查經資料大全

 

| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index |

 

Judges Chapter Nineteen                            

 

Judges 19

Chapter Contents

The wickedness of the men of Gibeah.

The three remaining chapters of this book contain a very sad history of the wickedness of the men of Gibeah in Benjamin. The righteous Lord permits sinners to execute just vengeance on one another and if the scene here described is horrible what will the discoveries of the day of judgment be! Let each of us consider how to escape from the wrath to come how to mortify the sins of our own hearts to resist Satan's temptations and to avoid the pollutions there are in the world.

── Matthew HenryConcise Commentary on Judges

 

Judges 19

Verse 1

[1] And it came to pass in those days when there was no king in Israel that there was a certain Levite sojourning on the side of mount Ephraim who took to him a concubine out of Bethlehemjudah.

A. concubine — Heb. a wife a concubine that is such a concubine as was also his wife: called a concubine only because she was not endowed. Perhaps he had nothing to endow her with being himself only a sojourner.

Verse 2

[2] And his concubine played the whore against him and went away from him unto her father's house to Bethlehemjudah and was there four whole months.

Against him — That is against her faith given to him.

Went away — Either for fear of punishment; or because her heart was alienated from him; wherein not only she sinned but her father by connivance at her sin and neglect of just endeavours for her reconciliation to her husband.

Verse 3

[3] And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses: and she brought him into her father's house: and when the father of the damsel saw him he rejoiced to meet him.

Friendly — To offer her pardon and reconciliation.

Verse 12

[12] And his master said unto him We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel; we will pass over to Gibeah.

A stranger — That is of a strange nation: which the Canaanites possess; for though the city Jerusalem had been taken by Caleb chap. 1:8 yet the strong fort of Zion was still in their hands whence it is likely they did much molest and afterwards by God's permission drive out the Israelites who dwelt there.

Verse 15

[15] And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah: and when he went in he sat him down in a street of the city: for there was no man that took them into his house to lodging.

To lodge — Though they were soft and effeminate in other respects yet they were hard-hearted to strangers and at that time there were no public-houses in that country.

Verse 16

[16] And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim; and he sojourned in Gibeah: but the men of the place were Benjamites.

Ephraim — Whence also the Levite was which enclined him to shew the more kindness to his country-man.

Benjamites — This was indeed one of the cities belonging to the priests; but the cities which were given to the priests and whereof they were owners were not inhabited by the priests or Levites only especially at this time when they were but few in number but by many other persons of different professions.

Verse 18

[18] And he said unto him We are passing from Bethlehemjudah toward the side of mount Ephraim; from thence am I: and I went to Bethlehemjudah but I am now going to the house of the LORD; and there is no man that receiveth me to house.

House of the Lord — Which was in Shiloh. Thither he went either because he lived there for that was in the tribe of Ephraim; or rather because he would there offer prayers and praises and sacrifices to God for his mercy in reconciling him and his wife.

Verse 20

[20] And the old man said Peace be with thee; howsoever let all thy wants lie upon me; only lodge not in the street.

Let all … — It matters not whether thou wantest nothing or everything I will take care to supply all thy wants.

Verse 21

[21] So he brought him into his house and gave provender unto the asses: and they washed their feet and did eat and drink.

Washed — As they used to do to travellers in those hot countries.

Verse 22

[22] Now as they were making their hearts merry behold the men of the city certain sons of Belial beset the house round about and beat at the door and spake to the master of the house the old man saying Bring forth the man that came into thine house that we may know him.

Merry — That is refreshing themselves with the provisions set before them.

Sons of belial — Children of the devil wicked and licentious men.

Verse 23

[23] And the man the master of the house went out unto them and said unto them Nay my brethren nay I pray you do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house do not this folly.

Into my house — And therefore I am obliged to protect him by the laws of hospitality.

Verse 26

[26] Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the door of the man's house where her lord was till it was light.

Fell down — Namely dead; killed partly with grief of heart and partly with excessive abuse. Thus the sin she formerly chose verse 2 is now her destruction; and though her husband pardoned her God would punish her at least as to this life.

