shall not labour in vain or spend your strength for naught. Are you still
slow of speech? Nevertheless
go on. Have you been rebuked and rebuffed? Have
you had little else than defeat? This is the way to success. You shall
macadamize the road with the rough flints of your failure. Toil on and believe
on. Be steadfast in your confidence
for with a high hand and an outstretched
arm the Lord will fetch out His own elect
and He will fetch some of them out by you.
III. Our last word
is upon the power of God. Without the power of God the voice of man would have
been an utter failure. What effect was produced by the voice of Moses? Went
there not forth with it a power which plagued Pharaoh? It filled the sinful
land of Egypt with plagues. So men that preach God¡¦s gospel with God¡¦s power
fill the world with plagues. What will occur by and by? Why
the oppressor will be glad
to part with his bondsmen. It sometimes happens that the ungodly become
themselves very glad to get rid of God¡¦s chosen people
whom they are prone to
persecute. ¡§Their melancholy ill comports with our liveliness
¡¨ so they say. A
lady who joined this Church some years ago
moving in the higher circles of
society
said to me
¡§I was quite willing to continue my acquaintance with my
friends
but I found they gave me the cold shoulder
and did not want me.¡¨ Just
so. It is a great mercy when the Egyptians say
¡§Get ye gone
¡¨ and when they
are ready to give you jewels of silver and jewels of gold to get rid of you.
The Lord wants His people to come right out and to be separate; He knows how by
the simple utterance of the gospel to put such a division between His people
and those who are not His people
that even the ungodly shall begin to say
¡§Get you gone; we want to have nothing further to do with you.¡¨ Glory be to God
when such a thing as that happens. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
A Divine threat
1. Claims attention.
2. Certain of execution.
3. Stern in requirement. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Zipporah took a sharp stone.
Neglected duty a hindrance to the performance of religious work
I. Moses had
neglected the duty of circumcising his son.
II. That this
neglect of duty introduced an experience of pain into his life.
III. That this
neglect of duty endangered the performance of his religious work. Many a
Christian worker is rendered feeble to-day by the sin of his past life. Let us
beware how we imperil the freedom of men
and the work of God
by our own
neglect. Freedom from sin is the great essential to the success of Christian
work.
IV. That the
neglect of this duty was most foolish
as it had after all to be performed. Men
will have to face their neglected duties again
if not for performance in this
world
yet for judgment in the next. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
The Divine purpose of a strange event
I. Take the fact
just as stated (Exodus 4:24).
1. The very terms are confessedly startling. The Lord seeking and
trying to kill! But His fatherly heart withheld His arm.
2. The character of the sufferer makes it still more remarkable. To
cut short such a life as that of Moses--how strange!
3. Considerations of time and circumstances only deepen the wonder.
God had just spoken to Moses as a friend
and expressly engaged him for an
exceptionally important work.
4. The prominence and emphasis given to the record complicates the
mystery. It is God speaking to all generations on things belonging to their
peace.
II. Cause and
purpose of so strange a dispensation.
1. Moses¡¦ compliance with Egyptian custom of circumcising only
adults.
2. So long as he discarded the national seal or sign of the covenant
made with Abraham
he was essentially unfit to take the place of recognized
champion and deliverer of God¡¦s people.
3. His position was that of a rebel
determined not to submit to an
ordinance acknowledged to be Divine. God would sooner ¡§kill¡¦¡¨ Moses than allow
him to enter on a work in a state of hardened impenitence.
III. Immediate
results. Moses yielded
and God ¡§let him go.¡¨
1. Though up to that moment there seemed no hope of escape
the
instant there was confession on one side
there came forgiveness on the other.
2. Henceforth there is not simply a change
but a marked improvement
in his entire spirit and character.
IV. Consequent blessings
and blessedness.
1. The disease was instantly arrested.
2. Thereon followed another token for good
to cheer and to
strengthen his heart (Exodus 4:27-29).
