| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
2
Chronicles Chapter Twenty-four
2 Chronicles 24
Chapter Contents
Joash
of Judah
The temple repaired. (1-14) Joash falls
into idolatry
He is slain by his servants. (15-27)
Commentary on 2 Chronicles 24:1-14
(Read 2 Chronicles 24:1-14)
Joash is more zealous about the repair of the temple than
Jehoiada himself. It is easier to build temples
than to be temples to God. But
the repairing of places for public worship is a good work
which all should
promote. And many a good work would be done that now lies undone
if active men
would put it forward.
Commentary on 2 Chronicles 24:15-27
(Read 2 Chronicles 24:15-27)
See what a great judgment on any prince or people
the
death of godly
zealous
useful men is. See how necessary it is that we act in religion
from inward principle. Then the loss of a parent
a minister
or a friend
will
not be losing our religion. Often both princes and inferior people have been
flattered to their ruin. True grace alone will enable a man to bring forth
fruit unto the end. Zechariah
the son of Jehoiada
being filled with the
Spirit of prophecy
stood up
and told the people of their sin. This is the
work of ministers
by the word of God
as a lamp and a light
to discover the
sin of men
and expound the providences of God. They stoned Zechariah to death
in the court of the house of the Lord. Observe the dying martyr's words: The
Lord look upon it
and require it! This came not from a spirit of revenge
but
a spirit of prophecy. God smote Joash with great diseases
of body
or mind
or
both
before the Syrians departed from him. If vengeance pursue men
the end of
one trouble will be but the beginning of another. His own servants slew him.
These judgments are called the burdens laid upon him
for the wrath of God is a
heavy burden
too heavy for any man to bear. May God help us to take warning
to be upright in heart
and to persevere in his ways to the end.
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on 2 Chronicles》
2 Chronicles 24
Verse 6
[6] And
the king called for Jehoiada the chief
and said unto him
Why hast thou not
required of the Levites to bring in out of Judah and out of Jerusalem the
collection
according to the commandment of Moses the servant of the LORD
and
of the congregation of Israel
for the tabernacle of witness?
The chief — It
is observable
that he is not called the chief priest
or high-priest
but only
the chief
or the head
which he might be in many other respects
either by
reason of his near relation to the royal family: or because he was the chief of
one of the twenty-four families.
Verse 7
[7] For the sons of Athaliah
that wicked woman
had broken up the house of
God; and also all the dedicated things of the house of the LORD did they bestow
upon Baalim.
The sons —
Ahaziah
and his brethren before they were carried away captive
chap. 21:17
who did this by her instigation
as this
phrase implies.
Broke up —
Both broke up the treasuries
and defaced the house itself.
Verse 14
[14] And
when they had finished it
they brought the rest of the money before the king
and Jehoiada
whereof were made vessels for the house of the LORD
even vessels
to minister
and to offer withal
and spoons
and vessels of gold and silver.
And they offered burnt offerings in the house of the LORD continually all the
days of Jehoiada.
Vessels —
Because Athaliah and her sons had taken the old ones away
verse 7.
Verse 15
[15] But
Jehoiada waxed old
and was full of days when he died; an hundred and thirty
years old was he when he died.
An hundred and thirty years old — By which it appears
that he was born in Solomon's time
and had lived
six entire reigns before this. They buried him among the kings
with this
honourable encomium
(perhaps inscribed upon his grave-stone) that he had done
good in Israel. But the little religion that Joash had
was all buried in his
grave. See how great a judgment to any prince or people
the death of holy
useful men is!
Verse 16
[16] And they buried him in the city of David among the kings
because he had
done good in Israel
both toward God
and toward his house.
Israel — In
Judah
which was an eminent part of Israel
and the only part of it which owned
God
or was owned by God as his Israel
to whom therefore he often appropriates
this name.
Verse 17
[17] Now
after the death of Jehoiada came the princes of Judah
and made obeisance to
the king. Then the king hearkened unto them.
Made obeisance — In
that posture presenting their requests to him
that they might not be confined
to troublesome journeys to Jerusalem
but might have the liberty
which their
fore-fathers enjoyed
os worshipping God in the high-places. This liberty once
obtained
they knew they could worship idols without disturbance: which was the
thing at which they aimed. And for the prevention of such abuses
God obliged
all to worship him in one place.
Verse 18
[18] And
they left the house of the LORD God of their fathers
and served groves and
idols: and wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespass.
