| Back to Home Page | Back to
Book Index |
Ezekiel Chapter
Eighteen
Ezekiel 18
Chapter Contents
God has no respect of persons. (1-20) The Divine
providence is vindicated. (21-29) A gracious invitation to repentance. (30-32)
Commentary on Ezekiel 18:1-20
(Read Ezekiel 18:1-20)
The soul that sinneth it shall die. As to eternity
every
man was
is
and will be dealt with
as his conduct shows him to have been
under the old covenant of works
or the new covenant of grace. Whatever outward
sufferings come upon men through the sins of others
they deserve for their own
sins all they suffer; and the Lord overrules every event for the eternal good
of believers. All souls are in the hand of the great Creator: he will deal with
them in justice or mercy; nor will any perish for the sins of another
who is
not in some sense worthy of death for his own. We all have sinned
and our
souls must be lost
if God deal with us according to his holy law; but we are
invited to come to Christ. If a man who had shown his faith by his works
had a
wicked son
whose character and conduct were the reverse of his parent's
could
it be expected he should escape the Divine vengeance on account of his father's
piety? Surely not. And should a wicked man have a son who walked before God as
righteous
this man would not perish for his father's sins. If the son was not
free from evils in this life
still he should be partaker of salvation. The
question here is not about the meritorious ground of justification
but about
the Lord's dealings with the righteous and the wicked.
Commentary on Ezekiel 18:21-29
(Read Ezekiel 18:21-29)
The wicked man would be saved
if he turned from his evil
ways. The true penitent is a true believer. None of his former transgressions
shall be mentioned unto him
but in the righteousness which he has done
as the
fruit of faith and the effect of conversion
he shall surely live. The question
is not whether the truly righteous ever become apostates. It is certain that
many who for a time were thought to be righteous
do so
while verses 26
27 speaks the fulness of pardoning
mercy: when sin is forgiven
it is blotted out
it is remembered no more. In
their righteousness they shall live; not for their righteousness
as if that
were an atonement for their sins
but in their righteousness
which is one of
the blessings purchased by the Mediator. What encouragement a repenting
returning sinner has to hope for pardon and life according to this promise! In
verse 28 is the beginning and progress of repentance.
True believers watch and pray
and continue to the end
and they are saved. In
all our disputes with God
he is in the right
and we are in the wrong.
Commentary on Ezekiel 18:30-32
(Read Ezekiel 18:30-32)
The Lord will judge each of the Israelites according to
his ways. On this is grounded an exhortation to repent
and to make them a new
heart and a new spirit. God does not command what cannot be done
but
admonishes us to do what is in our power
and to pray for what is not.
Ordinances and means are appointed
directions and promises are given
that
those who desire this change may seek it from God.
¢w¢w Matthew Henry¡mConcise Commentary on Ezekiel¡n
Ezekiel 18
Verse 2
[2] What
mean ye
that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel
saying
The
fathers have eaten sour grapes
and the children's teeth are set on edge?
The land of Israel ¡X
The two tribes
not the ten.
The fathers ¡X
Our fore-fathers.
Have eaten ¡X
Have sinned.
The childrens ¡X We
their children
who were unborn
suffer for their sins.
Verse 4
[4] Behold
all souls are mine; as the soul of the father
so also the soul of
the son is mine: the soul that sinneth
it shall die.
Behold ¡X
There can be no colour of partial judgment in the proceedings of God
who is
equally God to all.
All souls ¡X
All persons.
The soul ¡X
The person
whether father or son
shall die
shall bear his own punishment.
Verse 6
[6] And
hath not eaten upon the mountains
neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols
of the house of Israel
neither hath defiled his neighbour's wife
neither hath
come near to a menstruous woman
Hath not eaten ¡X
Hath not committed idolatry
offering sacrifice
and eating of the things
sacrificed to idols; whose temples and altars were on mountains
Hosea 4:13.
Verse 8
[8] He
that hath not given forth upon usury
neither hath taken any increase
that
hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity
hath executed true judgment between man
and man
Increase ¡X
Illegal interest.
Iniquity ¡X
Injustice of every kind.
Verse 9
[9] Hath walked in my statutes
and hath kept my judgments
to deal truly; he
is just
he shall surely live
saith the Lord GOD.
Shall live ¡X
Shall be delivered from famine
pestilence
and sword
and shall see good days.
Verse 13
[13] Hath
given forth upon usury
and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall
not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood
shall be upon him.
His blood ¡X
Heb. 'Tis plural
bloods; both the blood of the innocent which he murdered
and
his own blood which thereby he forfeited; the blood of his own soul and life:
that is the whole blame of his misery in time and eternity
shall lie upon
himself.
Verse 17
[17] That
hath taken off his hand from the poor
that hath not received usury nor
increase
hath executed my judgments
hath walked in my statutes; he shall not
die for the iniquity of his father
he shall surely live.
Hath taken off ¡X
Withdrawn his hand from hurting or wronging the poor
tho' he had power to do
it securely.
Verse 20
[20] The
soul that sinneth
it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the
father
neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the
righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him
and the wickedness of the
wicked shall be upon him.
Shall not bear ¡X
This is a most unquestionable truth; and tho' perhaps it may seem otherwise in
some cases
yet could we see perfectly the connexion between persons and
persons; could we see the connexion of sins and sins
and how easily
secretly
and undiscerned men become guilty of the same sins
we should see father and
son
though perhaps one of them might not do the evil
both guilty
and neither
punished for the sin farther than if it was his own: nor do the scriptures
Exodus 20:5; Deuteronomy 28:18
doom persons to punishment
for sins from which they are wholly free; but if children shall follow their
fathers in sin
then if they die for those sins
'tis because these are their
own
not as they are their fathers.
The righteousness ¡X It
shall be well with the righteous
for he shall eat the fruit of his doing
he
shall be rewarded as a righteous one.
The wickedness ¡X
The reward of wickedness. "The son shall not die
not die eternally
for
the iniquity of the father
if he do not tread in the steps of it: nor the
father for the iniquity of the son
if he do all he can to prevent it.
Verse 22
[22] All
his transgressions that he hath committed
they shall not be mentioned unto
him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live.
Not mentioned ¡X
Not to him.
Verse 25
[25] Yet
ye say
The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear now
O house of Israel; Is not
my way equal? are not your ways unequal?
The way ¡X
His whole management of affairs.
Not equal ¡X
Not right
or consistent with his own declaration
and law.
Verse 28
[28]
Because he considereth
and turneth away from all his transgressions that he
hath committed
he shall surely live
he shall not die.
He shall surely live ¡X "That is
he shall be restored to the favour of God
which is the
life of the soul."
Verse 31
[31] Cast
away from you all your transgressions
whereby ye have transgressed; and make
you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die
O house of Israel?
Make you a new heart ¡X Suffer me to do it in you.
Verse 32
[32] For
I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth
saith the Lord GOD:
wherefore turn yourselves
and live ye.
I have no pleasure ¡X
Sinners displease God when they undo themselves; they please him when they
return.
¢w¢w John Wesley¡mExplanatory Notes on Ezekiel¡n
18 Chapter 18
Verses 1-32
Verses 1-3
What mean ye
that ye use this proverb concerning the land of
Israel
saying
The fathers have eaten sour grapes
and the children¡¦s teeth
are set on edge?
Sins of fathers visited on their children only in this world
¡§The fathers have eaten sour grapes
and the children¡¦s teeth are
set on edge.¡¨ The declaration of God
in the second commandment
that He would
visit the sins of the fathers upon the children
for three or four generations
had been translated into this quaint proverb. Manasseh and they which were
seduced by him to wickedness
greater than that of the Amorites
have been long
dead; why
they still argued
why should we be punished for their sins? Surely
the ways of God are unequal in this thing
that the children¡¦s teeth should be
set on edge by the sour grapes which not they
but their fathers have eaten;
and that a man¡¦s sins should be visited upon his innocent posterity. Ezekiel¡¦s
answer is two fold.
1. ¡§What mean ye to use this proverb?¡¨ Ye
who have been at no pains
to reform yourselves
and by such reformation avert the woes and the captivity
denounced against your country for the sins of Manasseh
and those of his
people; ye can with no reason complain
who are no better than they. What mean
ye
saith the prophet
¡§that ye use this proverb? For have not ye
and your
fathers
yes
both your fathers and ye also
have rebelled against the Lord?¡¨
2. However
he tells them that they shall not have occasion to use
this proverb any more in Israel. Concerning the meaning of this declaration
there is some diversity of opinion. The most probable opinion is
that Ezekiel
speaks of the times that were coming
when the doctrine of a future state
should be generally entertained
and of the punishments which will be awarded
in that state
to every individual
for his own sins and no other
according to
their proper malignity. ¡§The soul that sinneth
it shall die
¡¨ it only shall
perish everlastingly. The prophet might also mean
that the great cause of
men¡¦s sins being visited upon their posterity
so far as that punishment was
the consequence of a special providence
was shortly to cease from among his
people. That sin was the sin of idolatry. Of so many of the children of the
captivity as were incapable of being reclaimed by the punishments all of them
now suffered
the end would be
that they should die
by the sword
the plague
or famine
or
at all events
die in captivity
while those of the better sort
who were weaned from the practice of this great offence
should see their
native land again
build again the wails of their city
and
whatever their
other offences might be
should offend God no more by idolatry.
3. But the declaration of the text
that there should be no more
occasion to use this proverb
may mean
that the times were coming
the times
of the Messiah
when the old system of laws and ordinances should be superseded
the temporal sanctions of the law of Moses be forgotten and lost
in the
thought of the everlasting rewards and punishments of a future state;
concerning which punishments
if Ezekiel is
as we believe
speaking of them
he declares that the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father. Each man
in that state
shall suffer only for his own sins. ¡§The soul that sinneth
it
shall die.¡¨ It is not natural death that is meant. Both the bad and the good
suffer that. It is what is called in Revelation
¡§the second death
¡¨ eternal
misery after death
of which it is declared
that the carnally minded shall
suffer it
and the righteous and the good never taste it.
4. Undoubtedly
there is a sense in which it will never cease to be
true
that the son shall suffer for the sins of the father. The effects of
every man¡¦s sins
as regards this world
are felt by his family
both while he
fives and often long after.
Lessons--
1. The evidence
brought daily before our eyes
how severely the
misconduct of parents is wont to be felt by their children
should reconcile us
to the declarations of Scripture upon the subject.
2. The knowledge of this should be an availing consideration to deter
us from evil courses
and show us the exceeding sinfulness
the madness also
and folly of sin; that by giving way to it we not only become enemies to our
own souls
but cruel enemies to those whom we most love.
3. If we are ourselves suffering through the misconduct of those who
have gone before us
let us by no means tread in their steps; let them be a
warning to us
and not an example
and let us be very careful that we do not
by imitating their bad example
lose our own souls
which can only be through
our own fault. (A. Gibson
M. A.)
The entail of suffering
I. The fact is
indisputable. Men are liable to an entail of suffering. The Divine law asserts
it (Exodus 20:5). Compare with this the awful
malediction of Christ (Matthew 23:35). The teachings of sacred
Scripture harmonise entirely with those of experience on this point. Not so
surely will a father¡¦s inheritance descend to his sons as his physical
characteristics. Hence hereditary diseases. How many of these were originally
the result of violations of the Divine laws
natural or moral
needs not to be
shown. And so mysterious are the relations which bind together succeeding
generations that
in many cases
both the mental and moral characteristics are
seen to be transmitted. The evil tempers we have indulged reappear in our
offspring to torture them; and when they are evil
it may be said
¡§The fathers
have eaten sour grapes
¡¨ etc.
II. The procedure
may be vindicated. We may confidently assert that this procedure cannot be
shown to be unjust. Man is a sinner. ¡§We are a seed of evil-doers; children
that are corrupters.¡¨ We are therefore liable to punishment. The only question
which
as sinners
we have a right to entertain respects the degree of our
punishment. Does our punishment
in the entailed evils of which we have spoken
surpass our guilt? If not
we have no right to complain. But this procedure may
be vindicated
moreover
by a reference to its adaptation to the great end of
God¡¦s moral government of mankind. That end may be simply stated to be the
repression of moral evil. To secure this end
he appeals to us in every
possible form
and by every conceivable motive. What more likely to deter a man
from vicious indulgence than the thought that it may taint the blood
paralyse
the limbs
and cloud the skies
of those who ought to inherit the reward and
perpetuate the blessing of his own virtues? And what more humiliating to a
parent than to see the very faults which have disgraced and plagued himself
reproduced in the children of his fondest love?
III. The use of the
proverb shall cease; not that Jehovah shall ever repeal this law
but that the
consistency of it with moral perfection being perceived
men shall cease to
urge that which shall afford them neither excuse nor ground of complaint.
1. An acquaintance with the rules which guide the Divine judgment of
transgressors shall prevent men from using this proverb.
2. The common relation which all men sustain to Him may well prevent
us from attributing iniquity to Him. ¡§Behold
all souls are Mine
¡¨ etc.
3. The true spirit of penitence which a knowledge of His equity and
His love excites shall
in a similar manner
acquit Him. A deep sense of sin
and true contrition on account of it
will not suffer men to cavil against God:
then they meekly ¡§accept the punishment of their iniquity.¡¨
4. If any darkness yet seem to hover around these truths
the dawn of
the last day shall assuredly dispel it; and friends and foes shall then
unite--the former joyfully
the latter inevitably--in the confession that ¡§The
ways of the Lord are equal.¡¨ (Homilist.)
Heredity and responsibility
It is a well ascertained fact that not merely are the physical
features of parents reproduced often in their offspring
but likewise their
moral and intellectual characteristics. Genius runs in families. The son is
frequently renowned for the same accomplishment for which his father
and
perhaps his grandfather
were renowned before him. The same thing is true of
moral defect. The vice to which the parent was the slave is the vice for which
in a multitude of cases
the child shows the most marked propensity. This
reproduction of parental characteristics in the children may
indeed
be
attributed to another cause than the principle of heredity; it may be
attributed
and not without reason
to the effect of example. Children are
great imitators. But much as example may have to do in the way of creating a
likeness between parent and child
the fact that such likeness exists where
example has had no opportunity of working--as in the case of the parent dying
during the child¡¦s infancy--proves that the likeness cannot be the result of
example alone. It is related in the life of the famous French philosopher and
mathematician
Pascal
that his father
also a great mathematician
being
desirous of educating his son for the Church
studiously kept out of his reach
all books bearing upon his own favourite study
and took other precautions to
prevent his son forming a taste for mathematics. But all his precautions were
vain. Young Pascal engaged in the study in secret
without any of the usual
aids
and as a result
reproduced and solved most of the propositions in the
first book of Euclid
without
it is alleged
having ever had a copy of Euclid in
his hands. The particular bent of the father¡¦s genius here descended to the
son
and found expression for itself in spite of all the efforts made to
prevent such a result.
I. The reference
is plainly to the sufferings which children have sometimes to endure in
consequence of the evil-doings of their parents. We may not perhaps be very
deeply affected
although we ought to be
by the thought that our wrong-doing
causes suffering to others in whom we have comparatively little interest. But
when we consider that we not only harm
by setting them an evil example
those
whom we most deeply love
the children whose presence now brightens our home
but may also harm
may be preparing great suffering for children unborn
who
may yet call us by the endearing name of parent
we cannot help feeling what
need
what great need there is
apart altogether from the demands of morality
as such
to live
for the sake of those whom we love most
and from whom we
would ward off every pain
upright and pure lives--careful alike of our moral
and spiritual health. Only in acting thus may we hope that
in as far as it
rests with us
our children shall not enter upon the conflict of life crippled
handicapped
and thus have their prospect of victory immensely lessened. That
good is perpetuated under this law of heredity as well as evil ought to be
remembered
or we might otherwise think it a cruel law.
II. What bearing
has the law upon our individual responsibility? Does it diminish or do away
with it? The Jews
at the time Ezekiel wrote
were in a very miserable state.
The nation was hastening to its doom. They were on the eve of that great
catastrophe often predicted--the destruction of Jerusalem--their pride and
glory
and the captivity. With this dismal prospect in view
and with present
troubles pressing painfully upon them
they would not see in their own
behaviour any reason for their suffering. They tried to make out that they were
innocent children suffering solely for their fathers¡¦ sins: ¡§Our fathers have
eaten the sour grapes of idolatrous pleasures
and we are suffering the
consequences.¡¨ But although within certain limits it might be true they were
suffering for their fathers¡¦ sins
it was also true that their own evil doings
their sins against light and knowledge
were the main source of their
sufferings. They could not divest themselves of individual responsibility. All
souls are God¡¦s; as the soul of the father
so also the soul of the son. The
soul that sinneth
it shall die. He that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity
he is just
he shall surely live. It is further pointed out in the context that
a righteous son is not condemned for his father¡¦s profligacy
any more than a
profligate son is saved by his father¡¦s righteousness. ¡§The son shall not bear
the iniquity of the father
neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the
son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him
and the wickedness
of the wicked shall be upon him.¡¨ The teaching here is clearly to the effect
that it is our own acts
and not the acts of another
that shall either justify
or condemn us. And that is the teaching also of our Lord: ¡§By thy words shalt
thou be justified
and by thy words shalt thou be condemned.¡¨ Again
in the not
uncommon fact that a bad father may have a good son
and a good father a bad
son
we have a conclusive proof that the law of heredity does not act in such a
way that its operation cannot be resisted. It can be resisted
and on the fact
that it can be resisted
and successfully resisted
rests our moral responsibility.
It may be a hard struggle
in some cases it will be an exceedingly hard
struggle
but with God¡¦s help it will not be a vain one. Numberless instances
are on record of men who have developed a beautiful character under the most
adverse circumstances
and this should encourage everyone
however hard his
lot
and however heavily handicapped he may be by tendency or circumstance
to
undertake the struggle and persevere therein. Stronger is He that is for us
than all they that are against us. Let us but trust Him--let us but look to
Jesus--and so fight. The victory will be sure. (N. M. Macfie
B. D.)
Heredity
Through the whole realm of living things there runs the great law
of inheritance. All that lives tends to repeat itself in the life of its
offspring. The ant
for example
begins life not only with the form and
structure of its ancestry
but in full possession of all those marvellous
industrial instincts which today have passed into a proverb. The marvellous
sagacity of the sheep dog
which no amount of training would ever confer upon a
poodle or a fox terrier
comes to it by way of inheritance as part of its
birthright. In similar fashion old habits and curious antitheses tend to repeat
themselves in like fashion
even where the originating circumstances no longer
remain. For example
we are told
by those who know
that in menageries straw
that has served as litter in the lion¡¦s or the tiger¡¦s cage is useless for
horses; the smell of it terrifies them
although countless equine generations
must have passed since their ancestors had any cause to fear attack from feline
foes. You must often have noticed a dog turning itself round three or four
times before it settles in front of the fire
but it is probably only doing
what some savage and remote ancestry did many generations ago when it trundled
down the long grass of the forest to make a lair for itself for the night.
Everyone knows how the peculiar cast of features that we term Jewish tends to
reappear in generation after generation. The vagabondism of the gipsy
again
is in his blood
and he cannot help it. It is said that on one occasion the
Austrian Government started a regiment of gipsies
but on the first encounter
they ran away
A hundred mental and physical characteristics run in families
and so we have the aquiline nose of the Bourbons
the insolent pride of the
Guises
the musical genius of the Bachs
and the scientific genius of the
Darwins. Along the lines of his being
physical
mental
and moral
man derives
from the past. As an American writer very happily and sagaciously puts it:
¡§This body in which we journey across the isthmus from one ocean to another is
not a private carriage
but an omnibus
¡¨ and
be it said
it is our ancestors
who are fellow passengers. Yesterday is at work in today; today will live again
in tomorrow
and the deeds of the fathers
be they good or be they ill
are
visited upon the children unto the third and fourth generation. Now
this
doctrine of heredity
as it is termed
is
to use a popular phrase
at the
present moment very much in the air. The novelist
the dramatist
the
journalist
the educationalist
the moralist
the theologian
and the social
reformer have all made it their own
and are all of them ready with this or
that application of it to some aspect of our daily life. Now
it is impossible
to ignore the fact that the doctrine of heredity
as it is held and taught by
some today
practically robs life of all moral significance. It is not merely
that it conflicts with this or that conclusion of morality; it cuts away the
ground under the foot of all morality
and makes the word itself to be
meaningless. It is not merely that it takes this or that doctrine of the
Scriptures; it makes null and void the truths which the Scriptures
as it were
assume as the base and groundwork of all. Taking for granted the facts of
heredity as I have illustrated them
how do these facts affect our ideas of
moral responsibility? I think the answer may be put in three-fold form:
heredity may increase
heredity may diminish
heredity can never destroy man¡¦s
responsibility. Heredity may increase a man¡¦s responsibility
for if it be true
that we inherit evil from the past
it is not less true that we inherit good;
and if he is to be pitied and dealt tenderly with who
through no fault of his
own
enters upon a grievous heritage of woe
is not he to be visited with stern
condemnation who
reaping a rich harvest which other hands have sown
squanders
his inheritance in riotous living? But it may also diminish
for there are
certain hereditary vices
like drunkenness
for example
which are sometimes
not only vices
but also diseases; and just in so far as they are diseases as
well as vices
so far do they call for our pity rather than for our
condemnation
--a fact
perhaps
that has not always had due weight given to it
by some of our sterner moralists. God asks not only where does a man reach
but
where does a man start. He counts not only the victories that men win
but the
odds in the face of which men fight
the moral effort that is needed; and many
a time when our poor blind eyes can only see the shame and disaster of seeming
defeat
His eyes have marked the ceaseless
if often thwarted
struggle to cast
off the yoke and bondage of evil. Heredity may increase
heredity may diminish
heredity ban never destroy man¡¦s responsibility
and it is just there that we
join issue with so much that is being said and so much more that is being
implied at the present day. This idea of heredity has so completely fascinated
the minds of some
that to them man is nothing more than a bundle of
transmitted tendencies
the resultant of antecedent forces
a projectile shot
forth from the past
whose path he could calculate with mathematical accuracy
did he but know the precise character and amount of the hereditary forces that
are at work in him. The unquestioned facts of heredity are emphasised to the
exclusion of all other facts as though in this
and this alone
were the key to
the whole mystery of the life of man. The prophet meets the complaints of the
people with two words from the mouth of God
¡§Behold
all souls are
Mine
¡¨--that is to say
every individual soul is related to God. We are related
to the past; that is the fact upon which those to whom Ezekiel spoke laid all
the emphasis
but we are also related to God. We derive from the past
but that
which we derive from the past is not the whole of us
--we derive also from God.
¡§As the soul of the father is Mine
so also the soul of the son is Mine.¡¨
Weighted as we may be with sins which are not our own
we have each of us a
moral life that is our own
received direct from God. If upon the one side of
me--if I may put it in that awkward fashion--I am linked to a sinful human
ancestry
and so rooted in Nature; on the other side of me I stand in a Divine
lineage
I am rooted in God. The second word of the prophet follows from it as
a natural corollary
¡§All souls are Mine; therefore
the soul that sinneth
it
shall die.¡¨ That is the charter of the individual soul. What does it mean? That
it is never our past that condemns us
that a man¡¦s past can be a man¡¦s ruin
only in so far as he allies himself with it
and makes it his own. I repeat
we
are related to the past
therefore the facts of heredity cannot be denied
and
must not be overlooked; but that which we derive from the past is not the whole
of us. We are also related to God
and through that relationship the strength
of the grace of God can come to us. And it is that two-fold fact concerning
every man that makes man a responsible being. He can choose
he can take sides;
and it is only when a man takes evil to be his good
when
barking the struggle
altogether
he leaves evil in undisputed possession of the field
that he
stands condemned before God. Turning aside from the prophet for one closing moment
I want you
looking beyond the prophet¡¦s teaching
to gather confirmation of
his message. Look at the Bible. There is no book to make allowance for us all
like this Book; no place where earth¡¦s failings have such kindly judgment
given. ¡§Our wills are ours
we know not how.¡¨ We cannot sound the mysteries of
our frame
but ¡§Our wills are ours to make them Thine.¡¨ The peace that follows
righteousness
remorse after wrong-doings
the honour that everywhere men pay
to self-sacrifice
the kindling indignation with which we listen to some story
of base cunning and cruel wrong
the passionate thrill that passes through the
whole nation to its very centre when a deed is done for freedom or a blow is
struck for truth
--these things
which are among the most sacred and splendid
of human experience
and which
as Dr. Dale used to say
are as real as the
movements of the planets and as the ebb and flow of the tides--these things are
only to be explained if it be true that man is free to choose betwixt truth and
falsehood
for the good or evil side. So
in fact
with this. If a man is
living in conscious rebellion against God
the poor and paltry plea of the
father¡¦s sins will not avail. Oh yes
we may talk as we will about sour grapes
and I know not what else besides
but when conscience has a man by the throat
he follows humbly in the footsteps of the Psalmist--¡§The guilt is mine
the sin
is mine before God.¡¨ If God¡¦s angel has us by the hand and is drawing us away
from our bad evil selves
let us hear and answer to His call
and it may be
that even yet by His grace we shall be crowned. (G. Jackson
M. A.)
Individuality
There is scarcely a thing in the world which is well attested
which can bring forward more strong or more indisputable evidence than this
truth which is incorporated in the proverb. Every land
every race
every age
has seen its truth. The fathers are always eating sour grapes
and the
children¡¦s teeth alas
are always being set on edge. Look
I would ask
at your
own life and your own experience. Here are men placed in divergent
circumstances in life. We often look round and see how true it is that a man is
weighted in the race of life by folly
by the extravagance of his father. A
man
on the other hand
toils on industriously
accumulates possessions for his
children
and in doing so gives them the advantage of the position which he has
established. Or
take that other thing we often speak of--that which we cannot
help--the inheritance of our name. How true it is that a man inheriting a good
name is often carried away to a position far in advance of what we may call his
native worth
because the great flowing wave of his father¡¦s success carries
him high up the beach of life; and how true
on the other hand--painfully true
it is
that
when a child inherits a disgraced name
he finds himself at once
in the midst of a world that is ready to close its doors upon him. Or
take
that which is a stronger illustration still--this law of hereditary descent
which operates throughout the whole world. What strange power is it that makes
a man vacillate? How is it he cannot hold on to the straight and true way of
life? Or again
why is it this man is unable to cope with the strain of life?
Watch him
and see what hesitancies there are about his nature. See how he starts;
what strange apprehensions visit him that do not visit healthier organisations.
There you have in that strange nervous organisation the story of that which has
been the perilous fault of his ancestry: the overstrained life
the long hours
the eager toil
the care
the anxiety
the worry that has worn into the
father¡¦s frame are reproduced here. And that which is true with regard to
personal history is true
also
with regard to national history. Are we not
bearing the weight of our fathers¡¦ sins? Look on the difficulties which
surround our own administration. See how hard it is for men exactly to poise
their legislation between leniency and justice. And understand that when we
have to deal with the wild
tumultuous dispositions of those people who entirely
disbelieve in our good intentions towards them we are
as it were
enduring the
pain of our teeth being set on edge because of the follies and the sins of past
generations. Now
what is the reason
then
that the prophet should take upon
himself to denounce what is so obviously true? A little reflection will show
that it is not so strange as it at first sight appears. He denounces its use
because it is used in an untrue sense and for an unlawful purpose. It is
certainly true that when the fathers had eaten sour grapes the children¡¦s teeth
were set on edge. All the past history of Israel showed it. These men to whom
the prophet wrote were themselves illustrations of it; they were exiles
and
their exile and their national disintegration was the result of their fathers¡¦
sin. But it was quoted in a wrong sense
it was quoted in the sense of trying
to make people cast a shadow upon the loving kindness of God; therefore the
prophet takes up his parable against them. He argues and expostulates
he shows
that the sense in which it is used is an unfair and an unjust sense; he says
¡§Look upon life; watch the man whose career has been good--one who has been
pure
who has been just
who has been generous--observe him. He is under the
care and protection of God. If his son
¡¨ he argues
¡§becomes a man of violence
a man of impurity
a man who is full of the debaucheries and injustices of
life
then
indeed
upon that man will fall the shadow of his own sin; but if
his son rises up
and gazing upon the life of his grandfather
and gazing upon
the life of his father
turns aside from his own false ways
then upon such a
man will dawn the brightness of God¡¦s favour.¡¨ ¡§The soul that sinneth shall
die.¡¨ The son shall not bear in that sense the iniquity of the father. It is true
he must inherit the disadvantages which are handed down to him from father to
son; that the great and fatal law of life will operate
and that he cannot
expect to ca
use
as it were
the shadow to go back upon the sundial of life
and to claim the position which would have been his had his father not sinned
at all; but
as far as the love of God is concerned
as far as the capacity of
rising up and doing some fit and noble work in life is concerned
as far as
purification of his own spirit is concerned
as far as the ennobling of his own
character is concerned
as far as his capacity to do something great and worthy
is concerned
he is not at a disadvantage at all. ¡§The soul that sinneth shall
die.¡¨ The sons
in that sense
shall not bear the iniquity of their fathers. It
was used
then
in an untrue sense
and it was used (and this is more important
still) for a false and unworthy purpose. ¡§Our fathers
¡¨ said they
¡§had
national life; they had grand energy; they had the concentration and the spirit
of a nation; they had that great spirit of unity and all the glorious
associations which created patriotic hearts;
they had the everlasting hills;
the snowy Lebanon was theirs; the rich and swift-flowing Jordan was theirs; the
fields instinct with the memories of a thousand victories were theirs: but we
are condemned to exile
condemned to dwell here by the barrier set by these
waters of Babylon. There is no hope for us: no future for us; our fathers eat
sour grapes
and our teeth are set on edge.¡¨ No wonder that when the prophet
saw they were quoting the proverb to bolster up their own indolence
and to
make it the shameful apology of their own disregard of their highest and
noblest duties
that
with all the indignation and sacred fire of his spirit
he rose up to denounce such an unworthy use of a truth. ¡§As I live
saith the
Lord God
ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel.