3. In further evidence of complete reconciliation
think of the
wonderful and unparalleled success with which the mission was crowned.
conclusion.
1. To such as are in vigorous health
the moral is--boast not thyself
of to-morrow.
2. To such as may recently have passed through heavy affliction
it
suggests the wisdom of much earnest self-scrutiny.
3. Of the large class of almost Christians
¡§not far from the kingdom
of God
¡¨ it asks with special solemnity ¡§Why halt ye between two opinions?¡¨
4. To those of us who call ourselves Christians
and profess to be
aiming at public usefulness
its unmistakable voice is--¡§They should be clean
that bear the vessels of the sanctuary.¡¨ Sins unforsaken
however secret
or
however deplored
are sins unforgiven. (H. Griffith.)
Lessons
1. After greatest encouragements may bitter discoveries be made from
God to His servants.
2. In the way of obedience
God¡¦s servants may meet with the sharpest
temptations.
3. The place intended for rest by us may be turned into a place of
trouble by God. The inn.
4. Jehovah Himself may meet His dearest servants as an adversary.
5. God may seek to kill
when He purposeth not to kill His servants.
6. It is some sad defects in God¡¦s servants that put Him upon such
attempts (Exodus 4:24). (G. Hughes
B. D.)
The circumcision at the inn
1. That a law
the fitness and utility of which we cannot discover by
our natural reason
is more a test of the spirit of obedience than a moral
requirement that commends itself to our judgment as good and proper; because
our compliance with the latter may be but a compliment to our own intelligence
and not at all an act of deference to the Divine authority. Of what use is
circumcision to the child? Or what good can it do to apply a little water to a child¡¦s
face? Surely
the guilt of neglecting such rites as these
if there be any
must be very small. It is not of small account that ourselves and our children
should be in the Church of God
and have
by covenant with God
a part in its
rich privileges and blessings. And God can surely appoint His own form of
entrance into it
and His own mark of membership in it. To neglect these rites
is trampling on God¡¦s love
and spurning His favours; and though He may not now
as in old time
visit our offence with physical disease or other visible
inflictions
He will surely not hold us guiltless.
2. Sickness
or danger of death in some form
is here sent as a
reminder of a past neglect of duty. Is not this often its office?
3. But it is far better
surely
to forestall such medicinal
sufferings by a voluntary revision of our lives
and a voluntary supplying of
those things that are wanting
by a remedying of neglects as far as it can be
done
a supplying of deficiencies as far as opportunity is given us. (B. A.
Hallam
D. D.)
Another meeting with the Lord
I. If we give
ourselves to the Lord in consegration
we may be sure that before we get fairly
to our work we must repair any of the waste places in our lives that are
apparent. And if we have overlooked any
we may expect that the Lord will meet
us with a drawn sword
and hold us prisoners to Himself
until we make the
crooked thing straight. Every person who has sought to walk in the consecrated
way has found out the truth that ¡§judgment must begin at the house of God.¡¨ In
other words
if we are to bring other people out of Egyptian bondage
we must
show in ourselves that we ourselves are delivered. How can a man bring another
up out of the bondage of strong drink
if he is indulging in that drink
himself? How can a man or woman lead another out of the Egyptian world of
pleasure and self-indulgence
if they are living in pleasure themselves? One
has said
¡§If you want to lift a soul out of the pit you must first get a good
solid footing out of the pit yourself.¡¨
II. There is a
still deeper meaning in this transaction. So soon as the rite of circumcision
was complied with
in the person of the son of Moses (who
I must think
stands
for himself in this case
because it was a denial of the truth on his part to
have allowed the rite to lapse in that son
as much so as to have neglected it
in his own body)
¡§the Lord let him go.¡¨ ¡§So
the Lord let him go
¡¨ is
significant. We are made free
in meeting the Lord and fulfilling His will. It
will be seen that the drawn sword was
after all
the sword of life. For in
fighting against our uncircumcised flesh the Lord is fighting against the death
that is in us. He never slays
but to make alive. And if we accept His judgment against
ourselves and die to the flesh
by being crucified with Christ
behold
we
live! (G. F. Pentecost
D. D.)
Lessons from the incident at the inn
1. That God takes notice of and is much displeased with the sins of
His own people
and that the putting away of their sins is indispensably
necessary to the removal of the Divine judgments.
