查經資料大全

 

| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index |

 

Job Chapter Nine

 

Job 9 Outline of Contents

Job: There Is No Mediator (v.1~35)

New King James Version (NKJV)

 

INTRODUCTION TO JOB 9

This and the following chapter contain Job's answer to Bildad and in this he asserts the strict justice at God; which is such that no man can be just in his sight not being able to answer to one charge or for one sin of a thousand he is guilty of Job 9:1; and that such are his wisdom and power that the most daring man cannot expect to succeed in an opposition to him Job 9:4; instances are given of his power in the works of nature and providence Job 9:5; notice is taken of the imperceptibleness of his actions and motions and of his sovereignty in all his ways Job 9:11; and of his fierce wrath and anger which is such as obliges the proudest of men to stoop under him; and therefore Job chose not to contend in a judicial way with him but in a suppliant manner would entreat him since his hand was so heavy upon him Job 9:13; he affirms in direct opposition to Bildad and his friends and insists upon it that God afflicts both the righteous and the wicked; yea gives the earth to the latter when he slays the former Job 9:22; he then observes the shortness of his days and complains of his heavy afflictions Job 9:25; and concludes that it was in vain for him to expect his cause to be heard before God there being no daysman between them; and wishes that the dread of the Divine Majesty might be taken from him and then he would freely and without fear speak unto him Job 9:29.

 

Job 9:1  Then Job answered and said:

   YLT  1And Job answereth and saith: --

Then Job answered and said. Without taking notice of Bildad's harsh expressions and severe censures or his unfriendliness to him; he enters directly into the argument grants some things confutes others and defends himself and his conduct.

 

Job 9:2  2 “Truly I know it is so But how can a man be righteous before God?
   YLT 
2Truly I have known that [it is] so And what -- is man righteous with God?

I know it is so of a truth .... That is that God is just and does not pervert justice and judgment as Bildad had observed Job 8:3; Job was a man of great natural parts and capacity; he had a large share of knowledge of things natural civil and moral; and he was a good man in whom the true light of grace shined; and being enlightened by the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of divine things he knew much of God of his being and perfections and of the methods of his grace especially in the justification of men as appears by various passages in this chapter; he knew that God was just and holy in all his ways and works whether of providence or grace; and this he kept in sight amidst all his afflictions and was ready to acknowledge it: he knew this "of a truth"; that is most certainly; for there are some truths that are so plain and evident that a man may be assured of and this was such an one with Job; he had no need to be instructed in this article; he was as knowing in this point as well as in others as Bildad or any of his friends; nor did he need to be sent to the ancients to inquire of them or to prepare himself for the search of the fathers in order to acquire the knowledge of this to which Bildad had advised; yet though this was so clear a point about which there was no room for further contest; but then the matter is:

how should man be just with God? if not angels if not man in his best estate in which he was vanity when compared with God; then much less frail feeble mortal sinful men even the best of men considered in themselves and with respect to their own righteousness: for to "be just" is not to be so through an infusion of righteousness and holiness into men which in the best of men is their sanctification and not their justification; but this is a legal term and stands opposed to condemnation and signifies a man's being condemned and pronounced righteous in a judiciary way; so a man cannot be adjudged reckoned or accounted by God upon the foot of works of righteousness done by him; since his best works are imperfect not answerable to the law but very defective and so not justifying; are opposite to the grace of God by which in an evangelic sense men are justified; these would encourage boasting which is excluded in God's way of justifying sinners; and could justification be by them the death of Christ would be in vain and there would have been no need of him and his justifying righteousness: especially it is a certain thing that a man can never be "just" or "justified with God" in such a way or through any righteousness wrought out by him; that is either he is not and cannot be just in comparison of God; for if the inhabitants of the heavens are not pure in his sight the holy angels; and if man at his best estate was altogether vanity when compared with him what must sinful mortals be? or not be just at his bar; should he mark their iniquities enter into judgment with them or an action against them summon them before him to answer to charges he has to exhibit; they could not stand before him or go off acquitted or discharged: or in his account; for his judgment is according to truth; he can never reckon that a perfect righteousness which is an imperfect one: or in his sight; for though men may be just in comparison of others or at an human bar in an human court of judicature and in the account of men and in their sight to whom they may appear outwardly righteous as well as in their own sight; yet not in the sight of God who sees all things the heart and all in it every action and the spring of it; see Psalm 143:2 Romans 3:20; in this sense a man can only be just with God through the imputation of the righteousness of Christ accounting that to him putting it upon him and clothing him with it and so reckoning and pronouncing him righteous through it; and which is entirely consistent with the justice of God since by it the law is fulfilled magnified and made honourable and justice satisfied; so that God is just while he is the justifier of him that believes in Jesus Romans 3:26.

 

Job 9:3  3 If one wished to contend with Him He could not answer Him one time out of a thousand.
   YLT 
3If he delight to strive with Him -- He doth not answer him one of a thousand.

If he will contend with him .... If God will contend with man so Sephorno; enter into a controversy with him litigate and dispute the point in law whether he is just or not man cannot answer to the allegations he will produce; or if man should contend with God a potsherd strive with its maker to what purpose would it be? he could never avail himself by such a procedure; the match is unequal there is no striving or contending with God in a judicial way:

he cannot answer him one of a thousand; which some understand that God will not answer men; he will not vouchsafe to give an answer to such that plead with him or talk with him of his judgments in providence or pretend to vindicate themselves their ways and their works before him; but this sense seems contrary to Jeremiah 12:1; but the meaning is that man cannot answer God; either not one man out of a thousand that is none at all; unless by one of a thousand is meant the interpreter one among a thousand even the Messiah the chiefest among ten thousand; the one man of a thousand Solomon found upon search; see Job 33:23; he indeed has made himself responsible for his people as their surety and was able to answer for them; and he has answered for them and made satisfaction for their sins; it was exacted or required that is a full payment of their debts or a plenary satisfaction for their sins "and he answered" according to Isaiah 53:7; but rather the sense is that a man cannot answer either one time of a thousandF21אחת מני אלף "una vice ex millibus" Schmidt. or one argument to one article exhibited or to one objection or charge of a thousand brought against him by the law or justice of God; that is for one sin of a thousand he has committed; so Mr. Broughton renders it "to one thing of a thousand"F23"Ad rem unam ex mille" Beza; "ad unum argumentum ex mille argumentis" Vatablus; so Castalio Bar Tzemach. ; this suggests that the sins of men are numerous; their debts are many they are more than ten thousand talents which they are not able to answer to or pay off no not one of them; their iniquities are more than the hairs of their head they cannot be understood or reckoned: and now a man cannot answer for one of a thousand or the millions of sins he is guilty of; he cannot deny them he cannot excuse them he cannot make satisfaction for anyone of them; they are committed against an infinite Being and require an infinite satisfaction which man cannot give; they are violations of a law and injuries to divine justice that no man is able to atone for; whatever obedience he is capable of or does perform God has a prior right unto it and therefore can never answer for former transgressions; this being the case sinful man cannot be just with God upon the foot of his works which is the thing this observation is made to illustrate: man's obedience is so short and God's commandment or law so very broad that these two can never be brought to meet agree together or answer to one another; and therefore it may be strongly concluded that a man is justified if ever he is justified at all in the sight of God by faith in Christ and his righteousness without the deeds of the law Romans 3:28.

 

Job 9:4  4 God is wise in heart and mighty in strength. Who has hardened himself against Him and prospered?
   YLT 
4Wise in heart and strong in power -- Who hath hardened toward Him and is at peace?