All souls are Mine--the soul of every individual
be he on the banks of Babylon
or not
is Mine; all nations are Mine
whether they be in the plenitude of
their power
or whether they be in a poverty-stricken existence.¡¨ For every
soul
for every nation
there is a glorious destiny; and for men to shelter
themselves from their duty by declaring that a hard fate has bound them about
with its fetters of iron
and that there is no escape for them; that their
whole life is shipwrecked and ruined; that they are the miserable inheritors of
the fatality of their own organisation
of the tyranny of their national position
is forever to declare themselves unworthy of the name of men
that they have
lost faith in the power of God--it is to take a solemn truth
and wrest it to
their own destruction; it is to forge the weapons of their own imprisonment out
of the very thing which should be their highest stimulus to exertion. The
greatest of truths may be perverted to a false use. Truth is like a beam of
light
which indeed falls straight from its parent sun
but it is possible for
us to divert and alter the beauty of its hue by putting the prism of our own
fancy and conceit between it and the object on which we cast it; in like manner
we may misuse truths as well as use them; and if we misuse them
it is to our
own detriment and shame. Oh
fatal way in which extremes meet--that the
pessimist should say that he is under the fatal law of organisation
and it is
useless to do anything; and that the optimist should say he is under the fatal
and sweet law of organisation
and that it is needless for him to do anything.
Midway between these truths which we meet in men¡¦s lives
and which often
become the fatal sources of the apology of their indulgence--midway between
them lies the real truth; these are but the opposite poles of truth
the great
world upon which we live revolves upon its axis between these two. It is not
your part to live forever in the north pole of life
and declare that it is all
bitterness and a blasted fate; it is not your duty to live in the sunny pole of
the south
and to declare that your life is all sweetness and sunshine; your
lot and mine is cast in these moderate poles
where we know that law rules
and
love rules above our heads
sweet love beneath our feet
sweet law
both
strong
both sweet
both the offspring of God
both the sweet heralds of
encouragement
to lift up our energies
to exert ourselves in the toil of life
and to be men
for do you not say that it is precisely in the counterpoising
truths of law which is inexorable
and love which is never inexorable
that the
power of life
and heroism of life
is found? (Bp. Boyd Carpenter.)
The two-fold heredity
It seems
then
that there is nothing new under the sun
and that
in the days of Ezekiel men had anticipated
in some respects at least
Darwin
and Ibsen and the problem novel; they were dealing with some
at least
of the
difficulties which perplex us
upon whom the ends of the world have come.
Science has made plain the part played by the law of heredity
the transmission
of tendencies and characteristics from parents to offspring
in the development
of life upon the globe. Criminologists have carried the idea over into the
moral and judicial sphere
producing specimens of ¡§pedigree criminals
¡¨
families in which the criminal taint has descended from parents to children for
generation after generation
Novelists and dramatists have found in the subject
a fertile source of plots and tragedies. Social reformers find heredity a fact
to be reckoned with. And now
as in Ezekiel¡¦s day
sinning souls are often
inclined to lay the blame of their own failures on those whose blood runs in
their veins. The first step to be taken in approaching this theme from the
Christian standpoint is to notice how frequently it is dealt with in the Bible
the book which by some gracious miracle anticipates all other books and reveals
to us the antiquity of our most modern problems. Our Lord Himself said
¡§Can
men gather grapes of thorns
or figs of thistles?¡¨ There is such a thing in the
moral world as pedigree
propagation of species
lines along which certain
qualities and tendencies are transmitted
and you do not expect out of one
stock that which
by its moral qualities
is properly the fruit of another.
Paul¡¦s close observation of the organism of human society
as reflected
specially in the Epistle to the Romans
is also a contribution to the subject;
he sees that the human race is one in sin
that the taint is transmitted from
generation to generation
that human history in one aspect of it gathers itself
round a kind of pedigree of degeneration
so that by the disobedience of one
many are made sinners. But though there is something in the knew Testament on
the theme
there is more in the Old. In the New Testament it is specially the
individual who comes to his rights; in the Old Testament more attention is
given to the family
the nation
the generations which succeed each other and
yet are part of each other--at once inheritors and transmitters of the blessing
or the curse. It works for good: ¡§the mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to
everlasting upon them that fear Him
and His righteousness unto children¡¦s
children.¡¨ It works also for evil--¡§visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation.¡¨ And both in Jeremiah and in
Ezekiel we meet this idea
which had evidently become proverbial in
Israel--¡§The fathers have eaten sour grapes
and the children¡¦s teeth are set
on edge.¡¨ The people were making too much of that; the prophets were eager to
show them that there was another side to the truth. But that their proverb has
some truth in it
who can deny?
I. And first
the
fact. Here it is as a theologian (Dr. Denney
Studies in Theology) states
it: ¡§We are born with a history in us.¡¨ Here it is as a novelist (Oliver
Wendell Holmes
Elsie Venner) states it: ¡§Each one of us is only
the footing up of a double column of figures that goes back to the first pair.
Every unit tells
and some of them are plus and some minus We are mainly
nothing but the answer to a long sum in addition and subtraction.¡¨ If you
prefer scientific witnesses
their name is legion; this doctrine is one of the
cornerstones of scientific thought. One of the quaintest and most delightful
studies of the subject it is hardly profound enough to be called a study
and
yet it is exceedingly suggestive--is in Robert Louis Stevenson¡¦s Memories
and Portraits. You may remember the passage in which he describes his grim
old minister-grandfather
and wonders what he has inherited from him: ¡§Try as I
please
I cannot join myself on with the reverend doctor; and all the while
no
doubt he moves in my blood and whispers words to me
and sits efficient in the
very knot and centre of my being.¡¨ And not he alone
but a broadening line of
ancestors
stretching back into the cloudy past
the toilers and fighters and
adventurers of earlier generations
¡§Picts who rallied round Macbeth
¡¨. . .
¡§star-gazers on Chaldean plateaus.¡¨. . .¡¨And furthest of all
what sleeper in
green tree tops
what muncher of nuts
concludes my pedigree? Probably arboreal
in his habits.¡¨ It all amounts to this
that each human being is a thousand
rolled into one; the roots of our lives go deep down into history
drawing from
many different strata some of the elements that make us what we are. It is the
darker side of this fact that is reflected in the text. ¡§The fathers have eaten
sour grapes
¡¨--in other words
they have sinned
perhaps they have suffered for
their sins
the grapes have been sour even in the act of eating; but their
children after them have suffered also
perhaps in nothing more than in this
that in them the ancestral tendencies to evil have been perpetuated and
reproduced. It means this
that if a man has had ancestors who have been
say
drunkards or loose livers or men of ungovernable temper
very likely something
of their besetting tendency is transmitted into his very blood
and the battle
is all the harder for him because of their sin. And if he in his turn yields
himself a servant to sins like these
very likely his children and his
children¡¦s children will be enslaved by the same bondage. This is a reality so
tremendous that it has made some men curse the day they were born. Here is a
relationship which is not in the smallest degree in a man¡¦s own control; he was
not consulted as to the family into which he should be born. Yet that
relationship affects not only his physical but his moral and spiritual life; it
follows him into the race of life and into the fight of faith; it may prove a
continual burden and snare. Thank God if those who have gone before us have
been His servants
living sweet
strong
clean lives. We do not know how much
easier that has made the battle for us. It is a personal matter
a care and
conscience so to live that no one in whose veins your blood may run may have
reason to hate your memory for what you have been or have handed on to them.
And it is a social matter
the mightiest of arguments for every form of moral
and religious effort that can be brought to bear on the life of today. Today is
the parent of tomorrow. And anything of health and purity and love and God that
is sown like seed in the soil of the present generation does not end its
fruitfulness there; it is a gift and a blessing to the future--¡§and the people
which shall be created shall praise the Lord.¡¨
II. I notice that
though heredity is a fact
and sometimes a terrible influence
it is an
influence which has its limits. This needs to be emphasised
because when men¡¦s
hearts are in revolt against this tyranny of the dead past
they are apt to
forget that the evil transmitted is not unlimited or unmixed. Even taking the
bright and dark sides of hereditary influence together
it does not cover all
the facts of life. Professor Drummond is right when he says that for half of
life
at least
we have no ¡§inherited storage¡¨ of habit or tendency. And if we
take the darker side alone
still more is that a limited influence. It is
limited in duration: those words ¡§unto the third and fourth generation¡¨ have a
meaning. So far and no further extends what Jeremy Taylor calls ¡§the entail of
curses¡¨; there is a beneficent law which limits the time through which any evil
habit in a given family can continue its self-propagating power; if it had not
been for that
the world would be an infinitely worse place today. And it is
limited in extent also in the individual life; it is limited by the very fact
that a brighter side of hereditary influence exists; nobler instincts and finer
tendencies can also be transmitted; there is a kind of entail in the blessing
as surely as in the curse
and the entail of the blessing lasts the longer. These
limitations imply that individuality has its own rights and possibilities. They
imply that free will is not destroyed
even though hereditary influence gives a
strong bias towards evil. They imply that each life may be a fresh starting
point for the nobler possibilities of humanity. They imply that though a man¡¦s
ancestors may be among his most subtle and powerful tempters
not all their
power can forge upon him the fetters of an absolute fate. The truth seems to be
this
that there is enough reality in this fact of heredity to constitute an
important element in each man¡¦s trial and conflict
in some lives perhaps quite
the most important element. But there is not enough in it to abolish the trial
and the conflict
to make it an inevitable certainty that any man will fail in
the trial or go under in the conflict. Over against the fact of corporate unity
Ezekiel sets the equally real facts of personal responsibility; if men die
it
is for their own sins
not for the sins of their fathers. They could turn;
heavily weighted and sadly biassed though it is
human nature still swings upon
its pivot
and all things are possible. Grant that they cannot rid themselves
of sin
they have still a mighty defence against fate in this
that they can
turn from sin towards God--the God who waits to be a refuge and a deliverer.
III. That brings me
to the last thought
the counteractive. For it is too mild a statement of the
case to say that the influence of heredity is limited: it is attacked
it is
opposed
its overthrow is planned and dared from the strongholds of eternity.
Mr. Rendel Harris (Union with God
the chapter on ¡§Grace and
Heredity¡¨)
speaks the truth when he says: ¡§If we have not a Gospel against heredity it is
very doubtful whether we have any Gospel at all.¡¨ At any rate
many souls are
painfully conscious that if there is no Gospel against heredity
there is no
Gospel at all for them. But there is an older heredity than that which is
commonly meant by the word
older
deeper
more essentially related to our true
selves
reaching back even to the great deep from which we came. Listen to a
fragment of a human genealogy. ¡§Which was the son of Enos
which was the son of
Seth
which was the son of Adam
which was the son of God.¡¨ The Evangelist is
very daring. David the adulterer is in that genealogical tree
and Jacob the
supplanter
and many others
all more or less diseased
dwarfed
defiled with
sin. Can this
indeed
be allowed to stand as the ultimate origin of their
being
the oldest source from which they drew their life
¡§which was the son of
God¡¨? That honourable lineage is allowed even to them
and indeed the
genealogical tree of every one of us ends there
¡§which was the son of God.¡¨
Has not this God created us? Are not all our souls His
and is not His image
stamped upon us all? Older than any link which binds us to the past
generations
deeper than any resemblance to human ancestors which may appear in
our faces or actions or characters
--so old and so deep is the relationship
which connects us with the living God. Nay
it is a direct and immediate
relationship; that is the chief burden of the prophet¡¦s message here
in answer
to the morbid melancholy of the people¡¦s mood. ¡§As I live
saith the Lord God
all souls are Mine.¡¨ Each soul has still its own link with God
its own
responsibility to Him
and its own inheritance in Him. We may have done our
best to break this connection
to blot out this likeness. But He does not
disown the relationship. Now
this more wonderful heredity
so central and
essential in man¡¦s true nature
has been sadly overlaid and overborne by other
influences
such as those I have spoken of today. And God has taken special
means to restore it to its true place and influence
to create the family that
should realise the Divine intention
and bring the race of man to its true and
glorious destiny. Think of the wonder of that interposition! The man Christ
Jesus
bone of our bone
flesh of our flesh
descendant on His human side of a
stock that was no more exempt than we are from the universal disease. Yet He
was without sin
without one stain or taint of sin. The law of human heredity
was laid aside for once in Him
that the older
deeper
diviner heredity might
fully express itself
the answer to the world¡¦s despair! And this second Adam became
the head and founder of a new family
reproducing Himself in those who believed
on Him
filling them with His grace
training and enabling them to follow in
His steps
¡§that He might be the first-born among many brethren.¡¨ Can men
gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles? Of course not; but many a sorry
branch of the human tree
barren and almost ready for the burning
has begun to
bear wondrous fruit when it has been grafted into the true Vine. Jesus gives
power to become the sons of God; He starts them on the life in which the true
end of their being is to be fulfilled. Let us believe in this. Let us pray to
have it realised in us and ours. So we have a Gospel against heredity
and
surely it is a Gospel indeed. (J. M. E. Ross
M. A.)
Heredity and grace
The context also makes it clear that the captives in Chaldea used
the words as a querulous reproach against the Almighty. Their forefathers had
sinned; they
the descendants
were reaping the fruit. Not for their own
misdeeds were they now suffering such dire calamity
They were simply involved
as by the operation of a remorseless fate in the sins of their predecessors
and they were unable to shake themselves free from the crushing incubus. Now
these Jewish exiles voice very much of contemporary English thought at the
beginning of the twentieth Christian century. Men do not attempt to deny the
fact of moral evil. It is no longer pretended that this is the best of all
possible worlds; that the advance of education
refinement
and civilisation is
steadily driving sin out of the universe; and that under the evolutionary
process we may confidently anticipate the speedy advent of the new heavens and
the new earth. No! that shallow optimism of English Deism is scouted by modern
philosophy
whose keynote is heredity. The idea that the offence of the
ancestor involves the race in disability is no longer confined to the theology
of the dark ages. Scientists
social reformers
journalists
and novelists have
claimed it as their own. Darwin corroborates Paul. When the preachers of a
century ago talked of original sin they were grievously reproached for their
dark
gloomy views of human nature. It was a monstrous notion that men should
be handicapped in all their after destiny by the sin of one primitive man from
whom they chanced to be the descendants. That doctrine was only the invention
of diseased consciences
the fiction of priests
and impossible of acceptance
by any but the least enlightened of mankind. But modern philosophy has changed
all that
and now proclaims in its own way every principle of the old creed. So
widespread and dominant has this teaching become that in the words of a
discriminating critic
¡§one would think that the problem of heredity
constituted the sum and substance of life
and that a man is nothing but a sum
of tendencies transmitted from his ancestors.¡¨ Nor can we be blind to the
substantial truth of the modern doctrine. There is no theory which could
marshal a greater or more appalling array of evidence in its favour than the
theory incorporated in this Jewish proverb. The Bible itself assures us that
the sins of the fathers are visited upon the children to the third and fourth
generation. We see all around us men who inherit physical capacities
physical
qualities
physical aptitudes which make it not only difficult for them to
enter into life with the same advantage as their fellows
but which furnish
them with a terrible bias the wrong way. And let us thankfully acknowledge that
science has
at least
rendered this great service to the Christian faith. It
has shown that we do not stand alone. We are not isolated units. We are parts
of a great social organism bound to each other by close and indissoluble ties.
¡§No man liveth unto himself
¡¨ we are all members one of another. And yet the
startling fact remains that Ezekiel only quotes this proverb
expressive of so
much truth
in order to repudiate it. He declares that it is unworthy of those
who bear the name of Israel. ¡§What mean ye that ye use this proverb in the land
of Israel?¡¨--the land which acknowledges Jehovah
and which is His peculiar
possession? It is only fit for heathen
and ought to be swept forever from the
records of Israel. He repudiates the proverb because it was used in an untrue
sense
and was bound up with absolutely false inferences. The captives said
they were suffering because of their fathers¡¦ sin. That was true. Their present
misery was the result of the idolatry of their fathers. What then? Shall men
make the ugly inheritance from the past a bolster for indolence today
and an
apology for disregarding the duties of the hour? It was this mistake which the
exiles were making. Their eyes were so fixed upon their fathers¡¦ sin that they
could see none in themselves. They were the victims of dire misfortune--men to
be pitied and excused. A spirit of fatalism and despair had settled down upon
them
and they moaned that a hard fate had bound them in fetters of iron
from
which there was no escape. ¡§If our transgressions and our sins be upon us
and
we pine away in them
how
then
should we live?¡¨ There is a similar spirit
around us today. It is felt in much of our literature. Sin is regarded as a
man¡¦s misfortune rather than his fault. The drunkard
the impure
the idler
and ne¡¦er-do-well can no more help themselves for these evil things than they
can interfere with the size of their stature or the colour of their hair. I am
not exaggerating the trend of popular opinion. One of our best-known writers
in a little book which has become a household word
tells us that at the end of
the twentieth century men will ¡§look backward
¡¨ and then
for the first time
seeing things as they really are
will always speak of crime as ¡§atavism.¡¨ This
means
in plain language
that what has been bred in the bone must sooner or
later come out in the flesh. The murderer is therefore what he has been made;
he acts by necessity of nature
and cannot be otherwise than he is. Of course
we see at once where such teaching lands us. It means the denial of all moral
responsibility
and the paralysis of all aspiration. It is the doctrine of
despair. It is here that the Bible parts company with modern philosophy. It
does not deny the facts of heredity. It admits that men do not start equally in
the race of life. It shirks none of the hideous facts which are plain to every
observer of human life. It declares that to whom little is given of him little
shall be required. It speaks of One who watches above--¡§With larger other eyes
than ours to make allowance for us all.¡¨ But it refuses to regard any man as absolutely
determined by the influences he has received from the past. Our consciences
tell us that the Bible is right. How otherwise can we explain our feelings of
personal responsibility
our sense of shame and remorse? No man ever yet
morally felt accountable because he was of diminutive height. The sense of
accountability for our actions
however
is always with us. The very men who
deny it cannot write a page without using language which contradicts their
denial. And there is no explanation whatever for this persistency of
conscience
and its lofty refusal to be gagged and silenced
when we plead our
flimsy excuses at its bar
if a man is so hopelessly bound by his past that it
is impossible for him to be free. You never yet succeeded in justifying yourself
by shuffling the blame on to the shoulders of those who have gone before you.
No! the attempt to evade responsibility is essentially dishonest. It is a
futile make-believe. The man who attempts it hardly cheats himself
for in his
deepest heart he knows that
however hampered he may be in his fight with sin
he is not justified in the resignation of despair. The prophet supplies the
ground on which this verdict of conscience is justified. Ezekiel sets over
against the proverbial half truth of the exiles another which counterbalances
it. ¡§Ye shall no more use this proverb in Israel
for all souls are Mine.¡¨ Man
does not belong only to the family
the tribe
the nation. He belongs to God.
He possesses not only what he has derived from a tainted ancestry
but that
which he has received straight from God. The deeds of my forefathers are not
the only factor in the case. God must be taken into account. God lives and
works
and I belong to Him. The reply of the prophet is carried further in the
Christian Gospel. It tells me of a Saviour who is able to save unto the
uttermost. It opposes to these natural forces which incline to sin the power of
almighty grace. Every man here stands in direct personal relations with Jesus
Christ
and may come into personal saving contact with the strong Son of God.
Here is our hope. Christianity is a Gospel
because it points me to a Redeemer
who makes all things new. And so the work of the second Adam comes in to
restore the balance of moral forces disturbed in the fall of the first. The sin
of the natural head of the race is more than outweighed by the righteousness of
Jesus Christ. The new pulses of life from Him are mightier than the tide of
tainted life that comes to me out of the past. The transfusion of grace
prevails over that of corruption.¡¨ Where sin abounded
grace has much more
abounded. We are not under the tyranny of natural law. We are under grace. If
therefore
anyone says
¡§It is useless for me to hope to be better
greater
truer than I am. You do not know by what circumstances I am environed; you do
not know what terrible physical organisation I inherit. You do not know the
temper
the passion
the lust that are in me. I am the victim of this terrible
law which makes it impossible for me to rise and shake off its tyranny.¡¨ I
answer
¡§It is not so. You are not so weighted in the race that you must fall
and perish. There is help for every man
the eternal and undying energy of
Divine grace.¡¨ I tell you of Jesus
the servant of Jehovah who is anointed to
give deliverance to the captives. ¡§He breaks the power of cancelled sin
He
sets the prisoners free.¡¨ Jesus told the man with the withered hand to stretch
it forth. That is just what he had tried to do again and again without success.
But faith in Jesus
who gave the command
induced him to make the effort to
obey
and in the effort he received power. Jesus speaks to us all in His
Gospel
and He speaks to the weak and sinful side of our nature. He calls us to
a life of self-conquest
of purity
of holy service and high endeavour. And
when we set forth the insuperable obstacles in our way
our surroundings in
business
our inherited tendencies
our strong passions
our weak wills
and
say ¡§We cannot¡¨; He replies: ¡§Stretch forth thy hand.¡¨ Make this venture of
faith. You see all the forces arrayed against you. You do not see the living
Saviour who can make you more than conqueror. But act as if He were on your
side
and you shall find new life and new power. The will to be saved is the
beginning of salvation. (W. E. Bloomfield.)
The doctrine of heredity perverted
How do men pervert this doctrine of the fathers having eaten sour
grapes
and the children¡¦s teeth being set on edge? They seek to ride off from
responsibility on the ground that they are suffering vicariously
and perhaps
innocently; they cannot help doing evil: the thirsty throat was born within
them
and water cannot quench it
so they must drink fire and brimstone; they
say they are fated to do evil; the thief is in their muscles
and they must
steal; their father was a felon
and they must keep up the family line. In a
pensive tone
with a melancholy that is supposed to express a degree of
resignation
philosophical
although self-reproachful
they speak now about
law
heredity
development: and thus they walk down to darkness on the stilts
of polysyllables. The fathers have eaten sour grapes
say they
and our
innocent teeth are set on edge: this is the outworking of the mystery
the
occult law of heredity. The Lord will not have that any longer; He says
This
proverb shall cease; these people are being ruined by their own epigrams
they
do not see the full sweep and scope and bent of things. Then He lays down the
grand
all-inclusive
all-involving doctrine to which we shall presently turn.
But is there not a law of succession
of heredity; is there not a mystery of
paternity
following the little boy all the time? Yes
there is. Take care what
use you make of that fact. Let it fall under the great all-governing law
and
then it will come into right perspective. How does society
that humanity which
is next to God
treat this law of heredity? Very directly
summarily
and
justly. The culprit
being not only a felon but a philosopher
says to the
magistrate
I was born as you find me; I am not the thief
it is my father who
is guilty of felony; pity me as the victim of heredity. And his worship
being
also a philosopher
without being a felon
says
The argument is good
it is
based in reason; you are discharged. Is it so in society? Is it not accounted
just in society that the soul that sinneth
it shall be punished? Instead
therefore
of having a theology that does not coincide with our own highest
instincts and noblest practices
we had better see what adjustment can be
created as between our theology and our habits
laws
and practices. In society
we ignore heredity: what if in the Church it has been pushed as a doctrine to
evil because of irrational uses? What is the great principle
then
that is to
supersede small proverbs and local sayings and misapplied epigrams? ¡§As I live
saith the Lord¡¨--solemn word: when it is uttered I feel as if the gates of
eternity had been thrown back
that the King might come out in person and
address His people the universe--¡§As I live
saith the Lord God
. . .behold
all souls are Mine¡¨; and the law of punishment is
¡§The soul that sinneth
it
shall die.¡¨ The universe replies
That is just
that is good. That is not
arbitrary; that is necessary
that is reason working itself out
a great stern
law operating beneficently
when judged by sufficient breadth of time. The Lord
is not a tyrant with a rod of iron in His hand
smiting men because they do
wrong; He is the Sovereign of a universe so constituted that no man can tell a
lie without loss--loss of quality
loss of standing
loss of dignity
loss of
confidence. That is God¡¦s universe--sensitive to truth
sensitive to all that
is exact
honourable
noble
pure
right. It is good to live in such a universe
so long as we are in harmony with its spirit
but when we lose touch with its moral
music it crushes us
not tyrannically and arbitrarily
not in a spirit of petty
resentment
which begets resentment
but in a spirit of justice
reason
righteousness. See how good the Lord is. The just man shall live
saith the
Lord. If the just man have a son that is a robber
the robber shall not be
saved because the father was a just man. If a bad man have a good son
that
good son shall live
though his father be wallowing in hell. The question is
not what was your father
but what you are. Shall we say
Lord
my father was a
bad man
and therefore I cannot help being bad myself? The Lord will not allow
that reasoning. The Lord gives every man a chance in life
an opportunity;
allots to every man a measure of faith
or grace
or reason; attaches to every
man something on which he can found a Divine judgment. Shall we say
My father
was so good that I have not felt the need of being good myself; I want to be
saved with the family? The Lord will not admit such reasoning. We are not saved
in families
we are saved one by one; so the Lord will have it that His way is
equal. The great law of punishment therefore stands. (J. Parker
D. D.)
Heredity and environment
Various themes are afoot in our days
and have been in generations
past
to relieve us from the pressure of personal responsibility for the
character of our own life. We want to get some scientific ground to excuse
ourselves whenever the ideal in our souls condemns the real in our action. The
theory abroad in our day
clad in a robe of scientific weaving
and therefore
counted respectable
has these two feet--one called heredity
the other
environment. It is assumed by many that a man can stand firmly
and hold up his
head bravely
if only he alternates these two ideas. If one gives out and will
not account for things
he can put the other forward. The consequence is that
many people are fatalists. I am what I am
because my father and mother and
grandfather and grandmother were what they were. This fatalism is paralyzing to
the higher moralities and charities of life. While on the one side it condemns
on the other side it discourages. Let us not say (it would be foolish to do it)
that the influences of heredity do not descend. The Old Testament people knew
they did. The idea was expressed very strongly in the words that
not in their
guilt but in their natural consequences
the sins of the fathers should be
visited on the children to the third and fourth generations. That is about the
longest period of life (in the human family) an evil has; but goodnesses and
virtues keep on to thousands of generations. In that is our hope of the final
complete triumph of good over evil. ¡§Visiting the iniquities of the fathers
upon the children to the third and fourth generation
and showing mercy unto
thousands (of generations) of them that love Me and keep My commandments.¡¨
Heredity justifies itself. It is beneficent in its purpose and working.
Notwithstanding that evil tendencies are started
notwithstanding that a next
generation may be handicapped
yet the question whether more evil than good
ever descends is one which we cannot now stay to discuss. Personally
I cannot
but believe that life is always a blessing given
and that along the line of
the most unfortunate heredity that thin stream of Divine life flows which can
never be extinguished till God withdraws Himself. And that is
to my mind
proved by the experiences we have of the regenerating force of a purified
environment. The cases are legion for numbers in which some of the most useful
lives now being lived have carried in them an heredity of the very worst.
People were thinking in Ezekiel¡¦s time as we are thinking in our time. They
were misrepresenting God and His providence. They were talking of one another
as if each were simply the exact sum of a row of figures; as if they were
animals of certain sorts or families. The lion is not responsible for being a
lion
nor the leopard for his spots
nor the tiger for his bloodthirstiness
nor man for his characteristics. That was the kind of speech heard from lip to
lip. Into the midst of it all the prophet came with his message from God
¡§The
soul that sinneth
it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity
etc. This
language recognises that each of us is something more than a section in the
stream of heredity
and something more than a silver-plated mirror receiving
the impression of the life round about us
whether we will to receive it or
not. A man is not accountable for his heredity
and only partly for his
environment
but he has a self which is related to both
but which is more than
both. He can say ¡§I.¡¨ He can say ¡§I will.¡¨ Around those two words all his
responsibility gathers. What fathers and mothers have given us
that is between
them and God. But there is something they have not given us. Within all the
forces of life
vital and mechanical
there is a Divine movement. Out of theft
Divine Spirit has come the soul which is the self
which sits at the centre of
things
receiving and rejecting
approving and disapproving--the Ego--the
I--the self. This is the mystery--the wonder of life. No theories
no
philosophies
no systems can deny it or undo it or scatter it
or give it to
someone else
or make someone else responsible for it. Individuality is as real
as society itself. Evaporate it we cannot. Melt it into something else than
itself we cannot. All theories about man being heredity and environment
and
nothing else
are lifeless
in the presence of this persistent
unsubduable
and unconquerable ¡§I¡¨ which presides over every man¡¦s destiny. Not for Adam¡¦s
sin--not for your father¡¦s sin--not for your mother¡¦s sin--but for your own
that which is unquestionably your own
will you be called to account. The truth
under Ezekiel¡¦s words
¡§The soul that sinneth
it shall die
¡¨ etc.
that truth is the reassertion of God¡¦s claim on the faithfulness
of each as well as on the allegiance of all. If you examine history you will
find that God has moved the race forward
and reforward by consecrated
individualities. When He has punished its laziness and sloth and wickedness
it
has been by the misleading force of men of strong individuality
not
consecrated but desecrated
--for everything that is not used for God is
desecrated. It
. Old Testament times men were gradually led from one truth to
another. Not till Ezekiel¡¦s time did the great truth of each person¡¦s
individual accountability to God ring out clear and free. It was Ezekiel¡¦s
revival note
and
indeed
is not the root distinctiveness between Romanism and
Protestantism in this very truth? In Romanism individualism is so controlled
that it can never arise to the place where between it and God there is nothing
to intervene. In Protestantism the individual finds himself face to face with
God. His first allegiance is not to the Church and not to the State
but to God.
As intelligence increases he learns that he can serve the Church best and the
State best by serving God. What was the impression that the early Christians
produced on the society around them? ¡§These all do contrary to the decrees of
Caesar
saying that there is another King--one Jesus.¡¨ Does not that passage
show the simplicity of their allegiance? It was not divided. It gave them no
trouble. They were not perplexed about it
because they were honest and
sincere. Each man serving the same Christ
and subjecting his own will
came
into a new and deeper relationship to other men than had aforetime been
realised. There was no question of the collision of interests. Each man knew he
could serve the interests of his own family best by individual allegiance to Christ.
Each knew he could serve his Church best and his country best by serving
Christ. (Rouen Thomas.)
The proverb of heredity falsely used
There is a sense in which that proverb was then
and is now
perfectly true. No generation starts fresh in the race of being. It is the
offspring of a past; it is the parent of a future. It is so; and it must be so.