2. That no circumstances of prudence or convenience can ever with
propriety be urged as an excuse for neglecting a clearly commanded duty
especially the observance of sacramental ordinances.
3. That he who is to be the interpreter of the law to others ought in
all points to be blameless
and in all things conformed to the law himself.
4. That when God has procured the proper respect to His revealed
will
the controversy between Him and the offender is at an end; the object of
His government being not so much to avenge Himself as to amend the criminal. (G.
Bush.)
Results of neglect
There is no need that the man in a skiff amid Niagara¡¦s
rapids should row toward the cataract; resting on his oars is quite enough to
send him over the awful verge. It is the neglected wheel that capsizes the
vehicle
and maims for life the passengers. It is the neglected leak that sinks
the ship. It is the neglected field that yields briers instead of bread. It is
the neglected spark near the magazine whose tremendous explosion sends its
hundreds of mangled wretches into eternity. The neglect of an officer to throw
up a rocket on a certain night caused the fall of Antwerp
and postponed the
deliverance of Holland for twenty or more years. The neglect of a sentinel to
give an alarm hindered the fall of Sebastopol
and resulted in the loss of many
thousand lives.
He who would lead others into obedience must himself be exemplary
Moses had
perhaps
yielded to the importunities of his
Midianitish wife in this matter; she may have been tempted to think that it was
a very slight thing after all. But he must learn to know no one but God
when
duty is in the ease; and in the very outset of his ministry
he must have it impressed
upon his heart that nothing is little which God has thought it important enough
to command. There is a temptation to be encountered at the beginning of every
enterprise; and according as we meet that
we demonstrate our fitness or
unfitness for entering upon the undertaking. When you are starting out on some
new and noble work
with aspirations kindled at some flaming bush of Divine
revelation to your soul
¡§be not high-minded
but fear.¡¨ Look for some test to
be administered to you just then
and look for it in no great affair
but
rather in some such common thing as the getting of your daily bread
or in some such
domestic matter as the government of your children; for by these God may be
determining your fitness for the work you covet; and if you fail in the trial
there will come no second probation. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
Circumcision among the Egyptians
The Egyptians
according to Herodotus
Strabo
and other writers
practised circumcision. ¡§This custom
¡¨ says the former
¡§can be traced both in
Egypt and Ethiopia to the remotest antiquity¡¨ (1. ii. c. 104). At what age it
was performed by the Egyptians is uncertain; but it is worthy of remark that
the Arabians circumcised their children when they were thirteen years old
because the founder of their nation
Ishmael
was circumcised at that age (Genesis 17:23). The Midianites
though
descended also from Abraham by Keturah
omitted it
and this explains the
reluctance of Zipporah to perform the rite upon her son. To save her husband¡¦s
life
however
she consented to it
and herself performed the operation
using
for the purpose a sharp stone
or knife of flint
which
as Herodotus tells us
was preferred to steel for purposes connected with religion
and especially for
making cuttings or incisions in the human person (Herod. 2:86). Specimens of
these knives
both broad and narrow
have been found in the tombs at Thebes
where they were used in the preparation and embalming of mummies
and may be seen in
collections of Egyptian antiquities. (T. S. Millington.)
Go into the wilderness to meet Moses.
Family relationships
I. The brotherhood
and affection subsisting between the different members of God¡¦s family. This is
twofold. God¡¦s people stand in a twofold relation to one another
as--
II. Notice the
breaches of intercourse brought about in this world between those members of
God¡¦s family who have seen and known
one another in the flesh.
1. Many interruptions of intercourse are brought about by
providential arrangements.