Left
… —
The king and princes that awhile ago so zealously repaired the temple
now
forsook the temple! So inconstant a thing is man! So little confidence is to be
put in him!
Verse 20
[20] And
the Spirit of God came upon Zechariah the son of Jehoiada the priest
which
stood above the people
and said unto them
Thus saith God
Why transgress ye
the commandments of the LORD
that ye cannot prosper? because ye have forsaken
the LORD
he hath also forsaken you.
Who stood —
The people were assembled in the court of the temple
which they had not quite
forsook
when Zechariah stood up in some of the desks that were in the court of
the priests
and plainly told them their sin
and the consequences of it.
Verse 21
[21] And
they conspired against him
and stoned him with stones at the commandment of
the king in the court of the house of the LORD.
Stoned him —
They stoned him immediately
without even colour of law; as horrid a piece of
wickedness
as any we read of in all the history of the kings. That ever such a
villainy should be committed
by men
by Israelites
in contempt and violation
of everything that is just
honourable
and sacred! The Jews say
there were
seven transgressions in one: They killed a priest
a prophet
a judge; they
shed innocent blood; polluted the court of the temple
the Sabbath
and the day
of expiation: for on that day
their tradition says
this happened.
Verse 22
[22] Thus
Joash the king remembered not the kindness which Jehoiada his father had done
to him
but slew his son. And when he died
he said
The LORD look upon it
and
require it.
Require it —
Make inquisition for innocent blood. But the words may be rendered
The Lord
will look upon it
and require it
will require satisfaction from you for it.
Verse 23
[23] And
it came to pass at the end of the year
that the host of Syria came up against
him: and they came to Judah and Jerusalem
and destroyed all the princes of the
people from among the people
and sent all the spoil of them unto the king of
Damascus.
The year — So
soon did God hear the cry of his holy prophet's blood
and revenge it.
The princes —
That it might appear they were sent and directed by God to single out to
destruction the first beginners of this general apostacy.
Verse 25
[25] And
when they were departed from him
(for they left him in great diseases
) his
own servants conspired against him for the blood of the sons of Jehoiada the
priest
and slew him on his bed
and he died: and they buried him in the city
of David
but they buried him not in the sepulchres of the kings.
Son — By
which it seems
he slew not only Zechariah
but his brothers also. Perhaps they
that slew him intended to take vengeance for that innocent blood. However that
was it
which God intended
in permitting them to do it.
Verse 27
[27] Now
concerning his sons
and the greatness of the burdens laid upon him
and the
repairing of the house of God
behold
they are written in the story of the
book of the kings. And Amaziah his son reigned in his stead.
Burdens —
The great judgments of God upon him
both by the Syrians
verse 24:23
and by great diseases
verse 25.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on 2 Chronicles》
24 Chapter 24
Verses 1-27
Verse 2
And Joash did that which was right in the sight of the Lord an the
days of Jehoiada the priest.
Goodness as a morning cloud
There are certain characters that are great curiosities. There are
also other characters that are great monstrosities. The ease of Joash is s very
extraordinary one. From his history learn--
I. That it is a great
blessing when people yield to godly influences.
1. The first six years of Joash’s life were spent in the temple.
2. He was started in life’s business in a very admirable way.
3. He was outwardly obedient to the law of the Lord in the days of
Jehoiada.
4. He was zealous for the externals of religion.
5. He influenced others for good.
II. Good as all
this is
it is not all that is needed.
1. This is not yielding the heart to God.
2. All this yielding to godly influences may exist without any
personal
vital godliness whatever.
3. An externally pious character may even prevent men from being
saved at all. It may lead a man to take for granted that he is saved.
4. To be under godly influences year after year
without any great
trial or temptation
may leave the personal character altogether undeveloped.
We must have some kind of test
or else we cannot be sure of the
character. You cannot be sure about principle being in any young man if he has
been kept under a glass case
and if his principles have never been tried. The
real character of Joash had never come out at all
because Jehoiada
as it
were
covered him. His own disposition was only waiting the opportunity of
developing itself. I have heard of an officer in India who had brought up a
young leopard. It was apparently as tame as a cat. One afternoon
while asleep
in his chair
the leopard licked his hand in all tenderness as a cat might have
done; but after
licking awhile it licked too hard and a little blood began to flow. It no
sooner tasted blood than the old leopard spirit was up
and his master was his
master no more.
