| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
1 Kings Chapter
Eleven
1 Kings 11
Chapter Contents
Solomon's wives and concubines
His idolatry. (1-8) God's
anger. (9-13) Solomon's adversaries. (14-25) Jeroboam's promotion. (26-40) The
death of Solomon. (41-43)
Commentary on 1 Kings 11:1-8
(Read 1 Kings 11:1-8)
There is not a more melancholy and astonishing instance
of human depravity in the sacred Scriptures
than that here recorded. Solomon
became a public worshipper of abominable idols! Probably he by degrees gave way
to pride and luxury
and thus lost his relish for true wisdom. Nothing forms in
itself a security against the deceitfulness and depravity of the human heart.
Nor will old age cure the heart of any evil propensity. If our sinful passions
are not crucified and mortified by the grace of God
they never will die of
themselves
but will last even when opportunities to gratify them are taken
away. Let him that thinks he stands
take heed lest he fall. We see how weak we
are of ourselves
without the grace of God; let us therefore live in constant
dependence on that grace. Let us watch and be sober: ours is a dangerous
warfare
and in an enemy's country
while our worst foes are the traitors in
our own hearts.
Commentary on 1 Kings 11:9-13
(Read 1 Kings 11:9-13)
The Lord told Solomon
it is likely by a prophet
what he
must expect for his apostacy. Though we have reason to hope that he repented
and found mercy
yet the Holy Ghost did not expressly record it
but left it
doubtful
as a warning to others not to sin. The guilt may be taken away
but
not the reproach; that will remain. Thus it must remain uncertain to us till
the day of judgment
whether or not Solomon was left to suffer the everlasting
displeasure of an offended God.
Commentary on 1 Kings 11:14-25
(Read 1 Kings 11:14-25)
While Solomon kept close to God and to his duty
there
was no enemy to give him uneasiness; but here we have an account of two. If
against us
he can make us fear even the least
and the very grasshopper shall
be a burden. Though they were moved by principles of ambition or revenge
God
used them to correct Solomon.
Commentary on 1 Kings 11:26-40
(Read 1 Kings 11:26-40)
In telling the reason why God rent the kingdom from the
house of Solomon
Ahijah warned Jeroboam to take heed of sinning away his
preferment. Yet the house of David must be supported; out of it the Messiah
would arise. Solomon sought to kill his successor. Had not he taught others
that whatever devices are in men's hearts
the counsel of the Lord shall stand?
Yet he himself thinks to defeat that counsel. Jeroboam withdrew into Egypt
and
was content to live in exile and obscurity for awhile
being sure of a kingdom
at last. Shall not we be content
who have a better kingdom in reserve?
Commentary on 1 Kings 11:41-43
(Read 1 Kings 11:41-43)
Solomon's reign was as long as his father's
but his life
was not so. Sin shortened his days. If the world
with all its advantages
could satisfy the soul
and afford real joy
Solomon would have found it so.
But he was disappointed in all
and to warn us
has left this record of all
earthly enjoyments
"Vanity and vexation of spirit." The New
Testament declares that one greater than Solomon is come to reign over us
and
to possess the throne of his father David. May we not see something of Christ's
excellency faintly represented to us in this figure?
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on 1 Kings》
1 Kings 11
Verse 3
[3] And
he had seven hundred wives
princesses
and three hundred concubines: and his
wives turned away his heart.
Seven hundred wives
… — God had particularly forbidden the kings to multiply either horses or
wives
Deuteronomy 17:16
17
we saw chap. 1 Kings 10:29
how he broke the former law
multiplying horses: and here we see
how he broke the latter
multiplying
wives. David set the example. One ill act of a good man may do more mischief
than twenty of a wicked man. Besides
they were strange women
of the nations
which God had expressly forbidden them to marry with. And to compleat the
mischief
he clave unto these in love; was extravagantly fond of them
Solomon
had much knowledge. But to what purpose
when he knew not how to govern his
appetites?
Verse 4
[4] For it came to pass
when Solomon was old
that his wives turned away his
heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God
as
was the heart of David his father.
Was old — As
having now reigned nigh thirty years. When it might have been expected that
experience would have made him wiser: then God permitted him to fall so
shamefully
that he might be to all succeeding generations an example of the
folly
and weakness of the wisest and the best men
when left to themselves.
Turned his heart —
Not that they changed his mind about the true God
and idols
which is not
credible; but they obtained from him a publick indulgence for their worship
and possibly persuaded him to join with them in the outward act of
idol-worship; or
at least
in their feasts upon their sacrifices
which was a
participation of their idolatry.
Verse 5
[5] For
Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians
and after Milcom the
abomination of the Ammonites.
Milcom —
Called also Moloch.
Verse 6
[6] And
Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD
and went not fully after the LORD
as did David his father.
Did evil —
That is
did not worship God wholly
but joined idols with him.
Verse 7
[7] Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh
the abomination of Moab
in the hill that is before Jerusalem
and for Molech
the abomination of the
children of Ammon.
An high place —
That is
an altar upon the high place
as the manner of the Heathens was.
The hill — In
the mount of olives
which was nigh unto Jerusalem
2 Samuel 15:30
and from this act was called the
mount of corruption
2 Kings 23:13. As it were
to confront the
temple.
Verse 8
[8] And
likewise did he for all his strange wives
which burnt incense and sacrificed
unto their gods.
And sacrificed
… —
See what need those have to stand upon their guard
who have been eminent for
religion. The devil will set upon them most violently: and if they miscarry
the reproach is the greater. It is the evening that commends the day. Let us
therefore fear
lest having run well
we come short.
Verse 12
[12]
Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it for David thy father's sake: but I
will rend it out of the hand of thy son.
Fathers sake —
For my promise made to him
2 Samuel 7:12-15.
Verse 13
[13]
Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy
son for David my servant's sake
and for Jerusalem's sake which I have chosen.
One tribe —
Benjamin was not entirely his
but part of it adhered to Jeroboam
as Bethel
1 Kings 12:29
and Hephron
2 Chronicles 13:19
both which were towns of
Benjamin.
Verse 15
[15] For
it came to pass
when David was in Edom
and Joab the captain of the host was
gone up to bury the slain
after he had smitten every male in Edom;
In Edom — By
his army
to war against it.
To bury —
The Israelites who were slain in the battle
2 Samuel 8:13
14
whom he honourably interred in
some certain place
to which he is said to go up for that end. And this gave
Hadad the opportunity of making his escape
whilst Joab and his men were
employed in that solemnity.
Had smitten —
Or
and he smote
as it is in the Hebrew: which is here noted as the cause of
Hadad's flight; he understood what Joab had done in part
and intended farther
to do
even to kill all the males and therefore fled for his life.
Verse 18
[18] And
they arose out of Midian
and came to Paran: and they took men with them out of
Paran
and they came to Egypt
unto Pharaoh king of Egypt; which gave him an
house
and appointed him victuals
and gave him land.
Midian — He
fled at first with an intent to go into Egypt
but took Midian
a neighbouring
country
in his way
and staid there a while
possibly 'till he had by some of
his servants tried Pharaoh's mind
and prepared the way for his reception.
Paran —
Another country in the road from Edom to Egypt
where he hired men to attend
him
that making his entrance there something like a prince
he might find more
favour from that king and people.
Land — To
support himself and his followers out of the profits of it.
Verse 19
[19] And
Hadad found great favour in the sight of Pharaoh
so that he gave him to wife
the sister of his own wife
the sister of Tahpenes the queen.
Found favour —
God so disposing his heart
that Hadad might be a scourge to Solomon for his
impieties.
Verse 21
[21] And
when Hadad heard in Egypt that David slept with his fathers
and that Joab the
captain of the host was dead
Hadad said to Pharaoh
Let me depart
that I may
go to mine own country.
Joab —
Whom he feared as much as David himself.
Own country —
Whither accordingly he came; and was there
even from the beginning of
Solomon's reign. And it is probable
by the near relation which was between his
wife and Solomon's; and
by Pharaoh's intercession
he obtained his kingdom
with condition of subjection and tribute to be paid by him to Solomon; which
condition he kept 'till Solomon fell from God
and then began to be
troublesome
and dangerous to his house and kingdom.
Verse 23
[23] And
God stirred him up another adversary
Rezon the son of Eliadah
which fled from
his lord Hadadezer king of Zobah:
Who fled —
When David had defeated him.
Zobah — A
part of Syria
between Damascus and Euphrates.
Verse 24
[24] And
he gathered men unto him
and became captain over a band
when David slew them
of Zobah: and they went to Damascus
and dwelt therein
and reigned in
Damascus.
A band — Of
soldiers
who fled upon that defeat
2 Samuel 10:18
and others who readily joined
them
and lived by robbery; as many Arabians did.
Damascus —
And took it
whilst Solomon was wallowing in luxury.
Verse 25
[25] And
he was an adversary to Israel all the days of Solomon
beside the mischief that
Hadad did: and he abhorred Israel
and reigned over Syria.
All adversity — He
was a secret enemy
all that time; and when Solomon had forsaken God
he shewed
himself openly.