2. All direct communication between brethren in the Lord is cut off
by death.
III. Consider the
need of and consequent yearning after each other¡¦s society and assistance
which
while parted
the members of God¡¦s family experience. The need is based
upon
and flows from
their spiritual constitution in one body. We are
in the
design of God
constituent parts of a whole
and we are continually evincing
our consciousness of this truth.
IV. Consider the
blissful reunion of the sundered members of God¡¦s family in the realms of glory. There
shall be a day when all the yearnings of the Christian¡¦s heart after the
society of his brethren shall be satisfied to the full
when his joy shall receive its
entire complement in his recognition of and intercommunication with those whom
he has known and loved in the Lord. (Dean Goulburn.)
Moses and Aaron
I. God brought the
leaders together. A strange place for their meeting
and a strange scene.
II. God brought his
leaders to his people. God may be obliged to prepare His leaders as well as His
people. Moses was not ready for his work until he was eighty years old. How
much of God¡¦s work may be waiting for His leaders! Pray for leaders set apart
in the Mount of God; but pray
too
for elders to gather about them. And pray
again for a people ready to be led. Everything must stay until so much is
attained
--a consecrated ministry
a consecrated eldership
a consecrated
church.
III. God brought his
leaders before pharaoh. God¡¦s enemies must be subdued if they reject the Divine
message. But first He will thoroughly apply gentle methods. (G. R. Leavitt.)
Moses and Aaron
I. Aaron¡¦s
commission.
1. Its reason suggestive to the reluctant servant (Exodus 4:1-14).
2. The fact suggestive of the Divine condescension and forbearance.
II. Aaron¡¦s
obedience.
1. Prompt.
2. Sincere.
III. Moses and Aaron
carrying out the Divine command.
1. They observed their respective places.
2. Their reception by the people (Exodus 4:31).
IV. The interview
between Moses
Aaron
and Pharaoh.
1. The reasonableness of the request.
2. The unreasonableness and haughtiness of the reply.
Lessons:
1. To analyze the Divine motive
in the use of all these human
instrumentalities
is fraught with most helpful and instructive suggestions.
2. The unwisdom of hesitancy
in accepting a clearly-indicated call
of God
is here seen.
3. The modesty and judiciousness with which the request of Moses and
Aaron was couched
suggest the carefulness which soul-winners should exercise.
4. In the haughtiness of Pharaoh we discover the preliminary step to
his fall. (D. C. Hughes
M. A.)
Lessons
1. God joineth His seconds to His firsts
as He seeth need for
redemption of His Church.
2. The same Jehovah only fits and calls His first and second
instruments for His works. All from God.
3. God may call the elder after the younger brother
and subject him.
4. God can bring brethren together which were as lost one to another.
5. Motion and place and work
God points out to His instruments of
salvation.
6. God makes the deserts places for deliverers to meet in for His Church¡¦s good.
7. God¡¦s call to meeting of instruments is to teach them their
respective work.
8. Hearts which God toucheth are ready for obedience to God¡¦s call.
9. The mount of God
and God in the mount
is best for His servants
to meet about His work.
10. Nature and grace teach men to give signs of love and loyalty to
God¡¦s substitutes below (Exodus 4:27).
11. It is just for supreme powers to open their commissions from God
to inferiors.
12. God¡¦s words alone are to be declared
which He speaks to His
servants
and are to be spoken by them.
13. Mission and commission of God¡¦s ministers must appear both from
God.
14. God¡¦s wonderful works as well as gracious works must be showed at
His command.
15. Joint ambassadors of the Church¡¦s deliverance need to know God¡¦s
words and works (Exodus 4:28). (G. Hughes
B. D.)
The two brothers
I. As educated by
different methods.
II. As meeting
after a long separation.
1. The meeting was providential.
2. The meeting had a moral and national significance.
3. The meeting was welcome to the brothers.
III. As uniting in a
grand enterprise. Brothers should unitedly place themselves in a line with the
providence of God.