So does it happen to many that being shut in
and tamed
as it were
but not changed
subdued
but not renewed
kept in check but not converted
there has come a time
afterwards when the taste of blood has called out the old nature
and away the
man has gone.
III. This yielding
character may even prove a source of mischief. The princes of Judah came and
“made obeisance to the king.” What followed?
1. Joash went off to sin.
2. He refused reproof.
3. He slew his friend’s son.
4. Having no faith in God
he robbed the temple
and gave all the
gold and treasures unto Hazael the Syrian. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The goodness of King Joash
1. The history of Joash enforces the duty of training ourselves
and
those who are under our guidance
to stand alone
and not to rest upon the
support of others.
2. Not that we should make small account of the counsel of wise and
religious friends. The perfect use of a wise adviser is not to determine for us
what we shall do in every particular case that day by day arises; but to help
us to store our minds with sound principles
such as we may call up for our own
direction when any emergency requires them.
3. There is a great difference in the natural constitution of men’s
minds. Some are like the creeping plant that grows up rapidly
but must always
hang for support upon some external prop. Others are like the oak
slowly
developing itself from among the meaner underwood
until it rears its head
alone above the trees of the forest. When the trellis or pole decays
the
creeper must fall to the ground; the oak abides seemingly unmovable in its own
strength. All the culture that man could bestow would never give to the creeper
the sturdiness of the oak.
4. But though man cannot change nature God can. He can impart
strength to the weakest character. Therefore the way to be firm in what is
good
is to take God for your guide and support
and not man (Galatians 6:4-5; Philippians 2:12-13).
5. There is no contradiction between the duty of seeking and in due
measure following the counsel of our good instructors and the duty of standing
fast for ourselves in the counsel of God. Just as the office of the moon is to
transmit the reflected light of the sun to the dark side of the earth; but if
the moon comes between the earth and the sun
it does but darken the earth
by
intercepting from it the rays that beam from that great light which is the
source of light and heat to both; so the parent
the teacher
or the priest
is
to stand for God towards the child
the pupil
or the private Christian
so far
as their imperfect knowledge or their spiritual needs require; but not so as to
eclipse God
or to make them forget that to God and not to man they are answerable in
the last resort for their deeds. (James Randall
M.A.)
Joash
Men may constrain us to a temporary amendment
but God alone can control
us to a lasting change of character and heart. Circumstances can make any one
of you religious for a time
and give you feelings and habits which will make
you appear religious to others
and what is worse still
lead you to suppose
that the outward appearance is the effect of inward principle. But nothing but
the grace of God
and the love of His name and His truth
can produce that
piety of heart which withstands temptation
and lives when all earthly agencies
are gone which nursed it
because it lives in Him who was pleased to make those
earthly agencies the means of grace to the soul. We have in this verse two
characters for contemplation.
I. Jehoiada
as an
example of influence exerted for good.
1. He had three elements of success with which to work.
2. Note here the relative influence of personal piety. “Joash did
that which is right.” The nation prospered in every sense through the
faithfulness of one man. Clear and consistent personal piety is always a
persuasive thing. No treatises upon religion can rival for persuasive power the
“living epistles known and read of all men.” Our calling as Christians is to
win others
as Jehoiada did
to do that which is right in the sight of the
Lord. We have received light that our faces may shine before men. The design of
God in our salvation is not only our happiness but our usefulness.
II. Joash as an
example for our warning. The religion which had its life and influence only
from a man was soon forgotten when the source of that influence had passed
away. There is a vital difference between the godliness which is the result of
external circumstances and that which is the product of internal principle. It
is the difference between the galvanised corpse and the living man; the star
and the meteor; the flash of the lightning and the action of the sunbeam. There
is a false godliness current among men.
1. With some piety is dependent upon policy.
2. With others it is a matter of periods.
3. With others it is a religion of place.
4. With others it is dependent upon the personal influence of some
minister
or upon the advice and counsel of a friend. (C. J.
Phipps Eyre
M.A.)
Life and character of Joash
I. The instability
of his religion.
1. He was zealous for God under restraint.
2. He degenerated when that restraint was taken away.
II. The honour and
the disgrace of his reign.
1. Honourable reforms.
2. Disgraceful crimes. Like Nero after the death of his teacher
Seneca
the philosopher
he was stained with crimes.
III. The disastrous
end of his life. Conclusion: Learn--
1. The responsibility of those to whom the care of young persons is
entrusted.