Beside —
This infelicity was added to the former; whilst Hadad molested him in the
south
Rezon threatened him in the north. But what hurt could Hadad or Rezon
have done
to so powerful a king as Solomon
if he had not by sin made himself
mean and weak? If God be on our side
we need not fear the greatest adversary.
But if he be against us
he can make us fear the least: yea
the grasshopper
shall be a burden.
Syria —
Over all that part of Syria
enlarging his empire the more
and thereby laying
a foundation for much misery to Solomon's kingdom.
Verse 28
[28] And
the man Jeroboam was a mighty man of valour: and Solomon seeing the young man
that he was industrious
he made him ruler over all the charge of the house of
Joseph.
Charge —
The taxes and tributes.
Verse 29
[29] And
it came to pass at that time when Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem
that the
prophet Ahijah the Shilonite found him in the way; and he had clad himself with
a new garment; and they two were alone in the field:
Went —
Probably to execute his charge.
Were alone —
Having gone aside for private conference; for otherwise it is most likely that
he had servants attending him
who
though they hear not the words
yet might
see the action
and the rending of Jeroboam's coat; and thus it came to
Solomon's ears
who being so wise
could easily understand the thing by what he
heard of the action
especially when a prophet did it.
Verse 39
[39] And
I will for this afflict the seed of David
but not for ever.
For this —
For this cause
which I mentioned verse 33.
Not for ever —
There shall a time come when the seed of David shall not be molested by the
kingdom of Israel
but that kingdom shall be destroyed
and the kings of the
house of David shall be uppermost
as it was in the days of Asa
Hezekiah and
Judah. And at last the Messiah shall come
who shall unite together the broken
sticks of Judah and Joseph
and rule over all the Jews and Gentiles too.
Verse 40
[40]
Solomon sought therefore to kill Jeroboam. And Jeroboam arose
and fled into
Egypt
unto Shishak king of Egypt
and was in Egypt until the death of Solomon.
Solomon — To
whose ears this had come.
Shishak —
Solomon's brother-in-law
who yet might be jealous of him
or alienated from
him
because he had taken so many other wives to his sister
might cast a
greedy eye upon the great riches which Solomon had amassed together
and upon
which
presently after Solomon's death
he laid violent hands
2 Chronicles 12:9.
Verse 41
[41] And
the rest of the acts of Solomon
and all that he did
and his wisdom
are they
not written in the book of the acts of Solomon?
The book — In
the publick records
where the lives and actions of kings were registered from
time to time
so this was only a political
not a sacred book.
Verse 42
[42] And
the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years.
Forty years —
His reign was as long as his father's
but not his life; sin shortened his
days.
Verse 43
[43] And
Solomon slept with his fathers
and was buried in the city of David his father:
and Rehoboam his son reigned in his stead.
Slept —
This expression is promiscuously used concerning good and bad; and signifies
only
that they died as their fathers did. But did he repent before he died?
This seems to be put out of dispute by the book of Ecclesiastes; written after
his fall; as is evident
not only from the unanimous testimony of the Hebrew writers
but also
from the whole strain of that book
which was written long after he
had finished all his works
and after he had liberally drunk of all sorts of
sensual pleasures
and sadly experienced the bitter effects of his love of
women
Ecclesiastes 7:17
etc. which makes it more than
probable
that as David writ Psalms 51:1-19. So Solomon wrote this book as a
publick testimony and profession of his repentance.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on 1 Kings》
11 Chapter 11
Verses 1-13
But King Solomon loved many strange women.
Solomon’s sin
A few years ago two paintings were exhibited in this country
which attracted wide attention. One of them represented Rome in the height of
her splendour
and the other in the depths of her decay. The contrast was
melancholy and instructive. One could not repress the question as he turned
from one scene to the other
What led to this mighty change? It was the old
story
which every great nation thus far in history has illustrated sooner or
later
that of a secret
slow-moving moral decay
preceding and occasioning
social upheaval and ruin. We might fancy that a similar picture might be drawn
between two periods in the history of Israel--one
that of the latter part of
Solomon’s reign
when there was an unsurpassed wealth and glory and power in
the holy city; and the other
only a few years later
when the kingdom was rent
and the sceptre had departed.
I. Solomon’s sin.
This was no ordinary transgression of an ordinary evil-doer. It was not the
general unworthiness of his life--an unworthiness that pertains to every child
of Adam. It was a distinct thing. It had an historical character--Solomon’s
sin. We now ask briefly in what did it consist?
1. It was not
primarily
sensuality. That was only the outworking of
an inner and far deeper evil. The simple and honest historian tells us that he
loved many strange women
thus breaking an explicit command to the chosen
people. Now the ultimate evil against which Moses was led to legislate in this
particular was not polygamy nor licentiousness
but the idolatry which the
foreigner would inevitably introduce. Among these women he found an
intellectual stimulus and gratification. They were more brilliant than Jewish
maidens
and their culture was a distinct and attractive element in the royal pursuit of
“wisdom.” For in that great experiment of life Solomon commanded the most
costly and varied forms of pleasure and of learning. All the world--all there
was in man--was made tributary to the object held up in view.
2. Nor was it pure and simple idolatry. That also was a symptom of
inner disorder and weakness. It was like polygamy
a form only of
heart-wandering from God. He built high places for his wives
which burned
incense and offered sacrifices to their gods. There is not the slightest
evidence that he ever abandoned the worship of Jehovah
or set up images of him
as Jeroboam did
or that he ever lost faith in Jehovah as the one and only true
God. But his heart was not perfect; and this was the sin beneath his sensuality
and idolatry. He began to waver by tolerating the false religions of his wives.
He was liberalised in religion. If people were only sincere
he may have said
no matter what they worship. If they live up to their light
it is well enough
without letting in more light. Who knows absolute truth? Who can say
“Thus
saith the Lord”? Who
thought this king
sets himself up to say that there is
only one narrow way of life? The religious world of to-day finds its most
subtle and powerful temptation in the general revolt against restraint and
constraint. It takes now one form and now another. It comes as a protest
against what is called narrowness
even in construing the terms of the gospel
upon which men enter into life. The world has always seen the insolence of
greatness against the law of God. It sees now the same insolence under cover of
the grace of God. But whatever we may discover in science or art
whatever gains
we may make in the domain of reason
there can be nothing essentially new in
the way of life by Jesus Christ. The data of theology are all furnished
and
have been for ages. The path of life is just as narrow and just as broad as
ever. God demands the whole heart
because anything less is nothing at all to Him. Half even of
Solomon’s great soul is worthless in the kingdom of heaven.
II. Solomon’s
punishment. We observe at once that it was of a character to be peculiarly felt
by one of his great endowments and brilliant opportunities. It came very slowly
In the first place
although we do not find it here recorded
he lived long enough
to see that his splendid experiment in life had been a miserable failure.
Vanity of vanities
all is vanity
was his sad verdict. His “world” passed away
and the lust of it. He ceased to desire. Punishment came in another form. He
was unable to transmit the kingdom to his posterity; and such men have an eye
to the future
in which their greatness will come to be fully seen and
honoured. They are above the narrowest lines of an ignorant selfishness. They
would make coming ages tributary to themselves. To Solomon
who had been made
acquainted with the mind of God towards Israel
there must have been a profound
sorrow in the certainty that his failure carried the nation down with himself.
Those in authority hold a peculiar place in the divine economy
because their
defections entail such widespread disasters. Hence God rightly exacts
extraordinary punishments of them. (Monday Club Sermons.)
Solomon’s sin
Solomon had come to the throne of the most important kingdom then
on the earth at the youthful age of twenty. Proud of his sublime eminence and
flattered by the obsequious attentions of foreign nations
he formed
matrimonial alliances with the royal families of them all until a harem of
seven hundred wives disgraced the Holy City. These heathen wives required their
heathen chapels and chaplains
and the complaisant king surrounded Jerusalem
with temples for the enactment of pagan idolatries. To the king
prematurely
old
at length comes the prophetic voice declaring the wrath of Jehovah upon
the apostate kingdom
the doom
however
softened in two particulars for the
sake of David
who
though long dead
still benefited the land by the effects
of his piety. The rending of the kingdom from the Solomonian line should not
take place till Solomon himself had passed away
and then a remnant (Judah)
should remain with the regular succession.
I. A life of
luxury is perilous to the soul. God intended man to labour even when he was in
Paradise. The idler is practically opposing a fundamental law of the Most High.
An abundance of wealth tempts a man to a life of pleasure
which is selfish
idleness
and when official power is added to the wealth the flood-gates of sin
are opened in the soul in almost all cases. He who
if busy in an honest trade
or profession
would readily throw off the approaches of gross sin by his
preoccupation. Solomon was a luxurious idler. He was not a statesman busying
himself for the good of his country. The young man who has independent
resources is in a very hazardous position. He is tempted to play the Solomon on
his own small scale. The sin
however
is just as great
and the ruin as
profound. He seeks associates who will amuse him
and
instead of growing in
spiritual wisdom and strength
he descends rapidly to the plane of stupid
carnality.