The England of today
the Church of today
the grown man
and the little child
of today
is not and cannot be what any one of these would have been if it had
had no yesterday; if each or any of them had not had an ancestry as well as a
history. There is a sense in which the proverb is perfectly true and applicable
to almost everybody--¡§The fathers have eaten sour grapes
and the children¡¦s
teeth are set on edge.¡¨ But this was not the use made of the proverb by the
contemporaries and countrymen of Ezekiel. They represented not that their
outward condition alone
their national or individual circumstances
but that
their spiritual state
their spiritual destiny
depended upon that for which
they were not responsible. God was displeased at them for sins not their own.
It was vain to approach Him with the cry of penitence or the prayer for grace.
A sentence of wrath and reprobation had gone forth against them
and to
struggle against it was to fight against God. This terrible view of life is
combated at length in the chapter. (Dean Vaughan.)
Parental responsibility
Dr. Leonard Bacon once preached a sermon on what he called the
obverse side of the Fifth Commandment
the duty of parents to be worthy of
honour. The child is born into the world with this right. His pure eyes look to
his elders for example. His soul waits for impulse and inspiration from them.
Woe unto that parent
who by unworthy character causes one of these little ones
to stumble; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck
and that he were drowned in the depths of the sea. (Christian Union.)
Verse 4
Behold
all souls are Mine; as the soul of the father
so also the
soul of the son is Mine: the soul that sinneth
it shall die.
The gospel of the exile incarnate in Ezekiel
(with Ezekiel 36:25-26; Ezekiel 37:14):--Every living ¡§word¡¨ must
be made flesh
and dwell among us; live in a human and personal life
breathe
our warm breath
grasp us with sympathetic and friendly hands
carry our sins
and bear our sorrows
if it is to gain admission at ¡§lowly doors¡¨; stir the
¡§spirit¡¦s inner deeps¡¨; compel and inspire to an ampler life the reluctant
souls of men. The maximum of power is never gained by ideas till they possess
and sway the ¡§body prepared for them
¡¨ and clothe themselves with the subtle
and mysterious influences of a vital and impressive personality. The notion of
rescuing the waifs and strays of town and village life was in the air of the
last century for a long time
and occasionally passed out of its formlessness
into print and speech; but it did not grapple with evil
and become the power
of God unto the salvation of young England
until it was incarnate in Robert
Raikes
of Gloucester
and through him became
as the Sunday School
¡§the
pillar of a people¡¦s hope
the centre of a world¡¦s desire.¡¨ The brutal hardness
and ferocious cruelty of the prisons of Europe had arrested the fickle
attention again and again
but no blow was struck to abate the prodigious
mischiefs of criminal life
and elevate punishment into a minister of justice
till John Howard was fired and possessed with the passion of prison reform
and
dedicated his will to its advancement with the glorious abandon and
success-compelling energy of the prophet. The same is true of the war for
personal liberty
of the battles against superstition
and so on ad
infinitum. Now
our Bible is a book of ideas--ideas the most simple and
sublime
central and essential to all human welfare; but these ideas do not
appear as ghosts of a strange and distant world
but clothed in our own
humanity
our veritable flesh and blood
speaking ¡§our own tongue wherein we
were born
¡¨ and moving in the midst of the experiences of sin and sorrow
temptation and suffering
and painful progress common to us all. The biblical
evangels are all in men. Each one comes with the momentum of a human
personality. The Gospel of all the Gospels
the pearl of greatest price
is in
the Man Christ Jesus; and in accordance with this Divine principle
the Gospel
of the Exile was incarnate in the prophets
and notably in Ezekiel. His very
name was a Divine promise
¡§God shall strengthen¡¨; and his life an enforcement
of the beautiful saying
¡§They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their
strength
¡¨ etc. The signs and proofs of imperfection notwithstanding
it is
palpable that Ezekiel
moved by the Holy Ghost
is a man of invincible newness
of spirit
works by methods of evangelical thoroughness
and inspires and
impels by motives of a decisively Christian quality.
I. Ezekiel
breathes the spirit of the new evangel from the beginning to the close of his
ministry
the spirit of unbending courage
iron consistency
uncompromising
faithfulness
heroic self-abnegation
and living faith in God. The breath of
Jehovah lifts him on to his feet. The ineffable thrill of the Divine life fills
him with a manly daring
makes his ¡§forehead as an adamant
harder than flint
¡¨
so that he faces and accepts in his inmost being the unspeakable bitterness of
the communications he has to deliver
and bears without repining the pressure
of an overwhelmingly sorrowful work for the disobedient and obdurate house of
Israel. The conscious possession of a gospel for men is the true inspiration to
fearlessness
defiance of wrong and falsehood and hypocrisy
calm and
inflexible zeal in work. The real prophet of his age reckons with calumny
misrepresentation
neglect
and poverty. Livingstone carries in his New
Testament the food on which martyrs are nourished. Savonarola is fortified for
death by the vision of the future of Florence which grows out of the good
tidings he preaches. Paul and Barnabas can readily hazard their lives as
missionaries because they know they are conveying the unsearchable riches of
Christ.
II. The Gospel of
the exile is incarnate in Ezekiel as to its method
as well as in its new and
conquering spirit. There is a penetrating thoroughness characteristic of the
life of the time
and of the particular experience through which Israel is
passing; a going to the root of individual and national mischief; a searching
of heart
an arousal of conscience
an insistence on the doctrine of individual
responsibility; a forcing of men face to face with eternal and irresistible
Divine laws--all essential to the successful proclamation of a true evangel for
sinning men.
1. The prophet¡¦s first word anticipates that of John the Baptist and
of our Lord
¡§Repent ye
repent ye. God is at hand. His rule is real
though
invisible. His kingdom is coming
though you do not see it. Repent
and repent
at once.¡¨ With an energy of language
and a vigour of epithet
and a vehemence
of spirit
that could neither be mistaken nor resisted
he rebuked the sins of
this house of disobedience
exposed its hollow sophistries and self-delusions
and bade it cast away its transgressions
and make itself a new heart and a new
spirit.
2. Nor does he rest till he has dug up the very roots of their false
and fatal wrong-doing
and laid bare to the glare of the light of day the real
cause of all their sin. They are fatalists. Ezekiel met this fixed iron
fatalism of the people with the all-encompassing and indefeasible doctrine of
the personal responsibility of each man for his own sin; as distinct from the
distorted notion of inherited and transmitted guilt and suffering
they were
proclaiming. ¡§God says
¡¨ he told him
¡§behold
all souls are Mine¡¨; each is of
equal and independent value; as the soul of the father
so is the soul of the
son; the soul that sinneth
it shall die--it
and not another for it; it alone
and only for its own conscious and inward wrong. God¡¦s ways are all equal
and
righteousness is the glory of His administration. Heredity is a fact; but it
neither accounts for the sum of human suffering
nor for the presence of individual
sin. The grape theory may fill a proverb
but it will not explain the Exile.
III. Ezekiel could
not have adopted so rigorous and searching a method unless he had been bathed
and inspired by the great evangelical motive. The motive to Ezekiel¡¦s ministry
is the loving
omnipotent
and regenerating God.
1. As the idea of sin bulges more and more in the thought of the
Jews
and burns with increased fierceness in their consciences
fed by the
sufferings of their nation
so with unprecedented sharpness of outline appears
¡§the wiping out¡¨ of guilt by the free
sovereign
and love-prompted grace of
God.
2. It is in the inspiration of hope in the almighty power of God that
Ezekiel soars to the highest ranges
and beholds his most memorable and
gladdening vision. Carried in thought to his ¡§Mount of Transfiguration
¡¨
Tel-Abib
he sees covering the vast area of the far-stretching plain the wreck
as of an immense army
of dry
bleached
and withering bones. He muses
and the
fire of thought burns
and the voice of God sounds in the lonely chambers of
his soul. The omnipotence of God is the certain resurrection of the soul of
man. He cannot be holden of death. This last enemy shall be destroyed. Power
belongeth unto God
and He uses it to save prostrate
despondent
and
despairing souls
convicted of guilt
oppressed with the consciousness of
death! His delight is in renewal as well as in mercy!
3. Nor is this a fitful and passing access of power
standing out in
life like a mountain peak in a plain
a sad memorial of a delightful past
and
prophecy of an impossible future; a record of privilege never again to be
enjoyed. No; for ¡§I will
¡¨ says God
¡§take away the hard
insensitive
unsympathetic
and selfish heart of stone
and will give you a heart of flesh
tender
responsive to the touch of all that surrounds it
open to the Divine
emotion of reverence and pity
love and aspiration; and I will put My spirit
within you
and write My laws on your heart
enrich you with personal
communion
and nourish you by a true obedience.¡¨ O blessed Gospel! O cheering
Pentecost of the Exile! How the hearts of the lowly and penitent in Israel
leapt to hail thy coming
rejoiced in the fulness of the blessing of faith
hope
and fellowship
with the Eternal! and prepared for the world-saving
mission to which God had called them. Who
then
will hesitate to preach God¡¦s
last
perfect
and universal Gospel to his fellow man? Who will not seek for
the strength which comes
All souls for God
There is a difference between the utterance of a man of science
and the utterance of a prophet. When knowledge or science speaks
we demand
that it shall prove its assertions; but when the prophet speaks
he speaks that
which demands and needs no reason
because he speaks to that within us which
can approve its utterance. Again
when the man of science speaks
what he
conveys may be interesting
but it does not necessarily convey any requisite
action on our part; but wherever prophecy speaks
it commands responsible
action on our part; it is the obligation of obedience. Now
Ezekiel was a
prophet
differing
no doubt
from other prophets; but
nevertheless
he was
one of those who gave utterance to those pregnant sentences or statements
which
having been once spoken
are spoken forever. You have an illustration of
it in the text. ¡§Behold
¡¨ says the prophet
and he speaks not for his own time
but for all time--¡§Behold
¡¨ speaking in the name of God
¡§all souls are Mine.¡¨
It is to the principle which underlies those words--and to the exhaustless
range of its application to various departments of human life
that I ask your
attention. It is indispensable to our conception of God that all souls should
be His. Imagine for one moment that it could be shown that there were souls
which did not belong to God; we should immediately say that the whole
conception which we had formed of God
the very fundamental idea which we
attach to the word
had been entirely destroyed
and He would cease to be God
to us if He were not God of all! But if it is true
then
as belonging to the
indispensable conception of the Divine Being that all souls should be His
the
power of the principle lies in this; a principle lies behind
I venture to
think
nearly all our opinions. It was so in the prophet¡¦s day. Here strong
opinions prevailed. The opinion which was strongest amongst the people of his
day
was an opinion concerning what would be called in modern language
heredity--¡§The fathers had eaten sour grapes
and the children¡¦s teeth were set
on edge.¡¨ A truth! An unquestionable truth when viewed from some standpoints.
But how did he deal with it? By bringing out the force of the old principle
the unquestionable principle
¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ Whatever may have happened
in the progress of generation after generation
whatever dark shadow may have
descended from father to son
however much the father¡¦s sin may have been
visited upon the children
that is not a token that they have ceased to be
God¡¦s
rather is it a token that the surrounding and the providential hand of
God is upon them still. And no act of one man can sever God from the rights
which He has over another man. And as no man can redeem his brother
so no man
can drag his brother out of the hand of the Almighty. For He lays down this
principle of sovereignty
All souls are Mine; and as God is crowned King of
heaven
so does He declare that His are inalienable rights
and no wrong and no
darkness and no sin can rob Him of those rights. That is the declaration of the
principle--¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ It is a statement of a right to property
¡§It
is He that hath made us and not we ourselves
and behold! our souls are His!¡¨
But are you satisfied that that shall be the only significance of it? It is the
declaration of Divine right
arising out of creation if you please
but
remember
it is ever true that the enunciation of Divine rights is the
enunciation of Divine character. We must never for a moment imagine that we can
dissociate the idea of God¡¦s rights from the idea of a Divine character. It is
the declaration not only of His claim over men by right of His creation of
them
but of His nearness to them and His care for them; that they have a claim
to His care arising out of His creation of them. That is what the prophet is
earnestly urging. For if you look for a moment you will see it is no mere naked
assertion of the right to property over men. What he is anxious for is to blot
out the darkness which their false and tyrannising opinion has brought over the
souls of his brethren. They are in exile
cowering down beneath the weight of
circumstances Which seemed inevitable and inexorable. He stands as before these
men and says
¡§Behold
you are liberated; God is near you. No one has a right
to declare that you do not belong to Him. I speak for your souls which are now
trodden down by the idea that somehow or another the dark shadow of the past
has put them out of the care of God
and out of the thought of God. This never
has been
and never can be
the case
for whatever a man be
with his soul
falling into wickedness and evil
or rising into goodness
all
all
no matter
of what sort
are under His care and keeping.¡¨ It is an attack upon the idea
that anything can take a man out of the care
out of the love
out of the
tenderness of God. And was he net right in his interpretation? The ages go by;
I turn to another book
and behold! the message of the book is the message
which runs precisely on those lines. Property
in the Divine idea
means the
obligation of property. What did your Master and mine say? He said
¡§Here are
men in the world: who are the men which show the carelessness of
responsibility? The hireling flieth
because he is an hireling
but the Good
Shepherd lays down His life for the sheep
because the sheep are His own
and
the right of property gives responsibility.¡¨ Those who are His by the claim of
possession have also a claim upon His care. If this be the principle
do you
not see how wide it is? And yet
surely often and often this principle has been
lost sight of
and opinions again have risen up to tyrannise over us and to
limit ¡§its¡¨ thought and its power. How often we are told
¡§Yes
they are God¡¦s
if--¡¨ There is always an ¡§if¡¨--¡§if a certain
experience has been gone through; if a certain ceremony has been
performed; if a certain belief has been acknowledged; if a certain
life has been lived
then they are God¡¦s
not otherwise!¡¨ You will not suppose
for a moment that I would undervalue an experience
nor an ordinance
nor a
faith
nor a life. But surely we must never confuse the manifestation of a
principle with the original principle itself. When the soul wakens up to the
consciousness of God
it is the awakening of the soul to the thought that God
had claimed it before. When the child is taken and admitted into the Christian
Church
you had not baptized it unless you had believed beforehand that the
redeeming hand of Christ had been stretched athwart the world. The faith that
you teach the humblest of your disciples will give him the first thought that
he belongs to God
for you will teach him
¡§I believe in God my Father.¡¨ And
the life that he has to live can only be the outcome of this
that he is
possessed by the power of a spirit which is declaring
to him that he is not
his own
but he is bought with a price. Nay
does not the apostle round his
argument precisely in that order? All the experiences
the joyous experiences
of Christian life
are the outcome of the realisation of that which was true
beforehand
that the soul belongs to any lesser or any lower
but simply to
God. Because ye are His
God has sent forth the spirit of His Son into your
hearts
crying Abba
Father. Such is the range of the principle as an
expression of Divine love
which is also the charter of human rights. Yes
it
stands forever written here
that the world may remember ¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨
We know what the history of the past was--contempt for this or that race. Can
there be contempt any longer
seeing that the Divine fiat has gone forth
¡§All
souls are Mine¡¨? It stands as the perpetual witness against the selfish
contempt of race against race. It is the declaration then
so far
of rights.
It is an individual one
for
believe me
no philosophy can ever take the place
of religion. It is absolutely impossible that altruism can be a fitting
substitute for self-sacrificing Christian love. The best intentions in the
world will not secure the objects of those good intentions. As long as you and
I live we shall find that the charter of human rights lies not in any
declaration from earth
but in a declaration from heaven. Just as the city
the
ideal city when it comes
will not spring from the earth
but will come down
from heaven
so
also
that which is the declaration of the citizenship of that
great city must descend from heaven
and the rights of men be conceived there
and not upon earth. For
unfortunately
it is only too true that civilisation
weaves within her bosom many strange passions and prejudices and opinions which
become an organised cruelty against the rights and the pities of men. There are
cruelties of philosophy
and cruelties of science
and cruelties of commerce
and cruelties of diplomacy. Cruelties of philosophy--one man teaches us that it
is impossible to raise out of their savage and sad condition certain races of
the world. Cruelties of science
when we are told that it is a pity to disturb
the picturesque surroundings of some of the lower African tribes
because the
scientific man loses the opportunity of a museum-like study when these races
become Christianised. Cruelties of commerce
when men are ready to condone the
wicked
and cruelly slaughter thousands
if they may secure a half per cent
more dividend upon their capital. Your answer is
¡§Here is a Divine principle;
have faith in this principle and behold the cruelty shall disappear.¡¨ It has
been so. The answer which has been given out of the exercise of faith in this
principle is an unanswerable reply to the objectors of all kinds. Everywhere
where there has been energy
everywhere where there has been this faith
it has
been faith in the one living principle that God¡¦s hand is over the whole race
and that all souls belong to Him. That is the answer to those who would seek to
make the charter of men less
and Jesus Christ coming to us says
¡§Behold
it
is even truer
¡¨ for over the whole world His love goes forth
and the armies of
His Cross spread East and West
and all are brought within His embrace
seeing
that He tasted death for every man. And as we contemplate
behold what happens!
We see immediately all these various races with their several conditions
with
their degraded state
or what we are pleased to call their uncivilised state
all of them are united in one thing: they have a common origin; they have a
common call; there is a common hope for them; there is a common hand of love
stretched out to them
and as you contemplate this fundamental bond of union
all the other idiosyncrasies and differences sink into insignificance compared
with this
that they are made of the same blood as ourselves
that their souls
are called by the same God as ourselves
and all these souls are His
and the
less we speak of these minor differences the better is the realisation of the
profound love of God which has become the charter of human rights. It is a
statute
finally of obligation
of service--¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ If all souls
are God¡¦s
then
humbly be it spoken
we too are His
and His claim over us is
the very same as the claim which we are seeking to extend the whole wide world
over
and His claim over us is the claim that we
being His
shall
in some
sort
resemble Him. In the constancy of His service who works ceaselessly
in
the self-sacrifice of that love which loved us and gave itself for us
the
obligation which springs out of that conception ¡§All souls are Mine ¡§is the
obligation that your whole life
your whole soul
all that you are
shall be
consecrated and dedicated to His service. And that is the rationale of
Christian missions. (Bp. Boyd Carpenter.)
The wealth of God and the obligation of man
I. The wealth of
God. He owns souls--intelligent
free
influential
deathless souls.
1. His wealth is immense. Think of the value of one soul. Think of
the inexhaustible powers
of the wonderful things that one soul is capable of
producing
of the interminable influence for good or bad that one soul
originates; and it may be well said
that one soul is of more value than the
whole world.
2. His wealth is righteous. He has the most absolute
the most
unquestionable right to them. He made them: He is the only Creator
and He has
the only right. They are His
with all their faculties and powers.
3. His wealth is inalienable. They cannot become their own
nor can
they become the property of another. They are his
absolutely
righteously
and
forever.
4. His wealth is ever-augmenting. The mountains are old
and the sea
is old
and the river is old
and even the youngest plants and animals that
appear are but old materials entered into new combinations
nothing more. But
souls are new in the entireness of their nature. Fresh emanations from the
Eternal Father are they all. Thus His wealth of souls increases.
II. The obligation
of man.
1. We should act according to His will. It is His will that we should
not ¡§live to ourselves¡¨--not seek our own. It is His will that we should centre
our affections on Him
love Him with all our hearts
etc. It is His will that
we should avail ourselves of the provisions of mercy in Christ Jesus.
2. We should confide implicitly in His protection. We are His
and if
we use ourselves according to His direction
He will take care of us
be our
shield in the battle
and our refuge in the storm.
3. We should be jealous for His rights.
All souls are God¡¦s
When we look at the world from any other point of view than the
Christian we are led to despise or to undervalue the mass of men. The man of
culture looks down on them as incapable of mental improvement; the man of
righteousness sees them hopelessly immersed in vice and crime; the reformer
turns away discouraged
seeing how they cling to old abuses. Everything
discourages us but Christianity. That enables us to take off all these
coverings
and find beneath the indestructible elements and capacities of the
soul itself. We see standing before us a muffled figure: it has been long dug
out of the ground
and is covered with a mass of earth. The man of taste looks
at it
and finds nothing attractive: he sees only the wretched covering. The
moralist looks at it
and finds it hopelessly stained with the earth and the
soil in which it has so long lain. The reformer is discouraged
finding that it
is in fragments
--whole limbs wanting; and considers its restoration hopeless.
But another comes
inspired by a pro-founder hope; and he sees beneath the
stains the Divine lineaments; in the broken fragments the wonderful
proportions. Carefully he removes the coverings; tenderly he cleanses it from
its stains; patiently he readjusts the broken parts
and supplies those which
are wanting: and so at last it stands
in a royal museum or pontifical palace
an Apollo or a Venus
the very type of manly grace or feminine beauty
--a statue
which enchants the world.
1. All souls belong to God and to goodness by creation. Compared with
the capacities and powers which are common to all
how small are the
differences of genius or talent between man and man! Now
suppose that we
should see in the midst of our city a building just erected with care and cost.
Its foundations are deeply laid; its walls are of solid stone; its various
apartments are arranged with skill for domestic and social objects; but it is
unoccupied and unused. We do not believe that its owner intends it to remain
so: we believe that the day will come in which these rooms shall become a home;
in which these vacant chambers shall resound with the glad shouts of children
and the happy laughter of youth; where one room shall be devoted to earnest
study
another to serious conversation
another to safe repose
and the whole
be sanctified by prayer. Such a building has God erected in every human soul.
One chamber of the mind is fitted for thought
another for affection
another
for earnest work
another for imagination
and the whole to be the temple of
God. It stands now vacant; its rooms unswept
unfurnished
wakened by no happy
echoes: but shall it be so always? Will God allow this soul
which belongs to
Him
so carefully provided with infinite faculties
to go wholly to waste?
2. No; God
having made the soul for goodness
is also educating it
for goodness. The soul
which belongs to God by creation
will also belong to
Him by education and culture. The earth is God¡¦s school
where men are sent for
seventy years
more or less
to be educated for the world beyond. All souls are
sent to this school; all enjoy its opportunities. The poor
who cannot go to
our schools; the wretched and the forlorn
who
we think
are without means of
culture
--are perhaps better taught than we are in God¡¦s great university. The
principal teachers in this school are three
--nature
events
and labour.
Nature receives the newborn child
shows him her picture book
and teaches him
his alphabet with simple sights and sounds. Happy are the children who can go
the most to Mother Nature
and learn the most in her dame school. The little
prince was wise who threw aside his fine playthings
and wished to go out and
play in the beautiful mud. The next teacher in God¡¦s school is labour. That
which men call the primal curse is
in fact
one of our greatest blessings.
Those who are called the fortunate classes
because they are exempt from the
necessity of toil
are
for that very reason
the most unfortunate. Work gives
health of body and health of mind
and is the great means of developing
character. Nature is the teacher of the intellect
but labour forms the
character. Nature makes us acquainted with facts and laws; but labour teaches
tenacity of purpose
perseverance in action
decision
resolution
and
self-respect. Then comes the third teacher
--these events of life which come to
all
--joy and sorrow
success and disappointment
happy love
disappointed
affection
bereavement
poverty
sickness and recovery
youth
manhood
and old
age. Through this series of events all are taken by the great teacher
--life:
these diversify the most monotonous career with a wonderful interest. They are
sent to deepen the nature
to educate the sensibilities. Thus nature teaches the
intellect
labour strengthens the will
and the experiences of life teach the
heart
For all souls God has provided this costly education. What shall we
infer from it? If we see a man providing an elaborate education for his child
hardening his body by exercise and exposure
strengthening his mind by severe
study
what do we infer from this? We naturally infer that he intends him for a
grand career.
3. Again
all souls belong to God by redemption. The work of Christ
is for all: He died for all
the just and the unjust
that He might bring them
to God. The value of a single soul in the eyes of God has been illustrated by
the coming of Jesus as in no other way. The recognition of this value is a
feature peculiar to Christianity. To be the means of converting a single soul
to put a single soul in the right way
has been considered a sufficient reward
for the labours of the most devoted genius and the ripest culture; to rescue
those who have sunk the lowest in sin and shame has been the especial work of
the Christian philanthropist; to preach the loftiest truths of the Gospel to
the most debased and savage tribes in the far Pacific has been the chosen work
of the Christian missionary. In this they have caught the spirit of the Gospel.
God said
¡§I will send My Son.¡¨ He chose the loftiest being for the lowliest
work
and thus taught us how He values the redemption of that soul which is the
heritage of all. Now
if a man
apparently very humble and far gone in disease
should be picked up in the street
and sent to the almshouse to die
and then
if immediately there should arrive some eminent person--say
the governor or
president--to visit him
bringing from a distance the first medical assistance
regardless of cost
we should say
¡§This man¡¦s life must be very precious:
something very important must depend upon it.¡¨ But now
this is what God has
done
only infinitely more for all souls. He must therefore see in them
something of priceless value.
4. Lastly
in the future life all souls will belong to God. The differences
of life disappear at the grave
and all become equal again there. Then the
outward clothing of rank
of earthly position
high or low
is laid aside
and
each enters the presence of God
alone
as an immortal soul. Then we go to
judgment and to retribution. But the judgments and retributions of eternity are
for the same object as the education of time: they are to complete the work
left unfinished here. In God¡¦s house above are many mansions
suited to
everyone¡¦s condition. Each will find the place where he belongs; each will find
the discipline which he needs. Judas went to his place
the place which he
needed
where it was best for him to go; and the apostle Paul went to his
place
the place best suited for him. When we pass into the other world
those
who are ready
and have on the wedding garment
will go in to the supper. They
will find themselves in a more exalted state of being
where the faculties of
the body are exalted and spiritualised
and the powers of the soul are
heightened; where a higher truth
a nobler beauty
a larger love
feed the
immortal faculties with a Divine nourishment; where our imperfect knowledge
will be swallowed up in larger insight; and communion with great souls
in an
atmosphere of love
shall quicken us for endless progress. Then faith
hope
and love will abide--faith leading to sight
hope urging to progress
and love
enabling us to work with Christ for the redemption of the race. (James
Freeman Clarke.)
All souls
The Christian Church has celebrated for more than a thousand years
an annual festival in honour of all its saints. It thus extended to a large
number of persons a memorial that was at first confined to its distinguished
champions
its confessors and historic names. There was something
beautiful--may we not say generous?--in such an observance. It thus embraces
the whole congregation of those who have been severed from this world¡¦s joy
and rest from its labours. It recognises no distinction of rank or belief or
fortune in those who dwell no longer in the flesh
but have passed to their
account. It considers only the sympathies of a common nature and the fellowship
of death. This is called the day of the dead; and with a pathetic specialty
each one is expected to bear upon his heart the recollection of his own dead.
Care is taken that no one of the lost shall be forgotten
though separated by
distance of time and become dim to the memory
and whatever changes of
relationship and transfers of affection may have come between. This anniversary
suggests something better than the revival of former sorrows
however
affectionate or sacred. It does not lead us in the train of any sad procession
but rather lifts up the heart to worship the universal Father of spirits.
¡§Behold
all souls are Mine
saith the Lord God.¡¨ They are His
whether
confined in the flesh or delivered from its burden; for whether one or the
other
¡§all live unto Him.¡¨ They are His
with whatever degrees of capacity He
has endowed them
small and great
weak and strong
to whatever trials of condition
He has appointed them
the happy and the afflicted; in whatever degree they
have acknowledged
or refused to acknowledge
that Divine ownership. It is not
true
that the empire of the Omnipotent is divided
and a portion of its moral
subjects cut off from its regard; whether by the power of an adversary or the
change of death. He has not given away His possession
or any part of it
to
another. ¡§Behold
all souls are Mine
saith the Lord.¡¨ And it is not true that
the Gospel sets itself forth for only a partial redemption; that for a few
elect ones only its wonders were wrought
and its angels appeared
and its
spirit was poured out
and its testimony spread everywhere abroad. It was to
reconcile the world to God that its great Witness suffered and rose. While on
earth
He chose the despised for His companions; He called the sinful to His
offered grace. The faith that He bequeathed when He ascended shows a like
condescension
carries on the same benignant design. It deals kindly with the
afflicted
the humble
--with those who are most in need of such treatment
and
those who are least accustomed to it. It repels none. It despairs of none. It
opens one faith
one hope. It instructs the living in its truth
that knows no
distinction among them
and it gathers the dead under the protection of its
unfailing promises. If
therefore
we would commemorate this day of All-Souls
what has been said may serve to give those thoughts their proper direction. Let
us first remember the souls of such as were once in our company
but ¡§were not
suffered to continue by reason of death¡¨; or of such as we never personally
knew
but who have yet always had a life in our revering minds. We may salute
them anew in their far-off state
and be the better for doing so. We do not
know what that state is
and need not know. We may trust them to the care of
Him who has said
¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ Let us repent ourselves afresh of any
neglect or injustice that we may have committed in regard to them. Let us
revive in our hearts the sense of all that endeared them to us. Let us prove
more ready and less fearful for the end
as we treasure up the admonitions
which their loss occasioned. Let us find that dim future not so void as it was
since they have gone before to inhabit it. And after we have performed this
duty
another that is more important remains. It is as amiable as that
and has
a broader practical reach than that. Let us remember the souls of those who are
walking with us a similar course of probation and mortality
surrounded like ourselves
with difficulties
exposures
infirmities
fears
and sorrows; equally
perhaps
though differently beset. Let us call to view our common frailties
our mutual obligations. Let us forgive if we have aught against any. (N. L.
Frothingham.)
The claim of God upon the soul
I. Every living
soul is
in a sense
the subject
the sharer
of the privileges
the attributes
of God.
1. There is
without contradiction
the privilege of life. Life! what
is life? Ah! who can answer
and yet who can fail to understand? ¡§What am I?
says a father of the Church; ¡§what I was has vanished; what tomorrow I shall be
is dark.¡¨ ¡§We do not know ourselves; we do not understand our own nature
¡¨
echoes the scarcely Christian philosopher: the further we go by natural reason
the deeper the darkness
the greater the difficulty; and yet the corn that
waves in the autumn wind
the flower that opens in the spring morning
the bird
that sings in the leafy thicket
nay
in a sense
the very wave that ripples on
the beach
much more the heaving swell of human multitudes that throng the city
streets
all conspire to sing the song
the solemn song of life; and the pulses
of the young heart vibrate to the music
--growth
movement
reality; the past
is dim
the future inscrutable
but here at least is a great possession
the
mystery
the thrilling mystery
of individual life. Better than silent stone
or sounding waves
or moving worlds
is one who holds the eternal spark of
life. Whatever comes
we feel
we know it
it is something to have lived. This
is what it means. It is to have been single
separate
self-determining. Yes;
man feels his own life; he is an object of his own consciousness; he is
and he
can never change in such sense as to be another self.