2. Caution those yet under guardianship and tutors and friends.
3. The awful end of those who turn aside from hopeful beginnings. (J.
Wolfendale.)
The Jehoiadas of society
It would seem to be about the last thing men do
to estimate
properly the value of subtle and silent influences
the magic and wisardry of
noble character. We may even be ashamed to do certain things in the presence of
the Jehoiadas of society. We are not ashamed of the things themselves
nor are
we unprepared to make experiments in regard to them; but whenever we would put
forth our hand to begin the experiments we see the observing Jehoiada
and
withdraw from the pernicious attempt. So it is that there are trustees of
commercial and social honour
men who would never do the dishonourable deed
speak the calumnious word
or mislead the sentiment of the market-place in
times of strong temptation and peril. We rely upon them as disinfectants
keeping the commercial atmosphere pure
and discouraging in the most positive
and decisive manner the spirit and action of men who are low-minded and
selfish. These Jehoiadas deliver no lectures upon commercial morality
nor do
they in any manner that can be charged with conceit display their own virtues;
they simply go on their straightforward course
doing justice
loving mercy
and walking humbly with God
and the result of their presence and character is
that even the worst men are restrained
weak men are confirmed in good
resolutions
and men whose character needs inspiration receive it from their
example. (J. Parker
D.D.)
That Joash was minded to repair the house of the Lord.
The temple repaired
It is worthy of note that in the mere outline of a reign
extending over twenty years
in very exciting times
space should have been
taken to record so minutely the repairing of the temple. No less remarkable is
it that the initiative in this great work was due to Joash and not to
Jehoiada--the king
not the priest. There was need for some one to lift the
standard for Jehovah and His worship. For since the accession of Jehoram
the
wicked son of the good Jehoshaphat
there had been a steady decline toward
idolatry. Spurred on by his wife
Athaliah
the worthy daughter of the monster
Jezebel
Jehoram allowed “high places” to be built to the heathen deities.
Dying after less than ten years of rule
of an agonising internal disease
the
crown descended to his one surviving son
Ahaziah. After a reign of little more
than a year
during which he was wholly under the power of his mother
Ahaziah
was slain by Jehu while on a visit to Israel. Athaliah seized the throne and
ruled for six years
fostering and encouraging heathenism to the utmost. To
make her usurpation more secure
she had
at the beginning of her reign
as she
supposed
compassed the death of all aspirants to the crown. But
through the
cunning and daring of Jehoiada and his wife
one boy
Joash
a son of Ahaziah
was preserved. When the time was ripe the priest led a revolt against the
queen
putting the young Joash
only eight years of age
upon the throne
and
causing the death of Athaliah. A great opportunity opened up for the young
prince. Jehoiada carefully instructed him during his childhood in the religion
of Jehovah
that
when he came to the years of responsible reign
he might
zealously foster the old faith. But
unfortunately
Joash was not strong enough
for the task. As long as he was under the tuition of Jehoiada he did fairly
well
though idolatry was suffered to extend itself; but after the death of the
old priest the pressure from heathenism was too great for his weak nature to
resist
and Joash followed the path of his immediate predecessors. True
the
third verse of our lesson may not indicate anything more than a resemblance to
heathen customs
inasmuch as they may have worshipped Jehovah in the “high
places”; still
having adopted that mode of heathen worship
it became easier
to introduce others
and thus the way was opened for that awful apostasy from
God when incense was burned to strange gods “in every single city of Judah.”
Nevertheless
Joash should have full credit for the one luminous work of his
whole reign--the repair of the temple. We shall find his plans of gathering and
expending the money worthy of our careful study.
I. The plans of
collection.
1. The first one
undoubtedly the king’s
shows him in a favourable
light. He assumes no priestly prerogative or authority. He simply enjoins the
priests to do their legitimate work--“go out into the cities of Judah and
gather of all Israel money to repair the house of the Lord.” The parallel
account in 2 Kings 12:4
gives the details of
the plan. Three methods of collecting the money are there described. First
“The money of every one that passeth the account.” Bahr considers these words
an incorrect translation of the original
preferring “money which passes
over”--that is
current money. It he is right
then no separate method is
indicated. But the weight of authority is in favour of the old translation
and
following this
the half-shekel which was paid for every one that was
numbered
from twenty years old and upward (Exodus 30:13
seq.)