He is wise in heart .... Originally essentially truly really and perfectly so; he is the only and the all wise God; his understanding is infinite; he is able to traverse all the schemes of men in things civil or religious and disappoint all their devices; for though there be ever so many of them or be ever so deeply laid the counsel of the Lord that shall stand; for there is no wisdom understanding or counsel against him; and therefore it is in vain to contend with him: he is so wise and knowing that he sees and knows all that is in man or is done by him whether in public or in private; there is not a thought in his heart nor a word on his tongue nor an action in his life and conversation but what he is thoroughly acquainted with; and everyone of these he will bring into judgment: how therefore is it possible that sinful men should be just in the sight of such a wise and holy Being upon the score of his own righteousness?

and mighty in strength; he is the most mighty; he is the Almighty; he has a mighty arm and strong hand; and unless a man had a strong arm like him his own right hand can never save him or his own righteousness justify him; wherefore to what purpose is it for a feeble man to contend and strive with him? and since he is not a man as he is how should they come together in judgment? and what a vain thing must it he to set a time for it since if we speak of strength lo he is strong? see Job 9:19

who hath hardened himself against him and hath prospered? either by behaving proudly and insolently to him as Pharaoh Sennacherib and others by speaking hard words against him as the Jews in the times of Malachi; and such hard speeches ungodly sinners utter against God Christ his Gospel ordinances people ways and worship of which they will be convinced and for which they will be condemned at the last judgment; and by bold and daring acts of sin running upon the thick bosses of his buckler giving themselves up to commit all uncleanness with greediness and making a covenant with hell and an agreement with death and so think themselves safe and secure at all events; but such never prospered and succeeded as they promised themselves but came to ruin and destruction: or "had peace"F24וישלם "et pacem habuit" V. L. Pagninus Montanus Bolducius; "et pace frueretur" Cocceius. or "found quietness" as Mr. Broughton: there is no peace to wicked men true solid peace either here or hereafter; when they cry "Peace" or promise themselves much of it destruction comes; and if God sets home the guilt of sin upon their consciences the lead of it is intolerable; it sinks them into despair and what then will be the worm that dieth not?

 

Job 9:5  5 He removes the mountains and they do not know When He overturns them in His anger;
   YLT 
5Who is removing mountains And they have not known Who hath overturned them in His anger.

Which removeth the mountains .... This and what follow are instances of the power of God and are full proofs of his being mighty in strength; and may be understood either literally not only of what God is able to do if he will but of what he has done; and historyF25Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 2. c. 83. Wernerus Palmerius Theophanes "a aurus" in Bolduc. in loc. furnishes us with instances of mountains being removed from one place to another; and ScheuchzerF26Physic. Sacr. vol. 4. p. 673. makes mention of a village in Helvetia called Plurium which in 1618 was covered with the sudden fall of a mountain and swallowed up in the earth with 1800 inhabitants and not the least trace of it to be seen any more; and in the sacred Scriptures is a prediction of the mount of Olives being removed from its place one half to the north and the other to the south Zechariah 14:4; and JosephusF1Antiqu. l. 9. c. 10. sect. 4. gives a relation much like it as in fact; besides Job may have respect to what had been done in his times or before them and particularly at the universal deluge which covered the tops of the highest mountains and hills and very probably washed away some from their places: or else it may be understood proverbially of the Lord's doing things marvellous and surprising and which are impossible and impracticable with men; see Matthew 17:20; or rather figuratively of kingdoms and mighty kings as the Targum comparable to mountains for their height and strength who yet are removed by God at his pleasure; see Zechariah 4:7

and they know not; when they are removed and how it is done; it is imperceptible; either the mountains are not sensible of it or the inhabitants of the mountains as Bar Tzemach; or men the common sort of men the multitude as Gersom: R. Saadiah Gaon interprets it of removing the men of the mountains and they know it not:

which overturneth them in his anger; for the sins or men which was the case of the old world: Mr. Broughton renders it "that men cannot mark how he hath removed them out of their place in his anger".

 

Job 9:6  6 He shakes the earth out of its place And its pillars tremble;
   YLT 
6Who is shaking earth from its place And its pillars move themselves.

Which shaketh the earth out of her place .... Can do it and will do it at the last day when it shall be utterly broken down clean dissolved and reel to and fro like a drunkard and be removed as a cottage and which John in a vision saw flee away from the presence of him that sat upon the throne Isaiah 24:19; for this cannot be understood of earthquakes in common which are only partial and do not remove the earth out of its place only shake some parts of it; and this may also refer to the time of the flood when the earth received some change and alteration in its situation as Mr. Burnet in his Theory of the Earth observes; and the Apostle Peter suggests something of this kind when he distinguishes the present earth from the former which he says stood out of the water and in it but the present earth not so but is reserved for fire 2 Peter 3:5

and the pillars thereof tremble; the centre or lower parts of it see Psalm 75:3.

 

Job 9:7  7 He commands the sun and it does not rise; He seals off the stars;
   YLT 
7Who is speaking to the sun and it riseth not And the stars He sealeth up.

Which commandeth the sun and it riseth not .... Either he could do it if he would by a word speaking as he ordered it to stand still in the times of Joshua Joshua 10:13 and caused the shadow to return ten degrees it had gone back in the dial of Ahaz in the times of Hezekiah 2 Kings 20:11; or else the sense is it rises not at any other time and place but when and where he commands it; or he commands it not to rise in the same place at one time of the year as at another and it rises not; or this may be understood of eclipses or of its being covered with clouds in tempestuous weather for a considerable time together when it seems as if it was not risen: some think this respects the three days' darkness in Egypt when the Israelites were there Exodus 10:22 which was a little before or about the time of Job; or rather it refers to the general flood in the times of Noah when it rained forty days and forty nights Genesis 7:12 during which time the sun appeared not and so seemed as if it was not risen; see Amos 8:9; HerodotusF2Euterpe sive l. 2. c. 149. relates from the memoirs of the Egyptians that the sun rose four times out of its usual course; twice it rose where it now sets and twice it set where it now rises:

and sealeth up the stars: either by the light of the sun in the daytime which hides them that they are not visible or by dark clouds and tempestuous weather in the night; such a season as that was in which the Apostle Paul and the mariners with him were when neither sun nor stars appeared for many days Acts 27:20 and so the Targum paraphrases it and"sealeth up the stars with clouds;'this may also refer to the time of the flood during the rain of forty days and nights Genesis 7:4; or to the annual motion of the sun through the ecliptic which makes the point of the sun's rising and setting vary and is the reason why some stars appear in summer and are sealed up in winter and others that are seen in winter are not visible in summer; and so Cocceius interprets it.

 

Job 9:8  8 He alone spreads out the heavens And treads on the waves of the sea;
   YLT 
8Stretching out the heavens by Himself And treading on the heights of the sea

Which alone spreadeth out the heavens .... The expanse or what we commonly translate "firmament"; but has its name in the Hebrew language from its being expanded spread and stretched out over the earth and all around it; and seems chiefly to design the ether or atmosphere which is a fine thin matter and substance spread around us and which is sometimes spread with clouds; this is said to be stretched out like a curtain and a tent to dwell in tents being made of curtains spread out Isaiah 40:21; and the allusion may be to a military tent the pavilion of a general of an army as Pineda observes from whence Jehovah plays his artillery upon his enemies thunder lightning hailstones and coals of fire; see Psalm 18:11; this respects not so much the first creation or spreading of the air or the heavens as the continuance thereof; God continues to spread them or to keep them spread that they may not be rolled up as a scroll; or folded up as a garment as they will be Hebrews 1:12; and this he does alone without the help of any creature angels or men; any piece of tapestry or carpet that is large is not easily spread alone; but what power must the vast expanse of the heavens require to be spread alone and continued so? nothing less than infinite; see Isaiah 44:24; some render it "which boweth the heavens"F3נטה שמים "inclinat coelum" Piscator. as the same word is rendered in Psalm 18:9; which he does when he fills them with clouds so that they seem to hang low and to be inclined towards the earth:

and treadeth upon the waves of the seaF4על במתי ים "super excelsa maris" Pagninus Montanus &c. "summitates maris" Tigurine version; "celsos vertices maris" Schultens. ; which he did at the first creation when the waters that covered the face of the earth were by his order collected into one place and there shut up and restrained from overflowing the earth; and which restraint as it is an act of power over them is designed by treading upon them and a continued act may be the rather meant here; see Genesis 1:8; and when the waves of it are lifted up as high as they sometimes are by strong and stormy winds the Lord on high is mightier than they he treads upon them and represses them; he rules their raging stills their noise and makes them smooth calm and quiet Psalm 65:7; this none but God can do: the Egyptian hieroglyphic of doing a thing impossible was a man's walking upon waterF5Orus Apollo apud Bolduc. ; the Heathens chose not to describe even their god of the sea Neptune by walking on it as being too great for him but by swimmingF6Cicero de Natura Deorum l. 2. ; of Christ's walking upon the sea see Matthew 14:25; it may be rendered "the high places of the sea": the waves of it when mounted to a great height by the wind; so Mr. Broughton "the high waves of the sea" see Psalm 107:25; there is a copy as the lesser Massorah observes which reads "upon the high places of the cloud"F7"Legitur et" עב "pro" ים i.e. "super excelsas nubes" Vatablus. see Isaiah 14:14; and Gersom interprets these high places of the heavens and of God's giving rain from thence.