II. The way of
wickedness is a steep descent. Solomon found the step from Pharaoh’s daughter
to Pharaoh’s god a very easy one. Youth flatters itself with an idea of its own
strength
and plans a descent into sin only a short distance
when it will
return and walk in the path of righteousness. It is the silly bird caught in
the fowler’s net. Association with evil blunts the perception of the evil
and
the young man is soon found apologising for the wickedness he formerly
condemned.
III. The wrath of
God is a dread reality. Men of loose life love to harp on the truth that God is
love
and then interpret love as amiable weakness. It was the Divine anger with
Solomon and his corrupted people which rent Israel asunder and raised up
formidable foes to destroy the prosperity of the land. Our text is perfectly
plain on that head
IV. The source of
the false life is in the false heart. Solomon’s heart was not perfect with the
Lord God. The word “perfect” here is not to be understood as referring to the
character
but to the motive and intent. A perfect character never existed on
earth since man fell
except the Lord Jesus. Solomon s religion was a political
and fashionable affair. A heart devoted to God had nothing to do with it. He
would pay outward respect to the religion of the land
but with the grand
liberality of a worldly heart he would be so broad in his views and so free in
his charity as to welcome all religious into his realm and capital. It is
simply the heart that is not perfect with God pursuing its course of nature. It
is the heart that can indulge in sin to any extent
and yet speak eloquently on
universal love and the excellent glory of humanity in general. The so-called
philosophy of the day is brimful of it
destroying the idea of the personality
of God in order that it may make room for a universal righteousness
sin being
eliminated as an old wife’s fable. It is the religion that is lauded on the
stage by depraved men and women
because it finds no fault with their
defilement. This is the Solomonian religion
which is set over against the
Davidic religion in our text. (H. Crosby
D. D.)
Solomon’s fall
I. The nature of
Solomon’s fall.
1. It was gradual. No man becomes wholly abandoned or altogether
depraved at once; formation of character is
both in its construction and
destruction
a gradual process.
2. It was sure. From bad to worse
like a stone rolling down a hill.
II. The causes of
Solomon’s fall.
1. The mixing of self-interest with God’s service. He chose wives
from nations with whom God had forbidden His people to intermarry; hence
contagion from such a bad example.
2. The union of piety and superstition.
III. The
consequences of Solomon’s fall.
1. It brought down God s displeasure.
2. It brought ruin on his kingdom. Even the sins of obscure men pass
in their effects beyond the power of their perpetrators (as no man liveth
no man dieth
so no man sinneth to himself) but how much more the sins of the great ones of
the earth!
IV. The lessons of
Solomon’s fall.
1. Great opportunities bring great responsibilities
and such cannot
be neglected with impunity.
2. Riches hinder access into the kingdom of God. Wealth applied to
selfish ends carries no blessing
but hardens the heart and causes it to lose
its hold upon God. (C. E. E. Appleyard
B. A.)
Verses 1-43
Verses 1-13
But King Solomon loved many strange women.
Solomon’s sin
A few years ago two paintings were exhibited in this country
which attracted wide attention. One of them represented Rome in the height of
her splendour
and the other in the depths of her decay. The contrast was
melancholy and instructive. One could not repress the question as he turned
from one scene to the other
What led to this mighty change? It was the old
story
which every great nation thus far in history has illustrated sooner or
later
that of a secret
slow-moving moral decay
preceding and occasioning
social upheaval and ruin. We might fancy that a similar picture might be drawn
between two periods in the history of Israel--one
that of the latter part of
Solomon’s reign
when there was an unsurpassed wealth and glory and power in
the holy city; and the other
only a few years later
when the kingdom was rent
and the sceptre had departed.
I. Solomon’s sin.
This was no ordinary transgression of an ordinary evil-doer. It was not the
general unworthiness of his life--an unworthiness that pertains to every child
of Adam. It was a distinct thing. It had an historical character--Solomon’s
sin. We now ask briefly in what did it consist?
1. It was not
primarily
sensuality. That was only the outworking of
an inner and far deeper evil. The simple and honest historian tells us that he
loved many strange women
thus breaking an explicit command to the chosen
people. Now the ultimate evil against which Moses was led to legislate in this
particular was not polygamy nor licentiousness
but the idolatry which the
foreigner would inevitably introduce. Among these women he found an
intellectual stimulus and gratification. They were more brilliant than Jewish
maidens
and their culture was a distinct and attractive element in the royal pursuit of
“wisdom.” For in that great experiment of life Solomon commanded the most
costly and varied forms of pleasure and of learning. All the world--all there
was in man--was made tributary to the object held up in view.
2. Nor was it pure and simple idolatry. That also was a symptom of
inner disorder and weakness. It was like polygamy
a form only of
heart-wandering from God. He built high places for his wives
which burned
incense and offered sacrifices to their gods. There is not the slightest
evidence that he ever abandoned the worship of Jehovah
or set up images of him
as Jeroboam did
or that he ever lost faith in Jehovah as the one and only true
God. But his heart was not perfect; and this was the sin beneath his sensuality
and idolatry. He began to waver by tolerating the false religions of his wives.
He was liberalised in religion. If people were only sincere
he may have said
no matter what they worship. If they live up to their light
it is well enough
without letting in more light. Who knows absolute truth? Who can say
“Thus
saith the Lord”? Who
thought this king
sets himself up to say that there is only
one narrow way of life? The religious world of to-day finds its most subtle and
powerful temptation in the general revolt against restraint and constraint. It
takes now one form and now another. It comes as a protest against what is
called narrowness
even in construing the terms of the gospel upon which men
enter into life. The world has always seen the insolence of greatness against
the law of God. It sees now the same insolence under cover of the grace of God.
But whatever we may discover
in science or art
whatever gains we may make in the domain of reason
there
can be nothing essentially new in the way of life by Jesus Christ. The data of
theology are all furnished
and have been for ages. The path of life is just as
narrow and just as broad as ever. God demands the whole heart
because anything
less is nothing
at all to Him. Half even of Solomon’s great soul is worthless in the kingdom of
heaven.
II. Solomon’s
punishment. We observe at once that it was of a character to be peculiarly felt
by one of his great endowments and brilliant opportunities. It came very slowly
In the first place
although we do not find it here recorded
he lived long
enough to see that his splendid experiment in life had been a miserable
failure. Vanity of vanities
all is vanity
was his sad verdict. His “world”
passed away and the lust of it. He ceased to desire. Punishment came in another
form. He was unable to transmit the kingdom to his posterity; and such men have
an eye to the future
in which their greatness will come to be fully seen and
honoured. They are above the narrowest lines of an ignorant selfishness. They
would make coming ages tributary to themselves. To Solomon
who had been made
acquainted with the mind of God towards Israel
there must have been a profound
sorrow in the certainty that his failure carried the nation down with himself.
Those in authority hold a peculiar place in the divine economy
because their
defections entail such widespread disasters. Hence God rightly exacts
extraordinary punishments of them. (Monday Club Sermons.)
Solomon’s sin
Solomon had come to the throne of the most important kingdom then
on the earth at the youthful age of twenty. Proud of his sublime eminence and
flattered by the obsequious attentions of foreign nations
he formed
matrimonial alliances with the royal families of them all until a harem of
seven hundred wives disgraced the Holy City. These heathen wives required their
heathen chapels and chaplains
and the complaisant king surrounded Jerusalem
with temples for the enactment of pagan idolatries. To the king
prematurely
old
at length comes the prophetic voice declaring the wrath of Jehovah upon
the apostate kingdom
the doom
however
softened in two particulars for the
sake of David
who
though long dead
still benefited the land by the effects
of his piety. The rending of the kingdom from the Solomonian line should not
take place till Solomon himself had passed away
and then a remnant (Judah)
should remain with the regular succession.
I. A life of
luxury is perilous to the soul. God intended man to labour even when he was in
Paradise. The idler is practically opposing a fundamental law of the Most High.
An abundance of wealth tempts a man to a life of pleasure
which is selfish
idleness
and when official power is added to the wealth the flood-gates of sin
are opened in the soul in almost all cases. He who
if busy in an honest trade
or profession
would readily throw off the approaches of gross sin by his
preoccupation. Solomon was a luxurious idler. He was not a statesman busying
himself for the good of his country. The young man who has independent
resources is in a very hazardous position. He is tempted to play the Solomon on
his own small scale. The sin
however
is just as great
and the ruin as
profound. He seeks associates who will amuse him
and
instead of growing in
spiritual wisdom and strength
he descends rapidly to the plane of stupid
carnality.
II. The way of
wickedness is a steep descent. Solomon found the step from Pharaoh’s daughter
to Pharaoh’s god a very easy one. Youth flatters itself with an idea of its own
strength
and plans a descent into sin only a short distance
when it will
return and walk in the path of righteousness. It is the silly bird caught in
the fowler’s net. Association with evil blunts the perception of the evil
and
the young man is soon found apologising for the wickedness he formerly
condemned.