seems to be
meant. Second
“The money that every man is set at”--that is
the amount
prescribed by the priests for those who made a “singular vow” according to the
law in Leviticus 27:1-8. The third was the
free-will offering
and probably more dependence was placed on this than upon
either or both of the other methods. Taken all in all
this plan was compulsive
and judicious
and deserved to succeed. But it failed
and why? There appears
to have been a combination of reasons. The words
“Howbeit the Levites hastened
it not
” furnish a hint that the appointed collectors
on whom the success of
the plan largely depended
did not enter heartily into its prosecution. They
were expected not only to take what the people brought in voluntarily
but
actively to solicit “every man of his acquaintance” (parallel account in 2 Kings 12:5). Whether they did not
relish moving
at the orders of the king
or were too lazy to “go out into the
cities of Judah
” we can only conjecture. We only know they did not hasten. No
doubt
too
there was much inertia on the part of the people themselves. The
general indifference to the old system of worship and the inevitable corruption
which followed dabbling with heathen practices both contributed to a lethargy
which could only be broken up by some extra-ordinary method. But the great
reason lies deeper
much deeper. Soften the account as we will
there was
wide-spread dissatisfaction with the course pursued by the priests. Whether
they had good grounds for suspicion or not
the people believed the collectors
had misappropriated the funds. And it is hard to clear them of this charge.
Doubtless some money came in from loyal souls who longed to see God’s temple
shining with the olden glory. Indeed
we know that some did
because when the
king called on the priests for a report he ordered them to “take no more
money.” Some
then
had been gathered. But what became of it? The priests never
made any return thereof. True
it condones the fault somewhat to plead that the
regular sacerdotal revenue had largely fallen off during the prevalence of
idolatry
and that the priests found themselves hard pushed for funds for their
subsistence and the temple-worship
and thus were forced to use what came into
their hands for immediate needs. But to divert money given for a specific
purpose to other channels
however proper
is practical embezzlement. And it is
easy to see how this course would breed dissatisfaction and revolt among the
people. Their joyful acceptance of the second plan
and the hearty liberality
exhibited
show conclusively that we have not argued unjustly. And the taking
of the whole matter out of
the hands of the priests by the king confirms our position. It would appear
that Joash gave ample time for the successful working of this first plan. Not
until the twenty-third year of his reign did he call the priests to account.
This does not mean
of course
that the collectors had been at work twenty
three years
for we are not told in what year they received their commission.
It certainly could not have been in the first years of Joash’s reign
because
he began to rule at the age of eight.
2. But having abandoned the first plan
the king quickly unfolded his
second one. This was as simple u it was effective. A box or chest
securely
locked
with a hole cut in the lid to admit pieces of money
was first prepared. It was
placed at the entrance-gate to the priest’s court on the right. Royal
proclamation was then made of the new plan throughout the land
and the people
exhorted to bring in their contributions in accordance with the law found in Exodus 30:12-16
and see their money
deposited in the chest. The part of the priests was the mere perfunctory duty
of receiving the money and putting it into the receptacle in the presence of
the donors. And now money fairly flowed in. Nor was it given grudgingly. “All
the princes and all the people rejoiced.” When the chest was full the priest
sent his scribe and the king his secretary
and the two emptied it
weighed the
money
bound it up in bags (2 Kings 5:23)
and carried it back
to its place. The process was repeated until an abundance was gathered for the
purpose. The plan was a great success. And why? Doubtless the novelty of the
plan accounts partly for it. The curiosity to look upon the first money-chest
of this description would bring in many contributions that otherwise would not
have been given. But
chiefly
every person saw his gift deposited in the
receptacle which was inaccessible to any but the regularly appointed officers
and thus he could be reasonably sure that his money would be laid out for the
purpose he intended. Herein lies the chief cause of the plan’s success--every
piece of money was strictly accounted for
and there was no possible chance for
a misuse of the funds.
II. The expenditure
was as noteworthy as the gathering. The same clear-headed
far-seeing intelligence
was behind it. Putting the two accounts together
it is plain that overseers
were appointed who had general charge of the repairs. The words
“such as did
the work of the service of the house of the Lord
” in the twelfth verse
indicate that the overseers were Levites. They had authority to employ artisans
of different kinds--masons and carpenters and workers in brass and iron--and
also to purchase the needed materials. Into their hands went the immense sums
which had been collected
and to them the workmen looked for their wages. And
what seems strange--almost incomprehensible--in view of the careful scrutiny
exercised over the collections
their overseers were not required to give
account of their stewardship (2 Kings 12:15). That they were
honest and “dealt faithfully” is apparent from the fact that
after finishing
their task and paying all the bills
they brought back a remainder to the king
and Jehoiada. With this unexpended balance they were enabled to furnish the
temple anew with the vessels necessary for the ritual service (1 Kings 7:49-50). The old ones had
been devoted to Baalim (verse 7). An apparent discrepancy exists at this point
between our account and that in 2 Kings 12:13
where the writer
declares that vessels were not made of the “money that was brought into the
house of the Lord.” Rawlinson seems to explain the matter satisfactorily by
showing that “all that the writer of Kings desires to impress on his readers
is
that the repairs were not delayed by any deductions from the money that
flowed in through the chest on account of vessels or ornaments of the house.