 

Job 9:9  9 He made the Bear Orion and the Pleiades And the chambers of the south;
   YLT 
9Making Osh Kesil and Kimah And the inner chambers of the south.

Which maketh Arcturus .... By which is meant not a single star but a collection of stars as Bar Tzemach and Ben Melech a constellation; hence we read of Arcturus and his sons Job 38:32. Aben Ezra understands it of the seven stars but these are thought to be meant by the Pleiades later mentioned; this constellation is about the Arctic or northern pole in the tail of the Bear appears in the beginning of September and brings stormy weather when winter is at handF8Sophoclis Oedipus Tyran. ver. 1147. :

Orion and Pleiades; the former of these also is not a single star but a constellation; by the help of a telescope no less than two thousand are numbered and in Hebrew it is called "Cesil"; hence the month "Cisleu" has its name which answers to part of November and part of December at which time this constellation is seen and is attended with stormy weather; hence Virgil calls it Nimbosus OrionF9Aeneid. l. 1. Vid. Horat. Carmin. l. 3. Ode 27. Epod. 15. : and the latter are what we call the Seven Stars sometimes by writers called Vergiliae because they appear in the spring; and have their name of Pleiades from sailing because at this time of year mariners go out with their ships; though some say this constellation is not favourable to them causing rains and tempestsF11"----pleiadum choro Scindente nubes". Horat. Carmin. l. 4. Ode 14. ; these three divide the whole year:

and the chambers of the south: the stars in the southern hemisphere about the Antarctic or southern pole; and called "chambers" as Aben Ezra observes because hidden and are not seen by those in the other hemisphere as if they were in a chamber: now the making of these is rightly ascribed to God who made all the stars Genesis 1:16; though this may rather regard the continuance of them in their being who calls them by name brings out their host by number directs their course keeps them in their orbs and preserves their influence.

 

Job 9:10  10 He does great things past finding out Yes wonders without number.
   YLT 
10Doing great things till there is no searching And wonderful till there is no numbering.

Which doth great things past finding out .... In heaven and earth; great as to quantity and quality not to be thoroughly searched out so as to tell their numbers nor explain and express the nature of them to the full; even what he has done and does in creation providence and grace:

yea and wonders without number; such as are amazing to men who cannot account for them and so many that they cannot number them. The same things are said by Eliphaz; see Gill on Job 5:9; and which Job here repeats to show that he agreed with him and was ready to own what was truth whenever expressed by him or his friends and especially such as made for the glory of the Divine Being.

 

Job 9:11  11 If He goes by me I do not see Him; If He moves past I do not perceive Him;
   YLT 
11Lo He goeth over by me and I see not And He passeth on and I attend not to it.

Lo he goeth by me and I see him not .... This is expressive of the invisibility of God; for though the angels in heaven always behold his face and men in the works of creation may see his eternal power and Godhead and other perfections of it displayed therein; and saints by faith have a comfortable and delightful view of him of his countenance his love grace and mercy in his word and ordinances and especially in the face and person of Christ the image of the invisible God and will in heaven most clearly see him as he is in the greater display of his glory and his grace; yet his essence is invisible not only not to be seen with corporeal eyes but not to be comprehended in the mind:

he passeth on also but I perceive him not; this "going and passing on" as ascribed to God must be understood in consistence with his omnipresence; he cannot be thought to move from place to place who is everywhere who fills heaven and earth with his presence and there is no going from it: local motion cannot be said of him; but this respects the operations of his providence; he is continually working all around us by supporting us in being and supplying us with what we want and so is near us and yet we see him not: Job experienced the bounties of his providence as well as the blessings of his grace in the time of his prosperity and now he felt the weight of his afflicting hand upon him; but yet as to his essence he could not see him; he was sensible that he was nigh him and find a concern in all that befell him but he could neither see nor comprehend him nor account for his dealings with him: he had "passed by" him in his state of nature and had looked graciously on him and had said unto him Live; he had "passed on" from him and hid his face so that he could not see him nor find him backward nor forward on the right hand nor on the left where he used to work see Job 23:3.

 

Job 9:12  12 If He takes away who can hinder Him? Who can say to Him ‘What are You doing?’
   YLT 
12Lo He snatches away who bringeth it back? Who saith unto Him `What dost Thou?'

Behold he taketh away .... There are some things God never takes away from his people; he never takes away his love from them he always rests in that towards them let them be in what condition they will; he never takes away his grace from them when once bestowed on them or wrought in them; he never takes away his special gifts of grace particularly the unspeakable gift of his son Christ Jesus which is that good part when chosen which shall not be taken away; nor any of the spiritual blessings wherewith they are blessed in Christ; these are irreversible and irrevocable: but temporal blessings he takes away at pleasure; so he had taken away the children the servants of Job his substance wealth and riches and also his bodily health to which he may have a particular respect; yea when it pleases him he takes a man out of the world as the Targum and Gersom interpret it:

who can hinder him? he does what he pleases in heaven and earth; his will is irresistible his power is uncontrollable; there is no turning his mind nor staying his hand nor turning it back; when he works none can let or hinder. Mr. Broughton translates it "who shall make him restore?"F12So Beza Pagninus Montanus Bolducius Junius & Tremellius Cocceius. if a man takes away what he has no right to he may be obliged by law to restore it; but whatever God takes away he has a right unto be it relations and friends health or wealth; if he pleases he can restore and does; and as he did to Job to whom he after gave twice as much as he had before; but then he is not obliged to do it none can force him to it:

who will say unto him what doest thou? not one that knows what God is or that knows himself a creature of his; no person will choose or dare to ask what God does or why he does this and not another thing or why this in the manner he does it; for he gives no account of his matters to the sons of men nor is he obliged to it and it would be insolent in them to require it see Job 33:13; this expresses his sovereignty.

 

Job 9:13  13 God will not withdraw His anger The allies of the proud[a] lie prostrate beneath Him.

   YLT  13God doth not turn back His anger Under Him bowed have proud helpers.

If God will not withdraw his anger .... Or "God will not withdraw his anger"F13אלוה לא ישיב אפו "Deus non revocabit furorem suum" Pagninus Beza. ; he is angry or at least seems to be angry with his own people in their apprehension when he afflicts them and hides his face from them or does not immediately appear to their relief and assistance; but this does not always last he does not retain or keep anger for ever; but shows great mercies to them and with everlasting kindness has mercy on them by discovering his love to them applying his pardoning grace and mercy and comforting them with the consolations of his spirit; but then he is angry with the wicked every day for their continual transgressions; and he never withdraws his anger from them neither here nor hereafter but punishes them with everlasting destruction and casts them into everlasting fire to which his wrath and anger are compared: the consequence of which is:

the proud helpers do stoop under him; or "the helpers of pride"F14עזרי רהב "adjutores superbiae" Montanus Vatablus Drusius Junius & Tremellius Schmidt Michaelis. or helpers of proud men; proud wicked and ungodly men who combine together and help one another against God his people cause and interest; men of power rule and government as Aben Ezra explains it; civil magistrates men in authority who instead of being terrors to evil doers encourage them and help them forward in their wickedness; but though both those that help and those that are helped may continue for a while and be supported yet they shall sooner or later fall under the mighty hand of God his power and wrath and be crushed by it. Some regard may be had either to the giants the men of the old world who filled the earth with violence and were swept away with the flood Genesis 6:13; or rather to the builders of Babel who helped one another to build a tower to make them a name and secure themselves and in opposition to God; but he being angry with them made them desist and they bowed under him Genesis 11:4. Some render it "the helpers of Rahab"; that is of EgyptF15So Jarchi. Rahab being a name of Egypt Psalm 87:4. The devils are meant whose sin was pride and by which they fell and which they have endeavoured to promote and cherish among men; but these proud spirits are cast out of heaven and into hell where they are reserved in chains of darkness to the great judgment Judges 1:6; and are obliged whether they will or not to stoop to the Lord and even to the son of God in human nature which their proud stomachs cannot well bear; but are forced to it the anger of God lying upon them and his wrath which will never be withdrawn from them.

 

Job 9:14  14 “How then can I answer Him And choose my words to reason with Him?
   YLT 
14How much less do I -- I answer Him? Choose out my words with Him?