III. The wrath of
God is a dread reality. Men of loose life love to harp on the truth that God is
love
and then interpret love as amiable weakness. It was the Divine anger with
Solomon and his corrupted people which rent Israel asunder and raised up
formidable foes to destroy the prosperity of the land. Our text is perfectly
plain on that head
IV. The source of
the false life is in the false heart. Solomon’s heart was not perfect with the
Lord God. The word “perfect” here is not to be understood as referring to the
character
but to the motive and intent. A perfect character never existed on
earth since man fell
except the Lord Jesus. Solomon s religion was a political
and fashionable affair. A heart devoted to God had nothing to do with it. He
would pay outward respect to the religion of the land
but with the grand
liberality of a worldly heart he would be so broad in his views and so free in
his charity as to welcome all religious into his realm and capital. It is
simply the heart that is not perfect with God pursuing its course of nature. It
is the heart that can indulge in sin to any extent
and yet speak eloquently on
universal love and the excellent glory of humanity in general. The so-called
philosophy of the day is brimful of it
destroying the idea of the personality
of God in order that it may make room for a universal righteousness
sin being
eliminated as an old wife’s fable. It is the religion that is lauded on the
stage by depraved men and women
because it finds no fault with their
defilement. This is the Solomonian religion
which is set over against the
Davidic religion in our text. (H. Crosby
D. D.)
Solomon’s fall
I. The nature of
Solomon’s fall.
1. It was gradual. No man becomes wholly abandoned or altogether
depraved at once; formation of character is
both in its construction and
destruction
a gradual process.
2. It was sure. From bad to worse
like a stone rolling down a hill.
II. The causes of
Solomon’s fall.
1. The mixing of self-interest with God’s service. He chose wives
from nations with whom God had forbidden His people to intermarry; hence
contagion from such a bad example.
2. The union of piety and superstition.
III. The
consequences of Solomon’s fall.
1. It brought down God s displeasure.
2. It brought ruin on his kingdom. Even the sins of obscure men pass
in their effects beyond the power of their perpetrators (as no man liveth
no man dieth
so no man sinneth to himself) but how much more the sins of the great ones of
the earth!
IV. The lessons of
Solomon’s fall.
1. Great opportunities bring great responsibilities
and such cannot
be neglected with impunity.
2. Riches hinder access into the kingdom of God. Wealth applied to
selfish ends carries no blessing
but hardens the heart and causes it to lose
its hold upon God. (C. E. E. Appleyard
B. A.)
Verse 4
When Solomon was old.
An aged sinner
Colporteur Pantel of Marseilles once offered a Bible to an old man
who angrily replied
“Wine is my god.” “Indeed
” said Pantel
“then let me tell
you that you have not imitated your god.” “What do you mean?” “Well
wine
becomes better as it grows old
while you
as you have grown old
have become
more wicked!” The man was taken aback by this reply. “Look here
” he said
“I’ll buy a Bible. It is least I can do after such an answer.” (British and
Foreign Bible Society’s Report
1902.)
Deterioration with years
A picture of a man who has grown in the wrong direction!
Backwards--downwards! A bright morning ending in a stormy night. What are these
snowy leaves which strew the ground? Perished buds and blossoms of holy
character. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Age reveals character
Age seems to take away the power of acting a character
even from
those who have done so the most successfully during the main part of their
lives. The real man will appear
at first fitfully
and then predominantly.
Time spares the chiselled beauty of stone and marble
but makes sad havoc in
plaster and stucco.
Verse 6
Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord.
Solomon the brilliant failure
The character of Solomon is unique--one of the loftiest and
saddest of the sacred volume. Grand in its stately strength and towering
height--sad in its demoralisation and fall. A morning fair and bright as ever
dawned on mortal vision--high noon golden and glowing
flashing its glories far
and wide--an evening clouded and mournful
with wailing winds and muttering
thunders. Is it not the type of many another life? What were the causes that
produced this mournful decline
and overhung with darkest clouds the closing
years of a life beginning with such high promise? We approach this question
with the more eager interest
because the principles upon which character is
built
and the influences effecting its demoralisation
are generically the
same in all ages. Men are rotting inwardly to-day
and the pillars of their
characters crumbling to decay
from the very same influences that wrought the
ruin of Solomon. Moreover
this fact of the decline and fall of character
once
lofty and apparently strong
is but the commonest occurrence in modern society.
We do well to study its insidious causes.
1. First
then
the superior endowments of Solomon became a snare to
him
as they are liable to prove to every gifted nature. Great talents involve
great liabilities. Every being is subject to inexorable laws
which cannot be
violated with impunity; God secures no man from the legitimate penalties of
their violation. One of these laws
is that which requires the improvement of talent as a necessary condition of
increasing or even retaining it. When God gave Solomon that priceless largess
of wisdom He did not exempt him from this law
nor take the work of preserving
his character and insuring his ultimate well-being into his own hands. It is a
fatal delusion that there is a mysterious gift of God
called Grace
which
allows a man to sleep on the lap of some fair Delilah
without being shorn of
the locks of his strength--a magic power that holds a man to the right against
his own deliberate choice.
2. Another cause wrought with insidious influence to effect his
overthrow. Solomon was the dupe of that prince of deceptive devils
misnamed
Policy. It was from motives of policy
doubtless
that he entered into alliance
with Egypt’s king; it was from motives of policy that he married the daughter
of that king
and took to his bosom his first heathen wife. Did ever man or
woman marry from policy--political
financial
or social interest--that in the
end did not find it the most miserable policy that ever mortal pursued
yielding its bitter fruits of sorrow and sin? There is but one bond that can
ever bind two human hearts together in union strong and holy enough for the
marriage relation; and that golden bond is Love--true
pure
uncalculating
heaven-born love.
3. In estimating the causes of Solomon’s decline
we must also
remember the danger that attends great worldly prosperity. Human nature is too
weak to bear
unharmed
great elevation. Dazzled and blinded by the splendour
of rank and honour and power and wealth
man reels and falls from the giddy
height.
4. But finally Solomon fell
a willing victim to the seductive charms
of pleasure and carnal indulgence. One sentence of the Inspired Volume reveals
to us this fatal cause: “Solomon loved many strange women: . . . his wives
turned away his heart after other gods; and his heart was not perfect with the
Lord his God.” Of all the insidious
corrupting
dangerous influences that ever
wrought the ruin of man
the influence of a bad woman is the most fatal and
irremediable. How powerless are reason and learning to preserve character in
the light of such a history as this! How weak is human nature in its best and
strongest estate! Who can trust his own heart when such as Solomon fall? Can
you
young man? Are you stronger
safer than he
leaning on that broken staff?
Let us learn to beware of the beginnings of sin. Not suddenly did this mighty
prince fall. Young man
take care that no worm secretly gnaws at the staff of
support on which you lean. What of Solomon’s final state? Saved or lost? The
good God only knows. In the series of frescoes on the walls of the Campo Santo
at Pisa
he is represented
in the resurrection
as looking doubtfully to the
right and to the left
not knowing on which side his lot will be east. If he
wrote the Book of Ecclesiastes
as it is probable he did
he saw at least the
folly of his sins. Let us listen to the deep-toned voice of warning that comes
to us from his inspired wisdom--sadly illustrated by his uninspired life--“Fear
God
and keep His commandments.” (C. H. Payne
D. D.)
Solomon’s fall
I. Neither age nor
experience brings any release to a man from his exposure to sin. “For it came
to pass
when Solomon was old
that his wives turned away his heart after other
gods.” There is no fool worse than an old fool. Wise man it was who said
“Count no one safe or happy till he dies.”
II. It is possible
for even a devout man to become a practical idolater in his secret heart. “For
Solomon went after Ashtoreth
the goddess of the Zidonians.” We are solemnly
warned against idols in our hearts
three times in one chapter
by a prophet.
Idolatry is still a possible sin to dread.
III. Progress by
steps of persistent advance into deeper sin may always be expected when one has
taken quick start away from the right and towards wrong. “Then did Solomon build a
high place for Chemosh
the abomination of Moab
” etc. There is nothing more to
be feared than the unperceived inroad of what might be termed a little sin. The
old parable relates that the trees of the forest once held a solemn parliament
wherein they consulted concerning the innumerable wrongs which the axe
first
and last
had done unto them and their neighbours. They insisted that this
dangerous implement of steel had no power of its own; and they therefore
instantly passed an enactment that no tree should hereafter be allowed to
furnish any blade with a helve on pain of being itself cut down to the root. So
the axe journeyed through the forests
begging but a bit of wood from the oak
from the ash
from the cedar
from the elm
from even the willow and the
poplar; but a stern denial met it at each turn; not one would lend it so much
as a splinter from its branches. At last
it desired just this small
indulgence: give it but a chip--a mere handle with which it could trim away useless
boughs
or cut off briers and bushes
for such suckers
as was well known
only
used up the juices of the ground; they always hindered the growth of any
thrifty tree and obscured its fairness and beauty. The forest win
impressed
with such moderation in the argument; it agreed that the axe in this instance
might be supplied with one fragment which a storm had riven from an unfortunate
sapling--a mere little stick
lying there
which no one prized and no one
dreaded. But the instant that keen edge of steel was fitted with any sort of a
handle
it struck off the branch
of a sturdy oak at a stroke
then hewed itself a new helve at its will; and
down went the elms
over toppled the cedars
and the hills grew bare as never
before. The time for all defence was passed when the forest surrendered.
IV. The guilt of
all transgression is in the sight of a holy god aggravated by past warnings
given. “And the Lord was angry with Solomon
because his heart was turned from
the Lord God of Israel
” etc.
