| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
Numbers Chapter
Twelve
Numbers 12
Chapter Contents
God rebukes the murmuring of Aaron and Miriam. (1-9)
Miriam struck with leprosy
and healed at the prayer of Moses. (10-16)
Commentary on Numbers 12:1-9
The patience of Moses was tried in his own family
as
well as by the people. The pretence was
that he had married a foreign wife;
but probably their pride was hurt
and their envy stirred up
by his superior
authority. Opposition from our near relations
and from religious friends
is
most painful. But this is to be looked for
and it will be well if in such
circumstances we can preserve the gentleness and meekness of Moses. Moses was
thus fitted to the work he was called to. God not only cleared Moses
but
praised him. Moses had the spirit of prophecy in a way which set him far above
all other prophets; yet he that is least in the kingdom of heaven
is greater
than he; and our Lord Jesus infinitely excels him
Hebrews 3:1. Let Miriam and Aaron consider whom
it was they insulted. We have reason to be afraid of saying or doing any thing
against the servants of God. And those are presumptuous indeed who are not
afraid to speak evil of dignities
2 Peter 2:10. The removal of God's presence is
the surest and saddest token of God's displeasure. Woe to us
if he depart! he
never departs
till by sin and folly we drive him from us.
Commentary on Numbers 12:10-16
The cloud departed
and Miriam became leprous. When God
goes
evil comes: expect no good when God departs. Her foul tongue
as Bishop
Hall says
was justly punished with a foul face. Aaron
as priest
was judge of
the leprosy. He could not pronounce her leprous without trembling
knowing
himself to be equally guilty. But if she was thus punished for speaking against
Moses
what will become of those who sin against Christ? Aaron
who joined his
sister in speaking against Moses
is forced for himself and his sister
to
beseech him
and to speak highly of him whom he had so lately blamed. Those who
trample upon the saints and servants of God
will one day be glad to make court
to them. It is well when rebukes produce confession of sin and repentance. Such
offenders
though corrected and disgraced
shall be pardoned. Moses made it
appear
that he forgave the injury done him. To this pattern of Moses
and that
of our Saviour
who said
"Father
forgive them
" we must conform. A
reason is given for Miriam's being put out of the camp for seven days; because
thus she ought to accept the punishment of her sin. When under the tokens of
God's displeasure for sin
it becomes us to take shame to ourselves. This
hindered the people's progress in their march forward towards Canaan. Many
things oppose us
but nothing so hinders us in the way to heaven
as sin.
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on
Numbers》
Numbers 12
Verse 1
[1] And
Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had
married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.
Miriam —
Miriam seems to be first named
because she was the first mover of the
sedition; wherefore she is more eminently punished.
The Ethiopian —
Either
1. Zipporah
who is here called an Ethiopian
in the Hebrew a Cushite
because she was a Midianite: the word Cush being generally used in scripture
not for Ethiopia properly so called below Egypt
but for Arabia. If she be
meant
probably they did not quarrel with him for marrying her
because that
was done long since
but for being swayed by her and her relations
by whom
they might think he was persuaded to chose seventy rulers
by which
co-partnership in government they thought their authority and reputation
diminished. And because they durst not accuse God
they charge Moses
his
instrument
as the manner of men is. Or
2. some other woman
whom he married
either whilst Zipporah lived
or rather because she was now dead
though that
as many other things
be not recorded. For
as the quarrel seems to be about
his marrying a stranger
it is probable it was a fresh occasion about which
they contended. And it was lawful for him as well as any other to marry an
Ethiopian or Arabian woman
provided she were
a sincere proselyte.
Verse 2
[2] And they said
Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not
spoken also by us? And the LORD heard it.
By us —
Are not we prophets as well as he? so Aaron was made
Exodus 4:15
16
and so Miriam is called
Exodus 15:20. And Moses hath debased and mixed
the holy seed
which we have not done. Why then should he take all power to
himself
and make rulers as he pleaseth
without consulting us.
The Lord heard —
Observed their words and carriage to Moses.
Verse 3
[3] (Now
the man Moses was very meek
above all the men which were upon the face of the
earth.)
Meek —
This is added as the reason why Moses took no notice of their reproach
and why
God did so severely plead his cause. Thus was he fitted for the work he was
called to
which required all the meekness he had. And this is often more tried
by the unkindness of our friends
than by the malice of our enemies. Probably
this commendation was added
as some other clauses were
by some succeeding
prophet. How was Moses so meek
when we often read of his anger? But this only
proves
that the law made nothing perfect.
Verse 4
[4] And
the LORD spake suddenly unto Moses
and unto Aaron
and unto Miriam
Come out
ye three unto the tabernacle of the congregation. And they three came out.
Suddenly — To
stifle the beginnings of the sedition
that this example might not spread
amongst the people.
Come out —
Out of your private dwellings
that you may know my pleasure and your own doom.
Verse 5
[5] And the LORD came down in the pillar of the cloud
and stood in the door
of the tabernacle
and called Aaron and Miriam: and they both came forth.
In the door —
While they stood without
not being admitted into the tabernacle
as Aaron used
to be; a sign of God's displeasure.
Verse 6
[6] And
he said
Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you
I the LORD will
make myself known unto him in a vision
and will speak unto him in a dream.
Among you — if
you be prophets
yet know there is a difference among prophets
nor do I put
equal honour upon all of them.
Verse 7
[7] My
servant Moses is not so
who is faithful in all mine house.