How much less shall I answer him .... Who is wise in heart and mighty in strength and has done and does the many things before related; who is invisible passes by and onwards insensibly; so that there is no knowing where to speak to him or how to guard against him since he can come on on every side at an unawares and unseen; and who is a sovereign Being who can do and does whatever he pleases; and therefore there is no such thing as disputing any point with him or calling him to an account for anything done by him: and if the great men of the earth proud and haughty tyrants and those prouder spirits if possible the infernal principalities and powers are obliged to bend and stoop to him; how should such a poor weak feeble creature as Job was enter the lists with him contend with God and argue with him about his dispensations or answer to any argument objection charge or article exhibited against him? here Job speaks humbly and meanly of himself as he in the whole context before speaks highly of God between whom there was no comparison:

and choose out my words to reason with him? suggesting that should he pick out words the most fit and proper to be used and put them together in the most exact order and which had the greatest force of persuasion and strength of reasoning in them yet they would be of no avail with God; these could have no influence upon him to turn his mind or alter either his purposes or his providences; and therefore concluded it was best for him to be silent and make no reply; but if he said anything to do it in a supplicating way as follows.

 

Job 9:15  15 For though I were righteous I could not answer Him; I would beg mercy of my Judge.
   YLT 
15Whom though I were righteous I answer not For my judgment I make supplication.

Whom though I were righteous yet would I not answer .... This is not to be understood of the righteousness of his cause that Job made no supposition of but strongly asserted and determined to hold it fast as long as he lived; nor of his evangelic righteousness the righteousness of faith he was acquainted with even the righteousness of his living Redeemer by which he knew he was and should be justified; and by which righteousness he could and did answer God as every believer may who making mention of this righteousness and of this only such an one may plead the righteousness of Christ with God as his justifying one and hold it up against all charges brought against him; yea by presenting this to God by faith he answers all the demands of the law of God both with respect to the precepts and penalty of it it being magnified and made honourable hereby and all that the justice of God can require and with which it is entirely satisfied; yea this righteousness will answer to God for him in a time to come in the last judgment: but Job speaks of his own legal and civil righteousness as a good man and a good magistrate; as the latter he put on righteousness and it clothed him; as the former having grace the root of the matter in him as he calls it it taught him to live soberly righteously and godly; he was a man that feared God and eschewed evil; and his sense is that though he should so well behave in every respect and so order his conversation aright before men that they could have nothing to lay to his charge yet he would not bring such a righteousness before God and pretend to answer him with it; for he knew that such a righteousness is no righteousness in the sight of God in the eye of his law and in the account of divine justice being not only imperfect but impure; not only rags but filthy ones attended with many sins as well as imperfections; wherefore no good man will put his cause before God on such an issue however he may before men; nay Job seems to carry this point yet further that though he had a sinless righteousness of his own and were as righteous as Adam before his fall or the holy angels in heaven yet he would not insist upon such a righteousness before God or pretend to answer him with it; for he knew that the inhabitants of the heavens and so man in his paradise on earth in his best estate were not pure in his sight but chargeable with folly and imperfection in comparison of him: and when he says he could not "answer" him his meaning is not that he would not answer to a question that was asked him but that he would not answer him in a judicial way; that if he should prefer a bill against him he would not put in at answer to it though he knew nothing by himself and could not charge himself with anything wrong in thought word or deed; yet if God charged him with it he would not reply against him he would not contradict him he would not answer again or litigate the point with him but give it up; because though he might not know he had done any thing amiss or there was imperfection in him yet God who was greater than his heart and knows all things is the heart searching and rein trying God he knew better than he did and therefore was determined to submit to him and be set down by him what he was:

but I would make supplication to my Judge: that is to God the Judge of the whole earth; and who is particularly the Judge of his own people their Patron and Defender their Judge and Lawgiver who will save them; for though he is a just God and a righteous Judge yet a Saviour; and it is one of the privileges of his people that they can come to him not only as the God of all grace and as their God and Father in Christ but to him as to God the Judge of all Hebrews 12:23; and lay their case before him and entreat his protection; and this Job chose to do rather than contend with him; for by "supplication" prayer is meant as it frequently is in both Testaments; and it signifies such prayer as consists of petitions for grace and mercy or for things to be bestowed in a way of grace and mercy; not according to merit but mercy; not for works of righteousness done but through the favour and good will of God; and which prayer is put up in an humble supplicant manner acknowledging a man's unworthiness that he is not deserving of the least of mercies nor expects any on account of any worth or worthiness in him or his services; and in such a way a man prevails more with God and is most likely to succeed than by contending with him in a judicial way. Jacob had power with God and prevailed but it was by weeping and supplication see Hosea 12:4; so Mr. Broughton reads the words "my would crave pity of my Judge.'Some render it "my adversary"F16למשפטי "in jus me vocanti" Cocceius; "ei qui mecum judicatur" i.e. "parti meae adversae" Gussetius p. 880. the opposite party in a court of judicature whom he would not contest with but supplicate and in the way make up matters with him. Job seems resolved to take such a method Christ advises to in civil cases Matthew 5:24.

 

Job 9:16  16 If I called and He answered me I would not believe that He was listening to my voice.
   YLT 
16Though I had called and He answereth me I do not believe that He giveth ear [to] my voice.

If I had called and he had answered me .... Mr. Broughton reads the words "if I cry will he answer me?" as if Job had some doubt upon his mind whether God would vouchsafe to answer him though he should make his supplication to him as he proposed; seeing he had so sorely afflicted him and still continued his hand upon him; or the words may be rendered "though I have called and he has answered"F17אם קראתי ויענני "etiamsi clamavi et respondit mihi" Schmidt. in times past. Job was a praying person he had often prayed to God in his closet and in his family for himself and for his children and for his friends and he had found God to be a God hearing and answering prayer but seems to question whether he would answer him now if he did pray to him:

yet would I not believe that he had hearkened unto my voice or "would hearken"F18כי יאזין "quod exauditurus esset" Schmidt. at this time and under the present circumstances; or should he the mercy would be so great that he could hardly believe it; so sometimes through joy men cannot believe what they hear and see as the apostles when Christ appeared to them after his resurrection; or as it was with the Jews returned from Babylon they were like them that dream they could scarcely tell whether their deliverance was a real fact or whether they only dreamed of it see Luke 24:41; so Job intimates that should he pray to God and be heard and delivered it would be so astonishing and transporting that at first he should not be able to give credit to it; or however he should not believe that it was for his prayers and supplications for any worth and value virtue and efficacy there was in them that he was heard; but it must be purely for his mercy's sake for the sake of the mediation of Christ and because these prayers were the breathings of his own spirit: or else the sense is that though he had heard and answered him formerly when he prayed in a supplicating way yet if he should contend with him in a judicial way and insist upon his own righteousness and present his supplication to God on that account he could never expect to be heard; and indeed he could not believe he should be heard on any account so long as his present sufferings lasted; which seems to be the sense of what follows where he gives his reasons for such belief or rather unbelief.

 

Job 9:17  17 For He crushes me with a tempest And multiplies my wounds without cause.
   YLT 
17Because with a tempest He bruiseth me And hath multiplied my wounds for nought.

For he breaketh me with a tempest .... Which rises suddenly comes powerfully and carries all before it irresistibly; hereby signifying the nature of his present sore afflictions which came upon him at once pressed him down and utterly destroyed him against which there was no standing: perhaps he may have some reference to the storm of wind that blew down the house by which his children were destroyed. Schultens renders it "a burning tempest"F19בשערה "in turbine ardenti" Schultens. such as is common in the eastern countries which ThevenotF20Travels par. 2. B. 1. c. 12. p. 54. B. 3. c. 5. p. 135. often makes mention of; which kills a man at once and his flesh becomes as black as a coal and comes off of his bones and is plucked off by the hand that would lift him up; with which a man is broken to pieces indeed to which Job may allude:

and multiplieth my wounds without cause; referring it may be to the many boils and ulcers upon his body; though it may also respect the multiplicity of ways in which he had wounded or afflicted him in his person in his family and in his substance and which he says was done "without cause"; not without a cause or reason in God who does nothing without one though it may not be known to men; particularly in afflicting men it is not without cause or reason; it he punishes men it is for sin; if he rebukes and chastises his people it is for their transgressions; to bring them to a sense of them to humble them for them to bring them off from them or to prevent them or purge them away and to try their graces wean them from the world and fit them for himself: but Job's afflictions were without any such cause intimated by his friends; it was not hypocrisy nor any notorious sin or sins he had been guilty of and secretly lived and indulged himself in as they imagined. Job here suggests his innocence which he always insisted upon and refers his afflictions to the sovereign will of God and to some hidden cause in his own breast unknown to himself and others: however so long as he dealt with him after this manner he could not believe his prayers were heard by him.