V. Retribution gathers
up the entire history of the sinner
even if it is discharged in one act.
“Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon
Forasmuch as this is done of thee
and
thou has not kept My covenant and My statutes which I have commanded thee
I
will surely rend the kingdom from thee
and will give it to thy servant.”
Henceforward it would do no good for this rejected monarch to awake himself to
paternal zeal
and try to build up the fortunes of his shattered realm for his
children. It is often worth while to attempt to avert a great catastrophe; but
one of the punishments sometimes inflicted for sin is the denial to the sinners
of all success in after usefulness.
VI. It may be
possible to misunderstand and even pervert God’s forbearance into excuse for
further sin. “Notwithstanding
in thy days I will not do it for David thy
father’s sake: but I will
rend it out of the hand of thy sore Howbeit
I will not rend away all the
kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy son
for David My servant’s sake
and
for Jerusalem’s sake which I have chosen.” On the shore of eternal history
stands this beacon-light for human warning. The wisest man in the world lived
to behave like a fool! ( C. S. Robinson
D. D.)
Solomon’s
life; its spiritual significance
I. The
co-existence of good and evil in the same human soul. So long as we are in this
world
this is more or less the case with the best of us; evil is not perhaps
entirely subdued
until this “mortal puts on immortality.” In heaven evil is
not found in alliance with good in any heart
nor in hell is good found in
alliance with evil. Their co-existence is only in the human heart
whilst here.
This fact should always be recognised by us in estimating the characters of our
fellow-men. A man is not to be pronounced utterly bad because he has committed
a wrong
nor completely good because he has performed some virtuous deeds. “Who
can understand his errors? Cleanse Thou us from secret faults.”
II. The energy of
the degenerating tendency in human nature. There seems to be in all men a
something
call it original sin
depravity
or what you like
which urges to
the wrong; a law in the members warring against the laws of the Spirit. You see
this force in the case of Solomon. It was in him stronger than three things.
1. It was stronger than the influence of parental piety.
2. The degenerating force within him proved stronger even than his
own religious convictions.
3. It proved stronger
moreover
than his own clearest conceptions of
duty.
III. The utter
insufficiency of all earthly good to satisfy the mind. “I said in my heart
go
to now
I will prove thee with mirth
therefore enjoy pleasure: and behold this
also is vanity.”
IV. The superiority
of true thoughts to all the other productions of man. Solomon was an active
man
and accomplished many material works while here; but what were they all
compared with his thoughts contained in the Book of Proverbs?
1. What are they as to their utility?
2. What are they as to their duration? Where now is his throne of
“ivory and gold”? etc. (Homilist.)
Verse 7-8
Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh.
Solomon and toleration
1. Proverbs
it has been said
are “the wisdom of many and the wit of
one
” at least they are most often trustworthy exponents of a uniform
experience. And there is a proverb which tells us that no one ever became
thoroughly bad all at once. And so it was with Solomon; as the stream of his
career sweeps by us in Holy Scripture
windows
as it were
are opened for us
through which we gaze out on that sunny flood
so full of promise
carrying on
its bosom such rich opportunities and varied treasures
and we note that as it
gets wider it loses its pure beauty
as it gets deeper it parts with its
simplicity. Here and there these glimpses into his life prepare us for a
catastrophe. It requires a vast store of wisdom to keep a man unspoiled amidst
popular applause. The power of wealth with all its opportunities may very
easily sweep away the calmer dictates of a higher reason. Solomon is the
liberal patron of error. He is not an idolater; it would not be fair to call
him that. But as he would tell us
“he is no bigot
” that the Zidonians and
Moabites were sincere in what they believed and practised. That his first duty
was to the empire
and to consolidate the acquisitions which he had made. After
all
there is an element of truth underlying all religions--“All worships are
true.” Take care
Solomon! The next step is only too easily taken
. which goes
on to proclaim
“All worships are false.” I suppose there is no chapter in
Church history which we look back upon with such unfeigned horror and
humiliation as that which deals with religious persecution. We never shall
forget the fires of Smithfield
or look with anything but disapproval at the
stern and repressive violence of the Puritan Rebellion. At the same time it
must be remembered that there is one thing which
if less repulsive
may be
equally deadly in God’s sight. Toleration
which springs from a real respect
for our neighbour’s convictions
is one thing; indifference
which does not
feel strongly enough to oppose
is another. At the present moment we are oddly
enough confronted with these two developments combining in their efforts to
weaken religion.
2. But Solomon does not stop at undenominationalism. No one does. It
is an impossible position. He settles down a step further into
aestheticism--the worship of the beautiful
the luxurious
the fascinating. A
protest against Ritualism is
no
doubt
an excellent thing in which every intelligent Churchman
should join
if we mean by the term a religion which consists of mere rites and
ceremonies
void of real
significance
subversive of the sterner realities of religious truth. There is
always a tendency
in view of the extreme difficulty of religion
to put up
with something easy
in which the heart and the intellect
and the better part
of man
need of necessity have no share. Some people think they can saunter
into heaven on a ceremony; or be wafted there on the wings of music; or be
carried there on a text of the Bible; or be admitted without any trouble
if
they sufficiently protest against somebody else. But the very essence of
religion is intense personal exertion and personal devotion
and religion has
always had to pay the penalty of this difficulty
which belongs to all true
excellence
in the various shifts and substitutes invented by indolent
humanity. Ritual
music
the accessories of Divine service
are utterly
abhorrent unless they mean something. Solomon was not spreading religion when
he erected his numerous shrines for the manifold superstitions of the East
and
their attractive rites. He was degrading it
he was vitiating the religious
instinct and depraving the religious sense. Do let us remember
dear brethren
that all the beauty
all the magnificence of the services of the Church
are
for the honour and glory of God
and that if we fail to honour Him
fail to
find Him
fail to worship Him
they only add to our own condemnation.
3. But the worship of aestheticism has no finality about it. It is a
religion of butterflies after all
who flit from flower to flower
who expand
in the sunshine and die in the frost
who are here to-day and are gone
to-morrow. Ephemeral
creatures of a day! Do not suppose it
for one moment
if
any of you have given up vital belief
if you have teased to believe in God
that you will be able to go on finding religious satisfaction in beautiful
sounds
and artistic sights; you will either get better
or you will get
worse--and it is terribly easy to get worse. The end of Solomon’s career is not
encouraging; the best you can say of it is
that it is shrouded in gloom. It
was an easy step from a worship of the beautiful to the nature-worship
so-called
which was the distinguishing feature of so many of the cults which
he imported to Jerusalem. There is a seamy side to many a renaissance
so-called
and there is a seamy side to much which is dignified now by the name
of the love of the beautiful. Nature-worship in its simplest form
and
apparently its least harmful form
takes the shape of the worship of what we
take to be our own nature. It is startling to find how intensely people dislike
anything in religion which is stern
or causes them trouble
or appeals to self-denial.
This appears in all manner of little ways. Solomon erects his nature-shrine for
the pent up denizen of the city
at some little distance outside
and tells him
that it is far better for him to go and worship God in the green fields
and
among the hedgerows
or even on the river
than to shut himself up in a musty
church in Jerusalem. He will tell him that “the Sabbath was made for man
” and
that to fill his lungs with pure air
and to scent the flowers and be cheerful
is the best worship which God seeks from him. And the worshipper of nature
comes back with a tired body
a dissatisfied mind
and a starved soul
and
believes that he has spent a happy Sunday. There
in the old temple at
Jerusalem
are the double sacrifices and the long round of services
because
those who have studied the mind of God believe that He requires on His day a
certain proportion of our time
not the smallest contribution which a Christian can
make
at the earliest possible hour in the morning
or the latest moment at
night. And if they ask for happiness and enjoyment
they remember how Mary
says
“He fills the hungry with good things
” or how the Psalmist says that God
“never fails them that seek Him.” But Solomon turns his back
his wisdom
departs from him
and he seeks for other gods. He is indifferent
and he calls
it toleration. He is intolerant
and he calls it religion. He dishonours the
Church
and he thinks that he does God service. He becomes aesthetic
he is
lingering now in the courts of the temple
he has turned his back on her
realities
he is like a man who just stays a little longer to hear the anthem.
He has turned his back
he is gone
he is worshipping nature
in all the
downward gradations of that terrible cult. Wise Solomon! who began with
building the temple
goes on by tolerating error
to become a besotted
voluptuary
and to insult God. It is the history of many a soul
who has
forgotten the lesson of his youth
who is false to his tradition
and falls
below his own standard. “Seest thou a man wise in his own conceits? There is
more hope of a fool
than of him.” (W. C. E. Newbolt
M. A.)
The half-and-half man
Up to a certain point
being a true Christian is a terrible thing.
The advantage lies in carrying it far beyond that point where fruit is to be
reaped. As long as the nights are long and the days are short we have the stern
certainties of winter; as long as the days are long and the nights are short we
have the sweet
precious
genial hours of summer; but when the days and the
nights are just about alike
and the equinox comes on
and light and dark strive
for the mastery
that is the time for storms to rage. And so
in Christian
experience
so long as the night is longest
you have the peace of darkness;
and when the day is longest
you have the peace of light; but when the night
and the day are of about the same length
and they strive to see which shall
rule
that is the time for storms. The hardest way to live is to be half a
Christian and half a sinner. The easiest way to live is to be wholly a sinner
or wholly a Christian. Harmonise on one side or the other
if you want quiet.