In all my house —
That is
whom I have set over all my house
my church and people
and therefore
over you; and who hath discharged his office faithfully
and not partially as
you falsely accuse him.
Verse 8
[8] With
him will I speak mouth to mouth
even apparently
and not in dark speeches; and
the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid
to speak against my servant Moses?
Mouth to mouth —
That is
distinctly
by an articulate voice; immediately
not by an
interpreter
nor by shadows and representations in his fancy
as it is in
visions and dreams; and familiarly.
Apparently —
Plainly and certainly.
Dark speeches —
Not in parables
similitudes
dark resemblances; as by shewing a boiling pot
an almond tree
etc. to Jeremiah
a chariot with wheels
etc. to Ezekiel.
The similitude —
Not the face or essence of God
which no man can see and live
Exodus 33:20
but some singular manifestation of
his glorious presence
as Exodus 33:11
20. Yea the Son of God appeared to
him in an human shape
which he took up for a time
that he might give him a
foretaste of his future incarnation.
My servant —
Who is so in such an eminent and extraordinary manner.
Verse 9
[9] And
the anger of the LORD was kindled against them; and he departed.
He departed —
From the door of the tabernacle
in token of his great displeasure
not waiting
for their answer. The removal of God~s presence from us
is the saddest token
of his displeasure. And he never departs
till we by our sin and folly drive
him from us.
Verse 10
[10] And
the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and
behold
Miriam became leprous
white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam
and
behold
she was leprous.
From the tabernacle —
Not from the whole tabernacle
but from that part
whither it was come
to that
part which was directly over the mercy-seat
where it constantly abode.
Leprous —
She
and not Aaron
either because she was chief in the transgression or
because God would not have his worship interrupted or dishonoured
which it
must have been if Aaron had been leprous.
White —
This kind of leprosy was the most virulent and incurable of all. It is true
when the leprosy began in a particular part
and thence spread itself over all
the flesh by degrees
and at last made it all white
that was an evidence of
the cure of the leprosy
Leviticus 13:12
13. But it was otherwise when
one was suddenly smitten with this universal whiteness.
Verse 11
[11] And
Aaron said unto Moses
Alas
my lord
I beseech thee
lay not the sin upon us
wherein we have done foolishly
and wherein we have sinned.
Lay not the sin —
Let not the guilt and punishment of this sin rest upon us
upon her in this
kind
upon me in any other kind
but pray to God for the pardon and removal of
it.
Verse 12
[12] Let
her not be as one dead
of whom the flesh is half consumed when he cometh out
of his mother's womb.
As one dead —
Because part of her flesh was putrefied and dead
and not to be restored but by
the mighty power of God. Like a still-born child
that hath been for some time
dead in the womb
which when it comes forth
is putrefied
and part of it
consumed.
Verse 14
[14] And
the LORD said unto Moses
If her father had but spit in her face
should she
not be ashamed seven days? let her be shut out from the camp seven days
and
after that let her be received in again.
Spit in her face —
That is
expressed some eminent token of indignation and contempt
which was
this
Job 30:10.
Ashamed —
And withdraw herself
from her father's presence
as Jonathan did upon a like
occasion
1 Samuel 20:34. So though God healed her
according to Moses's request
yet he would have her publickly bear the shame of
her sin
and be a warning to others to keep them from the same transgression.
Verse 15
[15] And
Miriam was shut out from the camp seven days: and the people journeyed not till
Miriam was brought in again.
Journeyed not —
Which was a testimony of respect to her both from God and from the people
God
so ordering it
partly lest she should be overwhelmed by such a publick rebuke
from God
and partly lest
she being a prophetess
the gift of prophesy should
come into contempt.
Verse 16
[16] And
afterward the people removed from Hazeroth
and pitched in the wilderness of
Paran.
Paran —
That is
in another part of the same wilderness.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on Numbers》
12 Chapter 12
Verse 1-2
Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses.
Miriam and Aaron’s sedition
1. The noblest disinterestedness will not preserve us from the shafts
of envy. The poet has said
in regard to another virtue
“Be thou as chaste as
ice
as pure as
snow
thou shalt not escape calumny”; and no matter how unselfish we are
we
may lay our account with some envenomed attacks which shall plausibly accuse us
of seeking our own things and not the things that are Jesus Christ’s. Nay
the
more conspicuous we are for devotion to the public good
we may be only thereby
more distinctly marked as a target for the world’s scorn. “I am weary of
hearing always of Aristides as the Just
” was the expression of one who plotted
for that patriot’s banishment; and if a man’s character be in itself a protest
against abounding corruption
he will soon be assailed by some one in the very
things in which he is most eminent.
2. This envy of disinterested greatness may show itself in the most
unexpected quarters. If Aaron and Miriam were capable of such envy
we may not
think that we are immaculate. It asks the minister to examine himself and see whether
he has not been guilty of depreciating a brother’s gifts
because he looked
upon him as a rival rather than as a fellow-labourer; it bids the merchant
search through the recesses of his heart
if haply the terms in which he refers
to a neighbour
or the tales he tells of him
be not due to the fact that
either in business or in society
he has been somehow preferred before him; it
beseeches the lady
who is engaged in whispering the most ill-natured gossip
against another in her circle
to inquire and see whether the animus of
her deed be not the avenging of some fancied slight
or the desire to protest
against an honour which has been done to the object of what Thackeray has
called “her due Christian animosity.” Ah! are we not all in danger here? How
well it would be if we repelled all temptations to envy as John silenced those
who tried to set him against Jesus; for
as Bishop Hall has said
“That man
hath true light who can be content to be a candle before the sun of others.”