 

Job 9:18  18 He will not allow me to catch my breath But fills me with bitterness.
   YLT 
18He permitteth me not to refresh my spirit But filleth me with bitter things.

He will not suffer me to take my breath .... Which some think refers to Job's disease which was either an asthma or a quinsy in his throat which occasioned great difficulty in breathing: I should rather think the allusion is to the hot burning winds in those countries before mentioned which sometimes blew so strongly as almost to take away a man's breath; so the above travellerF21Travels. par. 1. B. 2. c. 34. p. 177. reports that between Suez and Cairo (in Egypt) they had for a day's time and more so hot a wind that they were forced to turn their backs to it to take a little breath. The design of Job is to show that his afflictions were continued and were without any intervals; they were repeated so fast and came so thick upon him one after another that he had no breathing time; the import of the phrase is the same with that in Job 7:19

but filleth me with bitterness; to the full to satiety to loathing as a man may be with a bitter potion with wormwood drink and water of gall with bitter afflictions comparable to such whereby Job's life was embittered to him see Jeremiah 9:15.

 

Job 9:19  19 If it is a matter of strength indeed He is strong; And if of justice who will appoint my day in court?
   YLT 
19If of power lo the Strong One; And if of judgment -- who doth convene me?

If I speak of strength lo he is strong .... Or think of it or betake myself to that and propose to carry my point by mere force as some men do by dint of power and authority they are possessed of; alas! there is nothing to be done this way; I am a poor weak feeble creature in body mind and estate; I am not able to contend with so powerful an antagonist on any account in any way: God is strong he is the "most strong"F23אמיץ "robustissimus est" V. L. as some render it; he is mighty is the Almighty; the weakness of God is stronger than men; there is no disputing with God upon the foot of strength:

and if of judgment who shall set me a time to plead? If I think and propose to put things upon the foot of justice to have the cause between us issued in that way I cannot expect to succeed by right any more than by might; he is so strictly just and holy that no righteousness and holiness of mine can stand before him; he is God and I a man and therefore not fit to come together in judgment; and he a pure and holy Being just and true and without iniquity and I a sinful polluted creature; and besides there is none superior to him that I can appeal unto none that can appoint a place or fix a time for the hearing of the cause between us or that can preside in judgment and determine the matter in controversy; nay there is not one among the creatures that can be a daysman an arbiter or umpire; yea not one that can be so much as employed as council that can take the cause in hand and plead it and be a patron for me and defender of me; so that let me take what course I will I am sure to be nonsuited and worsted see Jeremiah 49:19.

 

Job 9:20  20 Though I were righteous my own mouth would condemn me; Though I were blameless it would prove me perverse.

   YLT  20If I be righteous Mine mouth doth declare me wicked Perfect I am! -- it declareth me perverse.

If I justify myself .... Seek for justification by his own righteousness trust in himself that he was righteous say that he was so and pronounce himself a righteous man what would it signify?

mine own mouth shall condemn me; the words of it being sinful vain idle and frothy; and if a man is to be justified and condemned by his words he may be sure of the latter: indeed "if any man offend not in word the same is a perfect man" James 3:2; but let a man be as careful as he can and keep ever such a guard upon his lips such is the imperfection of human nature that though a Moses he will speak unadvisedly with his lips at one time or another and in many things will offend; which would be his condemnation if there was no other way to secure from it; nay for a sinful man to justify himself or to say that he is a righteous man by his own righteousness and insist upon this before God if he is tried upon it he must be condemned; yea saying he is so is a falsehood abominable to God and enough to condemn him; and besides a man that knows himself as Job did must be conscious of much sin within him however externally righteous he may be before men; so that should he say he was righteous his conscience would speak or cause his mouth to speak and contradict and condemn him:

if I say I am perfect; not in an evangelical sense as he was; but in a legal sense so as to be free from sin which no man that is perfect in a Gospel sense is; as Noah Jacob David and others who were so yet not without sin; if therefore a man should assert this he would not say that which was right but what was perverse as might be proved:

it shall also prove me perverse; to be a wicked man; either he God shall prove or it his mouth as in the preceding clause; for to say this is to tell a lie which to do is perverseness see 1 John 1:8.

 

Job 9:21  21 “I am blameless yet I do not know myself; I despise my life.
   YLT 
21Perfect I am! -- I know not my soul I despise my life.

Though I were perfect .... Really and truly so not conscious of any sin in thought word or deed; this is only a case supposed:

yet would I not know my soul; I would not own myself to be so before God; I would not insist upon such perfection in his presence as what would justify me before him; since I am sensible the highest perfection of a creature is imperfection when compared with him: or the sense may be should I say I were "perfect I should not know my own soul"; I should plainly appear to be ignorant of myself as all perfectionists are; they do not know their own souls the plague of their hearts the evil of their thoughts the vanity of their minds; they do not take notice of these things or do not look upon them as sinful; they know not the nature of sin and the exceeding sinfulness of it:

I would despise my life; even if ever so innocent perfect and just; his meaning is that he would not insist upon the continuance of it on that account; he had no such value for it such a love of life as to contend with God upon the foot of justice about it; nor did he think it worth asking for so mean an opinion had he entertained of it see Job 7:16.

 

Job 9:22  22 It is all one thing; Therefore I say ‘He destroys the blameless and the wicked.’
   YLT 
22It is the same thing therefore I said `The perfect and the wicked He is consuming.'

This is one thing .... Or "one thing there is"F24אחת היא "unum est" Munster Mercerus Schmidt. in the world as Jarchi adds; or "one measure" as the Targum to good and bad men; one event alike to the righteous and to the wicked Ecclesiastes 9:2; so that as others render it "it is all one"F25"Perinde est" Cocceius. whether a man righteous and perfect or whether he is not he is equally liable to be afflicted and distressed: and "this is one thing very singular"F26"Singulare enimvero id!" Schultens. amazing and astonishing and very unaccountable; but so it is and which he differed from his three friends about; as to the justice of God he agreed with them in that; yea he believed he was righteous in whatever he did and even in this which was so strange and surprising though he could not account for it: and "this is uniform" as Mr. Broughton translates it; either God acts uniformly in what he does treating all men alike good and bad men; or Job was uniform in his sentiments he was all of a piece steady and constant retaining the same sense of things from which he had not departed nor could he depart:

therefore I said it; with the greatest confidence and assurance because he believed it and would say it again seeing no reason at all to alter his judgment; the thing was quite clear to him of which he had at least as he thought unquestionable evidence; and the thing he has respect to is as follows:

he destroyeth the perfect and the wicked; this is thought by some to be a very bad expression bordering on blasphemy and contrary to the nature and perfections of God and to the methods of his providence Genesis 18:23; and that Job speaks in the person of one destitute of the grace of God: but nothing is more certain than that this was the real sentiment of his mind his firm belief nor could he be persuaded to the contrary; indeed it may be understood in a good sense: by a "perfect" man we are to understand a truly good man one that has received the grace of God in truth and is perfectly justified and pardoned through the blood and righteousness of Christ; and by a "wicked" man one that is under the influence of his lusts is abandoned to them and never easy but while he is serving them which he is continually doing. Now the destruction of these is not to be interpreted of everlasting destruction; this indeed will be the case of wicked men but not of perfect and good men: God by his grace has made a difference between them in this world and so he will in the next; the one will go into everlasting punishment the other into everlasting life and will never come together in the same place or state; nor will the perfect man be destroyed at all in such sense; the grace of God within him and the righteousness of Christ upon him will eternally secure him from everlasting wrath and ruin: but it is meant of temporal destruction; sometimes indeed a remarkable distinction is made between the one and the other in a time of general calamity as Noah a perfect man was saved when the world of the ungodly were destroyed by water Genesis 7:23; and Lot a righteous man when Sodom and Gomorrah were consumed by fire Genesis 19:29; but frequently they fall together in the same common distress; good and bad men among the Jews were alike carried captive into Babylon signified by Jeremiah's good and bad figs Jeremiah 24:2; of good men Ezekiel Daniel Shadrach Meshech and Abednego are instances; though indeed it is on different accounts and with different views that the one and the other are destroyed with a temporal destruction in their persons their health their families or in their estates; such calamities upon good men are not as punishments for their sins as on the wicked; but as fatherly chastisements and for the trial of their graces for their spiritual and eternal good and that they might not be condemned with the world. Job's view in saying this is to observe that a man's state God-ward is not to be judged of by his outward circumstances whether he is a good man or a bad man since they may both be in the same afflictions and distress and which he opposes to the sentiments and sayings of Eliphaz and Bildad Job 4:7.