2. Another privilege of this lofty place in the scale of being is
immortality. Man¡¦s ordinary moods may suit a finite life. But these--this lofty
aspiration
keen remorse
unsatisfied desire
these infinite unspoken
yearnings
these passionate affections--whence come they? There is one answer
only one. From the depth of a conscious being
whose life
whose personality
is not bounded by the grave. Man is immortal. So dimly dreamed the ancients.
Alas
too often it was but a dream. Cicero was busied in ¡§Platonic
disquisitions
¡¨ as it has been said
¡§on the immortality of the soul¡¨; but when
his darling Tullia died
he and his friend could only fancy that ¡§if¡¨ she were
conscious she would desire comfort for her agonised father. Still
there was
the dream of immortality. Seneca spoke of it as a dream. ¡§I was pleasantly
engaged
¡¨ he wrote to his friend
¡§inquiring about immortality; I was
surrendering myself to the great hope; I was despising the fragments of a
broken life. Your letter came
the dream vanished.¡¨ Was it only a dream? At
least it was ¡§a great hope.¡¨ A dream
but destined to become a waking vision! A
hope
one day to be a clear reality! Christ came--came in His sweet simplicity
came in His deep humility
came with His great revelation. Christ came; came
and placed it in evidence
by His Divine teaching
by the indisputable need of
a future life for the fulfilment of His lofty principles
and last by that
stupendous fact of which the apostles
testing it by their senses
testing it
by all varieties of available evidence
knew and affirmed the truth--the
miracle
the unique
the crowning miracle
of the resurrection.
3. I instance one further privilege of the soul--The intuition of
moral truth
and with this the sense of moral obligation. An image emerges in
the Gospel
unique
beautiful; a picture suited for all situations
unchangingly powerful amid all changes of inner and outer life. The German
rationalist is perplexed by His perfection; the French infidel is startled by
His beauty; the modern Arian is constrained to admire
while he inconsistently
denies the assertion of Godhead
which
if falsely made
would shatter that
image of perfect beauty. Yes
the old saying--Tertullian¡¦s saying--is true
¡§O
soul
thou art by nature Christian¡¨; as He only sanctions thy yearnings for
immortality
so Jesus only satisfies thy sense of moral beauty. He does more.
The soul
approving
desires to love; but love requires an object--what object
like Thee
O uncreated beauty!
II. If the soul is
so endowed by God
it follows necessarily that God has a claim upon the soul.
It is on success in realising
remembering
acting upon this truth of our
relationship to God
that so much of our true happiness and
I may add
our
true dignity depends. Of what character is this claim?
1. God has a rightful claim upon our conscious dependence. And you
must render Him this service
oh! you must carefully render it
for many
reasons--Clearly
because to do so is to do that which all sensible men should
strive to do
to recognise and reverence facts. You do depend on God. Never
imagine that
like an intrusive caller
you can bow God politely and
contemptuously out of His creation; in spite of your puny insolence He is
there.
2. Such recognition is only a just outcome of gratitude. Count up
your blessings; perhaps they are so familiar to you
so strongly secured to
your possession by what seem
from habit
indissoluble bonds
that you have
forgotten that they are blessings. Better at once awake from that dream. The
keeping alive the sense of conscious dependence upon God exercises upon our
character a great moral influence. We never rise to the dignity of nature but
by being natural. This dependence is one of those pure facts of nature which
has imbibed none of the poison of the fall. Two powers accrue to the soul from
cultivating the sense of it--resignation and strength. The Christian learns
that the hand that gives
and gives so lavishly
may rightly be trusted to take
away. All of us
--we may settle it in our minds
with no morbid fearfulness
but with quiet certainty
--all of us most sooner or later suffer--ay
and
sharply. Let us pray so to know Him who made us
so to depend upon Him now
that when it pleases Him to try our constancy
we may
with a real resignation
¡§suffer and be strong.¡¨ Seek your strength where alone it will be found
available in a moment of crisis; cherish and stand upon the great thought of
God.
III. God¡¦s
preserving and so richly endowing the soul gives Him a claim that in its plans
and activities He should have the first place. ¡§Religion is that strong
passion
that powerful virtue
which gives the true colour to all else.¡¨ Give
Him you first thoughts in the morning; try to act as in His presence
for His
glory; let the thought of Him restrain a sinful pleasure
gladden an innocent
delight; love Him through all He gives you
and all He gives love in Him. Young
men
young women
remember it--¡§Them that honour Me I will honour.¡¨ He depends
on you for a portion of His glory. Angels do their part in song
in work
in
worship; yours they cannot do. One work He called you to do. You entered the
world
at a fixed time
to do just that work. When death comes
will it find
you working in that spirit?
IV. God makes this
claim upon you
that you despise no soul. This is difficult. We live in an age
when
more than ever
judgment goes by appearances--an age of rush
of
competition. The lad whom the schoolmaster ignored as stupid may turn out a
Newton. The little newspaper boy you pass as so much lumber in the street may
prove a Faraday; even intellectually
we may be mistaken. But a soul
as a
soul
demands respect. Despise no soul
however debased and grimed and soiled.
These souls are God¡¦s. The corruption of the morals of the poor pains you? It
is true--lamentable how imposture dries the springs of charity and makes a
cynic of the Christian. Never mind
life is full of sadness; but keep the heart
fresh. In spite of all
there are beautiful souls about the world; and for all
souls Jesus died. Despise no soul. At least
O Christian
pray for them.
V. Some serious
lessons.
1. The first is individual responsibility. Philosophers have fancied
that each movement of thought displaces some molecule of the brain
so that
every airy fancy registers itself in material fact. Anyhow
this is true: every
free choice of the creature between good and evil has an eternal import
and it
may be
it will be if you will have it so
a splendid destiny. ¡§What shall I
do
my father?¡¨ asked the barbarian conqueror
as he stood awe-stricken before
the aged Benedict. Calmly the saint replied in this fashion
¡§My son
thou
shalt enter Rome.¡¨ ¡§And then?¡¨ ¡§Then thou shalt cross the sea
shalt sweep and
conquer Sicily.¡¨ ¡§And then? Then thou shalt reign nine years; and then
¡¨ said
the father
¡§then thou shalt die
and then thou shalt be judged.¡¨ We may hope
in part at least we may believe
the lesson was not lost on Totila. My
brothers
have we learnt that lesson? The grave prerogative of the soul is
this: life¡¦s struggle over
then it ¡§shall be judged.¡¨
2. The soul¡¦s true beatitude is to know God. ¡§Acquaint thyself with
God
and be at peace.¡¨ Duty and communion make up life
the life that is worthy
of a soul. Is it yours? Remember
O soul
thy princely rank; aspire to God by a
true
a loving life. (Canon Knox Little.)
God¡¦s ownership of souls
God¡¦s right of property in these souls is not derived
as man¡¦s
is
but original; His
not by conveyance from another
but by right of
creation. As the Creator of the soul
and the Upholder of the soul
God can do
what He will with the soul. There are no codes of law to guide Him
no
interlacings of other rights with His right to fetter or restrain His will. On
the contrary
His will is His own law
and hence it is said
¡§He doeth
according to His will in the army of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth.¡¨
¡§All souls.¡¨ What a compass does this give to His spiritual proprietorship! All
human souls are His. Every being who ever lived on this earth in whom God
breathed the breath of an immortal spirit belongs to God. The souls of all
fallen angels are His. They are His
despite their rebellion; His despite their
sin; nor can they ever flee themselves from the absolute right of God to do
what He will with His own. The souls of the dwellers in heaven belong to God
Each and every order of spiritual existences
from the lowest who waits before
the throne
to the tallest archangel in the hierarchy of heaven
belongs to
God. What a mighty proprietorship is this! to be able to stand on this world
and say of each generation of its hundreds of millions of beings
as they pass
in a procession sixty centuries long
¡§Behold
all these souls are Mine.¡¨ To
stand like Uriel in the sun
and say of the thronging myriads which inhabit the
planets of this solar system
as they sweep their swift orbits around the
central light
¡§Behold all these souls are Mine.¡¨ Oh
surely
He who can say
this must be the great and glorious God! The question now arises
For what
purpose did God make these souls? Let God Himself answer. ¡§I have created him
for My glory
I have formed him; yea
I have made him¡¨; and again
He says
¡§This people have I formed for Myself; they shall show forth My praise.¡¨
1. The first inference is
That man holds his soul in trust from God
for the use of God. He has
indeed
implanted in you a will; but with that will
He has also given two laws
--the law of conscience
and the moral law of Sinai;
and that will must guide all its volitions according to these laws
and any
breach of either is known to
and punishable
by God. The terms of trusteeship
inscribed on each soul are--¡§Occupy till I come.¡¨ Occupy the powers
the
affections
the sensibilities
the will of this soul for Me. Occupy as My
steward
for My glory; and whenever these souls are used for any purposes
contrary to God¡¦s will
then is there in you great breach of moral trust
and
that is sin. But not only is there a breach of trust in thus misusing the soul
with which you are placed in trust
there is also involved in such conduct
absolute treason and rebellion. God says your soul is His
consequently He has
a right to rule over it
and receive
its fealty as its governor and
king; but
you cast aside His rule
and give your fealty and obedience to God¡¦s enemy. Is
not this treason
rebellion? But we have not yet done with this inference that
you hold your souls in trust for God; for your conduct in withholding your
souls from Him is not only a breach of trust
not only treason
not only
rebellion
but it is absolute robbery of God. I speak to you who are men of
probity and honour
who would eat the crust of poverty sooner than betray a
human trust--feel you no sense of shame in betraying the Divine trust which God
has placed in your charge? I speak to you men of patriotism
who would shed
your blood sooner than join the enemies of your country or foment rebellion
against the government which protects you-feel you no compunctious smiting of
conscience
no goadings of remorse
at your treason in adhering to the enemy of
all righteousness
in being a child and follower and servant of him who plotted
rebellion in heaven
who plotted rebellion on earth
and who is ever waging war
with God?
2. This brings us to the second inference
which is--that all misuse
of this trust is sin. God requires us to love Him with all our soul; this
He
says
is the first and great commandment. Each want of conformity to this law
is sin
for the apostle distinctly states
¡§Sin is a transgression of (or want
of conformity to) the law.¡¨ Each soul
then
which withholds itself from God
does
by that act
break the first and great commandment
and consequently
commits sin. And now
what does God in the text say of such sinning soul? ¡§The
soul that sinneth
it shall die.¡¨ What a fearful doom is this! The two great
elements of this death of the soul are--lst
The absence of all that constitutes
everlasting life; 2nd
The presence of every thing that constitutes everlasting
despair. There is forever present to the soul the consciousness of this its
two-fold misery. (Bp. Stevens.)
Mankind the Divine possession
I. God¡¦s claim to
our service. ¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨
1. Being itself
notwithstanding its characteristic individuality
is
of Divine origin. Need we go back to the remote ages of antiquity to search the
register of creation for our pedigree? Are there not records nearer home that
will answer that purpose? Look into that world of consciousness. There
in the
depths of your being
you will find the record. The intellect which grasps
knowledge
the moral sense which fights for the right
the affection which
rises above every creature to a Divine level
and the will which arbitrarily
determines our course of action
these are the entries in creation¡¦s register
which prove that God is our Father.
2. The properties of life teach us the same truth. An unseen hand
makes ample provision for our wants. We are sheltered by the mantle of His
power: and the presence of the Almighty is our dwelling place. That presence is
a wall of fire around us
to ward off destruction and death. Although our
journey is through a waste-howling wilderness
the cloud by day and fiery
pillar by night lead the way. His way is in the sea; His path in the great
waters; and His footsteps are not known. A thousand voices herald His coming
every morning; a thousand mercies witness to His goodness during the day. Out
of the fruit of the earth
the light and the darkness
the sustenance and
preservation of life; out of every part of nature
and every turn of
providence
the voice calls
¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨
3. We will further take the more emphatic testimony of redemption.
The hand of inspiration on the human mind
from the earliest ages
was a Divine
claim on our thoughts. But we will pass by the long series of testimony under
the patriarchal and Mosaic dispensations
in order to come to the mission of
the Son of God. The substance of that mission is contained in the statement
¡§Our Father which art in heaven.¡¨ By discourses and actions
the declaration
was made to the world with an emphasis which impressed the truth indelibly on
the mind of the race.
II. This high and
holy relationship imposes its own conditions.
1. Love to the being of God. Reconciliation by Jesus Christ leads to
the conception that ¡§God is love.¡¨ ¡§Pardon him
¡¨ said the sergeant to the
colonel of the regiment. The offending soldier had been punished many times
fill he hated every one of his comrades
and even virtue. He was pardoned. The
effect was striking--he became a loving man. Jesus said of the sinner
¡§Pardon
him
¡¨ and for the first time he saw that ¡§God is love.¡¨
2. Trustfulness in God¡¦s dealings. We are under an administration of
law and order which we do not quite understand. The inclination of the child is
often opposed to the father¡¦s wish. These two
ignorance on the one hand and
perverseness on the other
must be subordinated to the will of God. This is the
hard lesson of life.
3. Usefulness in God¡¦s vineyard. Life in earnest is the highest
condition of life. The life of the tree touches its highest point when it
throws off fruit in abundance. In conclusion
let us take a glance at the
profitable life which blossoms for immortality. Its activities are sanctified
by the Holy Spirit. Of the holy thoughts which revolve in the breast
the
heavenly aspirations which rise in the heart
the gracious words which are
uttered by the lips
and the kind deeds which are wrought in faith
of these
God says
¡§They are Mine.¡¨ (T. Davies
M. A.)
God¡¦s proprietorship of souls
There are hero two great facts presupposed
both of them impugned
and challenged by some of the fleeting false philosophies of the moment. The
one is the existence of God. The other is the existence of the soul. We believe
in the two great realities--God and the soul; and we know that the one want of
humanity
and therefore the one object and one office of religion
is the
bringing of these two realities together. The soul is a fugitive and runaway
from Him who is its owner. God in Christ is come to seek and to save. How very
magnificent is the Divine attribute thus opened! The comprehension
the very
conception of one soul
is beyond the reach of the reason
or even the
imagination. How unsearchable are the ways of one heart even to that one!
Multiply that one being by the ten and by the hundred surrounding
all within
the four walls of one church; what a word of awe and astonishment is here
¡§The
souls here present are Mine!¡¨ What must He be who claims that proprietorship!
No sovereignty of islands and continents
no dominion of stars or planets
no
empire of systems and universes can compete or compare with it for a moment. No
earthly potentate
no tyrant of history or of fable ever claimed the
sovereignty of a soul. The chain was never forged that could bind it; the
instrument was never invented that could even profess to transfer it. ¡§One soul
is mine.¡¨ No
it never entered the heart of man to say that. But now
if God
speaks and makes this His attribute
¡§All souls are Mine
¡¨ the next thought
must be
What is this thing of which it belongs to God alone to have
possession? Two characteristics of it will occur at once to everyone
of which
the first and most obvious is the sanctity. There is that in us which cannot be
seen or handled. That invisible
intangible thing belongs to God. It would be
an advance for many of us in the spiritual life if we could read the saying in
the singular number
if we could recognise and remember the single ownership
¡§My soul is God¡¦s
¡¨ not my own
to treat thus or thus
to use thus or thus
to
manage thus or thus at my pleasure; not mine to starve or to pamper; not mine
to honour or dishonour
to indulge or to defy; not mine that I should give it
this colour or that colour
at the bidding of vanity
of indolence
of caprice
of lust; not mine that I should say to it
Become this
or become that
as I
please to direct thy employments
thy relaxations
thy opinions
thy affections
regardless of what the Lord thy God hath spoken concerning each one of us. On
the contrary
to feel the revelation ¡§All souls are Mine
¡¨ and to draw from it
this inference: If all
then each; and if each
then the one--what seriousness
would it give
what dignity
and what elevation to this life of time
making
each day and each night take with it the impress also of that other revelation:
¡§And the spirit must return to God who gave it!¡¨ If all souls
then each soul
and if each soul
then
further
the soul of that other
for a moment or for a
lifetime so near thine own; brother
sister
friend
kinsman
wife
or child
it too has an owner
not itself
and not thou
and nothing can befall it for
joy or grief
for weal or woe
for remorse or wrong
but the eye of the
Omniscient observes
and the hand of the Omnipotent writes it down. Sanctity
then
is one thought; preciousness is the other. This is an inference not to be
gainsaid
seeing the proprietorship claimed in the text; and is it not
when we
ponder it
the very basis and groundwork of all hope
whether for ourselves or
for the world? If my soul is God¡¦s
can there be presumption
ought there to be
hesitation in the appeal to Him to keep and to save His own? Can either long
neglect
or distant wandering
or obstinate sinning
have rendered the case
desperate so long as there remains the possible petition: ¡§I am Thine--oh
save
me¡¨? And as for the individual
so also for the race. It seems to me that the
thought of the Divine ownership
with its obvious corollary
the preciousness
of the soul
has in it a direct and a sufficient answer to all the cavillings
and all the doubtings which beset our faith in the incarnation
the atonement
and the new birth. ¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ Then
shall He lightly abandon who has
thought it worth while to possess? We could not
indeed
know without
revelation what processes would be necessary or what would suffice to redeem a
soul. But what we say is this
that the Divine ownership implies the
preciousness of souls
and that the preciousness accounts for any processes
however intricate or however costly
by which Infinite Wisdom may have wrought
out their rescue and salvation. What those methods should be
God alone could
determine. He might never have told us of them. It is nowhere explained; but
¡§all souls are Mine¡¨ prepares us for His adopting those methods
whatever they
might be
and leaves nothing improbable
whatever else it may leave mysterious
in the bare fact that at any price and at any sacrifice God should have
interposed to redeem. (Dean Vaughan.)
God and the soul
1. The immediate occasion of this word of the Lord by the prophet was
a powerful objection made against the moral government of God. Punishment was
not dealt out to the transgressor
and to him only; but his children were made
to suffer too.
2. This misbelief of the people was very alarming; all the more so
that an element of truth was at the base of it. Doubt is never more serious
than when it questions the righteousness of God; and it is often easy to offer
some show of reason for such a suggestion. Ezekiel had to do with a kind of
misbelief which is not so very uncommon in our own time.
3. He met it
as such belief must always
I think
be met
not by
denying the half-truth on which the objection rests; but by affirming the
complementary truths of man¡¦s individual responsibility and God¡¦s absolute
fairness. We do belong to the race
and we do inherit the consequences of other
men¡¦s actions; but
none the less
each of us is a unit
dwelling in ¡§the awful
solitude of his own personality¡¨; each of us is responsible for his own
conduct
and must give his own account to God.
4. This rests on the fundamental truth that ¡§all souls are God¡¦s.¡¨
Men have a relation to God as well as to one another; and this is true not only
of some men
but of all. We all live in God. What we inherit from our ancestors
is not more important than what we receive
and may receive
from God
--it is
vastly less important. The supreme fact in every human life is
not heredity
but
God.
5. ¡§All souls are God¡¦s.¡¨ Every man lives in God
is sustained and
preserved by God
is dealt with by God in his own individual personality; and
that
not only in reference to material things
but in reference to the moral
and spiritual aspects of life. As the all-embracing air is around each
so is
the presence of God
and that is the guarantee for the government of each with
perfect fair play
in mercy and righteousness and love.
6. The truth before us
then
is that every human soul is an object of
God¡¦s care. In every man God has a personal interest. He deals with us
not in
the mass
but one by one; not simply through the operation of unbending
universal law
or as a blind
impersonal force
but by a direct and vital
contact.
7. I know that many among us find it almost impossible to share this
belief
and it may be confessed freely that many things which we see around us
are hard to reconcile with a strong faith in the truth which I am seeking to
establish--the truth that God has a personal and individual care for every
man--dealing with ¡§all souls¡¨ in perfect wisdom
righteousness
and love. We
find life full of glaring inequalities--surfeit and starvation side by side;
Dives feasting luxuriously
and Lazarus longing for the wasted crumbs; bounding
health that counts mere life a joy
and lingering sickness that prays for death
as gain; happiness that scarcely knows an unsatisfied desire
and exquisite
misery that hardly remembers a day¡¦s unbroken peace. We find the same
inequality extending to spiritual privileges. Here men live in the full light
of the Christian revelation
in a land of churches and Bibles
where helps to
holy living are abundant. Yonder men dwell in pagan darkness
ignorant of
Christian truth
destitute of Christian influence
surrounded by all that tends
to degrade and deprave.
8. What
then
is our proper course in the presence of these
difficulties? What can it be but to follow the example of Ezekiel in strongly
affirming the fact? Let the fact of God¡¦s personal
individual
universal care
be firmly grasped
and the difficulties will fall into their right place of
comparative unimportance.
9. If you have any momentary difficulty in accepting this as true
reflect
I beseech you
what a horrible theory would be involved in its denial--the
theory that for some of His children God has no kind thought
no tender
feeling
no purpose of mercy and love; that for some men He does not care at
all. He gave them life
and preserves them in being; but He does not love them.
They have the same powers and capacities as ourselves
are made capable of
trusting
loving
obeying
rejoicing in Him; but He has no merciful regard for
them
He withholds the enlightening truth
the saving grace
the redeeming
message; He shuts up His heart of compassions
and leaves them
as orphans in
the wild
to perish miserably for lack of ministers of love. But this is
infidelity of the very worst kind
the grossest and most mischievous.
10. Moreover
we may question if the sure signs of God¡¦s gracious care
are absent from any life. They do not lie on the surface
and we may miss them
at the first glance; but they are there
and larger knowledge would correct the
thought that anyone has been neglected. For any right understanding of this
matter we must get beyond the superficial reading of life which sees signs of
Divine love in what is pleasant
and signs of anger in the unpleasant. The
pruning of the tree shows the gardener¡¦s care
just as much as the supply of
its obvious wants; and we should remember that in the education of life and
character
the best results are sometimes secured by the most painful
processes. It is with apparently neglected lives as it is with apparently
neglected races and nations: a fuller acquaintance with them proves that they
also have been objects of the Divine care. When Mungo Park
travelling in
Central Africa
was ready to give himself up as lost
his failing courage was
revived by a bit of moss on which his eye chanced to fall; and that reminded
him that God was there. And if some leaf of grass or tiny flower is a witness
to the nearness and active energy of God
is not such witness to be recognised
in every devout thought
every idea of right and truth and duty
every effort
to attain to a knowledge of God and to render to Him acceptable service?
11. And if
look where we will
in every land and among all people
we
may find some witness to God¡¦s care of the individual life
it is only in the
Gospel of Christ that we find the full measure of His care adequately set
forth. As might naturally be expected
since He came to reveal the Father
there is no such witness to the care of God for His children as Jesus Christ.
His doctrine
His life
and His death constitute a three-fold testimony
so
clear
so ample
so emphatic that one could scarcely wish for more.
The value and accountability of the human soul
I. The value of
the human soul.
1. ¡§All souls are Mine¡¨ appears to imply a distinction and dignity as
to their origin. Father and son may share together flesh and blood
but the
soul is a direct creation from God. It has personality; for it is--each soul
is--a separate creation of Almighty God.
2. Creationism appears to protect the soul¡¦s spirituality and its
solitariness in a way Traducianism certainly does not; though it accentuates
the mysteriousness of the doctrine of the Fall. The soul comes from God
not as
a part of His substance
which is heresy
but by a creative act of His will.
This infusion of the soul puts man
¡§as distinguished from the brute
in a
conscious relation to God¡¨ (Aubrey Moore)
and this is the very root of
religion.
3. Souls
too
belong to God in a way the material creation does
not--they are made in His image ¡§and likeness¡¨; they are a created copy of the
Divine life. They find in Him not only the beginning
but the end of their
being. They hold communion with Him
can be conscious of His presence and
touch
and can respond to His love. The soul possesses faculties and moral
qualities ¡§which are shadows of the infinite perfections of God¡¨ (Pusey).
4. The soul¡¦s value may be further estimated by the Infinite Love of
the Son of God in dying to save us.
II. The soul¡¦s
separate accountability. ¡§The soul that sinneth
it shall die.¡¨
1. These words are repeated in verse 20
with the addition
¡§The son
shall not bear the iniquity of the father.¡¨ But in Lamentations 5:7 it is written
¡§Our
fathers have sinned
and we have borne their iniquities.¡¨
2. There are two limits to the declaration
¡§The son shall not bear
¡¨
etc. One is that it refers only to personal sin
and not to original sin; for
we are conceived and born in sin
because of the disobedience of our first
father
Adam. This is a fundamental doctrine of the Christian Faith (Romans 5:12-21). Another is that the
words only refer to the temporal penalties of sin
not to the guilt (culpa);
even with regard to results of sin
the tenor of the commandment
¡§visiting the
iniquity of the fathers upon the children
unto the third and fourth generation
of them that hate Me
¡¨ or ¡§to those that hate Me
¡¨ appears to imply that the
children are imitators of their parents¡¦ sins
and so become themselves
accountable. They only share the iniquities of their fathers ¡§if the children
imitate the evil example of the parents¡¨ (St. Gregory
Moral.
15:41).
But ¡§external¡¨ consequences of sin
which do not affect the relation of the
soul to God
do descend from father to son
entailing suffering or defect. The
destruction of Jerusalem is the turning point of the Book of Ezekiel
and a
great number of infants who had no responsibility perished in the siege.
3. But the prophet does not touch upon these exceptions
as he is
occupied with emphasising ¡§that aspect of the question¡¨ which the proverb
ignored
¡§and which
though not the sole truth
is nevertheless an important
part of the truth
viz.
that individual responsibility never ceases¡¨ (Driver).
No actual sin is ever transferred from one soul to another
nor eternal penalty
incurred through the misdeeds of ancestors.
4. ¡§The soul that sinneth
it shall die.¡¨ In other words
sin is
personal fault
not misfortune; sin is a free act of the soul
not a necessity:
¡§the soul that sinneth.¡¨ Sin is ¡§the misuse of freedom¡¨ (Luthardt). Sin
deadly
sin
separates the soul from God
the Source of life
and so brings about
spiritual death
as the separation of the soul from the body brings about
physical death.
5. Each soul is accountable before God
and cannot attribute justly
its misdeeds to some ancestral strain which makes for anything but
righteousness
nor to present circumstances.
III. Lessons.
1. To be careful
amid the seeming perplexities of God¡¦s providence
not to impugn the Divine justice or equity (verse 25).
2. To strive to realise the value of the soul
and how it belongs to
God
and to make God the Beginning and End of our being; also to reflect upon
the separateness of our existence
whilst outwardly so much mingled with the
lives of others.
3. The heinousness of sin
the only real evil
which injures or kills
the soul¡¦s life
should lead to hatred of sin and watchfulness against it.
4. Whilst the innate responsibility of each soul before God should
prevent us from making excuses for sin
and from resorting to the meanness and
injustice of charging others with being the cause of our iniquities
for which
we alone are personally accountable (Romans 14:12). (The Thinker.)
The universal responsibility of man
I. The universal
responsibility of man.
1. Explanation of the terms of this proposition. When we speak of the
responsibility of man
we mean that tie or bond or obligation or law
necessarily springing from the relations in which he stands
and the
circumstances in which he is placed
--by which he is not only bound to demean
himself in a manner answerable thereto
and is liable to the penalties of
failing therein
in respect of his own welfare and that of others with whom he
is surrounded and brought into daily contact; but more especially is this the
case in reference to the supreme God
to whom all his allegiance is directly
due
and from whose hands he must finally receive a gracious approbation
or a
most fearful and eternal condemnation. Again
when we speak of the universality
of this responsibility
or obligation
we mean that it applies both to all
individual persons and to all relative or social or other orderly
circumstances
by which human beings are connected together
and dependent upon
each other; and that in all these relations this obligation is more especially
to be considered in reference to their accountability to the Lord.
2. In its expansive nature and particular detail. Consider it in
reference--
II. Some awakening
reflections necessarily arising therefrom.
1. How needful it is that every person should seek to be thoroughly
grounded in the doctrine of man¡¦s universal responsibility.
2. What a clear ground for universal conviction and condemnation! The
glittering crown is no screen from this allegation
nor the royal robe any
covering from this guilt. Dignity
honour
wealth
fame
talents
abilities
lordly palaces
princely incomes
can neither shield the guilty culprit nor
avert the sentence to which he is exposed. Nor can any inferiority of rank or
station elude its piercing eye
or escape its widely extended arm. It is the
law of our being; and therefore it will find us out
wherever we are and
whatever we do.
3. What a vast amount of guilt lies at every man¡¦s door! Talents
neglected; abilities abused; influence and authority averted from the cause of
God and His truth
and dedicated to the service of pleasure and sin.
4. How just will be the righteous judgment of God upon all impenitent
sinners at last!
5. Let all who would escape that fearful doom bethink themselves in
time
and flee to the appointed refuge while mercy may be had. (R. Shittler.)
The individual
1. It would be too much to say that Ezekiel discovered the
individual
for no true prophet could ever have lost him. However clear-cut a
unity the State may have appeared to earlier prophets
they read life too
soberly
too earnestly to imagine it had any guilt or glory that was not
contributed to it by its individual members. No preacher preaches to his ideal
but to someone whom he is anxious to direct towards it. It was the dissolution
of the Hebrew State that helped Ezekiel to realise and formulate his new
message. At first he
like his predecessors
spoke to the people as a chosen
whole. He had come to Tel-Abib
to ¡§them of the captivity
¡¨ he had sat among
them for a week ¡§astonished
¡¨ when the Lord came to him
appointing him to be a
watchman
to hear the word of warning at God¡¦s mouth
and deliver it unrevised
to the wicked and to the righteous
one by one (Ezekiel 3:16-21). Then the individual
seems to disappear
and the State stands before him: ¡§For they are a . . . house¡¨
(Ezekiel 3:26). His signs and his parables
are for the ¡§house¡¨ of Israel. So
again
his ¡§Thus saith the Lord God
unto the land of Israel¡¨ has in it a personification of the State that
is peculiarly intense.