Verse 29

[29] And when he was come into his house he took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel.

Sent — By several messengers with a relation of the fact.

Verse 30

[30] And it was so that all that saw it said There was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day: consider of it take advice and speak your minds.

Speak — Let us meet together and seriously consider and every one freely speak what is to be done in this case.

── John WesleyExplanatory Notes on Judges

 

19 Chapter 19

 

Verses 1-30

Judges 19:1-30

Whither goest thou?
and whence comest thou?

The past and the future

These two questions were usually proposed of old to the traveller by the inhabitants of any district through which he might be passing; nor were they unnatural in a state of society wherein the infrequency of journeying must have rendered the appearance of a stranger a matter of curiosity and where owing to the want of houses of public entertainment hospitality was an important and necessary duty. What are we all in truth but wayfaring men--journeying towards a city of habitation? We are like this Levite sojourners passing through the streets--guests that tarry but a night and who require only a temporary shelter. Whence come we? and whither are we going?

1. The former of these questions if generally considered might be answered by remembering that we have no reason to vaunt of our origin since that is but of yesterday and of the earth. “Why is dust and ashes proud?“ If a recollection of our lowly origin might thus subdue the imperious and liberalise the selfish a sense of our sinful extraction ought in no less measure to abase the self-dependent. “Whence come we?” Some among us have come from the suffering of affliction. Have we been purified in that furnace? Has the storm pelting on the wayfaring man accelerated his homeward pace? Others have come from experiencing remarkable instances of the Divine mercy. They have come from some of the smooth plots of greensward the isles of palm-trees in the waste. How have they profited by the blessing? Have they thanklessly attributed their success to good fortune or boldly to their own arm instead of acknowledging the hand of the Father of lights? Have they tithed the bounty to poverty and distress?

2. It has been said (though the remark is a quaint conceit) that the heathen deity Janus from whom the first month in our year derives its name was described in the ancient mythology as having two faces the one looking on the past and the other on the future. But there hardly needs so fanciful an allusion as this to advance our contemplations from the irrevocable past to the solemn future. On that future let us next direct our forethought turning our attention from our origin to our destination “Whither goest thou?” We are travelling in a circle. We are hastening back to the earth from whence we proceeded. Dust we are and unto dust we shall return.

3. Place now these two questions together; view the line of life from its commencement to its termination; consider the past with reference to the future and the future as a continuation of the past. If there be any who have arrived at the present season from a year or a life which they can review only with shame and sorrow--who to the question “Whence comest thou? “ can only reply like Satan to Jehovah “We come from going to and fro in the earth and from wandering up and down in it”--let them think of the end of those hitherto squandered days to which they are ever speeding and know not how near they are come that they may if possible redeem the time that is past and improve that which is passing. (J. Grant M. A.)

Let all thy wants be upon me.

Helping others

1. This old man’s practice commends to us a double duty: the one that we should be ready to remove grief from our brethren and to quiet their troubled minds as we may. For grief and heaviness do much hinder the mind from doing any duty; especially they being deeply seated in the heart and turbulent passions of themselves and therefore the easing it of them is a setting of it at liberty.

2. The second duty we learn is more particularly the duty of hospitality; which as far as need required he did unto this Levite. The like kindness is to be showed by us to strangers sad in heart being known to be brethren that they be used of us kindly and in all courtesy but in no wise to grieve them being already heavy-hearted. (R. Rogers.)