 

Job 9:23  23 If the scourge slays suddenly He laughs at the plight of the innocent.
   YLT 
23If a scourge doth put to death suddenly At the trial of the innocent He laugheth.

If the scourge slay suddenly .... Not Satan as Jarchi and Bar Tzemach; but any sore calamity which surrounds a man lashes cuts and distresses him as a whip or scourge; such as any of God's sore judgments the sword famine pestilence or evil beasts which sometimes come suddenly unawares unthought of and unexpected; and are sometimes only chastisements in love the scourgings of a father though generally in wrath and hot displeasure and are an overflowing scourge which carry all before them; and therefore some restrain it to wicked men as the Septuagint version; and some understand it as if they were more mildly and gently dealt with by being suddenly and at once slain with such a scourge in their persons families and substance while others have their afflictions protracted and linger long under them as in the next clause:

he will laugh at the trial of the innocent; not that are free from sin entirely; for there are none such no not newborn infants; though they may be comparatively so yet they are not in an absolute sense being conceived in sin and shapen in iniquity: besides here it means adult persons good men that are truly gracious sincere upright harmless in their lives and conversations whose afflictions are "trials" of their faith and patience and other graces; and when God is said to "laugh" at them who seems to be designed here this must be understood consistent with his pity to his people his sympathy with them under all their afflictions he not willingly afflicting or grieving the children of men; nor can it be thought that he has them in derision and contempt or laughs at their calamities or in reality as he does at wicked men; but that he carries it so oftentimes in the dispensations of his providence as if he made no difference between them but mocked at the one as well as the other; seemingly giving no heed to their cries; not hastening to their help and deliverance but lengthening out their troubles for the trial of their graces; and so indeed is greatly delighted with the exercise of them under them and with seeing them bear them with so much patience courage and greatness of mind and submission to his will. Some interpret this of a wicked man laughing at the calamities of the righteous as the Ammonites and Edomites rejoiced at the destruction of the Jews; the church's enemy at her fall and as the Papists will at the witnesses being slain; but the former sense seems best; rather the scourge itself laughs at the trial of the innocent; so Schultens.

 

Job 9:24  24 The earth is given into the hand of the wicked. He covers the faces of its judges. If it is not He who else could it be?

   YLT  24Earth hath been given Into the hand of the wicked one. The face of its judges he covereth If not -- where who [is] he?

The earth is given into the hands of the wicked .... Either the wicked one Satan as Jarchi and Bar Tzemach who is the god of this world; or some wicked tyrant as Nimrod or some other known by Job in his time to whom he may have respect; or wicked men in general who for the most part have the greatest share of the earth and earthly things and of power dominion and authority in it; and this they have of God the powers that be are ordained by him and therefore to be obeyed; and what any have of the earth and the fulness of it they have it from him whose it is and who has a right to dispose of it and therefore being given by him they have a proper right unto it; but then it is only the things of this world which are given them; they have their portion here and that is their all; wherefore as the giving of these is no proof of a man's goodness so the taking of them away is no evidence of his wickedness; love or hatred are not to be known by these things; this is Job's scope and drift in this and Job 9:23

he covereth the face of the judges thereof; not Satan who blinds the minds of such that they should not understand justice and do it as the above Jewish writers interpret it; nor the wicked man that is possessed of riches and wealth power and authority who by his substance bribes the judges and blinds their eyes or by his power and authority awes them keeps them from executing true judgment or discourages persons fit for such an office and will not advance them but lets them lie in and covers them with obscurity; or such who are honest and faithful and are not to be bribed and browbeaten these he either removes from their post and covers their faces with shame or takes them away by death condemns and executes them as malefactors; it being usual in former times as well as in ours to cover the faces of such as are executed: but rather this is to be understood of God who delivers the earth into the hands of the wicked suffers them to have the rule over it and permits such things to be done as already observed; and besides gives up the judges of the earth to judicial blindness so that they cannot discern what is right and just and do it see Isaiah 29:10

if not where and who is he? if it is not so as I say where is the man and who is he that can disprove me and make me a liar? as Aben Ezra; let him come forth and appear and confute me and teach me otherwise if he can; or name the place of his abode and say who he is; or if God does not do this give the earth into the hands of wicked men and cover the faces of the judges of it and suffer wicked men to prevail and the causes of good men to be subverted the one to flourish and the other to be crushed; who does do it? where is the man that has done or can do it? certain it is that it is done; and who but that God that superintends all things sits in the heavens and does whatsoever he pleases can do such things as these? or could they be done without his will and permission? by such mediums Job proves his assertion that God destroys the perfect and the wicked; and therefore by the face of things in providence no judgment is to be had of a man's character good or bad and then instances in himself in the following verses.

 

Job 9:25  25 “Now my days are swifter than a runner; They flee away they see no good.
   YLT 
25My days have been swifter than a runner They have fled they have not seen good

Now my days are swifter than a post .... Or "than a runner"F1מני־רץ "cursore" Pagninus Montanus Junius & Tremellius Piscator &c. in a race in order to obtain the prize; or than one that rides post or runs on foot to carry a message such as were Cushi and Ahimaaz; and such are generally swift of foot or ride on swift horses who are so employed; and yet Job says his days are swifter or passed away more swiftly thorn such; meaning either his days in general; or rather particularly his prosperous days as Mr. Broughton interprets it; these no sooner came but they were gone:

they flee away; like a shadow or a dream or a tale that is told:

they see no good; or he saw perceived or enjoyed no good in them; not but that he did see and enjoy much good even much temporal good which is what is intended; but this was no sooner had than it was taken away that it was as if it had never been; the evil days of trouble and sorrow in which he had no pleasure came so quick upon him.

 

Job 9:26  26 They pass by like swift ships Like an eagle swooping on its prey.
   YLT 
26They have passed on with ships of reed As an eagle darteth on food.

They are passed away as the swift ships .... Those that are lightest built and run swiftest. Bar Tzemach thinks such vessels as are rowed with oars are meant which may be called "ships of will or desire"F2אניות אבה "navibus desiderii" Mercerus Drusius Schmidt; so Ben Gersom. as the words may be rendered because they may be rowed at pleasure and be carried to any place where and when a man thinks fit; whereas those that are not depend upon the wind and that must be waited for; or they design such ships that are so swift in their motion that they arrive to the haven as soon as men can well wish for and desire. Some render it "pirate ships" or "ships of enmity"F3"Naves inimicitiarum i.e. "piraticae vel hostiles"; as some in Drusius; so Broughton. ; such as are designed for spoil and plunder and which are light ones not loaded with goods and therefore move swiftly: the Targum is

"ships burdened with precious fruits;'and the Vulgate Latin version is "ships carrying apples:'now ships loaded with such sort of goods with perishing commodities are obliged to make their port as soon as possible. Some leave the word untranslated and call them "ships of Ebeh"F4"Navibus Ebeh" Pagninus Montanus Vatablus Bolducius Codurcus. ; which according to Jarchi Aben Ezra and others is either the name of a place or of a river in Arabia which ran with a rapid stream and in which ships were carried with great celerity. Bolducius relates from a traveller of his acquaintance who finished his travels in 1584 that he saw such a river about Damascus not far from the sepulchre of Job; but that must be the river Chrysorrhoas now called Barrady; but there were two rivers of this name Ebeh; one near Cufa and another in Wasith a country of Babylon as Golius observesF5Lexic. Arab. p. 2. . Others take the word to have the signification of reed or papyrus which grew on the banks of the Nile and of which ships were made; see Gill on Isaiah 18:1; and render the words "ships of reeds" or "of papyrus"F6"Naves arundinis" Michaelis "navibus papyraceis" Schultens Ikenius in ib. and which being light were very swift:

as the eagle that hasteth to the prey; the eagle is the swiftest of birds and therefore persons and things exceeding swift are compared unto them see Habakkuk 1:8; and it flies the most swiftly when being hungry and in sight of its prey and is nearest to it and flaps upon it which is the thing referred to and so may be rendered "that flies upon the prey"F7יטוש על אכל "involans in escam" Junius & Tremellius; "involat in escam" Piscator Schultens. . Job uses these metaphors which are the most appropriate to show how fleeting his days of prosperity were and how soon gone: and a climax may be observed in the words; a runner though he runs swiftly a ship moves faster than he and an eagle just about to seize its prey flies swifter than that.

 

Job 9:27  27 If I say ‘I will forget my complaint I will put off my sad face and wear a smile ’
   YLT 
27Though I say `I forget my talking I forsake my corner and I brighten up!'