What became of the surplus in the chest after the last repairs were completed
he does not care to tell us. But it is exactly this
the application of which
is mentioned by the writer of Chronicles.” We may venture to add our opinion
that the writer of Kings
in enumerating the special points of the overseers’
responsibility
mentions
casually
that they were not responsible for the
furnishing of the temple with the appropriate vessels. Their special business
was to look after the repairs. So
after many years of dilapidation
the people
saw their glorious sanctuary shine in all its former glory. The smoke of
sacrifice again rose heavenward
calling the backsliding children of Israel to
the faith of their fathers.
III. Practical
words.
1. One of the great problems which ever confront the Church is the
financial one. Doors open on every hand
and consecrated workers wait to go
through them
but the treasuries are empty. Settle this matter of finance
and
the spiritual interests will progress correspondingly.
2. The contribution box is not a “Vandal in the house of God.” It is
the legitimate successor of Jehoiada’s chest
and its regular use should be
considered a part of worship.
3. The people who give the money have a right to know where it goes.
And if it be diverted from its proper use
those who administer should not
complain if there follow a falling off in contributions. Men will have honest
dealing in Church finances. (H. H. French.)
The temple repaired
The work of Joash was to repair the temple and restore the
sacrificial worship. The bright side of Joash’s rule divides itself into the
man and his mission--his motive and his method.
I. Joash had to
conquer
spiritually
his own heart as well as the heart of his people. To know
Joash you must understand--
1. His lineage. Heredity did little for
but much against
the
formation in him of a pure character. Athaliah and Jezebel were his grandmother
and great.grandmother.
2. His environment. This was Jehoiada.
II. The mission of
Joash was to effect among his people a genuine reformation. The reconstruction
of the temple he viewed as the road to religious revival and reformation.
Destruction and reconstruction are alternating or synchronous processes ever
manifesting themselves in the efforts of God’s people. Joash is the resultant
and embodiment of both these forces. Destruction is easy
and to wicked men
only too natural (verse.7). Construction
and still more reconstruction
is as
difficult as destruction is easy.
III. Joash was
unselfish in his motive.
1. The times called loudly for reform.
2. Joash aimed at a revival of religion.
IV. The method of
Joash for increasing men’s interest in religion was the restoration of the
Lord’s house. A dilapidated temple of God is painfully significant. The great
collection under Joash for the temple is a model for Christian beneficence.
Dimly shadowed in the people’s offering under Joash
but distinctly taught in
the letters of Paul
are eight rules of Christian giving. We should give--
1. By principle and habit.
2. In the spirit of stewardship.
3. According to ability.
4. Willingly and cheerfully.
5. Secretly as a general thing
as unto the Lord
and not unto men.
6. As an act of worship.
7. In faith
venturing on God
as did the widow with her two mites.
8. Intelligently
as to the object.
Application: Mankind is “the house of the Lord” in ruins. We are
under solemn obligation to reconstruct this broken and shattered temple. (W.
Landrum
D. D.)
Joash repairing the temple
I. That the
providences of God connected with the house of the Lord call for grateful
remembrance.
II. The moral value
of the house of God to the community and the country in which it stands demands
honoured recognition.
III. The spiritual
value of sacred places should be fitly acknowledged. I lately heard an eminent
business man say
“Forty-six years ago yesterday noon the Holy Spirit came into
my soul. Yesterday I walked to the place and adored the ground where He blessed
me
and remembered that for forty-six years He had talked with me and kept me.”
IV. The house of
God can be properly cared for only by regular
systematic effort.
V. God has
to a
great degree
intrusted the beautifying of His house to the young. (Monday
Club Sermons.)
Repairing the temple
1. To each one among us there is a temple which should be far holier
in his eyes than was even the temple at Jerusalem in the eyes of the children
of Israel.