3. The utter meanness of the weapons which envy is content to employ.
A man’s house is his castle. No personal malice should enter into it with its
attack; and no mean report should be received from the eavesdroppers who have
first misunderstood and then misrepresented. If a man’s public life has been
blamable
then let him be arraigned; but let no Paul Pry interviewer cross his
threshold to get hold of family secrets
or descend into the area to hear some
hirelings’ moralisings. Even the bees
when put into a glass hive
go to work
at the very first to make the glass opaque
for they will not have their
secrets made common property; and surely we busy human beings may sometimes be
allowed to be by ourselves.
4. The assaults of envy are always best met by a silent appeal to
Heaven. Let the victims of unjust assault take comfort
for God will be their
defence. But let the envious ones take heed
for God hears their words
and He
will one day confront them with His judgment. He may do that long before the
day of final assize. He may meet them in His providence
and give them to
understand that they who touch His faithful servants are touching the apple of
His eye; nay
He may bring such trouble upon them that they will be glad to
accept of the intercession of those whom they have maligned. (W. M. Taylor
D. D.)
The sin of Miriam and Aaron: evil speaking
Divine hearing
and
saintly silence
I. The sin of
Miriam and Aaron.
1. Its root: jealousy and vaulting ambition.
2. Its occasion.
3. Its expression.
II. The divine
cognisance of their sin. “And the
Lord heard.” No one utterance of all the myriads of voices in His
universe ever escapes His ear. There is a Divine hearer of every human speech.
This is clear from--
1. His omnipresence (Psalms 139:7-12).
2. His infinite intelligence.
3. His interest in His servants.
III. The commendable
conduct of Moses under the provocation of their sin.
1. He was sorely tried (cf. Psalms 55:12-15)
.
2. He bore his sore trial most nobly.
Conclusion:
1. In the conduct of Miriam and Aaron we have a beacon. Let us shun
their sin
&c.
2. In the conduct of Moses we have a pattern. Let us imitate his
meekness. (W. Jones.)
The modern application of an ancient incident
I. The possession
of the greatest gifts does not exempt men from the liability to meanness and
sin.
II. The most
excellent and eminent servants of god are not exempt from the reproaches of
men.
III. Our greatest
trials sometimes arise from the most unlikely quarters.
IV. The lord takes
cognisance of the reproaches which are cast upon his servants.
V. The servants of
the Lord do well in bearing patiently the reproaches which are cast upon them.
(W. Jones.)
Miriam’s sin
;--
I. Miriam’s sin.
1. Jealousy.
2. Envy.
3. Evil-speaking. Privately sought to undermine the power of Moses
among the people.
4. Folly. Could she have succeeded in destroying the power of Moses
she would have failed in getting them to recognise her as their leader. She did
not see that she shone in the borrowed light of her great brother.
5. Rebellion against God. Moses was the servant of God: to resist him
was to resist the Master.
6. Vain excuses. “Because
” and because . . . Sinners are often
prolific in excuses; called by them reasons.
II. Miriam’s
detection. “And the Lord heard it.” Moses may have heard of it. This seems to
be implied By the allusion to his meekness (Numbers 12:3). If the Lord hear
then no
sin passes undetected. Moses gave himself no concern about it. Could Miriam
meet her brother without shame? The Lord spake suddenly. God pronounced Moses
“faithful.” What must Miriam have thought of her faithfulness?
III. Miriam’s
punishment. She was smitten with leprosy
and under circumstances that much
heightened the effect of the punishment.
1. It was in the presence of the person she had injured.
2. In the presence of her fellow-conspirators.
3. By the great God
against whose authority she had rebelled.
4. Was excluded from the camp publicly.
5. Humbled
by being cleansed in answer to the prayer of him she had
wronged.
Learn--
1. The great sin of evil-speaking. Especially against ministers of
religion
whose influence for good ought to be preserved not only by themselves
but by all about them. The character of public men is their strength. Destroy
their character
their power is gone. By this loss the public itself is
impoverished and injured. Hence such slander is suicidal.
2. God the defender of His servants. The severe punishment--and upon
no other than Miriam--shows the Divine abhorrence of the sin.
3. Moses
leaving the exposure and punishment with God
and
interceding for Miriam
teaches us how to regard attacks upon our character
and act under them
and towards such unhappy offenders. (J. C. Gray.)
Envy and pride meekly met
I. “what sinful
principles will prompt a man to do. Here we see the ties of nature disregarded;
the bonds of professed fellowship burst asunder; God’s interest disregarded.
Pride and envy had entered the heart
and all consequences were unheeded
even
though Moses should be brought into contempt before the whole congregation. Let
us fear lest such principles should ever get possession of our minds; the first
feeling must be mourned over and prayed against.
II. What divine
grace will enable us to bear. If we imbibe the spirit of our Lord and Master we
shall offer prayer for those who use us ill. If the approbation of God be ours
though all the world be against us it will do us no harm. It was said of one of
the martyrs that he was so like Christ that he could not be roused by injuries
to say one word that was revengeful. Oh
if this spirit were universal
what a
happy world would this be! See how the grace of God can enable us to return
good for evil
and thus feel an indescribable peace and happiness in our own
spirit
walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Ghost.