If I say I will forget my complaint .... The cause of it the loss of his children servants substance and health and endeavour to think no more of these things and cease complaining about them and attempt to bury them in oblivion and change his note:

I will leave off my heaviness; his melancholy thoughts words airs and looks; or "forsake my face"F8אעזבה פני "relinquam facies meas" Montanus Bolducius Schmidt. put on another countenance a more pleasent and cheerful one; the Jewish commentators generally interpret it "my anger" either at the dispensations of Providence or at his friends:

and comfort myself; that things were not worse with him than they were; or strengthenF9אבליגה "confirmabo vel roborabo cor meum" Mercerus; so R. R. himself as the word is rendered in Amos 5:9; against his fears and troubles and dejection of mind determining to take heart and be of good courage and not sink and succumb and faint under his burdens: none but God Father Son and Spirit can give comfort to distressed ones whether on temporal or spiritual accounts; but good men may make use of means for comfort such as hearing the word reading the Scriptures prayer meditation and conversation with good men.

 

Job 9:28  28 I am afraid of all my sufferings; I know that You will not hold me innocent.
   YLT 
28I have been afraid of all my griefs I have known that Thou dost not acquit me.

I am afraid of all my sorrows .... That they would return upon him and surround him and overwhelm him so that he should not be able to stand up against them or under them; that they would increase and continue with him and so he should never be released from them:

I know that thou wilt not hold me innocent: a sudden apostrophe to God as near him; the meaning is not that he was confident that God would not justify him but condemn him in a spiritual sense; Job did not despair of his everlasting salvation he knew and believed in his living Redeemer; he knew he should be acquitted and justified by his righteousness and not be condemned with the world; but he was certain of this as he thought that God would neither "cleanse"F11כי לא תנקני "quod non mundabis me" Montanus Bolducius Beza. him as some render the word from the worms his flesh was clad with and from the filthy boils and ulcers he was covered with; nor clear him so as that he should appear to be innocent in the sight and judgment of his friends; but go on to treat him as if he was a guilty person by continuing his afflictions on him even unto death; he had no hope of being freed from them and so of being cleared from the imputation of his friends who judged of him by his outward circumstances.

 

Job 9:29  29 If I am condemned Why then do I labor in vain?
   YLT 
29I -- I am become wicked; why [is] this? [In] vain I labour.

If I be wicked why then labour I in vain? If he was that wicked person that hypocrite Bildad and his other friends took him to be it was in vain for him to make his supplications to God as they advised him; so Gersom gives the sense of the words; since God hears not sinners such as live in sin regard iniquity in their hearts and practise it in their lives at least secretly as it was suggested Job did; if he was such an one it must be all lost labour to pray to God to show favour to him and deliver him out of his troubles since he might reasonably expect he would shut his eyes and stop his ears at such a man and regard not his cries; seeking to him must be in vain; prayer may be fitly enough expressed by labour it is a striving and wrestling with God and especially when it is constant importunate and fervent: but rather the sense is that if he was a wicked man in the account of God or was dealt with as one; if God would not hold him innocent as he asserts in the latter part of Job 9:28; then it was a vain thing to labour the point in the vindication of himself; since he could never think of succeeding against God so wise and powerful so holy just and pure. The word "if" is not in the original text and may be left out and the words be rendered "I am wicked"F12אנכי ארשע "impius sum" V. L. Pagninus; so Schmidt. ; not in any notorious manner as having lived a scandalous life or been guilty of some gross enormities as his friends insinuated but in common with other men; he was born a sinner had been a transgressor from the womb and though he was renewed and sanctified by the spirit of God yet sin dwelt in him and through the infirmity of the flesh he was daily sinning in thought word or deed; nor did he expect it would be otherwise with him while in this world; yea it was impossible for him to be without sin as Bar Tzemach observes to be the sense of the phrase; and therefore if God would not clear him or hold him innocent unless he was entirely free from sin as it was labouring in vain to attain to such perfection so it must be to no purpose and is what he chiefly intends to attempt to vindicate himself before God: or "I shall be wicked" or "ungodly"F13"Ego impius ero" Montanus Mercerus Bolducius; "ego reus ero" Codurcus; "equidem improbus ero" Schultens. ; I shall be treated as such not only by his friends who would reckon him a very wicked man so long as those afflictions continued on him let him say what he would; but by the Lord himself who he believed would never release him from them as long as he lived which in the eye of men would be a tacit condemnation of him; so the Targum "I shall be condemned 'and therefore it was labour in vain striving against the stream to go about to vindicate himself; nor was it possible that he could make himself out so clear and pure and perfect that such an holy Being as God was could find no fault in him in whose sight the heavens and the inhabitants of them were not clean; this is further evinced in the following words.

 

Job 9:30  30 If I wash myself with snow water And cleanse my hands with soap
   YLT 
30If I have washed myself with snow-water And purified with soap my hands

If I wash myself with snow water .... As it came from heaven or flowed from the mountains covered with snow as Lebanon see Jeremiah 18:14; or was kept in vessels for such use as being judged the best for such a purpose; so it was used by the ancientsF14"Discubuimus pueris aquam nivalem in manus infundentibus" Petronius in Satyr. as being what whitens the skin and strengthens the parts by contracting the pores and hindering perspiration; it signifies in a figurative sense that let him take what methods he would to cleanse himself from sin they were all in vain his iniquity would be seen and remain marked before God; and indeed there is nothing that a man can do that will make him pure and clean in the sight of an holy God; this is not to be done by ceremonial ablutions such as might be in use in Job's time before the law of Moses was given and to which he may have some reference; these only sanctified to the purifying of the flesh or only externally but could not purify the heart so as to have no more conscience of sin; nor by moral duties not by repentance as Sephorno; a fountain a flood an ocean of tears of humiliation and repentance would not wash away sin; if instead of ten thousand rivers of oil so many rivers of brinish tears could be produced they would be of no avail to cleanse the sinner; nor any works of righteousness done by man for these themselves need washing in the blood of the Lamb; for nothing short of the blood of Christ and the grace of God can do it:

and make my hands never so clean; the hands are what men work with Ecclesiastes 9:10; and so may design good works which are sometimes called clean hands; see Psalm 24:4; compared with Psalm 15:1; and may be said to be so when they are done well from a pare heart and faith unfeigned without selfish and sordid views with a single eye to the glory of God; which is doing them as well and making the hands as clean as well can be; yet these are of no avail with respect to justification before God and acceptance with him or with regard to salvation which is all of grace and not of works be they what they will; some render the words "and cleanse my hands with soap"F15בבר Smegmate Codurcus Junius & Tremellius Piscator Schmidt; so the Targum and Mr. Broughton. which cleanses them best of anything see Jeremiah 2:22.

 

Job 9:31  31 Yet You will plunge me into the pit And my own clothes will abhor me.
   YLT 
31Then in corruption Thou dost dip me And my garments have abominated me.

Yet shall thou plunge me in the ditch .... In the filthy ditch of sin the pit wherein is no water the horrible pit the mire and clay in which all unregenerate men are and to which hypocrites return as the swine to its wallowing in the mire; and in which impurity self-righteous persons are and are sooner or later made to appear notwithstanding all their outward righteousness holiness purity and perfection they boast of; and though Job was neither of these not an unregenerate man nor an hypocrite nor a self-righteous person; yet he knew that in comparison of the perfect purity and holiness of God he should appear exceedingly impure; and that God would treat him as such and hold him out to the view of others as the filth of the world and the offscouring of all things by continuing his afflictions from whence it would be concluded that he was the most impure person; and indeed by the ditch may be meant the ditch of afflictions as Sephorno either his present ones continued his filthy ulcers and scabs with which his body was covered all over or new afflictions he would bring him into where he would sink in deep mire there being no standing Psalm 69:2; some understand this of the grave the ditch or pit of corruption into which he should be cast and there putrefy and rot: but the other senses seem best:

and mine own clothes shall abhor me; not his clothes in a literal sense; either while living his filthy ulcers being such that were his clothes sensible of them they would loathe and abhor to touch him and cover him; or when dead his sepulchre garments his shroud or winding sheet would disdain to cover such a filthy body overspread with worms and dust; or as Vatablus paraphrases it clothes do not become a dead body; or as Mr. Broughton "when I go naked to the grave as though my clothes loathed me:'but the words are rather to be understood figuratively either of some of his friends that were as near and as close to him as his clothes or had been but now were estranged from him and loathed and abhorred him see Job 19:13; or better of his best works of righteousness which he put on as a robe Job 29:14; and which are a covering to the saints before men and are ornamental to them though not justifying in the sight of God; and indeed in themselves and compared with the holy law and holy nature of God are imperfect and impure; and if God was to enter into judgment with men they would be so far from justifying them in his sight or rendering them acceptable to him that they would cause them to be abhorred by him as all self-righteousness and self-righteous persons are see Proverbs 21:27; yea even the best works of men are but dung in the judgment of a good man himself what then must they be in the account of God? Philemon 3:8; Job here and in Job 9:30 has most exalted ideas of the purity holiness and majesty of God so that no creature nor creature holiness be they ever so perfect can stand before him or be pure in his sight.