IV. As entering
upon an important future. All the casual meetings of life are important in
their bearing upon present work and future destiny.
V. As reflecting
commendation upon their family. Sons honour their parents when they undertake
an enterprise for the good of men. Brothers cannot be better united than in the
cause of God. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
The meeting of two brothers
I. It was in a
strange place. Some men are only brotherly before the crowd
in privacy or
solitude they are social despots. The wilderness will test our affection.
II. It was
characterized by warmth of affection. They kissed each other. Brothers do not
often act thus in these days. They think it unmanly to do so. The age is cold
at heart. It is a token of courage as well as love that a brother will thus
greet his brother. But let the kiss be accompanied by kindly attentions
otherwise it is a mockery.
III. It was the
occasion for religious talk and consultation. No better topic than this. (J.
S. Exell
M. A.)
Christian brothers
1. Called by God to work.
2. Joined by God in work.
3. Conversing together about work.
4. Learning their respective work. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Providential arrangements
But admire the manner in which God governs the things of this
world and of His Church. When it pleases Him to save a soul
or call a servant
He causes all persons and all events to work together for this end
and in a
way already determined. As a skilful general sends each division of his army
without the knowledge of the others
to assemble on the same field of battle
so the Lord sends His servants who are fighting the good fight
to the place
and at the time where they ought to meet. It was thus that He sent Peter to
Cornelius
Ananias to Paul
Philip to the eunuch. It is thus that in our time
He sends missionaries to heathen lands. It was thus that He caused Farel and
Calvin to meet at Geneva
that they might help each other
and form a
friendship that lasted during their lives
and greatly contributed to the
success of their work. How this thought enlightens
strengthens
comforts
and
rejoices those who are engaged serving God. (Prof. Gaussen.)
The two brothers
The history of Moses and Aaron appearing together at the court of
Pharaoh
the one working miracles and the other as his spokesman
may have
given rise to the traditions of the Greeks and Romans
in which Jupiter and
Mercury
both of them Egyptian deities worshipped at Hammon and Thoth
are
described visiting the earth in a similar relationship. The latter was
represented with the caduceus
a rod twisted about with serpents
and was the
god of speech or eloquence. To such traditions the saying of the people of
Lystra may be referred
when Paul had healed the cripple (Acts 14:11). (T. S. Millington.)
Moses and Aaron; or
the use of association
True greatness is modest. It is a false greatness that
magnifies its own powers
and disparages the strength of opposing forces. One
of the penalties of greatness is isolation. It removes the man from common aids
and sympathies
and sets him by himself. Greatness is lonely. This isolation
Moses was beginning to feel
while the task before him grew awful
and swelled
into a frightful magnitude. Solitude
and that isolation which is worse than
solitude--separation from the insight and sympathy of men around us--is
weakening. Moses grew weak and drew back. Thinkers are not always speakers
nor
speakers thinkers. Nay
thought in its very striving after accuracy and
exactness
is apt to be a hindrance of fluency. Moses could think and act
but
he could not speak. He was a greater man than his brother
but his brother was
a better speaker. He could excogitate the ideas
and his brother could put them
into words for him. God is economical in His bestowments
and seldom heaps His
manifold favours on one man. Cromwell
whether a good or a bad man
was
certainly a great man; yet out of his tangled utterances it was hard to come at
his meaning. Here
then
the want was supplied
and with it
as appears in the
subsequent history
a much broader surface of want besides; for God is
¡§able
to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think
¡¨ and is ¡§wont to
give more than either we desire or deserve.¡¨ The abundance of His mercy will
not be kept within the narrow bounds our mean conceptions set to it. Moses
in
the guise of an Egyptian
and as the son of Pharaoh¡¦s daughter
had learned to
recognize and love his brother Aaron under Amram¡¦s roof; they had been nurtured
for uses of which neither of them dreamed. How much of this provision for a
secret future is there in the lives of men. What important effects to the end
of life may flow from the seemingly casual associations and intimacies of
childhood I This companionship at once delivered Moses from his solitude