The power of man can never impart this meek and quiet spirit; it can alone come
from the blessed influence of the Holy Spirit. (George Breay
B. A.)
The great evil of ambition
The true cause of this their murmuring was pride and ambition
self-love
ostentation
and vainglory. Hereby we learn that there cometh no
greater plague to the Church of God than by ambition and desire of
pre-eminence. The ambition and pride of Amaziah
the priest of Beth-el
would
not suffer the prophet Amos in the land of Israel
but he commanded him to fly
away into the land of Judah and prophesy there (Amos 7:10; Amos 7:12). We see this apparently
afterward (Numbers 16:1-50.) in Korah
Dathan
and
Abiram. Neither is this evil dead with these; for this is a great plague of the
Church to this day
and very pernicious. Nothing hath more ruined the Church of
God
overthrown piety
corrupted religion
hindered the gospel
discouraged the
pastors and professors of it
nothing hath more erected the kingdom of
anti-Christ than these petty popes
the true successors of Diotrephes
such as
desire to be universal bishops and to reign alone. The mischief hereof
appeareth by sundry reasons.
1. It causeth a great rent and division in the Church
and disturbeth
the peace of it (Numbers 16:1).
2. It setteth up men and putteth down the Lord and His ordinances
urging
compelling
and commanding against the truth (Acts 4:18-19).
3. It proceedeth from very evil roots
and bringeth forth very evil
effects
as an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruits. The causes from whence it
floweth are Satan
pride
disdain of others
self-love
no love of the truth
no zeal of God’s glory
no desire of the good of the Church.
The effects thereof are trouble
disquietness
fear
flattery
envy
and subtilty. Let us come to the uses.
1. It reproveth those who bear themselves as lords over the flock of
Christ.
2. Acknowledge this ambition to be a general corruption
the
remainders whereof are in all the servants of God
yea
in all the children of
Adam; we have drawn it from him
and thereby it hath leavened and corrupted all
mankind. If any man ask what it is
I answer
It is an immoderate desire after
dignity
and of dignity upon dignity; it is a thirst that never can be
quenched; for as the covetous person hath never enough money
so the ambitious
hath never enough honour. It is a secret poison
a hidden plague
the mother of
hypocrisy
the father of envy
the fountain of vices
the moth of piety
a
blind guide and leader of the hearts of men. The farther we think ourselves
from it the nearer commonly it cometh unto us; and therefore let nothing be
done through strife and vainglory
but in lowliness of mind let each esteem
other better than themselves (Philippians 2:3).
3. Lastly
let all learn to beware of this evil. (W. Attersoll.)
Claiming equality
If the Lord did speak by Miriam and Aaron
what then? The Lord
Himself acknowledges that He speaks in different ways to different men. To
some--perhaps to most--He comes in vision and in dream; things are heard as if
they were spoken beyond the great mountain; they are echoes
wanting in shape
and directness
yet capable of interpretations that touch the very centres and
springs of life
that make men wonder
that draw men up from flippancy
and
write upon vacant faces tokens of reverence and proofs that the inner vision is
at the moment entranced by some immeasurable revelation. To other men God speaks
“apparently”--that is
in broad and visible figure. He is quite near; it is as
if friend were accosting friend
as if two interlocutors were mutually visible
and speaking within hand-range of one another. There is nothing superstitious
about this; it is the fact of to-day. Take a book of science--what do you find
in that rational and philosophical bible? You find certain names put uppermost.
Why should not every boy that has caught his first fly
or cut in two his first
worm
say
“Hath not the Lord spoken unto me as well as unto Darwin
or Cuvier
or Buffon?--who are they?” But it does so happen that outside the Bible we have
the Moses of science--the chief man of letters
the prince of song. Take the
history of music
and we find names set by themselves like insulated
stars-great planetary names. What would be thought of a person who has just
learned the notes of music
saying
“Hath not the Lord spoken unto me as well
as unto Beethoven?” He has; but He has not told you so much. There is a
difference in kind; there is a difference in quality. We find this same law
operating in all directions. There are books that say
“Are not we inspired as
well as the Bible?” The answer is
“Certainly you are.” The Lord had spoken to
Miriam and to Aaron as certainly as He had spoken to Moses
but with a
difference; and it is never for Moses to argue with Miriam. Moses takes no part
in this petty controversy. He would have disproved his superior inspiration if
he had stooped to this fray of words. So some books seem to say
“Are not we
also inspired?” The frank and true answer is
“Yes.” Is not many a sentence in
the greatest of dramatists an inspired sentence? The frank
Christian
just
answer is
“Yes.” Is not many a discovery in the natural world quite an
instance of inspiration? Why hesitate to say
“Yes; but always with a
difference”? The Bible takes no part in the controversy about its own
inspiration. The Bible lives--comes into the house when it is wanted
goes
upstairs to the sick-chamber
follows the lonely sufferer into solitude
and
communes with him about the mystery of disappointment
discipline
pain of
heart; goes to the grave-side
and speaks about the old soldier just laid to
rest
the little child just exhaled like a dewdrop by the morning sun. It lives
because no hand can slay it; it stands back
or comes forward
according to the
necessity of the case
because of a dignity that can wait
because of an energy
that is ready to advance. Some books claim to be as inspired as the Bible. Then
they become leprous
and all history has shown that they are put out of the
camp. Many books have arisen to put down the Bible; they have had their day:
they have ceased to be. We must judge by facts and realities. When a man who
has no claim to the dignity asserts that he is upon an equality with the great
musician
the great musician takes no part in the fray; when the competitor has
played his little trick
one touch of the fingers regulated by the hand Divine
will settle the controversy. By this token we stand or fall with our
Christianity
with our great gospel. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Hatred between brothers and sisters
What were Aaron and Miriam to Moses? Even his own brother and
sister. And cannot such agree? Will there be jars and grudgings in such? Would
God it were not too true. Nay
such is our corruption
if the Lord lead us not
with His loving Spirit
that not only we disagree being brothers and sisters
but with a far more bitter and implacable wrath than others that are farther
off. What a venom was in Cain to his brother Abel when nothing but blood would
appease it? What was in Esau’s heart towards his brother Jacob? Oh
what venom
is this that lurketh in our nature if God leaves us to ourselves! May we not
justly marvel at some men
otherwise of great wisdom and judgment
that dare
break out unto the praise of these perturbations as virtues and badges of noble
minds? For what is this but as if a man would praise the diseases of the body
and the nettles and weeds and hurtful plants of the earth. Should not he be accounted
mad that would set his own house on fire? And I pray you what be that will cast
fire into his own heart to set it on a flame? Saint Augustine was wont to say
“Look how vinegar
put into a vessel thereby is made
sour and corrupted”; so is the malicious person by his own anger
made filthy and most distasteful to all good men. And if thus among strangers
oh
what among brothers and sisters! Wherefore what council is given to refrain
all anger
venom
and hatred
let it in particular be applied to bridle all
rage or dislike among such near ones as now we speak of. (Bp. Babington.)