2. So the prophet seems
in sign after sign
in parable after
parable
to cling to the old phrase of a sacred collectivism. But the new
individualism suddenly
and more intensely
reappears (chap. 18). The people
tried to make an excuse of heredity: ¡§The fathers have eaten sour grapes
and
the children¡¦s teeth are set on edge.¡¨ In our own days
as in those of Ezekiel
no doctrine has been more inconsiderately abused than that of heredity. The
prophet attempts
to undo the harm done through the proverb by a profound
statement in God¡¦s name: ¡§All souls are Mine.¡¨ God can never be careless of His
possessions. To Him their intrinsic value never changes. The prophet does not
so much deny the fact of hereditary transmission as deny its relevancy to the
consideration of personal guilt. He takes
for illustration
three generations:
a good father
a wicked son
a good grandson. Whatever advantages the wicked
son inherits
they do not save him from the consequences of his personal
wrong-doing; nor does the grandson¡¦s legacy of disadvantages rob him of the
fruit of his right-doing. The just ¡§shall surely live¡¨; the wicked
between a
just father and just son
shall ¡§die in his iniquity¡¨ (verses 5-18). If every
soul is equally related to God
that relation overrides the relation of one
soul to another. We are judged
not at the circumference
but from the centre.
Heredity
at most
is only one of the modes of our mutual relation as created
beings; it cannot affect the Creator¡¦s mind. To Him the father stands as
distinctly apart from the son as if there were no son
and the son as
distinctly apart from the father as if he were fatherless. Men may act
together
and act one upon another
but each of them will have to God an
individual worth. A soul is forever His soul. The accountability of a soul
its
guilt or redemption
lies supremely in its relation to God. ¡§All souls are
Mine.¡¨ The prophet proceeds to declare that life¡¦s present may be cut clear
from life¡¦s past. A tradition of righteousness cannot save a soul that has
fallen into actual wickedness; a tradition of wickedness cannot undo a soul
that strives after righteousness. What the world does impulsively
often
blindly
God does with due regard to the moral secret of the ¡§thousand
victories¡¨ and the ¡§once foiled.¡¨ He watches for the throb of new beginnings:
He sees the ¡§imperfect substance¡¨ of our desires and deeds. And yet we must be
careful not to force the prophet¡¦s teaching. A man may suffer for his father¡¦s
sins
or for the sins of his own past life; he may suffer
and yet not be
deprived of the privileges of the new kingdom. The inviolable relation is not
that of a soul to another
or to its own past
but to God. ¡§All souls are
Mine.¡¨
3. The vision grows upon the prophet
and so he comes to make his
still more ample announcement: ¡§Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked?
saith the Lord God: and not rather that he should return from his way
and
live?¡¨ It would seem as if the despair of man won from God His profoundest
secret
His most healing revelation. The State was failing to pieces
Israel
was scattered and unbrothered; but God met each individual son and daughter of
Israel with this great message--repeated later on
and confirmed ¡§with an
oath
¡¨ to use the language of the Epistle to the Hebrews (Hebrews 6:13; Hebrews 6:17)--¡§As I live
saith the
Lord
I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked¡¨ (Ezekiel 33:11). Though our ¡§dim eyes¡¨ are
unable
after all our endeavours
to comprehend the place of what seem to us
finite emotions in the Infinite Mind
we will still cherish the tender
the
brave Gospel
that God has ¡§no pleasure¡¨ in the death of the wicked.
4. We need Ezekiel¡¦s teaching today in many ways. The individual is
always tempted to hide from himself
or hide from his brother. He is more and
more tempted to rely upon the State
or upon the Church. Man belongs to himself
and to God
and to no other
in the final issue. ¡§Bear ye one another¡¦s
burdens¡¨--in his relation to his fellow creatures
¡§for each man shall bear his
own burden¡¨--in his relation to God. Whatever a man may suffer from one or the
other
or both
his hell is not from his parents or from his past
while he has
the power
by God¡¦s help
any moment--any brief
immeasurable moment--to cut
his soul loose from the things that are behind
and set sail for the Paradise
of God. ¡§The son shall not bear the iniquity of his father
¡¨ etc. (verses 20
27
28). A man is master of his fate the moment he lets the mercy of God find
him. It was not the discussion
for its own sake
that concerned the prophet.
He wanted to come close to the soul of each individual
in order to make his
fervent appeal: ¡§Make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die
O
house of Israel?¡¨ So earnest is he in emphasising man¡¦s share in his own
renewal
that he seems almost to forget God¡¦s share; but the reverse would be
true regarding the vision of the Valley of Dry Bones. It is this ineffaceable
signature of the Eternal Spirit in man that makes him worthy for God to contend
with in holy mercy (Ezekiel 20:35-36). No soul meets its
final fate before somewhere
somehow meeting God face to face. There is no mere
accident in the damnation of any soul. It is a deliberate choice
after an
ultimate controversy (Isaiah 1:18-20). ¡§As I live
saith the
Lord
I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked.¡¨ (H. E. Lewis.)
The death of the soul
This sentence is really the climax of an argument. It is the
conclusion
for the sake of which this chapter was written. The prophet¡¦s aim
is to emphasise individual in the stead of collective responsibility for sin.
It will not be the nation
it must not be some other soul or souls
for ¡§every
man must bear his own burden.¡¨ ¡§The soul that sinneth
that shall die.¡¨ Yet
this sentence can easily be misunderstood
and
in fact
often has been
misunderstood. Someone will say: ¡§Does the Bible mean that ¡¥to die¡¦ in
this sentence is to perish utterly and forever
or does it mean that the sinner
must be punished for his sin and suffer forever?¡¨ Now we will ask Ezekiel.
Suppose we had this old Israelitish prophet with us
and that we interrogated
him concerning the meaning of his own words. I can assure you that he would be
most astonished to hear the questions which I have just repeated. He would say:
¡§I was not speaking of mortality or immortality; I was speaking of the quality
of life
and I was thinking for the moment of the immediate future of my
beloved Israel.¡¨ Let us follow him through the experiences that made him say
this
and you will see very soon what he means. This prophet is a prisoner. He
is in the hands of Nebuchadnezzar
King of Babylon. He is one of the
Israelitish remnant that have been torn from their home
and by whom the
plaintive song is sung
¡§By the rivers of Babylon there we sat down and wept
we wept when we remembered Zion.¡¨ But these captives were not all that there
was of Israel. There was still an Israel at home
and a very bad Israel it was.
And this Ezekiel
who was a contemporary of the Jeremiah who wrote the
Lamentations over that wicked Israel
was looking from his land of captivity
far away to the Jerusalem from which he had been torn
and was speaking to his
fellow captives thus: ¡§Beloved fellow prisoners
our day of deliverance is coming
but it can only come after yonder evil Jerusalem is razed to the ground. Ours
it shall be to rebuild the temple
ours it shall be to worship God in a
purified sanctuary in the homeland once more. Yonder Israel is preparing her
own destruction. As u nation she must perish for her sins.¡¨ Beware
you
selfish
unpatriotic
slave-hearted men
who are living contentedly in the
abominations of the Babylonians. We shall go to the homeland
but the soul that
sinneth here
unworthy of the high calling
shall die to Israel
shall be
outside the covenant. By soul he simply meant man. By die he meant remain a
slave
or bear the penalty of exclusion from the glorious return. Since Ezekiel
wrote we have learned a great deal more as to what is meant by the word ¡§soul.¡¨
The principle upon which he laid emphasis here is this
that the man who is
doing wrong to his God does wrong to himself. He is not worthy to rebuild the
Temple. He is not worthy to return to the Holy Land. And no nation will suffer
for him. God¡¦s purposes cannot be foiled. The soul that sinneth
and that
alone
must perish. Now what are we to say ¡§the soul¡¨ means? In the earliest
portions of this marvellous Book of Books the word ¡§soul¡¨ means little more
than the animating principle of all organisms. ¡§The soul¡¨ means the breath or
the life that distinguishes the things which are organic from the things which
are not. Trees and flowers in that sense have and are souls. ¡§Let everything
that hath breath--let everything that hath soul--praise the soul.¡¨ Then it came
to mean
as we see
by a narrowing but by an intensification of its meaning
the animating principle of human consciousness. And so the word
delimitated
gradually expanded its meaning at the same time that it narrowed it
until in
the New Testament and in the later prophecies of the Old Testament the word
soul simply means the man. The soul is man¡¦s consciousness of himself
as apart
from all the rest of all the world
and even from God. What are we to do with
it
this soul of ours
this that marks me as me apart from all mankind? Why
to
fill it with God. ¡§This is life eternal
that they may know Thee
the only true
God.¡¨ Death is the absence of that fellowship with God. Now we begin to
understand what Christ meant--that it were possible for a man to gain the whole
world and lose his own soul. In other words
he is destroying the Godlike
within himself
he is failing in that for which he was created
he is perishing
even where he seems to succeed. This
again
is what Paul means when he says he
dies to himself that he may live to God. ¡§Ye died
and your life is hid with
Christ in God.¡¨ Nor is this false to what the prophet says: ¡§When the wicked
man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed
and doeth that
which is lawful and right
he shall save his soul alive.¡¨ The question of
questions for any of us is this
¡§What kind of soul are we building? Is our
attitude lifeward or deathward? Are we destroying that beautiful thing that God
has given into our keeping?¡¨ We will now speak about the same truth in relation
to ordinary
average human experience or acquaintance with life. Do any of you
know
as I too well know
what it is to have a childhood¡¦s companion or a
youth¡¦s friend of whom much was expected
bug the promise has never been fulfilled?
Do you remember that lad who sat beside you in the day school years ago of whom
the masters and proud parents said thug one day the world would ring with his
name? The boy was endowed with almost every gift that could be thought of for
making his way in life. Well
what has come to him? We have lost sight of him
for a few years maybe
and yesterday we met him. What was it that gave us a
shock and a thrill
a sudden sinking of the heart
as we looked into his
countenance? Why
this--something was missing that ought to have been there
and something was there we never thought to see. The thing that was missing was
life
and the thing that was present was death. That man has lived to the
flesh
and of the flesh has reaped corruption. In doing it he has limited
imprisoned
destroyed his own better nature
until now
all involuntarily as it
were
as you look on the beast
that gazes out of his eyes
you shudderingly
say: ¡§He is utterly without soul.¡¨ ¡§The soul that sinneth
it shall die.¡¨
Amongst my circle of friends there is one whose name you may probably have
heard
a man well advanced in years
and better known to an earlier generation
than to yours and mine
I mean George Jacob Holyoake. This man is not a
Christian
but those who have any acquaintance with his record know that he has
done a good many Christian things. I have been reading lately a book in which
he has put some recollections of his past. He calls it ¡§Bygones Worth
Remembering
¡¨ and in it he tells the story of some of his moral activities
and
of the men with whom he shared enthusiasms in earlier days. Amongst those who
called him friend were General Garibaldi and the patriot Mazzini. In this book
he tells of an occasion on which Mazzini
who was a God-intoxicated man
and
whose motto was ¡§God and the People
¡¨ reasoned with him and with Garibaldi on
their materialism
and gave utterance to a sentence of this kind: ¡§No man
without a sense of God can possess a sense of duty.¡¨ Garibaldi instantly
retorted impetuously: ¡§But I am not a believer in God. Have I no sense of
duty?¡¨ ¡§Ah
¡¨ said Mazzini
with a smile
¡§you drew in your sense of duty with
your mother¡¦s milk.¡¨ I could not read an incident like that without a feeling
akin to reverence for these great souls with a great ideal
Holyoake served his
generation well
so did Garibaldi
so did Mazzini. They were men of soul. Would
you deny that they possessed moral and spiritual life? These men were all
alive. Mazzini¡¦s theology gave way in the presence of the splendid fact. It is
the quality of the life into which we have to examine. There is no question but
the life was there. I quoted this morning from the story of the life of John G.
Paton
as told by himself
the veteran missionary. Will you let me read to you
this man¡¦s account of the daily habits of his father
and the influence it had
on his life? ¡§That father was a stocking weaver
a poor man in one of the poor
districts of Scotland.¡¨ ¡§But
¡¨ says J.G. Paton
¡§he was a man of prayer.¡¨ There
was one little room in between the ¡§but¡¨ and the ¡§ben¡¨ of that house
as the
Scots call it
into which he retired daily
and often many times a day. The
experience of this old Scottish weaver
which cast such a spell on the life of
his son
is as much a fact of the universe as the rain that is falling outside
and it needs to be accounted for and given its due place. It is the most
precious thing in the whole range of possible human experience that a man might
walk with God
that the light eternal might shine in his heart
that the soul
might live. Truly this is life
to know God and Jesus Christ whom He hath sent.
Contrast again in your mind for a moment this experience with that of the man
you will meet tomorrow
of whom you will say
such a one is dead to right
feeling
such another is dead to truth and honour
and
saddest of all
perhaps
you may say of some cynical
selfish being
he is dead to love. But
what are you doing? You are either marching towards the ideal of Paton¡¦s father
or you are marching away from it. To be as full of moral passion as a Holyoake
or a Garibaldi is better than to live for self or the world alone. But how few
there are who know what true life is. God knew where it was to be. In my
greenhouse sometimes I see a plant
from which I expected something
marring
its promise. One tiny speck of rust on a white petal
and I know my plant is
doomed. That speck is death; there will be another tomorrow
and yet another to
follow. Presently the soul
so to speak
of my little plant will be destroyed.
Every time you commit a sinful act you destroy something beautiful which God
made to bloom within your nature
you have a speck of death upon your soul. And
every time you lift heart and mind and will heavenward
and every time your
being aspires to God and truth
and every time the noble and the heroic and the
beautiful have dominion over you (for these are God) then you are entering into
life. (R. J. Campbell
M. A.)
Man¡¦s responsibility for his sin
Mr. Thomas
a Baptist missionary
was one day addressing a crowd
of natives on the banks of the Ganges
when he was accosted by a Brahmin as
follows: ¡§Sir
don¡¦t you say that the devil tempts men to sin?¡¨ ¡§Yes
¡¨ answered
Mr. Thomas. ¡§Then
¡¨ said the Brahmin
¡§certainly the fault is the devil¡¦s; the
devil
therefore
and not man
ought to suffer punishment.¡¨ While the
countenances of many of the natives discovered how pleased they were with what
the Brahmin had said
Mr. Thomas
observing a boat with several men on board
descending the river
replied
with that facility of retort with which he was
gifted
¡§Brahmin
do you see yonder boat?¡¨ ¡§Yes.¡¨ ¡§Suppose I were to send some
of my friends to destroy every person on board
and bring me all that is
valuable in the boat--who ought to suffer punishment? I
for instructing them
or they for doing this wicked act?¡¨ ¡§Why
¡¨ answered the Brahmin
with emotion
¡§you ought all to be put to death together.¡¨ ¡§Ay
Brahmin
¡¨ replied Mr. Thomas
¡§and if you and the devil sin together
the devil and you will be punished
together.¡¨ (Christian Herald.)
Verse 23
Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?
A summons to repentance
If we spare not our sins
but slay them with the sword of the
Spirit
God will spare us. The words are uttered by a figurative interrogation
in which there is more evidence and efficacy
more life and convincing force.
For it is as if He had said
Know ye not that I have no such desire? or think
ye that I have any desire? or dare it enter into your thoughts that I take any
pleasure at all in the death of a sinner? When the interrogation is figurative
the rule is
that if the question be affirmative
the answer to it must be
negative; but if the question be negative
the answer must be affirmative. For example:
Who is like unto the Lord? the meaning is
none is like unto the Lord. Whom
have I in heaven but Thee? that is
I have none in heaven but Thee. On the
other side
when the question is negative
the answer must be affirmative; as:
Are not the angels ministering spirits? that is
the angels are ministering
spirits; and
Shall the Son of man find faith? that is
the Son of man shall
not find faith. Here
then
apply the rule
and shape a negative answer to the
first member being affirmative
thus: I have no desire that a sinner should
die; and an affirmative answer to the negative member
thus: I have a desire
that the wicked should return and five; and ye have the true meaning and
natural exposition of this verse. But here some cast a dark mist
which hath
caused many to lose their way. How (say they) do we maintain that God desireth
not the death of a sinner
who before all time decreed death for sin
and sin
for death? This mist in part is dispelled by distinguishing of three sorts of
God¡¦s decrees--
1. There is an absolute decree and resolute purpose of God
for those
things which He determineth shall be.
2. There is a decree of mandate
or at least a warrant for those
things which He desireth should be.
3. There is a decree of permission for such things
as if He
powerfully stop them not
will be. Of the first kind of decree or will of God
we are to understand those words of the Psalmist (Psalms 135:6)
and of our Saviour (John 17:24). To the second we are to
refer those words of the apostle (Romans 9:19; Ephesians 1:5; 1 Timothy 2:4; 2 Peter 3:9; 1 Thessalonians 4:3; Romans 12:2). If ye rightly apply these
distinctions
ye may without great difficulty loosen the knots above tied: the
first whereof was
whether God decreed sin original or actual. Ye may answer
according to the former distinctions
that He decreed effectually all the good
that is joined with it
or may come by it
or it may occasion; but He decreed
permissively only the obliquity or malignity thereof: He neither doth it
nor
approveth of it when it is done
but only permitteth it and taketh advantage of
it for the manifestation of His justice.
To the second question
which toucheth the apple of the eye of
this text
whether God decreeth the death of any? ye may answer briefly
that
He doth not decree it any way for itself
as it is the destruction of His
creature
or a temporal or eternal torment thereof; but as it is a
manifestation of His justice.
1. Doth God take no pleasure in the death of the wicked that daily
transgresseth His law
ungraciously abuse His mercy
and slightly regard His
judgments? Doth He use all good means to reclaim them
and save them from wrath
to come? Is the life of every man so precious in His eyes? Doth He esteem of it
as a rich jewel engraven with His own image? How careful
then
and chary ought
we to be
who are put in trust with it (locked up in the casket of our body)
that we lose it not.
2. If judges
and all those who sit upon life and death
did enter
into a serious consideration thereof
they would not so easily (as sometimes
they do) cast away a thing that is so precious
much less receive the price of
blood.
3. If a malefactor arraigned at the bar of justice should perceive by
any speech
gesture
sign
or token
an inclination in the judge to mercy
how
would he work upon this advantage?--what suit? what means would he make for his
life? how would he importune all his friends to entreat for him? how would he
fall down upon his knees and beseech the judge for the mercies of God to be
good unto him? Ho
all ye that have guilty consciences
and are privy to
yourselves of many capital crimes
though peradventure no other can appeach
you! behold
the Judge of all flesh makes an overture of mercy
He bewrayeth
more than a propension or inclination
He discovereth a desire to save you! Why
do ye not make means unto Him? Why do ye not appeal from the bar of His justice
to His throne of grace? Why do ye not fly from Him
as He is a terrible Judge?
to Him
as He is a merciful Father? (D. Featly
D. D.)
God and the soul
One of the masters of Old Testament theology
a student of
singular nobility of mind and penetration of judgment
Dr. A.B. Davidson
has
said of this and of the kindred 33rd chapter: ¡§Perhaps there are hardly any
more important passages in the Old Testament than those two chapters of
Ezekiel.¡¨ And why? Because
as he says
¡§there we may say that we see the birth
of the individual mind taking place before our eyes.¡¨ It was the first
or one
of the first
assertions of the truth that man is more than the circumstances
of which he is a part; that in God¡¦s sight he stands single and free. We can
best understand the force of this particular chapter if we remember the
historical circumstances out of which it came. Nebuchadnezzar
the ruthless
conqueror
had laid waste Jerusalem. ¡§He carried away all Jerusalem
and all
the princes
and all the mighty men of valour
and all the craftsmen
and none
remained save the poorest of the people of the land.¡¨ That band of exiles
among whom was the young Ezekiel
was carried to Babylon
and there the best of
them lay astonished at the crushing blow which God had dealt to them.
Jerusalem
the inviolable hill of Jehovah
spoiled and degraded
within eleven
years laid waste and desolate
abandoned of God. It seemed to them that they
were involved in the punishment of the sins of their fathers. There could be no
escape
no penitence in the land of their exile could disentangle their souls
from the ruin in which the sins of their forefathers had engulfed them. It was
natural that their thoughts should run in such a channel. Hebrew religion
tended to merge
the individual in the state or family. The covenant of God was
made not with the individual so much as with the State. The dealings and
punishments of God with His people embraced not only the person
but his whole
family
to the third and fourth generation; and so it seemed to them that they
could not
for all their anguish
escape the consequences of their fathers¡¦
sins. It was the object of Ezekiel to lift the burden of despair from his
fellow exiles. He discerned in the very breaking up of the national life a call
to the individual to become deeper and more personal in his obedience and
faith. He sought to disentangle the person from the nation and the family
to
make him realise his own freedom and separate responsibility in the sight of
God. God is sovereign over the dispensations of His own laws. He treats every
man
at every moment
precisely as that man is by virtue of his own separate
and solitary responsibility. Man is free morally
whatever the chain that may
bind him to his ancestors. God is free morally
and judges every man by virtue
of that freedom. But the prophet carried the truth a stage further. Among these
exiles there were doubtless individual men and women who felt that the chain
that bound them
bound them to an irreversible destiny
was not the chain of
their fathers¡¦ sins
but of the sins they themselves had committed. They
remembered the law of Jehovah which they had despised
the worship of their
fathers in the temple
which they had ignored or polluted by their idolatry. It
seemed to them that their cup was full; they could not escape the punishment of
the sins of the past. They were shut up to the impotence of unavailing remorse.
To them the prophet¡¦s message was like that which he gave to his community. He
reminded each of them that still
in spite of their sins and shortcomings
there was within a separate life
a freedom which could arise from the past
impenitence and return
and that matching that freedom there was also the
sovereign grace of Almighty God. That was the prophet¡¦s message to his own day.
I wonder if any of you have discerned with what singular force it applies to our
own? The place which was taken when Ezekiel wrote
by the customary habits and
traditions and principles of Hebrew religion
is taken today by the
characteristic teaching of modern science. The old words of the covenant of
God¡¦s punishment of men to the third and fourth generation have given place to
the new words of ¡§heredity¡¨ and ¡§environment.¡¨ But the principle is the same.
Science has been teaching us wonderfully
beautifully
terribly
with what a
subtlety and closeness of tie we are bound through our brains and bodies to the
ancestors from whom we sprang
the circumstances under which we live
the
progeny which we leave behind us; we know that our character is the product of
a thousand influences of climate
of scenery
of sights and sounds
of food
of
tendencies in the blood
of faculties and perversions of the brain
and we
accept the truth. It gives a very wonderful and real
as well as a very solemn
aspect to this universe of which we are part. We build upon it. It is the truth
that is the main-spring of all our zeal for education
of all our efforts for
social reform; to that truth we turn when we wish to measure the fulness of our
social responsibility. But is it the last and only word? Is man nothing but the
product of these circumstances
the creature of invisible laws? If it be so
then before long we may come to that feeling of despair which lay upon the
breast of these exiles of Jerusalem. We must balance that truth with the other
which Ezekiel recovered for his contemporaries--the truth that man¡¦s nature
though it is inwoven by the influences of blood and surroundings
yet has
within it a personal life higher than
and apart from
that nature. It is
free--it is capable
when aroused
of moulding that nature to its own will. God
Himself is something more than an union of irreversible and irresistible laws.
He is
He remains
a sovereign moral Personality
caring as a Father for the
children that He has made
knowing them as individuals
dealing with them man
by man in the separateness of their own single freedom and responsibility. I
ask you to consider the basis which Ezekiel is teaching us in its reference to
our lives as members of a community and as personal beings.
1. First of all
there is a message to us as members of a community.
Sometimes the Hebrew took joy from the thought that he was bound with his
fathers and children in the bonds of the covenant of the will of God. And
sometimes we take joy in the thought that we are bound together by those subtle
and intricate ties to the nature which surrounds us
and to our fellow beings
in long distances of the past and future. But when the Hebrew realised God¡¦s
punishment in the waste of Jerusalem
he was filled with the chill of despair.
No doubt
for a time
the thought that man is the product of his circumstances
fills us with the energy of reform. It makes us
perhaps
with even greater
zest
turn to every effort to improve the condition of the environment of the
people. But when we try
how long the task seems
how thick and obstinate the difficulties
how impossible it seems to compass it within the short generation in which the
necessities of life permit us to labour. And meanwhile
what have we to say to
the individual men
women
and children who are living under these conditions?
Think for a moment of those atoms of social waste whom we call the
unemployable. You see them as they pass before your eyes
the product
indeed
of circumstances--the sins of their fathers written in the marks of disease
the sins of their own youth written in the furtive glance of the eyes and the
shambling gait
the sins
it may be
of the community which has failed to find
a place for them
in the hopelessness and futility of every effect that they
may make. And yet
what are we to say to them? Are we to say to them with the
mere teaching of determinist science: ¡§Your transgressions and your sins are
upon you
and you pine away in them
why should you live?¡¨ Yet apart from some
vast
at present as it seems
inconceivable change of our industrial
conditions
are they not hopeless? If science says the last word
surely they
are. Yet when you find yourself placed face to face with an individual man of
these multitudes
can you use that language? Can you turn to them and say: ¡§You
are the doomed product of a bad environment; there is no hope for you. You must
stay as you are¡¨? Nay! rather you make it your one object to disentangle the
man from the mesh in which he is placed. You seek to find out somewhere the
springs of the real man within him. You desire to create some emotion
some
motive
some interest
by which that self of his
that manhood of his
may be
aroused
re-created
and go forth and be strong. And you can venture upon that
effort because you believe
with an instinct that is stronger than a one-sided
theory
that somewhere or other in that poor
broken life there remains dormant
and hidden the germ of a freedom of his own that he can arouse and use
if only
there is sufficient strength and motive power given to him. You try to reach
and touch and find the man within him; and that instinct of yours restores the
balance of the truth. Science is true. There is this product of the
environment. We must work and labour with unremitting toil to change and
improve it. But the one inevitable
indispensable factor of social reform is
the individual freedom and responsibility of the man. Even when you change his
circumstances
this alone will be powerless unless you have changed the whole
man¡¦s will so that he cooperates with the change in his circumstances; and therefore
every scheme of charity which neglects this truth
which belittles this factor
of the man¡¦s own individual freedom and power and responsibility
is a real
danger.
2. Secondly
the prophet¡¦s message is to the personal life. There
were men to whom Ezekiel spoke who felt the burthen upon them
not of the load
of their fathers¡¦ sins
but of their own. It may be that among the men to whom
I speak there are some who are conscious of the same impotence of remorse. The
sins of your body have immeshed your body and mind in the bondage of evil
habit. You can think of some mistake that you made
irreversible now
which has
spoilt your life. You are tied up in the doom of your destiny. Or
perhaps
there are others
who have not gone so far
but when there comes to them the
prompting of some better impulse they meet it with such replies
expressed or
unexpressed
as this: ¡§It is no good
it is too late; my nature is made
I
cannot change. These heights are for others
I cannot attain unto them. Like
Sir Lancelot
the quest is not for me. I am what my life has made me
and it is
too late to change.¡¨ And so when these better impulses come they are avoided
they are refused. Possibly they gradually die out
and the prison gates begin
to close. Now
in this there is a truth which cannot be gainsaid. We cannot
escape
not even God Himself can enable us to escape
from the actual
consequences of our sins. That is true; we cannot quarrel with the teaching
both of science and conscience. But it is not the whole truth. There remains
that hidden self
that inner man
and it is free. It has always the power of
rising from its past and going forth to a new future. You say it is impossible.
With man perhaps it is impossible. But with God all things are possible. For
that freedom of mine
however feeble and broken
is not alone; there is another
free and sovereign power waiting for it
acknowledging it as His own image
welcoming it
coming down upon it
with His own strength and power. When I use
my freedom I meet and touch the freedom of the sovereign grace of God Himself.
If only we act upon that impulse which is the sign of the persistence of our
better self
we find somehow that that strength comes down upon us. It may be a
miracle. Our Lord asks the unanswerable question whether it is easier to say to
the sick of the palsy
¡§Arise and walk
¡¨ or to say
¡§Thy sins be forgiven
thee.¡¨ I know not what mystery may be behind that truth
but truth it is if
only we will act upon it; if only that will
broken and feeble as it may be
will
emerge from the ruins of its past
and act for itself in the spirit of return.
Then it will find that the freedom of God¡¦s grace is at its hand
and will come
to it and strengthen it. We must
it is true
continue to bear our sins
but
there is all the difference in the world between that and being borne by them.
When we bear them
our recovered spirit is master of them. Even remorse can be
a continual reminder of the long-suffering of God. The weakness
baffling and
humiliating to the end
can be the occasion for the triumph of the strength of
God. You have seen sometimes the coast when the tide is far out. It looks a
mere barren tract of sand and stone
but somewhere far out in the deep a
movement takes place. The tide turns
and soon the water covers the waste land.
So my life
when I look back upon it
may be the barren tract of sand
the
grave of lost opportunities
strewn with stones of stumbling and rocks of
offence. But if only in the great deep
where the Spirit of God touches the
spirit of man
my free self can go out to Him
then there is the turning of the
tide
and sooner or later that full tide of God¡¦s refreshing and restoring
grace will cover the waste places. I am--in my own personal self; God is--in
His own sovereign Personality; and on these two truths we can all base the
perpetual hope of a new beginning. (Bishop Lang.)
Sin slays the sinner
Manton says: ¡§The life of sin and the life of a sinner are like
two buckets in a well--if the one goeth up
the other must come down. If sin
liveth
the sinner must die.¡¨ It is only when sin dies that a man begins truly
to live. Yet we cannot persuade our neighbours that it is so
for their hearts
are bound up in their sins
and they think themselves most alive when they can
give fullest liberty to their desires. They raise up their sins
and so sink
themselves. If they could be persuaded of the truth
they would send the bucket
of sin to the very bottom that their better selves might rise into eternal
salvation. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
God¡¦s solemn inquiry of Gospel hearers
I. The evidence in
every Christian country of God¡¦s having no pleasure at all in the death of
sinners.