Take the middle ground
if you want perpetual gales. (H. W. Beecher.)
Verse 12
Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it.
Solomon’s sin
I. The action
related to us. To appreciate it
we must consider
II. The motive
revealed to us. Why this mercy shown in this instance? Only two reasons are
mentioned. One had to do with Jerusalem (1 Kings 11:13)
the place of
Solomon’s throne. God had chosen it for His dwelling-placer with great objects
in view. The other motive (twice mentioned) has to do with Solomon’s father. “For
David’s sake” the threatened evil was postponed till after his son’s death; and
even then
for the same “David’s sake
” it was not to be complete. See
finally
how all this encourages us in the hope of salvation through Christ.
See how completely it is part of God’s character to spare one man for another’s
sake; especially where they are so connected that they may be considered as
one. Also
if He does thus for a sinner and a servant (as here)
how much more
for His Holy One (Acts 2:27)
His own Son
the Christ of
God! (W. S.
Lewis
M. A.)
Children honoured for their fathers’ sake
Many peerages have been created in this realm which descend from
generation to generation
with large estates
the gift of a generous nation
and why? Because this nation has received some signal benefits from one man and
has been content to ennoble his heirs for ever for his sake. I do not think
there was any error committed when Marlborough or Wellington were lifted to the
peerage; having saved their country in war
it was right that they should be
honoured in peace; and when for the sake of the parents perpetual estates were
entailed upon their descendants
and honours in perpetuity conferred upon their
sons
it was only acting according to the laws of gratitude. (C. H.
Spurgeon.)
Verses 14-41
Verses 14-22
And the Lord stirred up an adversary unto Solomon.
Divine impulses
Is this an old story that has in it no modern pith or music
or is
it our own life anticipated and set in strange lights? Does it not throw some
light upon the unexplained restlessness which now and again comes over the
spirit of perhaps the quietest man? What is it that tugs at the heart and that
says
“Come this way?” We are not sitting upon barren rocks
nor are we
ploughing inhospitable and unresponding sand: we are in paradise: we have but
to touch the ground and it blooms with flowers or teems with luscious fruit.
And yet that same invisible hand keeps tugging at the heart
that same weird
voice sustains its appeal in the reluctant
wonder-struck and unwilling ear.
“Leave the gilded roof
leave the marble floor
leave the loaded table
leave
the streams of ruddy or foaming wine; come away
come away.” What is it that
will not let us alone? I said
“I will die in my nest
” and lo
it was torn to
pieces. You cannot escape the religious element in life; you may shut your
eyes
you may close your ears
you may learn the language of earth and the
worse language of the pit
and you may exclude all outward religious ministries
and appeals
but now and again there is a shaking in the life
a whisper in the
ear
a strange quiver in the air
a face at the window
a quantity you cannot
name. Then again
this incident shows us how impossible it is
sometimes
to
give reasons for our action. Persons say to the Hadads who come round them
“Why do you leave Egypt?” and Hadad says
“I do not know.” “O foolish man
are
you going back to Edom
the memory of cruelty
shame and agony
without knowing
why you are going back?” And poor Hadad can only answer
“Yes.” And to the men
who can give a reason for everything
Hadad’s answer is a reply of insanity.
Oh
happy is the
man who has never to leave the paved pathway
who knows nothing of the pains of
inspiration
the pangs of a high calling
the surprises of a Divine election!
Yet not so happy
measured by the higher and larger scale; if he misses much
pain
he misses much high delight; if he is commonplace on the one side
he is
commonplace all through. Is it not better sometimes to be mad with inspiration
though afterwards there be collapse and suffering
than never to feel the
Divine afflatus
and never to respond to the call of God? In the fourteenth
verse of the chapter in which the narrative is recorded the whole secret is
given. The Lord had stirred up the heart of Hadad against wicked Solomon. It
was a Divine
stirring
it was an impulse from heaven
it was the sound of a rushing mighty
wind from the skies
a song without words
a ministry without articulation
a
movement of the soul. Have you ever been in that case in any degree? I have
and persons have said to me
“Surely you can give us some reasons for going?” I
have said
“Really
I cannot help
but a sensible man always bases his conduct
upon reason. Think of it and tell us what your reasons are
and they will
relieve our minds
for our anxiety is very painful
” and I have only had to
say
“I cannot tell you anything more about it
but I must go.” This narrative
suggests the inquiry
How am I to know when I am stirred by Divine impulses?
When the impulse moves you in the direction of loss
pain
and sacrifice
the
probability is that the impulse is Divine. Now where is your stirring? Gone. I
thought it would go. I have frightened many birds in the same way
and they
have flown from the trees on which they had alighted
in chaffering crowds.
Moses is called--to what? To hardship and difficulty
and much pain
and long
provocation in the wilderness. Before him Abraham is called--to what? To a
pilgrimage that has a beginning only that he can ascertain: what the
explanation and conclusion of it will be he knoweth not: the impulse was
Divine. Then I hear a dear old father-friend: now
what says he? Listen.
“Howbeit
let me go
in any wise.” Where to
dear father? “To the other
country.” What other country? “I have a desire to depart.” What
to leave the
old house at home
with all your children and grandchildren
and the garden
and the library
and the church--you have not a desire to depart
have you?
“Yes. O that I had wings like a dove
for then I would flee away.and be at
rest. My Lord calls me
I must meet Him in the promised land.” Ay
God sends
that homesickness over the heart when He wants to take us up. We begin to say
“I am much obliged to you for all your kindness; you have bestowed favours and
honours upon me. God bless you
but--I want to go
to go home
to be at rest; I want to see God’s
heaven--let me go.
“Hark!
they whisper: angels say--
Sister
spirit
come away.
I want to go now. Lord
now lettest thou Thy servant depart in
peace: I am
ready; put in the sickle
cut me down and garner me in heaven.” It is a Divine
stirring: it is the beginning of immortality. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Verse 21-22
When Hadad heard in Egypt that David slept with his fathers.
A few turns of a kaleidoscope
Let me use this text like a kaleidoscope
giving it three or four
turns
and try to describe what I see. Dealing with the incident as it stands
here
there is a lesson for kings and all that are in authority. And it is
something like this: Do not abuse your power. “In wrath
remember mercy.” When
you have your enemy at the point of the sword
remember mercy even while you
remember justice
and pay off old scores. The national lesson we might learn
is
that if we will be over severe
if we will harass the Jews
for example
as
all nations have more or less combined to do
God will spread the lap of His
skirt over the Jews. “Vengeance is mine; I will repay.” God likes to see
justice done; but God will not have vindictive and sinful revenge
and He will
spread the lap of His cloak over the Jews as He did over Hadad. God may find His executors of
vengeance in the descendants of those with whom we deal too harshly
or our
fathers before us
long
long ago. Ay
they will spread through your English
cities and towns
and play the very mischief with you at voting times
and make
the balance “kick the beam “ in most undesirable and provoking fashion. We
forget that God hates inhumanity
and God’s heart repents Him for those who
seem to be utterly trampled under foot
and denied the right to live. He has
strange ways with Him
and He is worth watching. Therefore let mercy season
justice. Then there is the same lesson
not now from a national
but from a
private and personal point of view. Do not be vindictive. You may have power
to-day
but use it mildly; let mercy season justice
for you do not know what
may happen to yourself; and long after you are gone. The roots of this business
are very deep
and go very far back. In your hour of power be patient even to
the evil
lest you be betrayed into sinful abuse of power. As much as lieth in
you
live peaceably with all men. I know a man just now
and this is what has
come to him. Years ago he was in a certain business
and he was strong and
flourishing. But he dealt in a very high-handed and dictatorial manner with one
under him. He cast him out
or forced him to flee. And now--it has taken some
thirty years to do it
but thirty years have done it--now that man who was cast
out--Hadad over again--Hadad to-day has destroyed his former master’s business.
He started a rival establishment
has got on and prospered
and things have so
come about that he who was up is down
and he who was down is up. Therefore
take care; and just because you have the ball at your foot
and you have only
to kick it
kick it with discretion. Be magnanimous; the day may come when you
may need all your friends. But there is a spiritual lesson. Hadad comes back to
do mischief to Solomon
for he has beard things and drawn inferences. It has
spread among the surrounding nations that the strength of Israel now is not so
strong as it seems to be. It is far more pasteboard and stucco
than granite
and marble. They come and afflict him whom erewhile they feared. So with
individual men. Are there not men and women here to-day
and Solomon’s history
and danger is theirs? You are not what you seem to be. With all your credit and
reputation
you are backslidden in heart. And these old sins
like vultures
are sharpening their beaks
and they are coming round upon you. For God’s sake
and thine own
take care: hie thee back to God
return to faith
and prayer
and penitence. But I want to use this text in an entirely different way. One
cannot read this without wishing to apply it to a certain class of Gospel hearers in this
land of ours
and very likely in this very church
to whom it may be useful.