Verse 3
The man Moses was very meek.
The grace of meekness
How beautiful a grace is meekness! It may be somewhat difficult to
define; but whenever we see we cannot fail to know and to feel its gentle and
winning power. It is a grace that implies so very much in the heart. It is the
beautiful result of many other graces; whilst its place in the beatitudes shows
that it is the root on which others grow. Meekness is quite consistent with
power and authority; for Moses had great power and authority in Israel
and
yet
altogether unspoilt by it
he was the meekest of men. But we may look to
another example
far greater than Moses
who said
“All power is given to Me in
heaven arid on earth”; and yet added
“I am meek and lowly in heart.” It is in
such lofty places that meekness is the most beautiful
because it then can
and
does
stoop very low. But though this grace is evidently consistent with any
power and authority
however exalted
it is altogether inconsistent with the
love of power and with the love of authority. Meekness can only grow upon the
ruins of selfishness in all its forms
whether it be selfishness towards
God--that is
unbelief--or whether it be selfishness towards man
either in its
form of pride
love of our own way
love of ease
love of money. But we may
trace another feature in meekness from the example of Moses
and learn that
this grace is not the attribute of a weak character
but the ornament of a firm
and comprehensive spirit. Indeed
we seldom find real meekness in vacillating
characters; for such yield when they ought not to yield
and then
rebuked by
conscience for yielding
they become angry. Meekness will more often be found
in the resolute character when it is sanctified by the Spirit of God
and
obstinacy is purged out. Moses was a beautiful example of extraordinary
strength of character. His one will was stronger than the united wills of all
Israel. And yet amongst them all there was not one to be found so meek as he;
and the reason was
because his will rested on the will of God. It was an
unselfish will
and therefore it was that its uncommon power did not exclude
meekness. We all need this grace in every relationship of life. As parents
for
meekness should be the border and fringe of every act of authority; as
mistresses
for in the carlessness and want of conscientiousness of servants
your spirit may be tried nearly every day; as Christians
for St. Peter exhorts
us (1 Peter 3:15) to “be ready always to
give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you
with meekness and fear”; as teachers
for St. Paul says (2 Timothy 2:24-25). In these days of
collision between system and system
and of sad confusion of views of Divine
truth
we specially seem to need the spirit of meekness. For it is not rude
attacks upon error
but truth spoken in meekness and love that avails and has
most power. Meekness should be the handmaid of zeal. All of us must feel
if we
have only made the experiment
how difficult of attainment is this grace; and
yet there is great encouragement to seek it. It appears in the cluster of
graces described as the “fruit of the Spirit.” It is the last but one
perhaps
to show us the height at which it grows. There is a beautiful promise of
guidance to the meek “The meek will He guide in judgment: and the meek will He
teach His way” (Psalms 25:9); and in Psalms 149:4 is a larger promise
still--“He will beautify the meek with salvation.” And then we cannot forget
the beatitude uttered by the lips of Him whose meekness never failed--“Blessed
are the meek
for they shall inherit the earth!” (G. Wagner.)
Moses the meek
Who records this? The popular answer is
Moses. He is the reputed
author of the Pentateuch. Moses tells us
therefore
that Moses was the meekest
of men. But if so
what becomes of his humility? Some meet the difficulty by
reminding us that the verse is a parenthesis. It is enclosed in brackets.
Perhaps it was added afterwards by another hand. This
of course
is possible.
At the same time it is a desperate mode of dealing with the case. Supposing
that Moses did indite it
what then? It is not necessarily a display of vanity.