1. A true penitent is readily forgiven. Two striking illustrations
suggested here: a rebellious father¡¦s repentant son (verse 14
etc.)
and a
man once rebellious who amends (verses 21
22). In each instance his soul is
saved. None can fairly meditate on the promptness of such pardons without
perceiving God¡¦s delight in mercy (Micah 7:18).
2. The reason why the righteous God can so promptly pardon (Titus 3:4-7; John 3:16; Romans 8:32).
3. God has appointed a class of men to urge on the unworthy His
unspeakable gift (2 Corinthians 5:20). Did He wish the
destruction of the Ninevites when He sent Jonah to them? He has as little
pleasure in the death of the wicked now (Revelation 22:17).
II. The one simple
duty of hearers is to return (verse 32).
1. With the turning of true repentance
which involves a thorough
change of service. Note details of practical love in this chapter (verse 17)
and see conduct of Thessalonians (1 Thessalonians 1:9).
2. With the turning of trust (in the appointed Mediator) for all the
needed mercy and grace. (See the description in 1 Peter 2:24-25.)
3. With the turning quickened by the Holy Spirit (John 16:8)
which should be fostered by
prayer (Psalms 80:18-19).
4. With the turning which issues in life; the life of the acquitted
and holy (Romans 5:1-21 :l
2)
which is a sure
earnest of life everlasting (John 6:40). (D. D. Stewart
M. A.)
And not that he should
return from his ways
and live?--
The best return
St. Austin
lying on his death bed
caused divers verses of the
penitential psalms to be written on the walls of his chamber
on which he still
cast his eyes
and commented upon them with the fluent rhetoric of his tears.
But I could wish of all texts of Scripture that this of the prophet Ezekiel
were still before all their eyes who mourn for their sins in private. For
nothing can raise the dejected soul but the lifting-up of God¡¦s countenance
upon her; nothing can bring peace to an affrighted and troubled conscience but
a free pardon of all sins
whereby she hath incurred the sentence of death
which the prophet tendereth in the words of the text. I will endeavour to open
two springs in my text--the one a higher
the other a lower; the one ariseth
from God and His joy
the other from ourselves and our salvation. That the
conversion of a sinner is a joy and delight to God
I need not to produce
arguments to prove
or similes to illustrate; He that spake as never man spake
hath represented it unto us by many exquisite emblems (Luke 15:4; Luke 15:8; Luke 15:10; Luke 15:32). Scipio (as Livy writeth)
never looked so fresh
nor seemed so beautiful in the eyes of his soldiers
as
after his recovery from a dangerous sickness which he took in the camp; neither
doth the soul ever seem more beautiful than when she is restored to health
after some dangerous malady. The Palladium was in highest esteem both with the
Trojans and Romans
not so much for the matter or workmanship
as because it
was catched out of the fire when Troy was burnt. And certainly no soul is more
precious in the eyes of God and His angels than that which is snatched out of
the fire of hell and jaws of death. I have opened the first spring
and we have
tasted the waters thereof; I am now to open the second
which is this
That as
our repentance is joy unto God and His angels
so it is grace and salvation to
ourselves. As repentance is called repentance from dead works
so also
repentance unto life. For God pawns His life for the life of the penitent: ¡§As
I live
saith the Lord
I desire not the death of a sinner
but rather that he
should return and live.¡¨ Pliny writeth of a fountain in Africa
in which
torches that are blown out being dipped are kindled again: such is the fountain
of tears in the eyes of a penitent sinner; if the light of his faith be
extinguished to his sense and all outward appearance
yet dipped in this
fountain it is kindled again
and burns more brightly than ever before. The
Scripture furnisheth us not with many examples in this kind
lest any should
presume; yet some we find that none might despair. To comfort those that are
wounded in conscience
the good Samaritan cured him that was wounded between
Jerusalem and Jericho
and left half-dead; to comfort them that are sick in
soul
He recovered Peter¡¦s wife¡¦s mother lying sick in her bed; to comfort them
that have newly
as it were
given up the ghost
He raised Jairus¡¦s daughter;
to comfort them that have been sometimes dead in sins and transgressions
He
raised the widow¡¦s son; to comfort them that have been so long dead in sins
that they begin to putrify
He raised up Lazarus stinking in His grave.
Therefore
if we have grievously provoked God¡¦s justice by presumption
let us
not more wrong His mercy by despair; but hope even above hope in Him whose
mercy is over all His works. Against the number and weight of all our sins
let
us lay the infiniteness of God¡¦s mercy
and Christ¡¦s merits
and the certainty
of His promise confirmed by oath: ¡§As I live
I desire not the death of a
sinner; if he return
he shall live.¡¨ It is a most sovereign water which will
fetch a sinner again to the life of grace
though never so far gone. It is not
well water springing out of the bowels of the earth
nor rain poured out of the
clouds of passion
but rather like a dew falling from heaven
which softeneth
and moisteneth the heart
and is dried up by the beams of the Sun of
Righteousness. ¡§Turn and live.¡¨ Should a prisoner led to execution hear the
judge or sheriff call to him
and say
Turn back
put in sureties for thy good
behaviour hereafter
and live--would he not suddenly leap out of his fetters
embrace the condition
and thank the judge or sheriff upon his knees? And what
think ye if God should send a prophet to preach a sermon of repentance to the
devils and damned ghosts in hell
and say
Knock off your bolts
shake off your
fetters
and turn to the Lord and live? Would not hell be emptied and rid
before the prophet should have made an end of his exhortation? This sermon the
prophet Ezekiel now maketh unto us all. (D. Featly
D. D.)
Verse 24
When the righteous turneth away from his righteousness.
The evil of apostasy
1. There is a righteousness which men may turn from. There is an
opinionative righteousness (Luke 18:9; Matthew 23:28); many think themselves
righteous
and appear so to others: there is also a duty
a moral
or legal righteousness
such as Paul had (Philippians 3:6); and from these
righteousnesses men may and do turn daily. Many attain to a duty righteousness
under the Gospel
but yet fall off again (Matthew 13:20-22; 1 Timothy 5:15; John 6:66; 2 Peter 2:2; 1 Timothy 4:1). Take heed
therefore
of trusting in or to any righteousness of your own.
2. It is not sufficient to begin well unless we proceed: fair
beginnings without progress come to nothing. Consider the arguments which lie
here in the text
to keep you from falling off
and encourage you to persevere
in God.
The danger of relapse
Presumption and desperation are two dangerous maladies
not more
opposite one to the other
than to the health of the soul; presumption
overprizeth God¡¦s mercy
and undervalueth our sins; and on the contrary
desperation overprizeth our sins
and undervalueth God¡¦s mercy. Both are most
injurious to God; the one derogateth from His mercy
the other from His
justice
both band against hearty and speedy repentance; the one opposing it as
needless
the other as bootless Presumption saith
thou mayest repent at leisure
gather the buds of sinful pleasures before they wither
repentance is not yet
seasonable; desperation saith
the root of faith is withered
it is now too
late to repent. The life of a Christian is not unfitly compared to a long and
dangerous sea voyage; the sea is this present world
the barques are our
bodies
the sailors our souls
the pilot our faith
the card God¡¦s Word
the
rudder constancy
the anchor hope
the mainmast the cross of Christ
the strong
cables our violent affections
the sails our desires
and the Holy Spirit the
good wind which filleth the sails and driveth the barque and mariners to the
fair haven which is heaven. Now
in our way which lieth through many
temptations and tribulations
there are two dangerous rocks
the one on the right
hand
the other on the left; the rock on the right hand to be avoided is
presumption
the rock on the left threatening shipwreck is despair; between
which we are to steer our ship by fear on the one side and hope on the other.
To hold us in a solicitous fear that we touch not upon presumption
let us have
always in the eye of our mind--
1. The glorious and most omnipotent majesty of God.
2. His all-seeing providence.
3. His impartial justice.
4. His severe threatenings against sin.
5. The dreadful punishments He inflicteth upon sinners.
6. The heinousness of the sin of presumption
which turneth God¡¦s
grace into wantonness.
7. The difficulty of recovery after relapses.
8. The uncertainty of God¡¦s offer of grace after the frequent refusal
thereof.
To keep us in hope
that we dash not upon the rock of despair on
the contrary side
let us set before our troubled and affrighted consciences
these grounds of comfort--
1. The infiniteness of God¡¦s mercy.
2. The price and value of Christ¡¦s blood.
3. The efficacy of His intercession.
4. The virtue of the Sacraments.
5. The universality and certainty of God¡¦s promises to the penitent.
6. The joy of God and angels for the conversion of a sinner.
7. The communion of saints
who all pray for the comfort of afflicted
consciences
and the ease of all that are heavy laden with their sins.
8. The examples of mercy showed to most grievous sinners.
But to confine my meditations to the letter of my text. The words
divide themselves into (first) a supposition
when
or
if the righteous
forsake; secondly
an inference
his former righteousness shall not be
remembered
etc. The supposition is dangerous
the inference is pernicious.
1. Of the supposition
when the righteous turneth away from his
righteousness. No man ever made question but that a truly regenerate man may
depart from his actual righteousness
and commit iniquity
and do according to
all the abominations that the wicked doth; and that if he should die without
repentance
that his former righteousness should stand him in no stead
but
that he should suffer the pain of eternal death
which is all that the letter
of this text enforceth our assent unto. Our motions to God-ward
and
proceedings in a sanctified course of life
are like the rowing of a small boat
against a strong wind and tide (the blasts of the evil spirit
and the
propension of our corrupt nature)
much labour and sweat is required
and very
little is done with much ado; and if we slack our hands
and miss but one
stroke
we are carried down with the stream
and cast farther back than we can
fetch again with many strokes. What a foul and shameful thing is it with the
dog to return to your vomit of luxury
and with the swine to your wallowing in
the mire of sensual pleasures. As in the diseases of the body
so also much
more of the soul
all relapses are dangerous
and in some diseases altogether
incurable; the reason whereof alleged by some learned physicians is this
that
when we first take our bed the malignity of the disease worketh upon corrupt
humours in the body
which when they are purged
and we restored to health
if
after by any distemper we fall into the same malady
the malignity of the
disease worketh upon our vital spirits; in like manner the malignity of sin
before our conversion worketh but upon our corrupt nature
but after upon the
graces of God¡¦s Spirit. We find in Scripture many desperately sick
yet cured
the first time by our Saviour; but where do we read in all the Gospel of any
blind man¡¦s eyes twice enlightened? of any deaf ears twice opened? of any tied
tongue twice loosened? of any possessed with devils twice dispossessed? of any
dead twice raised? No doubt Christ could have done it
but we read not that
ever He did it
that we should be most careful to avoid relapses into our
former sins
the recovery whereof is always most difficult
and in some cases
(as the Apostle teacheth us) impossible (Hebrews 6:4-8). (D. Featly
D. D.)
Yet ye say
The way of the Lord is not equal.
Hear now
O house of Israel; Is not My way equal? Are not your ways unequal?
On the unequal distribution of happiness and misery
Let us suppose an attentive observer to take a general view of the
situation in which mankind is placed. The first thing that would strike him
would probably be the variety of conveniences and comforts distributed around
him
which are neither earned by his own merit nor produced by his own care.
This would lead him to a second observation
that many
and the most essential
of these conveniences and comforts are bestowed promiscuously
and without
exception
on the whole race of mankind: the sun rises on the evil and on the
good
and the rain descends on the just and on the unjust. What other
conclusion could he draw from these two observations than that the Power above
us is friendly to mankind? From this pleasing prospect the observer might turn
his attention to the evils and miseries which attend on human life. What are we
to infer from hence? Is it that God is a capricious Being
or that He has
pleasure in the misery
as well as in the happiness
of His creatures? To solve
this question
we may observe a remarkable difference between the two cases:
the benefits
which are common to all mankind
are numerous and important
and
are enjoyed
without intermission
every day and every hour. On the contrary
the evils common to all mankind
if any there be
are much fewer than is
usually supposed
and only occur on particular emergencies. How far even death
which is the only universal lot
is really in itself an evil
distinct from the
pain which is supposed to attend it
has never yet been ascertained; and the
pains of death are by no means common to the whole human race: many die
instantaneously without any pain
and many in lingering diseases without a pang
or a groan. It is not certain
therefore
that there is any one evil existing
which affects
necessarily and inevitably
the whole race of mankind. I might
add
in this place
that the evils complained of serve to answer many wise
purposes of discipline and probation. Hitherto we have considered those
benefits and those evils which arise from God¡¦s own appointment
without any
merit or demerit of our own. Let us next consider those which are the
consequences of our own conduct. In this view the first thing that would strike
an attentive observer would probably be that many vicious actions are attended
with regular and constant effects
and carry a sort of punishment along with
them. It would next be observed
that there are virtues also which bring their
own benefits along with them: temperance and regularity lead to health and long
life; industry and diligence to affluence and plenty; good faith and sincerity
promote esteem and regard; and patience
equanimity
and command of temper lay
the foundation for happiness
and form a constituent part of it. Yet still an
observer might take notice
that the good effects of virtue are not in any
degree so certain or constant as the ill effects of vice. This fact is
remarkable
and deserves to be seriously considered. It seems to prove
that
the distribution of good and evil
of happiness and misery
which arises from
our own actions
our own virtues and vices
is regulated by a different and
even opposite law
from that distribution of happiness and misery which comes
immediately and gratuitously
from the hand of God. In the latter
the benefits
and favours which we receive from God are more numerous
as we have seen
are
more extensive
more constant
and more certain than the evils which we suffer.
In the former
where our own actions
our virtues and vices are concerned
the
evils and punishments of vice are more numerous
more constant
and more
certain than the benefits or rewards of virtue. Shall we say
then
in this
case
that God is inconsistent
or that He is less a friend to virtue than an
enemy to vice? Not so
says the text.
1. In the first place
you will readily allow it to be highly
conducive to our piety and devotion that the dispensations of Almighty God
Himself
which are unconnected with any human virtues or vices
should be
as
becomes him
everywhere distinguished by marks of kindness
beneficence
and
bounty.
2. In the next place
it is highly conducive to our religious and
moral improvement
that virtue should not
in this life
be attended with its
distinct and immediate reward. The magnificent idea held forth by Christianity
of the value in which virtue ought to be held
would be totally done away; it
would be to appreciate that which is beyond all price; to demand prematurely a
momentary reward here
for that which
in the sight of God
and through faith
in the merits of Christ
no earthly enjoyment and immortal happiness alone can
repay.
3. In the last place
it is highly conducive to our moral improvement
that vice
on the contrary
should in many cases be attended with immediate
punishment. It is evident that this is not an instance of God¡¦s severity
but
rather of His clemency and mercy. It restrains the sinner
in kindness
before
it is too late
from ¡§treasuring up wrath
¡¨ etc. It tends to check no one
virtue which we have
and is the school in which we are best taught the virtues
which we have not. (W. Pearce
D. D.)
The inequalities of life
I. If we had to
find an immediate and direct answer to this question
¡§Is not My way equal?¡¨ we
should be disposed to say
¡§Decidedly not.¡¨ From the beginning to the end of
life there seems to be inequality
not equality. Consider
first of all
how
men are born. Birth is something so entirely removed from the region of
personal responsibility that no one of us is to be held accountable for
anything belonging to it. Yet how much depends on being well born! Some
thinking men have said that half the battle of life is won or lost according as
an individual is well or ill born. Now
when we examine into the facts of life
how very many people seem to be anything but well born! God¡¦s ways do not seem
equal in this respect. Certainly not on the surface. There are thousands of
children born from vicious parents. Very little chance do these seem to have to
be good men and women. Compare their heredity with that which belongs to some
of our friends here present
in whose ancestry has been no known criminal of
any kind
no unvirtuous man
no impious woman. When we make such comparison
it
does not seem as if God¡¦s ways are equal. Take a step forward
and again ask
the question when nurture begins to tell. The word ¡§education¡¨ covers a very
much larger area of life than we ordinarily assign it. The home in which we
live
the company we keep
the books we read for fun and not as tasks
all are
contributory to education. The word ¡§environment¡¨ comes in here. In regard to
that
God¡¦s ways do not seem equal. The opportunities of a pure and wise
education which come to some
contrasted with the vicious ignorance and coarse
immoralities by which others are surrounded
do not enable us easily to find an
affirmative answer to this question
¡§Are not My ways equal? saith the Lord.¡¨
Once more
the child is born and schooled; educated
as we say
by all through
which he has passed in these impressionable years of youth. And now the time
comes for sailing out on the ocean of enterprise. One young man finds his boat
ready built and ready manned and abundantly victualled
and he has only to step
aboard and sail off. A second casts about hither and thither
applying to one
and another to take him aboard
and let him scrub decks or do anything
and
almost loses heart before he can get any kind of start in life. Things do not
seem equal here
any more than in the other stages of life.
II. Yet the more
carefully we look into these facts
and the longer we dwell upon them
the more
copiously will they supply us with something suggestive of the necessity of
caution in dealing with them. We begin to think in this way: ¡§Let me not be too
rash in lay affirmatives. This is not God¡¦s perfect world. This is very far
from an ideal condition of society. It is a society disturbed by sin. I cannot
judge of the kingdom of God from what I see in society
every member of which
is under condemnation as belonging to a sinful race. So I must be careful in
forming my judgments. There are modifications and compensations discernible
even now.¡¨ First of all
it does not do to assume that happiness and
unhappiness are in the ratio of external possession or non-possession. The man
who has enough for all the legitimate uses of life is not at a disadvantage. He
has no real wants. The artificial wants of society have nothing to do with the
physical and mental necessities of life. Health
intelligence
aspiration
all
that is wholesome and good
do not depend upon anything artificial. The
disposition in our day
even among Christianised people
to make too much of
externals needs to be studiously guarded against when we are speaking of
equality and inequality. Has it not come to be one of the commonplaces of
existence that poverty is not always a curse
and wealth is not always a
blessing? When a child is born into the midst of the surroundings supplied by a
luxurious home
he is at a considerable disadvantage in seam ways. You say he
need not trouble about his future
so far as it consists in the providing for
the necessaries and the comforts of life. Now
if some of these comfortable
conditions are not as favourable to the putting forth of energy or the
developing of strength of character as are the other less coveted conditions
immediately the question of equality becomes a little harder to answer. I say
the more we investigate the facts of life the less disposed are we to say that
all inequalities are of the nature of injustice. Often and often the rich man¡¦s
son becomes indolent and ineffective
a mere lazy loafer on life¡¦s highway
through
want of that stimulus which comes naturally to the son of the poor man. It
would be interesting to investigate that region more thoroughly. We must leave
it for another remark bearing upon the answer we shall give to the question
¡§Are not My ways equal? saith the Lord.¡¨ The idea of responsibility comes in
here. It becomes us ever to remember the words
¡§To whom much is given
of him
much will be required¡¨; and
¡§To whom they commit much
of him will they ask
the more.¡¨ The Gospel of Jesus Christ is a gospel for all
but it is especially
a gospel for the weary and heavy-laden
for the man who has been badly born
for the man who has been handicapped in the race of life
for the man whose
chance has been of the poorest. There is a future
and it is not far off. There
Lazarus gets his chance
and Dives learns the lesson he refused to learn here
and now. (R. Thomas
D. D.)
The way of God and the ways of man
There is no foundation for an intelligent faith without the
admission that God¡¦s attributes are unchangeable and His will as inscrutable as
His being; that ¡§He is and was and is to come
¡¨ ¡§the same yesterday and today
and forever.¡¨ It is not man¡¦s mission to vindicate the way of God to
understandings which will not receive the impressions of faith and the reasoning
of love. He who undertakes by what he may call wise arguments to prove to the
discontented heart that God is love will lose his labour
and may perhaps be
himself made captive by the unbelief he rashly attacks. The same power which is
to convince the world of sin must also convince it of righteousness. The answer
to every cavil is the offer of eternal life
without money and without price
to all. They complain of their lost inheritance
and a nobler inheritance is
offered in exchange; they resent the imputation of their fathers¡¦ guilt
and
they are called upon to turn from their own
and then for their punishment they
shall receive a double reward in the life of their soul
which he who loses
shall gain nothing if he gain the whole world
and he who gains may well afford
to lose home and lands and all earthly possessions and advantages if it be
God¡¦s will to deprive him of them. It is in the simplicity and universal
application of this invitation of mercy that the Lord is content to risk the
vindication of His goodness. His purpose has been single and its scope
universal
and its means undeviatingly the same
for ¡§there is none other name
under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.¡¨ Away then with that
delusion which holds that law has succeeded law
covenant superseded covenant
in such a sense that at one time salvation was by works
at another time by
faith; once by the work of man
now by the work of Christ. He was the Lamb
slain from the foundation of the world. The law was and is a schoolmaster to
bring us to Christ; the law and the prophets testified of Him. Men may find
fault with the ways of God
because He does not by large miracles pour out the
flood of His Spirit upon the heathen; but the Lord replies
What have My people
done to spread the knowledge I have given them? It is of the nature of light to
expand its rays
and nothing but wilful obstructions can hinder it; why has the
Church hidden her light? why have Christian nations neglected their mission?
why have labourers been wanting when the field was ready for harvest? How shall
they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? how shall they hear except the
Word be sent unto them? That complaint which
if not loudest heard
is most
widely spread and most deeply rankles in the heart of man
arises out of the
inequalities of fortune
the manifold chances and changes of this mortal life
whereby the wicked prosper while the righteous struggle
fools are set in high
places while pious wisdom dies in obscurity
rich men are clothed in purple and
fine linen while Lazaruses are laid at their gate full of sores; indifference
has peace while sensitive hearts yearning for holiness and rest are left
melancholy and disconsolate
despairing of the peace that is theirs
and making
themselves labour out of their earnest search for rest. Heed not the prosperity
of the unrighteous; load not your souls with the burthen of envy
and murmur
not at comparisons which a moment of God¡¦s wrath may show to be vain; though
you be poor and of sad spirit
lonely and uncheerful
afflicted with the ills
of life and partaker of few of its blessings; though sin and its perplexities
may harass you; though happiness be to you a thing of the past
wrapt up in
fruitless memories and darkened by shadows from the grave; though trouble
should come or has come upon you;--let not the petulance of sorrow charge its
weariness upon the caprice of a Father
the faithfulness of whose mercy and the
perfection of whose judgments and the consistency of whose way are in nothing
more certainly manifested than in the troubles whereby out of the curse of sin
He brings the grace of everlasting life. In conclusion; remember that the way
of the Lord in His dealings with man is equal
impartial
consistent. The way
of His providence is equal
for all things work together for good to them who
love God; the way of His grace is equal
for it is and ever has been comprised
in the person of Jesus Christ; His providence waits upon His grace
and the
purpose of both is the salvation of our souls. (A. J. Macleane
M. A.)
When the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath
committed.
The conversion of a sinner
I. The wicked
ought to reform.
1. Sin is contrary to reason.
2. Being such
it cannot be justified. As the palsy-motion
which
seems to be quicker than other; but it is not from strength but from weakness:
no man can justify a sinful action; but to a bad conscience
or before an
unrighteous judge; who is either ignorant or partial
or himself as bad
by
undue principles
corrupt interest
or an abuse of power.
3. Every sinful action
however we may stand to it
or may be
countenance here in the world
will be discountenanced sooner or later
whether
we will or no.
4. If we do not repent of that which we have done sinfully
it will
lie upon us as the blackest spot
as the heaviest judgment
and as the worst
malady.
5. There is no expectation either of God¡¦s pardon
or of help from
Him
but in the way of repentance. For who can promise himself anything out of
the terms of the covenant of grace; namely
repentance from all dead works
resolution of obedience to God
and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
6. We are all under obligation to repent
though there would no good
come to us by it. For we are God¡¦s creatures
and held of Him; from whence it
follows
that we ought to serve Him
and to do His will
and to be at His
command.
II. Through the
grace which God doth afford
we may repent of all evil done
and make
application to God; and deprecate His displeasure
and leave off to sin
and
return to our duty
and so obtain His pardon. Neither let any man say
that the
text signifies no more than if one should say to an impotent man
remove this
mountain
and thou shalt have such or such a reward; or to bid a man to
comprehend the ocean in the hollow of his hand
and it shall so or so be done
unto him. These ways of speaking must not be put upon God
nor in any ease
attributed unto Him. When God saith to the sinner
repent and turn from your
wickedness
and you shall save your soul alive
it doth suppose that either He
is able or that He will make Him so. But here some may be ready to interpose
and say: surely God is not in good earnest
because He might if He would; for
who can resist the Divine will? It doth not follow
that because God doth not
enforce
that therefore He doth not enable. That God should force agrees
neither with the nature of God
nor with the nature of man; but that God should
enable
this is natural to the relation we stand in to God
who is original to
our being. Wherefore be resolved in this matter
that God is with us
and that
He is ready to afford His grace and assistance. Now
that you may not lose this
great argument and principle of reformation
and true and solid ground of
encouragement
to leave off to sin
and to return to God
because of His
gracious aid and assistance
I will give you assurance further by these six
particulars.
1. It was never God¡¦s intention
when He made man at first
to put
him into a state of absolute independency
or self-sufficiency. And therefore
whosoever assumes it to himself doth assume that which never did belong to a
creature-state.
2. Could man allege either necessity of evil
or impossibility of
doing good
it would be a plea when God calls us to an account
and admits us
to reason with Him.
3. Where there is excellency of nature there is always readiness to
communicate
supply
and gratify.
4. We cannot say worse of God than that His calls and monitions to
His creatures are not serious and in good earnest
and out of love and good
mind.
5. To assert our impotency and disability
and that God is wanting in
necessary assistance
is to expose us to an invincible temptation; and that in
these three particulars.
6. God hath done so much on His part
that He hath given us all
reason to believe
and think that He is well minded towards us; and that He is
resolved in the matter of our recovery; upon terms that are made easy and
possible.
The conversion of a sinner
I. The time when
the wicked turneth away from his wickedness. It is indefinitely spoken
and
doth not exclude late time
which may be an encouragement to everyone
be his
case never so desperate. But then
this is not spoken to encourage men¡¦s delays
and put-offs; for there are four great evils consequent upon that.
1. It were to ill resent the goodness of God thus to requite His
grace and favour
that we continue in sin because God is gracious.
2. It were to abuse ourselves
and do ourselves more and more harm.
3. It would make the work which is necessary to our happiness much
more hard and difficult. For ill use doth contract bad habits; and bad habits
contracted by long use and custom are with great difficulty left off.
4. Continuance in sin doth expose us to far greater danger.
II. The quality of
the person. Scripture doth not denominate persons wicked
or sinners
or
workers of iniquity
from weaknesses
failings
or from error of judgment
or
from indisposition at times
from sudden passion or surprisal; nor from the
irregularity of the first motion
that is so troublesome and grievous unto us
all. But they are called sinners and wicked persons who voluntarily consent to
known iniquity.
III. When a man may
be said to turn from his wickedness.
1. The negatives are these.
2. But then affirmatively
in three particulars.
IV. An account of
lawful and right. Here are two words for one and the same thing; and the one is
explicatory of the other. Now this is that which we all ought to do; and there
is no pretence of power and privilege to the contrary. And if everybody did
confine himself to that which is right
just
and fit
we should have a new
world; and there would be nothing of wrong or hard measure found among us: we
should then be the better one for another. There is a rule of right in all
cases
and it is the charge of all persons in the use of Power
to judge and
determine according unto that rule.
1. I will begin with the relation that is between parents and
children
and show you what is right for parents to do with their children
and
children to their parents.
2. I go to the relation of husbands and wives; there is the right of
the case between them.
3. Then for masters and servants. Masters
render to your servants
what is right
that which is equal
fair
and reasonable. Then for servants
there is the right of the case for them also
and that is to obey their masters
in all things
and to be true and faithful to them.
4. Then in our common converse
we ought to use all humanity
courtesy
and affability
giving all respect
despising nobody.
5. To descend to the creatures below us
there is a right of the case
here also. We must not abuse any.
V. The happiness
that follows upon renovation
repentance
and turning to God. He that doth so
shall save his soul alive. From this we may understand of how great benefit the
good use and improvement of our time is. How many are there that overlook the
business
purpose
and intention of life! We are here to run a race
and so to
run that we may obtain; and therefore we are to watch over ourselves
both as
to the things of our mind and body; and so to keep under our bodies
and bring
them into subjection
that we may not ruin and undo ourselves. Therefore I
advise every man that is serious to ask himself these questions.
1. Will this that I have done
or am doing
be accountable when God
shall call me to a reckoning?
2. That which Abigail put to David (1 Samuel 25:1-44)
¡§This will be no
grief of heart
nor offence
unto thee.¡¨
3. What shall I think of this when I shall lie upon my death bed?
4. How remediless will the consequence of evil be
when I shall have
the least relief by my reason
and be least capable of advice; and when I shall
have the least assistance of God¡¦s grace and Spirit? (B. Whichcote
D. D.)
Of the conversion of a sinner
I. The nature of
repentance; to turn away from wickedness
and to do that which is lawful and
right.
1. To turn from wickedness; this the negative part according to that
Let him eschew evil and do good. And that according to the very morality of the
heathens
virtus est vitium fugere
etc. Not to be vicious is the
rudiment of virtue
and ¡¥tis the beginning of wisdom to leave off playing the
fool. Now this turning from wickedness being a very hard work
nothing more
difficult than to throw off habits once contracted. Let us therefore by a
gradual deduction show the right way of proceeding
what course a new convert
that turns from his wickedness
usually takes.
2. The other is positive
to do that which is lawful and right.
II. The consequent
of thus doing is
that he shall save his soul alive.
1. By turning thus from his wickedness
and doing that which is
right
he shall be so accepted of God
that his sins shall never prejudice him
as to his eternal estate
whoever the person be
whatever his former life hath
been.
2. His thus doing prepares and disposes him for God¡¦s grace
whereby
he may be enabled to do more
till he work out his salvation; and God¡¦s grace
will perfect that good work which has been begun in him.