This is the time that a soul comes to when
known only to itself and to God
there comes across it yearning and discontent. You can hardly explain it to
yourself
and do not like to speak about it to other people. This longing comes
to you
not when you are young and struggling
but
mayhap
when you are in
mid-manhood
or growing age. Ask your own heart
and it will teach you. Does it
not ring responsive to my poor words this morning? It is Hadad before Pharaoh
over again. The genuineness of that feeling
may be tested by this: the
sacrifice it will involve. See what Hadad had to give up; see the risks he had
to run. To become truly regenerate
sons of God will make a wrench. If you had
become a true Christian years ago
it would have been
humanly speaking
kind
of natural and easy. But now
for all these years
you have been away in exile.
And you have got on
I don’t deny it. But what
I repeat
is that yearning in
your heart? Why are you not contented? Why can’t you be at rest? Will it cost
you something to put yourself right now
to go to Jesus
to become a Christian
to give up your world like Hadad
with its positions
and its honours
and its ambitions? Then
all the more make the wrench. Ah yes! Thank God for times like these. All
through your boyhood
or girlhood
your open youth
your busy
bustling middle
life
the world sufficed. Thank God for that dissatisfaction; it is a spur in
your lazy sides to send you home. What is happening to you is what happened to
Noah’s dove. The raven could sit pecking at any corpse on the water
and find
its satisfaction there. But doves are doves
and not carnivorous. The dove
found no rest for the sole of its foot
and it winged its way back across the
black hills of water
back to that great ship that came drifting slowly along.
Back to yon window
which is a kind of frame for the face of weather-beaten old
Noah
standing there with his hand stretched out so that the weary thing may
light. So Christ Jesus comes to weary hearts in London to-day. And He holds out
His hand and asks for weary worldlings to light upon it. He will take you into
warmth
and light
and love
and peace
and an ark of safety that will ride all
storms. Gleaming lightnings may flash past
the last judgment may thunder upon
the world
all things be overwhelmed in the wrath that is coming
but your soul
has reached its rest
its refuge
its abiding home. (J. M’Neill.)
Hadad: the pressure of destiny
David
and Joab the captain of the host of Israel
wrought great
desolation in Edom; “for six months did Joab remain there with all Israel
until he had cut off every male in Edom.” Amongst those who escaped was a
little child
comparatively speaking
an infant member of the royal house. He
was so little that he could not have made his escape alone
but he was taken
care of by certain Edomites of his father’s servants
and in their company he
fled into Egypt. Pharaoh was very kind to his royal exile. “He gave him an
house
and appointed him victuals
and gave him land.” With growing years he
came into growing favour
and by and by he married the sister of the queen of
Egypt. It would seem
then
that he did well to escape from his own ill-treated
country
and to put himself under the protection of the mighty and gracious
Pharaoh. It came to pass
however
that Hadad (that is the name of the Edomite)
said to Pharaoh
“I want to go home; let me depart
that I may go to mine own
country.” Pharaoh was astounded by the inquiry
and began to wonder whether Hadad
had been unkindly treated in Egypt
and in the frankest manner he said
“What
hast thou lacked with me
that
behold
thou seekest to go to thine own
country?” A very proper question; to which Hadad appears to have returned an
ungrateful and insufficient answer--“Nothing: howbeit let me go in any wise.”
You will find the secret in the fourteenth verse of the chapter:--“And the Lord
stirred up an adversary unto Solomon
Hadad the Edomite: he was of the king’s
seed in Edom.” It was a Divine stirring! It was a restlessness sent from God!
It was a hunger created in the heart!
1. Men cannot always give an account of their impulses. We seem to
have everything
yet we want something else. What that something else is
we
perhaps seldom know
or if we do know
we cannot put the want into words. We
have all Egypt
yet we are willing to leave it for Edom.
2. What we mistake
either in ourselves or in others
for mere
restlessness may be the pressure of destiny. We blame some men roughly for
desiring a change
and when we question the men themselves as to their reason
they tell us that they have been treated well
even handsomely
yet they want
to go! Then we condemn them as unreasonable
and we predict many a judgment for
them! Alas
how ignorant we are
and how cruel to one another!
3. We may judge of the value of our impulses by the self-denial
imposed by their operation. Consider what Hadad had to lose! “Except a man deny
himself and take up his cross daily
” he cannot be moving in the Divine
direction. Remember in the cases quoted David was impelled to war
and Samuel to
make revelations which must have cost his heart no small strain. Are our
impulses towards self-enjoyment?
4. Is it not by some such impulse that the good man meets death with
a brave heart? How else could he leave loved ones
home
manifold enjoyment
and social honour? Yet he pines for heaven. “I have a desire to depart.” “Oh
that I had wings like a dove”
To
thee
O dear
dear country
Mine
eyes their vigils keep.
God
surely sends this home-sickness into our hearts when He is about to call us up
higher.
5. Remember how possible it is to overrule our best impulses. Pharaoh
said stop
Hadad begged to be allowed to go. Peter said
“That be far from
Thee
Lord
” but Christ called him an offence
and drove him behind. “Grieve
not the Spirit.” “Quench not the Spirit.” Is not the Spirit of Christ urging
every man to leave the Egypt of sinful bondage? “Come out from among them
and
be ye separate
saith the Lord.” “Ye will not come unto me that ye might have life.”
(J. Parker
D. D.)
Hadad the Edomite (love of country)
This narrative of Hadad comes in as a short episode in the later
days of King Solomon
when he was being punished for his defection. The story
has an interest of its own. We wish to take this one feature--the love of
country--and look at it as implanted in the human heart for a wise and Divine
purpose
passing beyond this simple instance
and drawing whatever light we can
from God’s providence and Word.
1. The first remark we make is
that it is a feeling not only deep in
our nature
as we do not need to show
but acknowledged and approved in the
Bible. This has been denied
and some have blamed
while others have praised
the Book on this account; but whether it be to its blame or praise
the feeling
is there. We cannot surely fail to perceive that the love of country was
employed by God to build up the place He gave the Jewish people in preserving
His truth in the long period of darkness
before the time came for the Gospel
to go out into the world. Their love was drawn to it before they saw it as the
land of Promise. But what purposes are served by this? There is one which may
seem low enough to begin with
but which has its own importance. It is one of
the ways by which God secures that the earth should be inhabited. There is a
dispersive force in the world which began long ago
and which has been going on
ever since
the spirit of adventure and energy which seeks action and change;
so waste places are peopled and tilled. But there is needed not less an
adhesive power to maintain what is gained. The world must have an anchor as
well as a sail. Rocky Edom is dear as fertile Egypt
and bleak
storm-struck
islands more than southern Edens. If it were not for this
wars for sunny spots
would be more common than they are
and kindreds and peoples could not be
gathered and held together to build up communities. But the building up of
communities is a part of God’s providential design. Each one in its own place
brings out its own character
and
in the end
may be found to bring its own
contribution to the interests of humanity. We may come to a higher view of this
feeling when we think of its effect on the individual man. This love of the
native soil has been one of the great springs of the poetry of the race; and
whatever we may think of poetry ourselves
we cannot fail to see its power.
God
who gives the bird wings for its safety and delight
has given man
imagination. It is certainly His gift
if men would only use it for Him. And it
can be said with truth that
apart from the region of the spirit itself
it is
never more pure and purifying than when it takes for its subject the things of
native land and home.
2. Another thought suggested by this feeling is that it leads to acts
of great self-sacrifice and endeavour. Next to religion
there is probably
nothing in human nature which has called out such a heroic spirit of martyrdom
or such long
persistent labour
as the love of native land. The grandest part
of the history of nations has been the period when they have risen for
independence and freedom
against the attempts to crush out their liberty or
their separate life
and when they have left names of leaders which make hearts
of men throb and thrill wherever they arc heard. It is a poor Christianity
because it is not a true humanity
which affects to disregard this. There is an
heirloom of stimulus to a whole race in the heroic acts of those who have
bequeathed them a name among the nations of the world. There are men who can be
reached by the love of fellow-countrymen
when they cannot be moved by the love
of their fellow-men; and it is quite possible for a man to have both. The
narrower is sometimes more intense and energetic than the wider. In the annals
of the civil wars in England
an officer
who had fought in many battles
abroad
tells that in his first fight on English ground he heard a cry of agony
in his own tongue
and he looked behind him to see who of his men was killed.
He discovered that the cry came from the opposing ranks
and then first he
realised what a terrible thing it was to kill his own countrymen. There are
many who feel it so in our quieter times
and who can be stirred more strongly
to save from destitution and death those who speak their own language
and have
a nearer blood beating in their heart.
3. Another thought suggested by this feeling is
that it should
enable us to understand the hearts
and work for the rights of all men. There
is a rule recommended by some religious communities
that their members should
have no special friendships; that they should do nothing for each other as
friends. And there are some philosophers who defend this. They say that
“friendship is a barrier which hides from view the qualities of many who are
more worthy of regard
that it is a kind of theft from the common good for the
benefit of a few
and that
in a higher state of society
friendship will
disappear; which amounts very much to saying that if we put out our eyes
so as
not to see things that are close to us
we shall be more likely to discover
those that are far away. These are the theories of men who have either had no
hearts to begin with
or have managed to cover them by cobwebs of speculation.