There are two kinds of egotism--the false and the true. If a man refers to
himself simply as a historian
and merely because the circumstances of the case
call for it
that is quite a lawful
righteous egotism. If
on the contrary
he
does it out of conceit
he thereby manifests “vain glory
” and merits our
scorn. A consciousness of integrity will sometimes impel its possessor to
assert it
especially when it is misunderstood and persecuted. The uprightness
of Job led him to exclaim
“When I am tried I shall come forth as gold.” “The
man Moses was very meek.” But was he always such? Are we to regard his meekness
as constitutional? There appear to be solid reasons for thinking that Israel’s
distinguished lawgiver was originally impulsive and even passionate! At first
he was anything but slow to anger. And
as we read the narrative of his life
we mark the old disposition ever and anon asserting itself. Just as you
sometimes see
in the midst of green pastures and yellow corn
patches of rock
fern
and heather
reminding you of the pristine state of the ground
so now
and then the hasty spirit of Moses got the better of him. These were lingering
and occasional outbreaks on the part of what the apostle would call “the old
man.” They were exceptional. So faithfully had he watched against his besetting
sin
so prayerfully had he exercised vigorous self-control
that the naturally
irritable man became “very meek above all the men who were on the face of the
earth.” As a certain author admirably writes: “A traveller
giving an account
of an ancient volcano
tells of a verdurous cup-like hollow on the mountain
summit
and
where the fierce heat once had burned
a clear
still pool of
water
looking up like an eye to heaven above. It is an apt parable of Moses.
Naturally and originally volcanic
capable of profound passion and daring
he
is new-made by grace till he stands out in calm grandeur of character with all
the gentleness of Christ adorning him. The case of Moses is representative. It
does not stand alone in grand isolation. That our weakest point may become our
strongest is one of the most obvious and inspiring teachings of the Bible.
Peter Thomas
a physiognomist
closely scanning the face of Socrates
pronounced him to be a bad man. He even went so far as to specify his vices and
faults. “Proud
crabbed
lustful
” were the charges brought against him. The
Athenians laughed this to scorn. Everybody knew its falsity. The distinguished
sage was the exact opposite of the description. To their amazement
however
Socrates hushed them
and declared that no calumny had been uttered. “What he
has said
” be remarked
“accurately describes my nature
but by philosophy I
have controlled anti conquered it.” Let us be of good cheer. Philosophy is
good
but we have something better--“the grace of God which bringeth
salvation.” Let us but make it our own
and we shall joyfully experience its
victories. (T. R. Stevenson.)
Meekness
What is meekness? It is not the repudiation of self-defence.
Everything that is made has a right to exist
or God would not have matte it;
and
if any other creature trespasses on this its birth-charter
it is
justified in defending itself. Neither is meekness a mental incapacity to
discern insults and injuries. A man who cannot do that is not meek but stupid.
Nor is meekness a natural mildness which is incapable of being provoked. There
are people of such a temper--or
rather
non-temper. It is no credit to them.
We may call such people soft; but it would be a misnomer to call them meek. In
fact
unless they can be stirred up
they are incapable of meekness; for the
more natural fierceness a man has the more capable he is of meekness
and he
upon whom anybody that comes along may make his scratch is anything but a meek
person. Neither are they meek who are restrained from exhibiting resentment by
fear or self-interest. They are cowards. All these are negative qualities. And
it is impossible that meekness should belong to this tribe; for it must be
immensely positive and tremendously energetic since it is to subjugate the
earth and inherit it. The first element in meekness is docility--a willingness
to learn
a readiness to go through the drudgery and labour connected with
learning
a disposition to suppress the impatience which prevents us from
learning. The second element is self-restraint
both toward God and toward man.
The tendency of trouble is to irritate
to render the soul peevish
angry
morose
rebellious. But the meek soul has learned in the school of Christ. It
accepts the truth that “all things work together for good to them that love
God”; and
therefore
disciplines itself to patience under trial. Meekness
educates man up to a Godlike standard. It stores up strength in the soul--a
strength that shall prove available in the emergencies of life. The meek men
are the men of might. They have broad shoulders and strong backs
or they could
not carry this load of other men’s ignorance
infirmity
and sin; and it is
meekness that squares their shoulders
toughens their tendons
and develops
their muscles. The meek men are
if the exigency arises
the most terrible of
the earth. There are bounds to the exercise of meekness. Paul indicates this
when he says: “What will ye? Shall I come unto you with a rod
or in love?”
When the meek man does take the rod
he lays it on until the work is thoroughly
done. (H. M. Scudder
D. D.)
Verses 5-10
The Lord came down.
God’s vindication of Moses
There are several circumstances of the Lord’s proceedings laid
down in the text.
1. As
first
His speed. By and by the Lord called them; so showing
us how fitting a thing
yea
how pleasing to Him
convenient expedition is in
justice
and how displeasing
needless
and sinister delays. It showeth also
what a tender feeling God hath of the wrongs of His children
not only of some
but by name of magistrates’ and governors’ wrongs
when they are spoken against
without cause. Surely He so feeleth it
that even by and by He will undertake
the righting of them
and cannot hold from punishing such offenders as so
lightly regard His holy ordinance. We think that unless we keep ado in our own
causes it is not well (and I condemn not all care this way)
but certainly none
have been sooner and better righted than such as patiently have endured a time
and committed things to the justice of God.
2. He calleth the two offenders by themselves
leaving Moses to hear
and see for his comfort the Lord’s care for him. And this also is a great point
of justice
to call persons that have done amiss
not carrying matters in
secret and condemning without hearing.
3. He speaketh to them and biddeth them hear His words as He had
heard theirs. Which likewise showeth that true justice chargeth men
and doth
not hoard up in heart what cutteth off love and liking; giving good words
outwardly
and yet inwardly thinking most evil things. Oh
let us hear your
words if you have conceived any offence
and then will either confession or
true purgation give satisfaction? The contrary course may have policy in it
but who shall justify it for piety
charity
or any virtue?