 

Job 9:32  32 “For He is not a man as I am That I may answer Him And that we should go to court together.
   YLT 
32But if a man like myself -- I answer him We come together into judgment.

For he is not a man as I am .... For though the parts and members of an human body are sometimes ascribed to him yet these are to be understood by an anthropopathy speaking after the manner of men there being something in him which in a figurative sense answers to these; otherwise we are not to conceive of any corporeal shape in him or that there is any likeness to which he is to be compared: he is a spirit infinite immortal immense invisible pure and holy just and true and without iniquity; whereas Job was but a man a finite feeble mortal creature and a sinful one; and therefore there being such a vast disparity between them it was in vain to litigate a point with him to plead his cause before him or attempt to vindicate his innocence; the potsherds may strive and contend with the potsherds of the earth their equals but not with God their Creator who is more than a match for them; he sees impurity where man sees it not and can bring a charge against him and support it where he thought there was none and therefore it is a vain thing to enter the lists with him:

that I should answer him; not to questions put by him but in a judicial way to charges and accusations he should exhibit; no man in this sense can answer him for one of a thousand he may bring and men are chargeable with; wherefore Job once and again determines he would not pretend to answer him as he knew he could not see Job 9:3

and we should come together in judgment; in any court of judicature before any judge to have the cause between us heard and tried and determined; for in what court of judicature can he be convened into? or what judge is there above him before whom he can be summoned? or is capable of judging and determining the cause between us? there is the high court of heaven where we must all appear and the judgment seat of Christ before which we must all stand; and God is the judge of all to whom we must come and by whose sentence we must be determined; but there is no court no judge no judgment superior to him and his; there is no annulling his sentence or making an appeal from him to another; there is no coming together at all and much less "alike"F16יחדו "pariter" Junius & Tremellius Drusius. as some render it or upon equal terms; the difference between him and his creatures being so vastly great.

 

Job 9:33  33 Nor is there any mediator between us Who may lay his hand on us both.
   YLT 
33If there were between us an umpire He doth place his hand on us both.

Neither is there any daysman betwixt us .... Or "one that reproves"F17מוכיח "arguens" Montanus Bolducius Drusius; "redarguens" Vatablus Mercerus. ; who upon hearing a cause reproves him that is found guilty or is blameworthy or has done injury to another; but there is no such person to be found among angels or men capable of this supposing as if Job should say I should appear to be the injured person; or there is no "umpire" or "arbitrator"F18"Arbiter" Junius & Tremellius Piscator Cocceius Schultens. to whom the case between us can be referred; for as Bar Tzemach observes he that stands in such a character between two parties must be both more wise and more mighty than they; but there is none among all beings wiser and mightier than God:

that might lay his hand upon us both; and restrain them from using any violence to one another as contending persons are apt to do; and compromise matters settle and adjust things in difference between them so as to do justice to both and make both parties easy and make peace between them. HerodotusF19Thalia sive l. 3. c. 8. makes mention of a custom among the Arabians "when they enter into covenants and agreements with each other another man stands in the midst of them both and with a sharp stone cuts the inside of the hands of the covenanters near the larger fingers; and then takes a piece out of each of their garments and anoints with the blood seven stones that lie between them; and while he is doing this calls upon a deity and when finished the covenant maker goes with his friends to an host or citizen if the affair is transacted with a citizen; and the friends reckon it a righteous thing to keep the covenant.'To which or some such custom Job may be thought to allude. Now whereas Christ is the daysman umpire and mediator between God and men who has interposed between them and has undertaken to manage affairs relating to both; in things pertaining to God the glory of his justice and the honour of his law and to made reconciliation for the sins of men and to make peace for them with God by the blood of his cross; which he has completely done being every way qualified for it inasmuch as he partakes of both natures and is God and man in one person and so could put his hand on both and make both one; or bring them who were at variance to an entire agreement with each other upon such a bottom as even the strict justice of God cannot object unto. Now I say Job must not be understood as if he was ignorant of this for he had knowledge of Christ as a Redeemer and Saviour and so as the Mediator and Peacemaker; the Septuagint version renders it as a wish "O that there was a mediator between us!" and so it may be considered as a prayer for Christ's incarnation and that he would appear and do the work of a mediator he was appointed to which Job plainly saw there was great need of; or as othersF20So some in Caryll. "there is no daysman yet"; there will be one but as yet he is not come; in due time he will which Job had faith in and full assurance of: but there is no need of such versions and glosses: Job is here not speaking of the affair of salvation about which he had no doubt he knew his state was safe and he had an interest in the living Redeemer and blessed Mediator; but of the present dispensation of Providence and of the clearing of that up to the satisfaction of his friends so that he might appear to be an innocent person; and since God did not think fit to change the scene there was none to interpose on his behalf and it was in vain for him to contend with God.

 

Job 9:34  34 Let Him take His rod away from me And do not let dread of Him terrify me.
   YLT 
34He doth turn aside from off me his rod And His terror doth not make me afraid

Let him take his rod away from me .... Not his government over him of which the rod or sceptre is an ensign Job did not want to be freed from that; but his rod of affliction or stroke as the Targum the stroke of his hand which though a fatherly chastisement lay heavy upon him and depressed his spirits; so that he could not while it was on him reason so freely about things as he thought he could if it was removed and for which he here prays:

and let not his fear terrify me; not the fear of him as a father which is not terrifying but the fear of him as a judge; the terror of his majesty the dread of his wrath and vengeance the fearful apprehensions he had of him as a God of strict justice; that would by no means clear the guilty yea would not hold him innocent though he was with respect to the charge of his friends; being now without those views of him as a God gracious and merciful; to these words Elihu seeks to have respect Job 33:6.

 

Job 9:35  35 Then I would speak and not fear Him But it is not so with me.

   YLT  35I speak and do not fear Him But I am not right with myself.

Then would I speak and not fear him .... With a servile fear though with reverence and godly fear; meaning either at the throne of grace having liberty of access boldness of spirit and freedom of speech through Christ the Mediator and in the view of his blood righteousness and sacrifice; for when the rod of his law and the terror of his justice are removed and his grace and favour in Christ shown a believer can speak boldly and freely to God and not be afraid before him: but rather Job's sense is that were the rod of his anger taken off and the dread of his majesty which so awed him that he could not tell his case as it was and use the arguments he might to advantage; he should speak without fear and so as to defend himself and make his cause to appear to be just; to this the Lord seems to refer in Job 38:3; being bold and daring expressions which Job blushed when made sensible of it Job 42:5

but it is not so with me; there was no daysman between the Lord and him; the rod was not taken off his back nor the dread and terror of the Almighty removed from him; and so could not speak in his own defence as otherwise he might: or it was not so with him as his friends thought of him; he was not the wicked hypocritical man they took him to be or as the afflictive dispensations of God made him to appear to be according to their judgment of them: or the words may be rendered "I am not so with myself"F21לא כן אנכי עמדי "non sic ego apud me" Pagninus Montanus Beza Vatablus Mercerus Schmidt Schultens. ; that is he was not conscious to himself that he was such a person they judged him; or such were the troubles and afflictions that were upon him that he was not himself he was not "compos mentis" and so not capable on that account as well as others of pleading his own cause: or "I am not right in" or "with myself"F23"Quia non probus ego apud me" Bolducius; "quod non sim rectus apud me" Cocceius. ; not in his right mind being distracted with the terrors of God and the arrows of the Almighty that stuck in him; or he was not righteous in himself; for though he was clear of hypocrisy he was charged with he did not pretend to be without sin or to have such a righteousness as would justify him before God; and therefore desires things might be put upon the foot of grace and not of strict justice.

 

──John Gill’s Exposition of the Bible

 

New King James Version (NKJV)

Footnotes:

  1. Job 9:13 Hebrew rahab