2. This holiest of temples
a man’s own self
is exposed to injury
and decay.
3. As year passes after year
let us be reminded to repair each one
of us to that house of God which is built within him
and which has been
dedicated to the worship of God by the Holy Spirit which dwells in it.
4. In repairing the spiritual temple
one of our main purposes should
be to ascertain what in it needs to be stripped away and what demands
preservation.
5. The things to be discarded are--
6. The things which must be retained are--
Howbeit the Levites
hastened not.--
Indifferences rebuked
There is a distinct tinge of suspicion and “whipping up” in his
injunction to “hasten the matter.” Half-heartedness always means languid work
and that always means failure. The earnest people are fretted continually by
the indifferent. Every good scheme is held back
like a ship with a foul
bottom
by the barnacles that stick to its keel and bring down its speed. Eager
zeal has in all ages to be yoked to torpid indifference
and to drag its
unwilling companion along like two dogs in a leash. (A. Maclaren
D.D.)
Verse 10
And cast into the chest until they had made an end.
Compulsory and free-will offerings
The restoration of Solomon’s temple by Jehoiada under
Joash’s authority is a remarkable instance of cheerful giving
of a truly
voluntary offering. The money was not raised by a royal edict imposing a
subsidy
nor were the workmen impressed for service for so many months in the
year. By taxation and by forced labour
or levies
had Solomon’s temple been
erected. Such indeed was
and is
the almost invariable custom of Eastern
monarchs in the construction of all great works
whether religious or secular.
Though the prince might be lauded as a patron of religion or of art
a rankling
sense of oppression and injustice remained in the breasts of the toilers. This
Rehoboam had found to his cost
when his people demanded relief from the
burdens which the glories of Solomon had entailed on them. We may illustrate
this by an interesting inscription at Abilene. A splendid aqueduct and military
road have been engineered along the face of the lofty cliff which bounds the
deep valley. At the commencement of the aqueduct is the long inscription in
honour of the Emperor Trajan
for whom the gratitude of posterity is claimed
because of this great achievement. But below the inscription is chiseled deep
on the face of the rock
in letters of a rather different shape
added
no
doubt
after the emperor’s departure
“Impensis Abilenorum”--“At the expense of the people
of Abilene.” (Canon Tristram.)
Jehoiada waxed old.
A message for the aged
I. Examine the
name of this aged priest. “Jehoiada”--“one who has knowledge of Jehovah.”
1. He had been experimentally acquainted with Jehovah in His fatherly
and merciful character.
2. He had as priest special opportunities of gaining acquaintance
with God.
II. Consider his
beneficent influence in--
1. Instructing the youthful king.
2. Acting as regent of the kingdom.
3. Patriotically serving his country and promoting the well-being of
her people.
4. Doing good to
and in connection with
the house of God.
III. Contemplate the
honoured close of a long and useful life. (Fairfax Goodall
M.A.)
Religious instructors useful to civil society
Some have conjectured that these words were a part of an epitaph
put upon Jehoiada’s tomb. They express the high sense which the nation
entertained of his eminent usefulness in his sacred profession.
I. The common
opinion of mankind respecting the usefulness of religious instructors in civil
society. The opinion of the world upon this subject is evidenced by their
uniform and immemorial practice. Jews
Christians
and heathen have universally
agreed to support religious teachers.
II. This common
opinion of mankind respecting religious instructors is well founded.
1. The common opinion of the world is generally just. Men seldom form
a wrong judgment of those things which come under their own observation and
experience.
2. Another argument is drawn--
(a) The duties which rulers owe to their subjects.
(b) The duties which subjects owe to their rulers.
(c) Every private as well as public duty.
(a) The being and presence of the all-seeing and heart-searching God.
(b) The infinite authority of all His precepts and prohibitions.
(c) The controlling influence of His universal providence.
(d) Future and eternal rewards and punishments.
III. Suggestions.
1. Since men in all ages have generally and justly agreed in the
opinion that religious instructors are useful in civil society
it discovers no
less ignorance than presumption in those who adopt and endeavour to propagate
the opposite sentiment.
2. None are fit for civil rulers who would exclude religious
instructors from civil society.
3. A people ought to consider the gift of wise and faithful ministers
as a great public blessing.
4. It is the wisdom and duty of civil rulers to favour the cause of
religion and employ every proper method to promote the general diffusion of
religious knowledge.