the
isolation of peculiarity
by raising up for him a co-worker
to stand with him
on the same elevated plane above the mass of the people
and aid him in bearing
cares on which none but one so commissioned might presume to intrude. Here
then
was unity with subordination
and harmony with distribution and
diversity; and thus the apparatus of action for the great enterprise was
complete. See here the good of association. See how it raised Moses out of the
ague of despondency that overtook him when the object of his long desire had at
last come within his grasp; how it warmed his powers into resolute endeavour
and shed a benign influence upon his subsequent labours and sufferings. So
¡§Jonathan
Saul¡¦s son arose
and went to David in the wood
and strengthened
his hand in God.¡¨ So
too
our blessed Lord thought of this principle and acted
upon it
and stamped it with the seal of His infallible wisdom
when He sent
out His disciples two by two
making but six missions
where an earthly wisdom
would have thought it better economy to make twelve. And the great St. Paul had
always with him Barnabas
or Mark
or Luke
or Gaius
or Epaphroditus in his
missionary travels and labours. Let us remember that in the Divine household we
are knit together into one fellowship
and are to learn to be mutually
considerate and helpful
and ¡§bear each other¡¦s burdens
¡¨ as ¡§every one members
one of another.¡¨ God¡¦s work
our work
will be done more easily
pleasantly
effectually. See here
too
the good of subordination. Aaron was always with
Moses
his shadow or second self; but Moses always was head. If both had been
heads the machinery would not have worked so kindly
smoothly
and comfortably.
Nothing does well with two heads. (R. A. Hallam
D. D.)
Gathered together all the elders.
The first interview of Moses and Aaron with the elders of Israel
and the welcome they received
I. They acted upon
the Divine suggestion. All Christian work should be undertaken according to the
Divine suggestion
and in harmony with the Divine will. God generally tells men
how to work as well as what to do. If we were left to mark out our own methods
of toil
we should often involve both ourselves and the enterprise entrusted to
us in great danger.
II. They spake
according to the Divine dictation. Great workers require to be taught by God.
In this consists their safety and success. A man who speaks to the world the
messages of God will always be listened to.
III. They succeeded
according to Divine intimation. Thus Moses and Aaron awakened--
1. Faith.
2. Hope.
3. Devotion--of Israel.
Moses had previously said that Israel would not believe him. We
mistake our missions. We cannot form an estimate of success. If we act and
speak according to the instruction of God we must succeed. (J. S. Exell
M.
A.)
Lessons
1. Declaring of God¡¦s will is suitably united to the assembling of
His people.
2. God¡¦s spokesmen made by Him are fittest to declare his mind to His
people.
3. The words of Jehovah only
which He hath spoken to His servants
must be given to His assembly.
4. God may give His mind more immediately to one servant than to
another (to Moses).
5. God¡¦s stupendous works must be done
as well as His words spoken
to His people.
6. God¡¦s congregation are the first subject to whom His words and
works are sent. (G. Hughes
B. D.)
The gathering of the elders
The gathering of the ¡§elders¡¨ of the children of Israel may point
to no more than a family and tribal organization which was not known or used by
the Egyptians for the purposes of government
but only used among the
Israelites themselves for their religious and ritual teaching. But it would be
contrary to most oriental experience to suppose so. It has been the custom of
most eastern rulers
as of the Turks to-day
to recognize all proper
governmental organizations among a subject people. It was even a large part of
the wisdom of the politic Romans. The general government
indeed
extends its
power to the individual
and is not slow to do so. But it is both convenient to
have an opportunity for the ¡§respondent superior¡¨ principle in law to work
and
politic to have thus a hold upon the more generous feelings of the subject
classes. The heads of the subject
tribe
or people are made responsible for
collection (or at least the payment) of tribute
and for the preservation of a
certain law and order
and are the ready subjects of extortion on very slight
pretences. On the other hand
their brethren of inferior order take pride in
them
and serve them
and through them the general government
with much less
driving. A pretty fair example of this in modern times can be seen in the
Turkish recognition of the various religious bodies within its domains. Perhaps
it is the best of modern illustrations. (Prof. Isaac H. Hall.)