4. In His words He setteth down the difference of prophets
showing
that all have not alike measure vouchsafed of Him
and therefore may not argue
I am a prophet as well as he; ergo
as good as he. Such kind of
reasonings have in all times disquieted the Church and peace of the godly. The
differences which God layeth down you see in the text. To some by vision; to some
by dream; to some in darker words
to some in plainer; but to Moses mouth to
mouth; that is in a more excellent measure of grace
and familiar favour than
ever to any. Therefore
although the Lord had also spoken by them; yet
forasmuch as it was not in that degree as to Moses
they should not have
compared themselves with him
but yielded him a reverence above themselves.
Yea
how were ye not afraid
saith the Lord
to speak against My servant Moses
even against Moses? So showing that imparity of grace and gifts from the Lord
should work ever an imparity of honour and regard by all that will walk
rightly
though in some other respect there may be a parity. (Bp. Babington.)
Verses 10-16
Miriam became leprous.
The punishment of Miriam and Aaron
I. The divine
judgment because of the sin of Miriam and Aaron.
1. The punishment was inflicted by the Lord.
2. The punishment was appropriate to the sin.
3. The punishment fell most severely upon Miriam.
Had he been smitten with leprosy he would have been disgraced in
the eyes of the people
and his holy office would probably have been brought
into disesteem amongst them.
As priest he had to examine Miriam and pronounce her leprous.
Again he had to examine her and pronounce her clean before she was readmitted
to the camp. That he deeply realised his painful position is evident from the
narrative (Numbers 12:10-12). Let us remember that
there is judgment with God.
II. The divine
judgment leading to personal humiliation.
1. Humble acknowledgment to Moses.
2. Confession of sin.
3. Entreaty for the removal of the judgment from Miriam.
III. The remarkable acknowledgment
of the eminence of Moses the servant of the lord.
1. In the manner in which he was addressed by Aaron.
2. In the appeal which was made to him by Aaron. This appeal implies
on the part of Aaron--
IV. The
distinguished magnanimity and grace of Moses. “And Moses cried unto the Lord
saying
Heal her now
O God
I beseech Thee.” There was no resentment in his
heart
but fullest forgiveness and sincerest pity. His prayer for Miriam is an
anticipation of the precept of our Lord
“Pray for them which
despitefully use you
and persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).
V. The great power
of the intercession of good men.
VI. The justice and
mercy of god as manifested in his treatment of Miriam.
VII. The sin of one
person checking the progress of an entire nation. (W. Jones.)
Miriam smitten with leprosy: transfiguration through transgression
I. This
transfiguration was brought to pass on account of the jealousy of Miriam of
Moses
and the jealousy of god for Moses.
II. The
transformation was in keeping with the expressed jealousy of God and of Miriam
(W. Jones.)
The punishment of wrong doers
I. That both God
and man express their displeasure towards wrong doers on this earth.
1. God
in many ways.
2. Man
also
in many ways.
II. That the
wrong-doers are generally far more affected by the expression of man’s
displeasure than with that of God’s.
1. Most irrational.
2. Most impious.
3. Most perilous. (Homilist.)
The leprosy of Miriam
1. We should humbly submit to the will of Heaven.
2. We should remember that in the distribution of gifts
what is best
for one may be destruction for another.
3. To covet the gift of a neighbour is a wrong to him and an offence
to God.
4. Each man’s duty is to develop the gift that is in him. (Homiletic
Monthly.)
Miriam and Moses
Was this weakness
as some would say? Nay
verily
it was the
exhibition of colossal spiritual strength. It is the weak man who gives blow
for blow
who blurts out his wrath
who cannot control the passion of his
spirit. It may be well to give some closing rules as to the attainment of this
meek and quiet spirit
which in sight of God is of great price.
1. Let us claim the meekness of Christ. This
of course
was not
possible for Moses in the direct way in which it is for us. And yet there was
no doubt in his case also a constant appeal for heavenly grace. And in moments
of provocation there is nothing better than to turn to Him and claim His calm
His sweet silence
His patience and meekness
saying
“I claim all these
my
Lord
for the bitter need of my spirit.”
2. It is acquired
next
by cultivating the habit of silence. Express
a thought
and you give it strength; repress it
and it will wither and die.
You will often hear it said that the best way of getting rid of an importunate
passion is to let it out and have done with it. It is
however
a very mistaken
policy. Silence will kill it as ice kills fish when there are no ventholes by
which they can come up to breathe. Learn to be still
to keep the door of the
lips closed.
3. Next
by considering the harm done by the aggressors to
themselves. The cloud removed from over the tent
as if it must leave the very
spot where the culprits stood; and behold
Miriam was leprous
white as snow.
There is a profound piece of instruction here; you cannot say unkind or bitter
things about another without hurting yourself more than you hurt him. Like the
boomerang of the savage
curses come back to the spot from which they start.
4. In allowing God to vindicate our cause. Moses let God vindicate
him
and the Almighty God rode upon a cherub and did fly
and flew on the wings
of the wind. This is the secret of rest
to cultivate the habit of handing all
over to God
as Hezekiah did
when he spread out Sennacherib’s letter in the
house of the Lord. Commit yourself to Him that judgeth righteously.