5. It argues a great degree of infatuation in those who govern to
oppose or restrain religious instruction.
6. It is extremely difficult for civil rulers to subvert a good
government while religious teachers faithfully discharge their duty.
7. Ministers of the gospel ought to exert all the power and influence
which their sacred office gives them to prevent the ruin of the nation.
8. We have great reason to fear the displeasure of God for neglecting
and abusing the ministrations of His Word. (N. Emmons
D.D.)
Yet He sent prophets to them
to bring them again unto the Lord.
Judah’s apostasy
I. Prophetic denunciation
of apostasy resented.
II. Zechariah’s
death was parallel with that of St. Stephen.
1. His offence was the denunciation of the sin of the leaders of
Judah (Acts 7:51-53).
2. Stoned as a blasphemer.
III. Contrast in the
spirit of Judaism and Christianity--
1. Zechariah’s last words: “The Lord look on it and requite it.”
2. Stephen’s: “Lord lay not this sin to their charge.”
IV. Reflections.
1. The value of a wise and true friend. Jehoiada’s influence on Joash.
2. The necessity of a moral reformation as well as a political to
secure permanent results in religious changes. The reformation under Joash was
merely outward conformity.
V. The certainty
that a faithful ministry implies the unpopularity of those who exercise it.
1. All the prophets suffered under Judaism (Matthew 23:35; Luke 11:51).
2. Christ
Stephen
the apostles
the early Christians. Reformers all
through history.
3. Human nature always the same. It hates those who attack its sins.
VI. The spirit that
resents faithful reproof always entails retribution on itself (verse 23). To do
wrong and refuse instruction is the greatest misfortune a man can suffer.
VII. The necessity
to do right for duty’s sake
without expecting gratitude or acknowledgment. (J.
C. Geikie
D.D.)
The goodness of King Joash
1. In ten years from the death of Jehoiada
Joash was so utterly
another man that you cannot recognise in him one feature of that godly
disposition which distinguished his earlier years. He is a sad illustration of
the deceitfulness of the human heart; of the weakness of the natural man; and
of the perishing nature of that impulsive goodness which rests solely for its
permanence upon the constraining influences of others.
2. Joash still represents a large class--persons of warm and
susceptible feelings
acting habitually under impulse
of a temper of mind
volatile
or pliable
or keenly
sensitive
upon which impressions are easily made and as easily effaced.
3. Speaking as I am in a university city
I am reminded that I can
point to no spot more suggestive than this of the evanescent quality of that
light of the soul which is simply reflected
of that transient goodness which
walks by sight and not by faith. How many young men have gathered here
filled
with noble emulation
and strong in their own resolution to fulfil the purpose
of their coming! And what has followed? First the whisper of the arch-tempter
“You are free; eat
drink
and be merry.” Then the sceptic
asking
contemptuously
“What is truth?” The controversial humourist
commending his
ingenious sophistries with insidious drollery. The listless idler
intruding
his unwelcome presence upon the conventional hours of study. The voluptuary
putting his bottle to his companions
and filling them with shame for glory.
The sinner in the city
whose house is in the way to hell. The tradesman with
his offer of unlimited credit. The sordid moneylender
weaving his web of
usury. These
and such as these
have “made their obeisance
” like the princes
of Judah; and behold
Jehoiada is gone
and Joash has hearkened to them! He has
left the God of his fathers. He cannot prosper
because God has forsaken him.
4. Oh
if I am to send my son to fight the good fight of faith
to
wrestle against the powers of darkness
let me stablish him with this fact as
the counterpoise and antidote to the delusions of the world--that he is now a
responsible being. (Henry Drury
M.A.)
But slew his son.
Joash and Jehoiada
The picture here drawn of the failure of the best of tutors and
governors is unfortunately only too typical. Julian the Apostate was educated
by a distinguished Christian prelate
Eusebius of Nicomedia
and was trained in
a strict routine of religious observances; yet he repudiated Christianity at
the earliest safe opportunity. His apostasy
like that of Joash
was probably
characterised by base ingratitude. At Constantine’s death the troops in
Constantinople massacred nearly all the princes of the imperial family
and
Julian
then only six years old
is said to have been saved and concealed in a
church by Mark
Bishop of Arethusa. When Julian became emperor
he repaid this
obligation by subjecting his benefactor to cruel tortures because he had
destroyed a heathen temple and refused to make any compensation. (W.
H. Bennett
M.A.)
──《The Biblical Illustrator》