3. This reformation and amendment evidences a justifying and a saving
faith
and shows a man to be
to the glory of God¡¦s grace
a truly pious man
and one who may fairly entertain very good assurances of happiness in the life
to come. For though by Christ alone
as the meritorious cause
and by faith
alone
as the instrumental cause
we are justified and saved; yet that faith
itself will do us no good
no
nor Christ Himself stand us in any stead
unless
it be accompanied with repentance from sin
and amendment of life.
I might from hence draw several inferences of vulgar mistakes
about this necessary work of repentance; let me but mention two.
1. As to the first act
to turn from his wickedness that he hath
committed. Some think it enough to turn from some sins
and indulge themselves
in others
or at least to turn off one sin
and take up another in its stead.
But such must know
that they are still in captivity; they do but alter their
prison.
2. As to the second act
to do that which is lawful and right. There
are those
who seem to resolve all religion into hearing; that they look on as
the soul-saving ordinance; for by that comes faith. Be it so; but let not good works
be thrown aside as unnecessary
as dangerous. For what says the apostle? Not
the hearers
but the doers shall be justified.
III. The possibility
of the duty as to its performance: for else all were to no purpose.
1. God has a kindness for all the souls of men. He is a faithful
Creator; His mercy is over all His works
and He hates nothing that He hath
made.
2. There¡¦s no bar then
as on God¡¦s part
against any soul¡¦s
happiness. We say
unfortunate persons were born under an ill planet
but
whatever force the stars may have upon men¡¦s estates and successes
they have
none upon their minds and wills. Here ¡¥tis thy own will that writes thy
destiny; there¡¦s no fatality upon thee
but what thou bringest upon thyself.
There¡¦s no irreversible decree in our way
to exclude us
if we do not exclude
ourselves. Thy destruction is of thyself
O Israel. God made no man purposely
to damn him. Death was one of man¡¦s own inventions
and will be the reward of
his own evil actions.
3. God allows everyone such a sufficiency of means
as will at least
render him inexcusable. In the parable of Talents
they had everyone more or
less. Even where the means are denied or withdrawn
¡¥tis out of mercy upon
foresight of the abuse. These are certain truths
that every man may do better
than he does
and may have more grace to do better
if he seek it. If the
advantages of the Gospel
the assistances of grace
the influences of the
Spirit
the admonitions of conscience will not prevail with men
God will be
justified when He judges
even in their condemnation.
4. God having thus furnished us with helps
and being ready further
to enable us
expects and requires our own serious endeavours in the working
out of our own salvation
nor can we look to be saved otherwise. This passeth
for current doctrine in all worldly affairs
that men¡¦s industry and diligence
are the only arguments to build their assurance of success upon. And this much
more in spiritual and eternal concerns. A man is not to lie in a ditch
and
think to get out only by crying
God help me. The carter in the fable
when he
called for Hercules¡¦ assistance
was bid to set his own shoulder first to the
wheel. It is a proverb
that the world is made for the presumptuous; which
Christ seems to have consecrated to pious encouragement
when He tells us
The
kingdom of heaven suffers violence
and the violent take it by force. And thus
much to evince as the obligation
so the possibility of this duty of repentance
and conversion
that as it ought to be in the sinner¡¦s will
so ¡¥tis partly in
his power.
We shall now show how far that power will lead him.
1. A man may
if he will
forbear the gross act of sin.
2. A man may
if he will
shun the occasion of his sin
and get out
of the devil¡¦s way
and keep guard at his weak place. A vessel may run foul in
a dark night
and strike upon a secret
unseen rock; but if the pilot have any
the least care
he will beware places of known danger.
3. A man may
if he will
by degrees draw off his affections
and
estrange himself to his sin.
4. A man may
if he will
use his reason; and he doth not deserve the
name of man
that will not do that. He may so fortify his understanding
and
even natural conscience (for we are now within the compass of nature) that he
may at length arrive at a full perfect resolution against his sin.
Then as to do that which is lawful and right.
1. He may
if he will
keep himself well employed
and so not be at
leisure for his sin. Good exercise is an expedient for health of soul
as well
as body.
2. He may
if he will
go to church
to his closet
read
hear
pray
meditate
and frequent those religious duties wherein God has promised to
bestow grace
and pious persons are wont to improve it.
3. He may
if he will
inure himself by good acts as to the substance
of them
to the contrary virtues. I still speak of moral actions performable by
the strength of nature; so that yet we are not come within the sphere of
grace¡¦s activity. Hitherto a man may go of himself
if he will; and certainly
he is in a very hopeful condition that goes thus far. I shall not fear to tell
you
that he is gone a good part of his way to heaven
and there¡¦s no going to
heaven but this way. He has turned from his wickedness
and now does that which
is lawful and right; therefore he shall save his soul alive.
And how¡¦s that? That¡¦s on God¡¦s part; for though we must work out
our salvation
yet by grace we are saved still: ¡¥tis the gift of God
when
all¡¦s done.
1. God accepts such an one
as He did the devout centurion.
2. God further enables him; so as with His grace to prevent him and
assist him
as again in Cornelius his case.
3. God justifies him (his sins that he had done shall be mentioned no
more)
and will finally reward him; his soul shall live.
I shall conclude with two or three cautions
which may quicken us
that we do not put off this necessary work upon this presumption
that ¡¥tis in
our power to repent when we will.
1. That the longer ¡¥tis deferred
the more difficult it will be. Our
sins will grow stronger
our powers and resolutions weaker
and the grace and
favour of God less easy to be obtained
if we neglect the time when He may be
found.
2. That though true repentance be never too late
yet late repentance
is seldom true. ¡¥Tis a shrewd sign of our insincerity
when we are unwilling to
leave our lusts till they leave us.
3. That our intentions
though never so good
if we defer to put them
in execution
when we have time to do it
will not find so gracious an
acceptance at God¡¦s hands.
4. That everyone has a day of grace
and ¡¥tis a thing of extreme
danger to hazard the loss of that; to let the measure of our iniquities be
filled up
and so to have the things of our peace at last hid from our eyes
and repentance itself put out of our power. (Adam Littleton
D. D.)
Practical intention of the Gospel
I. The first step
to salvation is here described to be the relinquishment of former evil
practices. That sin is to be forsaken by the seeker of God¡¦s favour
requires
no proof. But how is it to be effected? There are many who think that prayer
and good resolutions are sufficient. That both of these are indispensable
is
most certain
and nothing can be done without them; but they are not always
effectual. To them must be added the turning away from the besetting sin; the
keeping out of the way of temptation. Probably the virtue and goodness of the
best consist more in resisting temptation than is commonly believed by the
looker-on. At the close of the day
what
we may ask
excites our grateful
emotions to God? That we have had grace to resist this sin and the other; not
that we have been positively good
but that we have not been positively bad.
One main source of the obedience
then
for instance
of the man whose
besetment is love of the world
consists in his keeping out of it
in his
turning away from it
as much as he possibly can. And this direction is equally
applicable to all other sins. You wish to give up sin; then studiously
self-denyingly
watchfully
prayerfully
turn away from the very atmosphere of
the temptation that would lead you to sin; and dream not of safety upon any
other terms.
II. After this
relinquishing known sin
the next step is
¡§to do that which is lawful and
right.¡¨ We know well the difficulty of reconciling the sovereign power of God
with the agency of helpless man. But let us consider
for the practical view of
the question
that the same God who made the body and its powers made also the
soul and its powers. Now
we feel no hesitation in speaking about the freedom
of motion of the limbs of the body; yet the whole power to move arm
or leg
or
hand
is derived as directly from God as is the power of the mind to think. And
notwithstanding this
we feel no hesitation in attributing to man a perfect
mastery over all the motions of his own limbs
though it be true that ¡§in God
he lives
and moves
and has his being.¡¨ When you tell a man to walk
in effect
you only tell him to use the power of body which God has given him. He walks
not because he gave himself the power to do so
but because God gave it to him.
Now we know the limits under which this can be applied to the soul. Sin has
cast its chain
so to speak
about the legs and arms of the soul. If you wish
to walk to a neighbouring place
we know of no impediment to your motions; but
if you wish to walk to heaven
the case is different. But who gave you the
unshackled limbs? God. And if He gives the like power to the soul
why may we
not
in like manner
exhort you to make use of it
without being misconstrued?
But what is the ¡§lawful and right
¡¨ the Christian obedience
required of you?
Repentance
faith
holiness. But these imply a thousand particulars
without
understanding many of which
it is but giving dark counsel. We spoke of
repentance first; but how is a man to perform this ¡§lawful and right¡¨ act? How
are you to feel sorrow for your sins? You cannot give this sorrow to
yourselves; nor can any human being give it you. How then is it to be obtained?
In the use
we reply
of God¡¦s appointed means. ¡§Do¡¨ them
for they are the
¡§lawful and right¡¨ means. Now
we think the appointed way of obtaining
repentance is by looking closely at and to Jesus Christ
in connection with
what you know of yourselves relative to the past and the present
and what you
justly suspect of yourselves for the future. Not that we suppose that any view
you can take of Jesus Christ
in connection with His dreadful sufferings for
your sins
could move you to real sorrow; but our belief is
that this is the
appointed effect of this particular means: if you once look at Christ in this
light
He will at the same time regard you for the most merciful of all
purposes. Is not every spiritual blessing to be traced up
instrumentally
to
Jesus Christ? Repentance certainly is a spiritual blessing; and therefore the
proper means are
to come to Him
in the hope that He
by His Spirit
will
awaken it within you. If you wait until you are a penitent before you seek for
the remedy of the Gospel
you are inverting the only safe order. Come to Jesus
Christ in prayer for the gift of repentance: this
we say
is the appointed
means. For we are only asking you to exert the power which is given you by God
to use His own means
that you may obtain His own blessing. But we pass on to
the second act spoken of as ¡§lawful and right¡¨ for the salvation of the
soul--faith in Jesus Christ. And certainly if repentance is a necessary act of
obedience
so is a reliance on the meritorious sacrifice of Jesus Christ. But
then what can you do
you yourselves do
in the way of obedience to this
injunction? You cannot give yourself faith in Christ
but you can pray for it.
You can read the history of His sufferings and death for your sins
with a
thoughtful mind; and in that same book in which they are recorded
you can read
the only valuable and true history in the world of yourselves. If you desire to
see the faithful representation of your countenance
you go to the looking
glass; and if you want to see the only real picture of your soul¡¦s condition
read God¡¦s Word for this express purpose
for you will find it nowhere else. By
thus using the plain means
so easy of access
for learning what you can of
Jesus Christ
and what you can of yourself
you meet God
as it were
in the
right road; you go as far as you can go. And as little do we expect that God
will go out of His way to withhold His suns
and rains
and winds
for maturing
the seed put into the ground with all care
in the use of His own appointed
means
as we believe He will withhold the suns
and winds
and rains of His
Holy Spirit to bring to ripeness the graces connected with ¡§saving the soul
alive¡¨ in those who thus do their part towards obtaining them. (J. E.
Golding.)
Because he considereth
and turneth away from all his transgressions.
Repentance
I. He considereth.
The blind
hardened man walks about thinking
speaking
acting
without
considering how the Almighty God is regarding him
what are to be the
consequences of all his thoughts
words
and ways
to what end he is to come.
He considers not what he owes to his God
his Maker
his Redeemer
his
Sanctifier
his great Benefactor. He considers not that he shall one day ¡§stand
before the judgment seat of Christ
to receive the things done in the body
¡¨ to
give account of the manner in which he has ¡§rendered unto God the things which
are God¡¦s
¡¨ the honour
the faithful service
the adoring and grateful love
which are due to Him from all His rational creatures. Oh what unspeakably great
and glorious things are often poured about the ears of hardened people
without
making the least impression on their hearts! Divine justice
creating
redeeming love
the death of Christ the Son of God
the coming of the Holy
Ghost
the grand events of the judgment day
heaven
hell
eternity
such
things as fully comprehended would fill the whole soul of man
and make him
stand motionless with admiration and amazement. See an awakened man
a man
¡§whose heart God hath touched.¡¨ The terrible voice of the most just judgment of
God has reached him. It has pierced his soul. It has roused him from his deadly
lethargy. It has made him think. He exercises his thoughts upon his condition
and his prospects. His life is brought before him. He sees how he has lived
without God in the world. His sins now begin to appear to him in an awful
light. He stands amazed at his dreadful situation. He considereth. How he is to
escape the wrath to come. How he is to be restored to the favour of his
offended God. How he is to master his sinful nature. How he is to acquire the
faith and love
the ¡§holiness
without which no man shall see the Lord.¡¨ All
his heart is now engaged in those great considerations; and so vast
so
overwhelming they appear
that everything else seems a trifle compared with
them. He considers that God is even yet his Maker
that He may still have a
regard to the work of His hands; that He has indeed given His Son
that He
might be merciful to him. Then he falls down with such feelings as he never
before experienced before his God
and pours out of the fulness of his heart
confessions of sin
cries for mercy
hopes of pardon
repetitions of God¡¦s promises
prayers for grace and a change of heart
and resolutions of amendment.
II. He turneth away
from all his transgressions that he hath committed. He forthwith begins ¡§in the
strength of the Lord
¡¨ trusting that His grace will be with him
to leave off
every kind of iniquity of language and conduct
to avoid all ungodly society
to check his bad tempers
to resist his vile passions
to devote himself to
pious practices
to d course of real
earnest
heartfelt prayer
to diligent
thoughtful
and devout reading of the Scriptures
and to all the duties which
he owes to his neighbour. He is not like so many
who ¡§return
but not the Most
High;¡¨ who make some confessions
offer some prayers
leave off some sins
who
are ¡§almost persuaded to be Christians
¡¨ who go a little way toward God
but
will not go all the way to God
will not become His faithful
consistent
devoted servants. He that really returns to God
really devotes himself to the
service of the Lord
considers that he is not his own master
to pick and
choose what duty he will do
and what he will leave undone
when he will do his
duty
and when he will leave it undone; he considers
that he is ¡§not his own
for he is bought with a price
and must glorify God
¡¨ by leaving off every
sinful practice
and by the faithful
regular
and consistent discharge of
every duty. (R. L. Cotton
M. A.)
O house of Israel
are not My ways equal?
Scripture appealing to the reason and conscience of man
This is one among the many instances to be found in Scripture
where the rational and moral nature of man is appealed to in justification of
the Divine conduct. Christianity must be felt by us to be true before it can be
felt by us to be binding on our consciences. And who is to be the judge of its
truth or falsehood? Where and what is the tribunal before which its credentials
are to be produced
examined
and decided on? What is it
or what can it be
but the reason of man
--Reason in her high seat of purity and power
lifted up
above the tainted and corrupting atmosphere of worldly passions and prejudices
and calmly and serenely engaged in the consideration and contemplation of
truth. This is one of the first and plainest rules to be adopted for our
intellectual guidance. It is regarded as an axiom by all sober thinkers
that
every proposition or statement which is found to be self-contradictory or
irrational is at once to be regarded as incredible. This
of course
imposes upon
man the heavy responsibility of using his reason fairly
of judging not
according to the appearance
but of judging righteous judgment. With this
condition it will be the surest and safest light to our feet and lamp to our
path. There is another and a similar proposition to the one just mentioned
which I shall now proceed to enforce
having respect not so much to our
intellectual as to our moral nature. In the Scriptures
appeal is not only made
to our reason
our understanding
for the truth of their declarations
but to
our moral feelings and convictions
And accordingly I would lay down this
principle as akin to the one already touched upon
namely
that any
representations of God
and of the character of God
which went to the
subversion or destruction of those primary and essential distinctions of truth
justice and goodness
which have been established by the common consent of the
wise and good of all ages
--any such representations
assuming what pretensions
they may
are to be met with instant and utter rejection. When the Scriptures
address our consciences
when they speak of the law written on the heart
when
they ask us to judge of ourselves what is right
and when God appeals to us for
the justice of His proceedings
saying
¡§Are not My ways equal?¡¨--they take for
granted that we have that within us which is capable of forming sound moral
judgments
and of coming to right moral conclusions. So again
when the
Scriptures speak to us of the goodness and the loving kindness and the mercy of
God
they do not begin with defining the sense in which they use these terms.
They suppose that we have already a general and sufficiently accurate knowledge
of them. They take for granted the existence of these qualities among men
as
arising out of the very constitution of their moral nature
wherever the
faculties of that nature have been suffered in any degree to develop and expand
themselves. What is goodness in man is the same that we mean by goodness in
God. And so with justice
faithfulness
and mercy. These qualities
which we
ascribe to God
we have first gotten a knowledge of by our own feelings and
experience as human beings. If the Divine mercy and benignity mean not
something like this
if they have no resemblance to kindred qualities existing
in our own bosoms
what are we to understand by them? They become mere sounds
and nothing else
words to which there attaches no significance
and all our
conceptions of the character of God are reduced to the greatest possible
vagueness and obscurity. Once overrule and bid defiance to the clearest
dictates of the understanding
once set at naught and despise the deepest and
most universal of our moral sentiments
and the mind is fitted and prepared for
the belief of any opinion
however absurd
for the reception of any sentiment
however cruel and revolting. Demand of me anything but the surrender of my
intellectual and moral guides. Require of me to give heed to the evidence you
may tender in favour of a proposition
however strange
however remote from my
present views and apprehensions
and it may be my duty to attend
to ponder
and at length to believe. But require me to give audience to assertions and
statements in behalf of self-evident contradictions and palpable moral
incongruities
and I revolt from the rashness of the attempt. I feel it to be
an affront to the nature which God has given me. If we have no faith in the
fundamental principles of human reason
and in the primary and essential moral
feelings of the human heart
the foundations of all rational conviction are
destroyed
and we are let loose to be driven about by every wind of doctrine
to be the victims of the wretchedest fanaticism
or of the most deadening and
depressing scepticism. I am aware that
in answer to these remarks
we shall be
reminded of our profound ignorance of the nature of God
and of the utter
inadequacy of the human intellect to take unto itself the measure of the
Divine. Most true it is that there is much belonging to the nature of God of
which
in this dim twilight of our being
we have scarcely more than a mere
glimpse. This is especially the case with what are called the natural
attributes of God. We know but little
and can know but little
of what
Infinity is
and Omnipotence and Eternity. Our apprehension of them may not
come up to the fulness and completeness that distinguish them; but still
as
far as it goes
it seems to be clear
definite
and exact. While much
obscurity
perhaps
attaches to what we may term our metaphysical notions of
God
we have no resting place on which the mind can repose
but the moral
conceptions of God. That resting place
therefore
let us never abandon. Rather
let us cleave to it
and guard and protect it as the home of our affections and
the sanctuary of our consolations. But it may be asked
Do you mean
then
to
exalt reason and conscience above the Word of God? Do you mean that that Word
should submit itself to our erring human judgments? What we contend for is
simply this
that no doctrine deduced from Scripture by human interpretation
which
is at war with the intellectual and moral nature of man
which is at variance
with the first and plainest directions of the understanding and the conscience
can be the Word of God
and entitled to the authority thence arising. We have
no ideas of God clearer than those belonging to our moral conceptions of Him.
When we say
Lo
God is good
we have a distinct understanding of what we mean
by it. And so we have when we say that He is just and kind and merciful. These
are properties with which reason and Scripture agree to invest Him. Fortified
by these authorities
we take into our minds
and cherish as our greatest
treasure
corresponding moral views of the Divine character. There they are
lodged firmly and abidingly. From them our thoughts and hopes should never be
separated. If
therefore
I perceive anything in the Scriptures which at first
sight appears to be discordant with these views of the character of God I
endeavour
by wider inquiry and deeper search
to find out a more consistent
sense; but if that cannot be found
I say not that God is not the benignant and
merciful Being that I took Him to be
but that from some cause or other I
understand not the passage before me. In this way it is that I would meet and
object to the doctrines of Calvinism. They begin with setting aside the
clearest deductions of reason
and then with sweeping away every notion of
justice and goodness that had fixed its habitation in my soul. Why are the most
impressive appeals made to us in the Scriptures in behalf of the loving
kindness and tender mercy of our God
if neither the reason nor the conscience
of man can understand and feel what
as respects the Divine Being
goodness and
mercy are? In that case goodness and mercy may mean anything or nothing; and to
draw from them any reasons for consolation and trust must be vain and useless.
Our belief will be a belief in a God unknown
and our worship will be the
worship of we know not what. Fear not
then
to use your reason
your
understandings
on the subject of religion; but beware of using them for
purposes of display
for the gratification of your vanity
and the exercise of
your skill. Consider them as talents
for the faithful employment of which you
will have to render an account at the bar of Almighty Justice. Feed the
immortal lamp within you by meditation and prayer
and elevate your souls to
heaven; and then reason
in union with the Word of God
will guide you into the
ways of wisdom
and her ways are the ways of pleasantness
and her paths are
the paths of peace. (T. Madge.)
Repent
and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so
iniquity shall not be your ruin.
Preservative from ruin
I. The assumption of an awful
fact. Iniquity induces ruin. The term ¡§ruin¡¨ occurs but seldom in the sacred
Scriptures. It is
however
one of awful import and aspect; a word ever used in
an evil sense to describe the fearful disaster which has befallen him who was
the subject of it. In the text the word is employed to describe the eternal
misery of the soul.
1. He who is ruined has lost something of which he was formerly in
possession. When an individual meets with sudden reverses of a painful
character in his circumstances
and is called to sustain an extensive
deprivation of property
we are accustomed to say
that such an one is ruined.
But of all the loss and forfeiture which men can sustain
none can possibly be
compared with that which is experienced by him who is ruined by his iniquity.
2. We apply this term to the demolition or destruction of a fabric.
In hell there is nothing witnessed but ruin. Some of the finest and most noble
intelligences ever formed
are there irreparably and eternally ruined. ¡§Morning
stars¡¨ which once sang for joy around the Almighty¡¦s throne are in a state of
wretchedness and perdition. This ruin is:
II. The efficacy of a divine
admonition.
1. Repentance implies the existence of that which is sinful and
erroneous (Romans 3:10-12; Romans 3:23).
2. Repentance comprises a consciousness of having done wrong
a
conviction of sinfulness. We are so accustomed to think of ourselves more
highly than we ought to think
that we need pray earnestly to God to show us
what we are
and to open our eyes to ¡§behold wondrous things out of His law¡¨ (Psalms 119:18).
3. Repentance includes also sorrow for sin; a ¡§godly sorrow¡¨ (2 Corinthians 7:10)
a sorrow wrought in the
heart by the Spirit of God.
4. Repentance is attended with confession of sin. This may be
performed in a two-fold sense: first to God
and secondly to man. (R.
Treffry.)
Breaking the entail of sin
I. The ruin which sin brings
on the sinner.
1. Great.
2. Irreparable.
3. Awfully painful.
4. Inevitable.
II. The means by which ruin
may be prevented.
1. Conviction of sin.
2. Contrition for sin.
3. Confession of sin.
4. Departure from sin.
5. An earnest desire
etc. (E. R. Derby.)
God¡¦s vindication of Himself
I. A serious exhortation.
1. The grounds on which it proceeds. Judgment shall be given
according to our ways.
2. The exhortation--to repentance. Turn away from what is useless
hurtful
loathsome. There must be no reserve.
II. An earnest remonstrance.
¡§Why will ye die?¡¨
1. Is it because your sins are too great to be pardoned?
2. Is it because God commands you to make new hearts and you cannot
do it?
3. No
the reason is
the love of sin.
III. An encouraging
declaration.
1. ¡§So iniquity shall not be your ruin.¡¨ What a God of mercy is here!
2. ¡§I have no pleasure
¡¨ etc. Judgment is His ¡§strange act¡¨; He holds
off from striking till vengeance can slumber no longer. (John D. Lane
M. A.)
A call to the impenitent
I. The characters that are
addressed. Such as are still the subjects of an evil nature
and are still
living in sin against God.
II. The danger that is
indicated. Iniquity is represented as inducing and exposing to ruin. We know
what it is for a man to be ruined in his property--to be reduced from affluence
to poverty--what it is for a man to be ruined as regards his health and
constitution
and
consequently
in those enjoyments that are dependent on
health. We know what it is for a man to be ruined in his character and credit
and everything that renders him respectable in society; but all the notions we
can form of ruin
as referring to these external circumstances
will give us a
very inadequate idea indeed of the ruin that sin induces--the ruin of the soul.
The ruin of the soul implies exquisite
positive suffering
such as no language
can describe--its final condemnation under the curse and wrath of God; a
condemnation that cannot be repealed; a state of banishment from God¡¦s presence
and the glory of His power; final and eternal banishment. It is worth while to
turn our thoughts to this
and to consider how it is that iniquity induces
ruin
at once so dreadful and so awful. In the first place
I would say it
operates in this way
inasmuch as it naturally produces the effect I have
noticed
in robbing the soul of all its excellence. Again
it induces ruin
inasmuch
as it operates in separating the soul immediately from God
who is the source
of felicity
the fountain of good.
III. The only remedy accessible
to sinners is repentance. Do not confound it
I would say
with the sorrow of
the world. A man may be in grief
and may be the subject of great sorrow. This
may not be repentance: sorrow it is; but
you know
there is the sorrow of the
world as well as a sorrow of a godly sort. I would say
do not confound
repentance with the mere fear of punishment. I would say
again
it is not a
mere transitory impression of grief
on account of sin. True repentance
let me
say
implies a knowledge of sin. It is the Holy Spirit alone that can give us
right views on such a subject as this
and can make the Law a schoolmaster
to
bring us to Christ--who can reveal to us the holiness of the law
the extent of
its demands
as it applies not merely towards the actions
but to the thoughts
and intents of the heart. And
in addition to this
repentance also implies the
conviction of sin. The charge is fixed on his conscience
and he cannot throw
it off. He feels that he is in this situation
and he cries
¡§What must I do to
be saved?¡¨ Let me say
too
that conviction will be followed
where it is
genuine
by suitable impressions and emotions. (J. Hill.)
Escape from ruin
I. God will judge us
everyone according to his ways: not according to our plan of our ways
but
according to His. All men will hereafter be judged according to the
dispensation they have been under. Those who are under the law will be judged
by the law; sin in them will be the transgression of their law. Those who are
without the law--that is
without a written law--will be judged without a
written law--by the law of nature written upon their hearts. But those who have
been under the Gospel will be judged by the Gospel.
II. If under this dispensation
we are found impenitent sinners we shall be ruined. Ah! it is a touching thing
to witness what we call ruin
even in this life; to see wringing of hands
and
wringing of hearts
and hopeless grief; but ruin for eternity is infinitely
worse than this; for the grave will soon end earthly sorrows
but the
resurrection from the grave is only the beginning of eternal ruin.
III. If we are found repentant
we shall not be ruined. Repentance has a different character according to the
different conditions of men; but it always implies a change of mind
issuing in
change of conduct
which change of conduct must needs have respect to the
dispensations of religion under which God has brought men. If the Jewish
nation
in a matter that threatened national ruin
repented and turned to God
according to their law
they obtained deliverance from that ruin that otherwise
was coming upon them. If Christians under the Gospel turn to the provisions
under that Gospel
they turn to Christ
and they obtain eternal life through
Him. Conviction of sin
and misery on account of sin
is not repentance. (T.
Snow.)
Verse 31
Make you a new heart
and
a new spirit.
A new heart
I. This is an
exhortation which
in one form or another
every man needs to hear. Here is a
man who has to cross a river. There is no difficulty in crossing--the bridge is
there--it is plain and palpable; but he stops to speculate how the bridge could
have been erected--how it could span the river--and he goes still deeper into
subtleties
and speculates how it is possible that he has the power of crossing
it
and all the while neglects the work before him in theories that amount to
no practical value
if they ever could be decided. Now here is a simple
practical work set before a man--to make himself a new heart and a new spirit.
So far as man¡¦s own immediate action is concerned
there is little reason why
he should perplex himself with controversies or questionings about human
ability and total depravity. I do not say that the truth or falsehood of these
theories is not an important consideration. But I say no man need trouble
himself long with theories
so far as his own immediate duty is concerned
in
this demand for practical action. Another question may be disposed of
when we
consider how practical this appeal is
and that is the question
Who makes a
new heart? Do you make it
or does God make it? Now here
as almost everywhere
else
we find two poles to one truth--one referring to God
and one to man--but
the moment we come to act
they are reconciled. If one warms into earnest
effort upon the idea of having a new heart and a new spirit
the two conditions
of God¡¦s agency and man¡¦s agency will melt together. If he stand still in cold
barren speculation
he freezes to death. And it is a mistake to suppose that
God is not glorified when we dwell upon the point of human action. When we say
you can make a new heart and a new spirit
it is a great mistake to suppose
that we take the glory from God. For whence come all good desires and all right
actions? They proceed from God
and from Him alone. And so do all strength and
all ability. A man does not get an education
any more than a new heart
of
himself. Is it not Providence that furnishes the circumstances which may incite
him to the pursuit of an education
and help him to get it? Is it not
Providence that touches the mysterious processes of the mind by which education
becomes possible? Now suppose we should say
¡§This matter of getting a new
heart is a process of self-education¡¨; it would be reduced to simple terms
and
yet a great many would start from it and say
¡§This won¡¦t do; it is too cold and
naturalistic--too much of human agency to call getting religion a process of
self-education.¡¨ And yet what is self-education but the inspiration and the
life of the Divine? You do not strike God out when you put human agency in. The
fact is just this: God stands ready with His conditions
which are necessary to
all human effort and to all success
whenever man is ready to fall in with
those conditions. When we set the sail
the wind will blow; when we sow the
seed
the agencies that God Himself has prepared in the atmosphere and in the
earth will perform their part; and when we set ourselves to work to make a new
heart
God¡¦s Spirit will breathe upon us and help us to consummate the work. No
man that knows what it is to strive to overcome evil affections within
and
sore temptations without
to grow better and purer
will take anything to
himself in working out that deliverance. If in any degree he shall attain that
end
he will feel that he has had Divine help--that something higher than he
has breathed into him and inspired him. The very process of his work will show
where he touches God
and where God Almighty has helped him
and he will give
all the glory to Him. So it is perfectly consistent with God¡¦s power and glory
to speak to us in the words of the text
¡§Make you a new heart and a new
spirit.¡¨ It is a call to action. What are you waiting for? You will never be in
a better condition than now to make yourself a new heart. The call is at once;
it is now. The Divine agencies are ready; it is only for you to surrender
yourself to the conception of the great purpose and the great aim
and God will
answer
and the blessing will come flowing within.