The people believed.
Lessons
1. The people¡¦s faith should closely follow upon God¡¦s word
ministered
and by His works confirmed. A good connection.
2. Where God promiseth success to His ministers in the faith of
others
there they shall believe (Exodus 3:18).
3. All professed believers
receive not God¡¦s word with the same
faith.
4. Hearing is the usual sense of bringing in faith and the fruits of
it.
5. God¡¦s gracious visitation of His Church
and providential sight of
its afflictions
is very good to be heard by them.
6. Such hearing of God¡¦s visiting love and redeeming providence must
affect God¡¦s Israel.
7. Faith working by this sense stirs up souls to suitable returns
unto God.
8. The humblest and sincerest worship in body and spirit is the most
suitable return to God for His redemption. (G. Hughes
B. D.)
Human and Divine attitudes
I. The attitudes
predicated of the people.
1. Their belief.
2. Their reverence.
3. Their devotion.
II. The attitudes
predicated of God.
1. He saw the affliction of Israel.
2. Visited Israel. (J. S. Exell
M. A.)
Faith easy when in the line of desire
People are a great deal more apt to receive a message as from God
when it is in the line of their own longings. The Israelites were quick to
receive from God a promise of relief from Egyptian brick-making
readier to
worship than when they wanted water or meat on the desert and failed to find it
ready at hand for them. And they were very much like the rest of us in all
this. How we should bow our heads and worship if the one inner longing of our
hearts at this moment were granted to us
or even promised of God
all of a
sudden! But how is it while God keeps back from us that which we long for
and
we know that He is prompted to His course by both wisdom and love? Do we bow
our heads and worship
all the same? Well
we bow our heads; but not always to
worship. (H. C. Trumbull.)
Confidence in God
The Roman noblemen could give no greater proof of their confidence
in their city and army
than when they bought the land on which their
Carthaginian enemies were encamped around the city. And we can give no greater
proof of our confidence in God
than by trusting Him in the land which our
enemies
darkness and sickness and trouble
seem to possess
and acting as if
He were their master
and mightier than they all. (W. Baxendale.)
The believing people
I. God always
furnishes sufficient evidence to justify belief. Moses was a stranger to the
people; Aaron doubtless well known. He had a welcome message--deliverance.
Miracles in outward form: miracles typical in character: rod changed to a
serpent and back
Moses changed from a shepherd to a ruler; cleansing of
leprosy
the purifying of the human for Divine use.
II. Hearing
precedes believing. God sent Aaron to speak. Ministers sent to preach.
III. The Israelites
manifest their faith publicly. We must confess Christ in token of faith.
IV. God prepares
the way for the reception of His truth. Aaron called to meet Moses. God¡¦s
Spirit precedes and accompanies the truth we utter.
V. Faith secures
deliverance. By it the Israelites secured theirs. So must we by ours. It is
unto us according to our faith. (Dr. Fowler.)
Bowed heads
1. Some heads are bowed with business cares. During the last four
years many homes have been broken
and others sadly reduced
not so much
through men¡¦s own folly
as from the long and serious depression in trade.
2. Some heads are bowed with sorrow over sinful children. That
never-fading picture of the Prodigal Son
painted by a master hand
is often
too truly representative of our own families. Young men
think of all the pain
and anguish you cause for those dear parents by your lives of sin.
3. Some heads are bowed with bereavement. To many of us there have
come dark days of sorrow and pain. Roses have withered in our domestic gardens;
buds have been nipped before they had time to bloom; lights we loved have gone
out. (Charles Leach.)
¢w¢w¡mThe Biblical Illustrator¡n