5. Also in intercessory prayer. Moses cried unto the Lord
saying
“Heal her
O God
I beseech Thee.” When we pray for those who have despitefully
used and persecuted us
it is marvellous how soon the soul gets calm and
tender. And the Lord heard His servant’s prayer
and healed Miriam; but the
whole host was delayed a week through her sin. We may be forgiven
but these
outbreaks of sin always entail disaster and delay. Neither we nor others can be
where we might have been had they not occurred. (F. B. Meyer
B. A.)
Miriam’s punishment humiliating
The punishment was as humiliating as it was public. Her
tongue
so free upon her brother’s conduct
is mute enough now
except to cry
if any approached her
“Unclean! Unclean!” She who aspired to be Queen of
Israel is cast forth as an unclean thing from the camp. When the dreadful
punishment was finished
she came back to the camp humbled
and no doubt
strengthened in her soul by the correction she had received. (S. Robinson
D. D.)
Shame for the envious
The lesson here has a very close application to all who engage as
the Lord’s instruments and agents in the work of building up Christ’s kingdom.
When those so engaged forget the nature of their calling
and fall into
contentions and bickerings about their relative position as agents for Jehovah
the result must in the end be shame and humiliation for the envious and
jealous
and damage to the cause of Christ
about which He will surely make
inquisition. How much of the strifes and bickering between Christians of the
same Church
and between different sects comes not from earnestly contending
for the faith
but from the narrow jealousies and envyings wholly personal with
those who indulge them! How often is it simply the Miriams and Aarons giving
way to their petty jealousy under cover of scruples of conscience! (S.
Robinson
D. D.)
Such as have the chief hand in sin
are principally subject to
punishment
Aaron was accessory to this mutiny against Moses
but Miriam was
chief in the sin
and therefore is also chief in the punishment. Simeon and
Levi were not the only murderers of the Sichemites and invaders of the city
but they were the chief ringleaders
and therefore are only named (Genesis 34:25)
and punished (Genesis 49:5). Whosoever practiseth any
evil
whether he be principal or accessory
is guilty in the sight of God
and
therefore such as are ministers of other men’s evils are oftentimes punished
whether they be reasonable or unreasonable creatures (Genesis 3:14; Leviticus 20:15; Exodus 21:28-29; Exodus 21:32; Joshua 6:17; Isaiah 30:22). As God is just
so He
punisheth the instruments of injustice. Notwithstanding
though the instruments
do offend and not escape
the chief punishment is ever reserved for the chief
offender.
1. For such as are chief in government ought to stay their inferiors
from evil
as the head governeth the members. Eli is charged with the
wickedness of his sons (1 Samuel 3:13). Such governors make
themselves the tail and not the head
whereas they should order those of their
house as the soul ruleth the body.
2. God will require the blood of those that perish at the hands of
the governors; the magistrate is the watchman of the commonwealth; the minister
is the watchman of the Church; the householder is the watchman of the family;
all set as it were in their watch-tower
and all must give an account for such
as are under them.
3. The sin of those that have the chiefest hand in it is greater than
of others
so it deserveth the greater punishment; forasmuch as the sin and
punishment shall be suitable one to the other.
Uses:
1. It belongeth to all
especially to such as are superiors
to
consider this; they think themselves absolute
and that they ought of right to
command what they list to their inferiors. But as they are superior in place
so they shall also be superior in punishment
if they command anything against
God and His Word.
2. It is the duty of all householders to be careful to order their
families aright
and to compel them to serve the Lord.
3. Lastly
there cometh a great blessing upon their heads that are the
chief in any good work
that encourage others in the ways of godliness
for
they shall have a principal reward. Happy and blessed therefore are they that
govern their charges as becometh them (Genesis 18:18). This is a notable
commendation of Abraham
he was chief
and one that went before the rest in
good things
and therefore he should chiefly be rewarded. This should stir us
up
not only to do good
but to be chief in doing good
to go before others
to
lead them the way
that so we may have the greater and better reward in that
great day
(W. Attersoll.)
Miriam’s degradation
A striking spectacle was once Witnessed in the Four Courts
of St. Louis. A young man was under arrest for some crime. Before being
committed to prison
he was taken to the photographer’s rooms
and his picture
taken to be sent to the various cities keeping “rogues’ galleries
” to be hung
up on the walls with the faces of other criminals kept there. The description
of the feeling manifested by the young man on this occasion is both touching
and suggestive. “Big tears formed in his eyes and fell down on his cheeks. He
dropped his head on his breast and cried. He was so overcome with emotion that
he could not speak until he was again placed in his cell in the gaol. After
swallowing great lumps in his throat
he said he now felt he had dropped from
the role of a gentleman to that of the lowest criminal; and the thought
of his picture being placed in the rogues’ gallery was more than he could
bear.” How dreadful to be classed with the workers of iniquity
and to become
the spectacle before man and angels of one who rejected light and truth
and
basely sinned against a great and gracious God. (S. S. Chronicle.)
Heal her now
O God
I
beseech Thee.
The prayer of Moses for Miriam
I. The prayer.
1. Explicit. Nothing vague.
2. Earnest.
3. Generous.
4. Well-timed.
II. The answer.
1. Most gracious.
2. Most wise.
3. Most speedy. (R. A. Griffin.)
Moses’ generosity
Miriam would have wounded Moses with her tongue; Moses
would heal her with his: “O Lord
heal her now.” The wrong is the greater
because his sister did it. He doth not say
I sought not her shame
she sought
mine; if God have revenged it
I have no reason to look on her as a sister
who
looked on me as an adversary; but
as if her leprosy were his
he cries out for
her cure. Oh
admirable meekness of Moses! His people
the Jews rebelled
against him; God proffers revenge; he would rather die than they should perish.
His sister rebelled against him; God worlds his revenge; he will not give God
peace till she be re-cured. Behold a worthy and noble pattern for us to follow! (Bp.
Hall.)
──《The Biblical Illustrator》