Augustine has said that we may make a ladder of the dead things within us
to
climb to the highest; but there is another ladder of living things by which we
can rise as high
and by which our sympathies can be travelling to and fro like
the angels in the dream of Bethel. The vision begins in the dreamer’s own
breast
and then it passes up into the skies. This is the very way in which God
Himself has dealt with us. He came from the limits of the universe into this
world
and became our friend
that He might lead us step by step into the
fulness of Him that filleth all in all.
4. The last thought we suggest is
that this feeling may help the
conception of another and a higher country. It is quite true that we find the
spirit of patriotism filling the hearts of men with the highest enthusiasm
and
spreading itself over masses of men and long periods
but bringing little
spiritual desire. Yet it is one of the ways
as we have said
by which God
keeps the heart above sensualism and utter selfishness--a kind of salt that
saves nations from entire corruption. We see in the Bible that the thoughts of native
land and home are more than any others the figures which God has used to convey
to us conceptions about the future. They are more than figures. They have been
woven into His plan of education. He made the old patriarchs exiles
in order
that He might create in them the longing which went further than any land
behind or before them
in this world. The last view given us of the heavenly
world is that of a land and city which have over them a Father and an Elder
Brother
and for friends the nations of the saved. (J. Ker
D. D.)
Patriotic sentiment
An American citizen in a foreign city
seeing the meteor flag of
his native land floating at the masthead of a ship
is inwardly moved by the
associations it revives to patriotic feelings
to emotions of love
to fond
anticipations of his return to the joys and repose of his fireside. But of his
secret thoughts the people about him know nothing. To them the flag of his
country is but as one flag among many others. They meddle not with the secret
joys it kindles within his swelling breast. It is even so with the secret of
the Lord in a good man’s breast. He walks the street like other men. Yet while
their thoughts are of things visible and earthly
his are of God and things
unseen. He sees God in everything about him. God is communing with him
feasting him on holy thought
quickening his spiritual aspirations
comforting
him with assurances of his sonship
and with visions of his incorruptible
inheritance. (W. Hoyt
D. D.)
Verses 31-33
Thus saith the Lord God of Israel
Behold I will rend the kingdom
out of the hand of Solomon.
The purpose of God
“Nothing
” we are told
“succeeds like success.” It is the sign of
a man of transcendent genius and power that he is able to carry through all his
projects
and bring his schemes to a successful issue. And yet God seems to
fail. What could be a greater failure than this world
if it was made by a
beneficent God
says the average observer? Why are evil
misfortune
pain
and
failure so obvious in its history
and so marked upon its operations? So with
Christianity itself; it is the commonplace of missionary meetings that only a
small fraction of the world has as yet become Christian
after centuries of
preaching and earnest effort. Even where the Church has spread
and fixed her
seat
how many schisms and controversies rend her unity
how imperfect is the
faith of professing Christians
how unworthy their lives
how poor the realisation
of those promises to which they cling. Before we can criticise anything we must
know the facts. Before we can give a worthy judgment we must be in a position
to judge
and in pronouncing on the great work of God in the universe
we may
well ask ourselves
are we in a position during our short visit
which we call
life
when we know so imperfectly what came before
when we know absolutely
nothing of what comes after--are we in a position to judge? There we stand with
the vast ocean before us. Here the wave has receded and left a bare patch of
sand
there it is thundering with overwhelming catastrophe against some
crumbling barrier. Is the tide coming in
or is it receding? Is there a
progress or a steady shrinking back? Before we can decide we have to move away.
Has God failed? Is this world in any sense a mistake? Are the Chronicles of
Israel and Judah an uninteresting record of a monotonous disaster
unedifying
to the soul
and
powerless to amuse any attention
or fire our enthusiasm? Is Christianity to alter
its name to Civilisation T and to substitute the worship of the beautiful for
the service of the sanctuary
the book of science for the Book of God? Is the
Church to be carted away in its crumbling masses to the lumber room
where lie
now covered with the dust of ages the mouldering forms of Utopias
Republics
and “Cities of God
” in the model room
where repose the unattainable visions
of unpractical men?
I. The plan of
God
regarded from the side of His wise omnipotence. Is this world a failure?
Does it whirl unchecked and uncontrolled along an aimless path
where luck and
fortune and chance are the apparent and only guide to its caprice? Is life a
game of chess with an unknown adversary
whom we neither see nor hear--where a
mistake on our part is followed by a blow
and that a blow without a word? Have
vice and violence and cunning
on the whole
the upper hand in the control of
the world? Have all the improvements
the luxuries
the refinements of life
only crushed off in their path a wider and a more sordid fringe of poverty
a moraine
of misery
and secured the greatest happiness of the few at the expense of the
happiness of the greater number? No! Just remember that God is dealing with a
fallen world
a world not as He made it
but as man marred it. A child no
doubt
as he lies on his bed
powerless
faint
and ill
crippled by an
accident
thinks the doctor cruel as he handles his aching limb
and probes the
dangerous wound
and prescribes the bitter medicine; he wishes to be free
to
be active
to be playing with his fellows
to feel life in his limbs and health
in his frame
to eat what is pleasant
to taste what is sweet
and to fill his
life with joy. But the father or the mother
and those who have at heart his
welfare
marvel the rather at the skill
the nerve
the resource of the careful
physician who is bringing health out of sickness
and a wholesome life out of
deformity and mishap. An orchard of trees pruned and cut back is a sorry sight
to one
who does
not understand the secrets of fruit-bearing
and will not be there to see the
golden clusters in the rich autumn. God is dealing with a fallen world
where
the measures must be largely remedial
and tending towards a future
rather
than self-sufficient in the present. The world is better than it was
it has
advanced
and is advancing. Although here and there men sigh over the barren
sand
as the wave sighs off with a gasp and a groan
and a sound of falling and
disaster. Look out over the world and you will see progress--you cannot deny it--a
tending towards a renewal of that time
when in the beginning God saw
everything that He had made
and behold it was very good; while by the side of
progress we see the unerring punishment which overtakes sin and evil;
retribution we call it; a sign that God has given us a law
which cannot be
broken.
II. Equally shallow
is the criticism which would believe the purpose of God to have failed in His
church. The Church is God’s Kingdom set up for the better management of the
world. And most emphatically the Church has not been a failure. We have the
strange spectacle of lands
once covered with its beneficent richness
now
barren and dry
and in the hands of the infidel. We see large fields of the
Church
once covered with ripe grain
and rippled with the breath of Heaven
now lying fallow
untilled
apparently uncared for
and yet all waiting on the
good purpose of God. If we refuse to despair of the world
much more do we
refuse to despair of the Church. The purpose of God in spite of drawbacks is
being worked out here.
Who can deny it?
III. But there is
another region where we are apt to charge God with failure. I mean the region
of our own soul. God has called us through the Red Sea
and
we say
would God
we had stayed in Egypt. God has led us into the promised land
and we say it is
no land of milk and honey. Men turn round on the old Bible and say it has
failed; on the simple life of prayer and devotion; and say that it has proved
powerless to effect its purpose. It is a bitter thing
dear brethren
to look
back on life and say that it has fared. To look back on a pure home and careful
training only to deride it
and get away from it. To have that bitter severance
in life
which owes no piety to
the past
which has lost all sense of vocation
or duty
or
mission
and simply lives on from day to day a life which would be bearable
were it not for its pleasures
and hopeful were it not for its ambitions. It is
a terrible verdict which the world records of a man when it says
“He has
thrown himself away.” It is a terrible sense of failure
when a man owns to
himself
“I am not what I used to be.” It is sad for the returning prodigal to
think of a large portion of his life
of which the most hopeful wish would be
that it might remain a blank. It is a more awful thing for a man to feel that
his early hopes and aspirations have failed
and that a brilliant morning is
likely to be obliterated in a stormy sunset. What can be more sad than the complete breakdown of
the moral sense in the heart once alive unto God? Wise Solomon sunk in
sensuality; David
whose heart was responsive to every ripple of the Divine
breath
dull and insensate; the altar of God spurned
Sunday desecrated; evil
eagerly followed; the shame of vice causing no blush
the meanness of it no compunction?
And yet God’s purpose survives in another way. Magdalen stands before the world
to cheer it with the sight of penitent love
more deep
more utter
because
like a precious flower
it has been snatched out of the abyss of sin. An
Augustine stands before the world
stored with an experience written in letters
of blood
and burned in with horror into his soul
invites those who have made
shipwreck of youth
to hope to revive and seek Him ten times the more. Ah! my
brethren
believe in the inherent vitality of all God’s good gifts to you. If
ever you have been religious
when you now are cold and dead
cherish that seed
of life. God means yet again to revive it if you will let Him. If ever your
heart was open and responsive before sin blinded your eyes
and the ways of the
world made you hard
put yourself back before the first wilful sin
and know
and believe that God wishes to revive in you the promise of a better past. (W. C. E. Newbolt
M.
A.)
──《The Biblical Illustrator》