Consider of it take advice and speak your minds.--

Deliberation

I. There are some actions so shocking that all men do upon the first hearing of them without taking time to consider without asking the opinion of others unanimously agree to condemn them. Now amongst those truths which do thus gain our assent upon the first view I think we may justly reckon those judgments which we form concerning the essential differences of moral good and evil. For our sight is not more quick in discerning the variety of figures and colours nor more taken with the beauty of some or displeased with the deformity of others; the nicest ear hath not a more distinct perception of the harmony or discord of sounds; nor doth the most delicate palate more accurately distinguish tastes than our intellectual faculties do apprehend the plain distinction between right and wrong honest and dishonest good and evil and find an agreeableness and satisfaction in the one a disagreeableness and dissatisfaction in the other. And it is for very wise and good reasons that God hath so formed our faculties that concerning such actions as are extraordinary in either kind such as are extremely good or extremely wicked all men should be able to judge thus readily and thus truly. For in human life it often happens that an occasion is given us of doing some great good or a temptation laid before us to commit some great evil when there is no leisure allowed us of entering into a long deliberation in which cases it is necessary that we should act according to our present light; and therefore by Providence wisely ordered that we should enjoy such open daylight that there should be no danger of our stumbling. By this method God hath made the same wholesome provision for the security of our souls as He hath done for preserving the health of our bodies. To such meats as might prove noxious to us and being once taken down digested and mingled with the mass of our blood might quickly destroy our lives we have often so strong an antipathy that we refrain from them merely on account of this natural aversion without considering the mischievous consequences that might arise from our indulging ourselves in them; and in the like manner those sins which carry with them the greatest malignity and which are most perilous to the souls of men do create in our minds an utter abhorrence.

II. Although such actions do at the first view appear very odious yet in order to confirm or rectify our first judgments it is proper to consider them farther and to take in the advice of others When a thing appears crooked to the eye upon the first view we cannot but pay so much deference to the testimony of our senses as to presume it such; but because this appearance may sometimes proceed from a defect in the organ and not from any real crookedness in the object for our better satisfaction we measure it by a rule and then pronounce with more certainty concerning it. And the same method we ought to observe in judging of moral actions; if they at the first sight appear notoriously wicked we cannot but entertain a violent suspicion of their being such; but because this appearance may arise from some corruption of our judgment when there is no obliquity in the actions themselves the best way to prevent all possibility of error will be to examine them by the only infallible test the law of God. But this sentence will carry still more weight if we do not depend too much upon our own judgments but call in the advice of others. Men are so apt to differ in their opinions and take so great a delight in contradicting each other that those truths must carry with them a more than ordinary degree of evidence in which all or most men do agree. He who considers what a wide difference there is in the ways of men’s thinking and judging from the difference of their complexions tempers education character profession age religion and other innumerable specialities by which they are distinguished one from another and disposed to form very different judgments concerning the same persons or things will not be surprised to find that several men do seldom concur in the verdict which they pass upon those actions that fall within their observation. Some speculative truths there are in which the interests of men being not at all concerned all may unanimously agree; some rules of life there may be though these much fewer than the other which most men may join in the approbation of; some virtues and vices which considered abstractedly and without regard to persons they may agree to praise or to condemn but when they come to judge of actions not as they are in idea and theory but as they are in reality and fact nor as they are in books but as they are performed by such and such men here several things will offer themselves to influence and bias their judgments. When therefore notwithstanding there are so many and strong obstacles to hinder men from concurring in their opinions any actions are condemned by a general consent this unanimity of judgment is though not a demonstrative proof yet a very strong presumption that such actions are notoriously wicked and in reality such as they do universally appear.

III. When any actions do both at the first view and also upon farther inquiry appear very flagitious we should then without any reserve openly and freely speak our minds concerning them. A mark of infamy hath by the universal consent of all civilised nations been set upon some actions tending either to the great disparagement of human nature or to the great disturbance of civil societies that a sense of shame and fear of disgrace might be powerful curbs to restrain men from doing such vile things as would be sure to stain their reputations and to fix an indelible blot of ignominy upon their memories. The greatest mischief that can possibly be done to the souls of men is to discourage them from doing their duty by speaking evil of what God hath commanded and to encourage them in the commission of sin by speaking well of what God hath condemned and therefore a woe is justly denounced by the prophet Isaiah against those who call good evil and evil good. But the interests of virtue and piety are also very much endamaged by those who though they do not go so far as to call evil good do yet by a criminal silence forbear to call it evil; and therefore those priests are accused by God of violating His laws and profaning His holy things who put no difference between the holy and profane neither show the difference between the clean and the unclean. (Bp. Smalridge.).

──The Biblical Illustrator