II. The peculiarity
which this power and privilege of making a new heart exhibits in man. It is a
wonderful thing that a man can make himself a new heart. How all little
shallow scepticisms go down before one grand moral fact! Superficial science
affects to see in man nothing but a superior animal--a highly-developed ape;
and judged solely by its standard
man is but little superior
and in some
respects appears inferior
to the higher order of brutes. But when we seek to
find the true standard of excellence
how distinct he stands from all the
creatures around him! All sealed things he unloosens; all secrets he lays open;
and as he marches on from point to point of civilisation
of glory
of
intellectual attainment
of scientific achievement
by the inward power within
him
the outward world is changed and assumes aspects that reflect his genius
and thought. But there is more than this in man. There is the power of going
into himself
and quarrying in the deep places of his own soul. There is a
power of changing the tendency and plane of his own life. You never heard of
that in the brutes. They all run in the same round
move forward in the same
direction
revolve in the same orbit from age to age. But man has the power of
stopping short
changing his direction
lifting up the level of his life
and
becoming a new being. So it is the inward change that makes him the new being.
It is the new spirit that comes into a man that produces the great and vital
change. This is the new birth of which Christ spoke to Nicodemus. ¡§Make you a
new heart and a new spirit
¡¨ and then you have the new man--then you have new
life. Oh
how wonderfully religion adjusts itself to the great facts and needs
of human nature! for is there anything that could be stated of such immediate
and vital importance as this simple appeal
¡§Make yourself a new heart¡¨? Out of
this change come all other changes. No movement for the regeneration of
society
no measure for the improvement of the world
can be radically
effective but as it comes out of the reservoirs of individual hearts. It is a
good world or a bad world
as men¡¦s hearts are good or bad. How vital
how
radical
then
is the appeal made in the text! In all conditions of life
in
all trims
in all misfortunes
this is what we want--a new heart--and then the
aspect of things will be changed. Because we cannot always change things
themselves. The man that is borne down by calamity cannot alter his calamity.
But make yourself a new heart; fall into harmony with God¡¦s law in the matter;
see your misfortune in a providential point of view
far up in the light of
some higher and grander purpose which God has in store for you
and look if the
thing will be changed. It will stand there as a calamity if you look at it in
your old way; but if you look at it in the light of God¡¦s providence
it will
be a new thing to you. ¡§Make you a new heart.¡¨ How vital this is! It goes below
all things else. It goes to the centre of a man¡¦s personality
and out of it
springs all real life. Not make yourself new brains. We do not want them so
much as hearts. Not new conditions. We see men well endowed with conditions
but
not with the will to use them. We want new hearts; not new intellectual powers.
We cannot make new brains
but we can
every one of us
make a new heart. The
great consideration is
Do we desire a new heart? What is the life within? Are
we selfish? Are we gravitating simply to this world
living within our aims
vain cares
and uses? ¡§Make you a new heart and a new spirit.¡¨ (E. H.
Chapin
D. D.)
The sinner¡¦s duty to make
himself a new heart
This will appear--
I. From the nature
of a new heart. It is a heart that loves
and fears
and serves God. It is
called ¡§new
¡¨ as being entirely another and a different heart from that of the
sinner. The sinful heart is a selfish heart--a heart fixed in its supreme
affections on the world
and opposed to God. A new heart is a heart of
benevolence or love. The sinful heart rejects the Saviour; a new heart believes
in Him. A sinful heart loves sin; the new heart hates it. The sinful heart
leads its possessor into sinful practices; the new heart prompts to a course of
holy obedience to the will of God.
II. From the nature
of man. Man is an intelligent voluntary being. He is capable of knowing his
duty
and of performing it. He has understanding; the power of knowing what is
right and what is wrong. He has the capacity of feeling the motives to right
and wrong action. He has a will or heart; the power of choosing and refusing
or of loving and hating. He not only possesses these powers and capacities
but
he uses them. And the only question is
how ought he to use them? Ought he to
use them right or wrong? With ample powers to love God or to love the world
he
is required to love the one
and forbidden to love the other. Ought he not to
comply? Ought not such a being to put away his old heart of enmity
and to make
himself a new heart of love?
III. God commands
sinners to make themselves a new heart. The text is explicit. The command is
Amend
reform; make you a new heart. The same thing is implied in every other
command of God given to sinners. There is not one which does not require a
right heart--the exercise of those affections in which a new heart consists.
Does God require sinners to love Him? It is with all the heart. Does He require
them to believe? It is with the heart. Does He require them to pray? It is to
seek Him with all the heart. And so of every other command.
IV. The same thing
is evident from facts. It has often been done; and this in two forms. Thus Adam
was once holy--his heart was right with God. Now
in turning from holiness to
sin
he changed his own heart--he made himself a new heart. And surely
if a
man can turn from right to wrong
from holiness to sin
he can turn
and ought
to turn
from sin to holiness
from wrong to right. But this is not all. Every
Christian has
in fact
through grace
made himself a new heart. ¡§Ye have
purified your souls in obeying the truth
through the Spirit¡¨; ¡§Ye have put off
the old man
and put on the new man.¡¨ True
when the sinner does this
he does
it through the Spirit. Still he does it. He purifies his soul. It is his act.
It is an act of obedience. He obeys the truth. And what does God do
when by
His Spirit He brings the sinner thus to act? He causes the sinner to love
to
repent
to believe--to give his heart to God in the exercise of these
affections. It is not God who repents
believes
and loves
but the sinner.
V. If sinners are
not bound to make themselves a new heart
then the law of God is not binding on
men. There can be no sin in violating a law when there is no obligation to obey
it. On the same principle
man has never broken the Divine law. Or
rather
there is no law of God; for a law which imposes no obligation is no law. If
therefore
the sinner has not always been
and is not now
under obligation to
make himself a new heart
or
what is the same thing
to love God
he never has
sinned at all--he commits no sin now. Can any believe this?
VI. The same is
evident from the nature of the Gospel. The Gospel is a system of grace from
beginning to end. Its great atonement by blood--the awakening
renewing
and sanctifying
influences of the Divine Spirit--is all grace. But
as we have seen
if man is
not bound to make himself a new heart
he is not a sinner. Christ
then
has
not died for sinners. He did not come to seek and save those who were
lost--those who deserved eternal death; but those who were innocent. Again: if
the sinner is not bound to make himself a new heart
there is no grace in the
influences of the Holy Spirit. Grace is favour shown to sinners--to the
ill-deserving. If
then
man is not bound to make himself a new heart
without
the aids of the Divine Spirit
then he is not to blame
is not ill-deserving
for not having such a heart
and of course there is no grace in giving him such
a heart.
VII. The character
of God decides the truth of our doctrine. Here I present the simple question of
reason and of equity. Ought the sinner to love the all-perfect God? God
his
Maker
his Preserver
Benefactor
Saviour--God
the best friend he has in the
universe--God
whose character is infinite excellence
combining all that is
comprehensive in wisdom
vast in power
enrapturing in goodness and
mercy--claims the sinner¡¦s heart--claims it of right--claims it under His own
promise and oath to give all He can give to bless. In opposition is arrayed the
world
which deceives
ensnares
corrupts
and destroys the soul forever. And
can reason
can conscience
hesitate as to the reasonableness and the equity of
these opposing claims? Remarks.
1. They who deny the sinner¡¦s power as a moral agent to make himself
a new heart
deny the scriptural doctrine of the Divine influence
or the work
of the Holy Spirit.
2. This subject shows us that ministers are bound to exhort sinners
to make themselves new hearts
and to do nothing
which implies that they are
not to do this.
3. We see the absurdity of the sinner¡¦s plea
that he cannot change
his own heart.
4. We see why the influences of the Holy Spirit are necessary to
change the hearts of sinners.
5. The duty of the sinner to make himself a new heart is to be
regarded by him as a practicable duty. (N. W. Taylor.)
Duty of sinners to make a
new heart
I. What a new
heart is. There is no ground to suppose that it means any new natural power or
faculty of the soul
which is necessary to render sinners capable of
understanding and doing their duty. They are as completely moral agents as
saints
and as completely capable
in point of natural ability
of
understanding and obeying the will of God. Nor can a new heart mean any new
natural appetite
instinct
or passion. Whatever belongs to our mere animal
nature
belongs to sinners as well as to saints. Nor can a new heart mean any
dormant
inactive principle in the mind
which is often supposed to be the
foundation of all virtuous or holy exercises. We may as easily conceive that
all holy affections should spring from that piece of flesh which is literally
called the heart
as to conceive that they should spring from any principle
devoid of activity. This leads me to say positively
that a new heart consists
in gracious exercises themselves; which are called new
because they never
existed in the sinner before he became a new creature
or turned from sin to
holiness. This will appear from various considerations. In the first place
the
new heart must be something which is morally good
and directly opposite to the
old heart
which is morally evil. But there is nothing belonging to the mind
that is either morally good or morally evil which does not consist in free
voluntary exercises. This will further appear
if we consider
next
that the Divine
law requires nothing but love
which is a free
voluntary exercise. And this
I
would further observe
is agreeable to the experience of all who repent
and
turn from their transgressions
and make them a new heart and a new spirit. The
change which they experience is merely a moral change.
II. What it is to
make a new heart. When God says
Be sober--Be vigilant--Be humble--Be
obedient--Be holy--Be perfect--He means that men should put forth truly pious
and holy affections. And so far as these and other Divine precepts respect
sinners
they require the exercise of the same affections
only with this
peculiar circumstance
that they are ¡§new¡¨ or such as they never exercised
before.
III. It is the duty
of sinners to make them a new heart.
1. The mere light of nature teaches that every person ought to
exercise universal benevolence. This duty results from the nature of things.
And surely sinners under the Gospel are no less obliged
by the nature of
things
to put away all their selfish affections.
2. God
who perfectly knows the state and characters of sinners
repeatedly commands them to make them a new heart. When God commands them to
love Him with all their hearts
and their neighbour as themselves; or when He
commands them to repent
to believe
to submit
to pray
to rejoice
or to do
anything else; He implicitly commands them to make them a new heart
or to
exercise holy instead of unholy affections.
And for sinners to
exercise holy affections
is to exercise the new affections in which a new
heart consists.
1. If the making of a new heart consists in the exercising of holy
instead of unholy affections
then sinners are not passive
but active in
regeneration.
2. If sinners are free and voluntary in making them a new heart
then
regeneration is not a miraculous or supernatural work.
3. If it be a duty which God enjoins upon sinners
and which they are
able to perform
to make them a new heart
then there is no more difficulty in
preaching the Gospel to sinners than to saints. (N. Emmons
D. D.)
Man¡¦s duty to remake
himself
I. Man morally has
made himself what he is. The dominant disposition of some is love for sensual
indulgence
of others love for money
of others love for show
of others love
for power and fame. To suppose that Almighty Love and Holiness created
intelligent beings to be inspired and ruled by such dispositions as these is to
the last degree derogatory to the Divine character
and repugnant to all our
moral intuition and a priori reasonings. The moral heart that God
put within man at first had a disposition to love and serve Him supremely.
II. Man morally is
bound to remake himself
1. This is not an impossible work.
There are moral means
supplied by God in the Gospel for the very purpose. What are they? In one word
demonstrations of His infinite love for sinners. The one grand demonstration is
the delivering up of ¡§His only begotten Son¡¨ for the restoration of a guilty
world.
2. This is an urgently important work. ¡§Make you a new heart.¡¨ To
make fame
power
money
these are childish trifles compared with the work of
making a new heart. Your well-being here and yonder
now and forever
is
involved in this work. (Homilist.)
Soul reformation
I. Soul
reformation is an imperative work.
1. It is practicable.
2. It is essential.
II. Soul reformation
is self-work. No one can do this work for you. You may build houses
plant
farms
educate your children by proxy
but this is work that you yourself must
do
and no one else. But how is it to be done? What is the way? Concentrated
thought upon the infinite loving tenderness of that God against whom we have
sinned
as demonstrated in the biography of Christ.
1. Such thought is adapted to the end. Ah! millions of stony hearts
have been transformed into flesh as they have mused on Calvary.
2. Men have the power of giving this concentrated thought. All men
are thinkers
and all men are thinking upon some subjects with more interest
than on others. (Homilist.)
The existence and renewal
of a moral heart in man
(with Ezekiel 36:26):--
I. The existence
of a moral heart in man. Every man is under the all-controlling power of some
one disposition
and this disposition
like the physical heart
beats its
influence in every vein and fibre of the spiritual nature. All the activities
of man are streams from this fountain
branches from this root
pulsations from
this organ.
II. The renewal of
the moral heart in man.
1. As a personal duty.
2. As a Divine gift. ¡§A new heart also will I give you.¡¨ There are
two ways in which God bestows gifts on men. One way is irrespective of his
choice and effort. Life itself and the necessary conditions of life are
blessings that come to us without any effort on our part. But there are other
blessings which He gives only on condition of human effort. He gives crops only
to those who cultivate the fields and sow the grain
knowledge only to those
who observe
investigate
and study. So He gives this new heart only to those
who ¡§consider their ways
¡¨ repent
and believe the Gospel. (Homilist.)
The harmony between Divine
sovereignty and human agency
(with Ezekiel 36:26 and Psalms 51:10):--That these texts are closely related to each other must be
obvious even on the most cursory examination. The same expressions occur in
each of them
and they all clearly point to one and the same subject of
momentous interest. A further attention
however
will show
that while the
subject is the same in all
it is presented in a different light in each. In
all
the one unvaried topic of regeneration is placed before us; but in passing
from one to another
the point of view from which we look upon it is changed.
The first comes from God the Lawgiver; the second comes from God the Redeemer;
the third comes from man the suppliant. The first is the loud and authoritative
voice of Majesty; the second is the still small voice of Mercy; the third is
the humble
earnest voice of Entreaty.
I. The precept.
What place does it hold in this arrangement? What is its office? What good
practical purposes does it serve?
1. This command has evidently made you conscious of your
helplessness
and I call that a practical movement
a very practical
movement--an invaluable result--and the indispensable prerequisite to all
others. Would you ever have known how completely your senses are all sealed in
spiritual sleep but for the authoritative voice of God? and even that
as you
can testify
only like a dying echo
through your dream
crying
¡§Awake
awake
thou that sleepest.¡¨
2. It will not only lead you to think of your weakness and
helplessness
but it will tend to show you how complete and thorough your
impotency is
and to deepen the sense of this upon your soul. Go and try to
make yourself a new heart. Labour to regenerate your own soul. ¡§Whatsoever thy
hand findeth to do
do it with thy might.¡¨ And then tell your success. Break
off every old habit
if you can. Give up every outward act of sin. Mortify the
deeds of the body. But have you changed your heart? Have you given it new
dispositions
new desires
new delights?
3. Besides evoking the testimony of experience and consciousness
the
precept has power to touch the springs of conscience; and without this it would
indeed be utterly inefficient. You may have been ¡§alive without the precept
once
but when the precept comes in spiritual power
sin revives
and you die¡¨
(Romans 7:9). You die to all pride
and peace
and hope. You learn two solemn
truths
which
when taken together
gave you no rest till they mercifully shut
you up to the only remedy. You know your helplessness; but you cannot sit down
contented
for you know also your obligation and responsibility. You know your
obligation but you do not become legalists
for you know also your
helplessness. You feel that you cannot obey; but this does not set all at rest
because you feel that you must obey. You feel that you must obey; but neither
does this settle all
for you also feel that you cannot.
II. The promise.
1. It is obvious that the wisdom of God is wonderfully exhibited in
bringing in the promise at this precise point. If it had come sooner
the soul
would not have been prepared to receive it. If it had come later
the soul
would have been already given over to hopeless despair.
2. How is the grace of God adored by the fainting soul
when
after
the conflict with the precept
the promise comes brightly into view. Like the
same law given to Moses a second time
not amidst thunderings and lightnings
and darkness and tempest
but amidst light
and peace
and favour
all God¡¦s
goodness passing by before His servant
sheltered now in the cleft of the rock;
so here
the preceptive form
which caused the tempest and the terror in the
soul
being all done away
the very same substance
in all its integrity
is
restored
but now beaming in the light and lustre of a free and a gracious
promise
¡§A new heart will I give unto you
a new spirit will I put within
you.¡¨
3. But the grace of God is still more wonderfully glorified by the
consideration
that
while this is the very thing which we need
and which God
offers to bestow upon us
it is also the very thing which we are bound to
render unto Him. Grace abounded when
sympathisingly
He gave me that new heart
which I was unable to make; but grace much more abounded when
forgivingly
He
gave me that new heart which I was bound to make
and guilty in my inability to
make it.
4. And now the sovereignty of Divine grace can be obscured or
concealed no longer. This also the believer is taught to feel and to
acknowledge by reason of his previous discipline under the precept. In learning
his obligation and responsibility
he at the same time necessarily learned the
majesty and kingly authority of God.
III. The prayer. It
appropriately comes last
because it is grounded on
and takes its warrant from
the promise
pleading the fulfilment of the promise that thereby the object of
the precept may be gained. The prayer
when offered
grows out of the promise;
the prayer
when answered
satisfies the precept. The precept teaches man that
he is helpless; the promise tells him there is help; the prayer secures the help.
The precept teaches man that he is responsible and guilty; the promise tells
him there is forgiveness; the prayer obtains the pardon. The precept teaches
man God¡¦s authority; the promise tells of God¡¦s grace; the prayer tries and
tests God¡¦s sufficiency. The precept teaches man his dependence; the promise
declares dependence in God well placed; the prayer puts dependence on God
accordingly. The precept teaches man humility; the promise gives man hope; the
prayer shows man¡¦s trust. The precept gives
scope for God¡¦s righteous justice;
the promise gives scope for God¡¦s faithfulness; the prayer gives scope for
man¡¦s faith. In all cases
the prayer is necessary to complete the cycle; and
if the precept and the promise do but graciously exercise the soul
the prayer
will and cannot but follow. To the prayerless
therefore
there is here very
clear and simple ground for self-examination and self-condemnation. You have
only to plead with God to do all the work to your hands. Will you cast away
eternal joy and court eternal agony by refusing that? (H. Martin.)
Precept
promise
and
prayer
The text connects itself
closely with a topic much debated among theologians
namely
what man can do
or cannot do
in regard to overcoming the bias of a corrupt nature
and making
himself meet for the kingdom of God. This meetness consists in a changed heart
a renewed mind and spirit; and I shall try to show you that
in this Book of
Ezekiel
we have this great mystery brought down to the level of our human
intelligence in a way which
whatever its aspects towards God
puts the fact of
human duty and human accountableness on a foundation which nothing can disturb.
There are three principal passages in Ezekiel bearing upon this subject
which
must always be read and considered together. The first is in the text
where
this inward change is made the subject of a precept: ¡§Make you a new heart and
a new spirit.¡¨ The second is in the eleventh chapter
where the change spoken
of is made the object of a promise: ¡§And I will put a new spirit within you;
and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh.¡¨ The third is in the
thirty-sixth chapter
where
in relation to this promise of a new heart and a
new spirit
it is intimated that the subject is one for earnest prayer: ¡§Yet
for this will I be inquired of by the house of Israel to do it for them.¡¨
I. The precept
¡§Make you a new heart and a new spirit.¡¨ Now what place
in the Divine
arrangements for our conversion
are precepts of this kind supposed to occupy?
What do they mean? What do they assume? What practical effect have they
or
ought they to have
upon our moral conduct and convictions? They are to awaken
us to a conviction of our helplessness
they are to reveal to us our souls¡¦
danger
they are to show to us the deep seatedness of our depravity
they are
to break in upon the slumbers of the natural conscience--in a word
they are to
set us upon making an effort. The effort may be feeble and imperfect and
unpromising
but still an effort it is
and an effort such as
in the case of
any worldly interest being endangered
we should assuredly make
however slight
the chances of success. What man on seeing a huge crag just loosening over his
head
or seeing flames issue from his neighbour¡¦s dwelling house
would omit to
use such means as were within his reach
on the plea
¡§What good would it do?¡¨
However apparently impracticable therefore
precepts of the kind contained in
the text are useful
if only as showing that
as far as regards ourselves
they
are impracticable. They naturally set us upon thinking how the need they have
discovered may be supplied
and the disorders of our moral condition may be
corrected
and the ruin and the death and the helplessness and the condemnation
may be turned from us or taken away. When our Lord ordered the paralytic man to
take up his bed and walk
or the blind man to look and say if he saw aright
He
seemed to be telling them to do that which was impossible. And if they had
thought so
and had made no effort
the evils they were suffering from would have
remained untaken away. But
concurrently with the command went forth an impulse
upon the souls of the men that the command was of God
and that anything
enjoined by Him must be possible. And it is precisely under this aspect that we
are to view the command
¡§Make you a new heart and a new spirit.¡¨ You say you
cannot make it. I say there is a sense in which you can make it
just as much
as at the bidding of Christ a man was able to stretch forth a withered hand. A
command from God
we must always remember
is
in its own nature
an appeal to
human accountableness. It forecloses all excuses. It disallows any possible
ground of exemption. It assumes that there is in every one of us a certain
power of compliance
and therefore convicts of obstinacy and disobedience the
man who does not turn that power to account. And the like principle applies to
the text
and all others of kindred import.
II. The precept
viewed in the light of the promise. This same Ezekiel who is instructed to call
to the house of Israel
¡§Make you a new heart and a new spirit
¡¨ also has it in
charge to deliver as God¡¦s kind assurance to the people
¡§A new heart also will
I give you
and a new spirit will I put within you.¡¨ Everything God does
whether in the material or moral world
is characterised by harmony
proportion
order
law. ¡§As our day
so our strength¡¨; as the command to run
so the grace to draw; as the exhortation ¡§Make you a new heart and a new
spirit
¡¨ so the provision of all needful agencies by means of which this new
creation is to be made. Here then we see how much of light is shed upon the
Divine dealings with us
when we join the promise on to the precept; when we
are brought to see that God never exhorts us to do a thing without putting the
means of compliance within our own reach and power. This viewing the two things
in juxtaposition will be found to rid us at once of a whole host of speculative
difficulties and objections
which might have attached to the precept if it had
stood alone. ¡§Make you a new heart¡¨--change the hue of AEthiop¡¦s skin--turn
back the whole current of your likes and dislikes
and bid the tide set with
equal vehemence the contrary way--this is a hard saying
some will say
hard
and even something more--impossible. Admitted. ¡§With men this is impossible;
but with God all things are possible.¡¨ That which is impossible to the precept
is possible to the promise. We are never allowed to view these two great facts
of the moral world apart. There are two great truths--their authority alike
over the human conscience
and their claims alike to a rational belief. And
these are: first
that the origin
as well as the effective agency
in the work
of our salvation is to be traced to God only; and the other that
in connection
with that work
and as morally furthering that work
much has to be done by the
sinner himself.
III. The precept and
promise together considered in their relation to prayer. Ezekiel had been
commissioned to give the injunction
¡§Make you a new heart¡¨; and a little after
he is told to add that word of consolation
¡§A new heart also will I give you¡¨:
yet lest the promise should inspire presumption
or the precept should lead to
despair
he adds
¡§I will yet for this be inquired of by the house of Israel to
do it for them
said the Lord God.¡¨ The precept speaks of death; the promise
points to life; the prayer is the permitted signal for the resurrection when
challenging the power of the Eternal Spirit to ¡§breathe upon dead souls that
they may live.¡¨ The precept shows us that we have work to do; the promise
evidences that we have not the power to do it; the prayer suggests the use of
certain instituted means
in order that God may do it for us. The precept is
the will of God commanding; the promise is the goodness of God encouraging; the
prayer is helplessness pleading at His footstool with eyes fastened on the
mercy seat
because afraid to look upon the throne. In a word
they form
in
combination
a holy
blessed
and glorious Trinity. For the precept is the
Sovereign Father of the universe enjoining obedience. The promise is the Son of
His love entreating that the offender may be spared. The prayer is the
indwelling Spirit within us waking up the heart to devotion
and showing us
both how to wrestle and prevail with God. Wherefore
that ye may be able to
keep the precept
pray; that ye may have part in the promise
pray; that ye may
have the spirit of effectual fervent prayer
pray. Keep the end of all in
view--¡§A new heart and a new spirit
¡¨ a changed judgment and restored
affections
a submitted will and a heavenly mind. (D. Moore
M. A.)
The formation of a new
heart
I. it what is to
be understood by the heart and spirit. We are conscious of the power of
perception
reason
memory
and volition. These are essential properties of the
soul. We are likewise sensible of the affections
or those free
voluntary
moral exercises
which are the powers
or properties
of the heart. When the
Scriptures speak of the heart as being changed
or made new
they always mean
the affections
or volitions
or free
moral exercises. To these they uniformly
attach praise
or blame
because they are free and voluntary.
II. What is to be
understood by the new heart and new spirit. These are new and right exercises
or new and right affections. They are those free
moral exercises
which are in
conformity to the revealed will of God
and sanctified by His Spirit. As the
heart consists in voluntary exercises and affections
these in the impenitent
sinner are wrong
and must be changed in order to be right. They must be withdrawn
from improper objects
and directed in a right channel. They must be withheld
from all undue attachment to this vain world
and placed on God
and heavenly
things
as the supreme good. The general tenor of the life must likewise be in
obedience to the Divine commands. When any sinner by true repentance returns to
these good exercises
he has a new heart and a new spirit
and is become a new
creature. His old
wrong affections are changed into new
right affections
and
his good exercises in the obedience of his life prove him to be a new man.
III. How sinners can
make to themselves this new heart. The first steps are to cast away all
transgression
to repent of every sin
to forsake every evil and false way
and
then enter upon a life of new obedience. Sinners must first cease to do evil
and then learn to do well. Neither must they be content with external
obedience. They must withdraw their love
or undue attachment
from this vain
world and set their affections on things above. As the new heart consists in
new
right affections
and in those free
moral exercises which are agreeable
to the will of God; therefore to form this
every sinner must abandon those
desires and voluntary exercises of the mind
heart
and life which are wrong
and forbidden
and enter upon those that are right and commanded by God. If
anyone do this with a sincere desire after new and constant obedience
he will
by the blessing of God have a new heart and a right spirit
and enjoy the
evidence of it in his own breast. Lessons--
1. We infer the greatness
the urgency
and reasonableness of the
work.
2. If the making of a new heart consist principally in casting away
all transgressions by sincere repentance
and entering upon a new life
then
resolutions this way are the first steps to become really good
and ought to be
constant exercises in order to continue so.
3. If the heart consist in free
moral exercises
as the Scriptures
view it
then every man must be active in his own conversion
or regeneration
or in obtaining a meetness for the enjoyment of God.
4. We see on this view of the subject a constant call for active
exertion
watchfulness
and circumspection
and also a foundation for that
spiritual warfare represented by Paul.
5. No one has more moral goodness
or holiness
than he has good
or
holy
exercises.
6. The work of becoming and continuing good both in heart and life
lies with every one of you to perform for yourselves under the assistance and
grace of God. (Pitt Clarke.)
Conversion a radical and
entire change
Manton says: ¡§A wolf may
be scared from his prey
but yet he keepeth his preying and devouring nature.¡¨
He has not lost his taste for lambs
though he was obliged to drop the one
which he had seized. So a sinner may forego his beloved lust
and yet remain as
truly a sinner as before. He gives up the drink for fear of losing his
situation
or dying of disease
but he would be at his liquor again if he
dared. The fear of hell whips him off some favourite vice
and yet his heart
pines for it
and in imagination he gloats over it. While this is the case
the
man in the sight of God is as his heart is: the muzzled wolf is still a wolf
the silenced swearer is still profane in heart
the lewd thinker is still an
adulterer. Something is done when a wolf is scared or a transgressor driven out
of his evil ways
yet nothing is done which will effectually change the wolf or
renew the ungodly heart. A frightened sinner is a sinner still. Like the
frightened dog
he will return to his vomit; and like the sow that was washed
he
will wallow in the mire again as soon as opportunity offers. ¡§Ye must be born
again¡¨:--this is the only effectual cure for sin. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Why will ye die
O house of Israel?--
Expostulation with the
impenitent
I. Several
important truths are here taken for granted.
1. That all unrepenting sinners will assuredly die.
2. That God is extremely reluctant to execute the fatal sentence.
3. That sinners may yet
if they will
escape eternal death.
II. Why will ye
die?
1. Is it because you seriously believe that the pleasures of sin
with death at the end of them
are better than holiness
with heaven for its
reward?
2. Is it because you have satisfied yourself that the warnings of the
Bible are without foundation? that there is
in reality
no death of the soul
hereafter
no hell for the ungodly
no heaven for the righteous?
3. Is it because
while you profess to believe the Bible
you still
inconsistently doubt whether sin will end in everlasting death?
4. Is it because there are in the world multitudes as careless
or as
wicked
as yourself; and you think it impossible that so many should all be in
the way to destruction? In answer to this reason
let us ask ourselves
What is
all the world to us in this matter? God speaks to us individually.
5. Is it because death and judgment seem to be far off; and
therefore
although you do not wish to perish
yet you suppose it is time
enough yet to turn and repent? If so
I must plainly tell you that you are
to
all intents and purposes
choosing eternal death. You have no real intention to
turn to God at a future day: you do but deceive your own soul. (J. Jowett
M. A.)
Why will ye die
I. We are not
settled in our religious faith. We do not know whether the Bible is true or
not. We do not know whether Christ is God or not. Are you
in the passage of
the years
getting any nearer a decision? Why do you not go into this subject
and go through it? If your child be sick
and you do not know whether it is
just a common cold or the diphtheria
you pursue the doctor until you find out.
Now
I do not blame you for not becoming Christians
but I do blame you for
taking neither the one side nor the other. Through all these years you have
been in a fog. You know the steamship Atlantic went on the rocks in a
fog; you know that the Arctic and the Vesta struck in a fog; you
know that only a little while ago the steamship Schiller went down with
nearly all on board in a fog; and it is amid the same kind of circumstances
that some of you are going to shipwreck. Did Darwin
or Tyndall
or Herbert
Spencer ever help a man to die? When the surges of death rise mountain high
would you rather be in this staunch frigate of the Gospel--a frigate of ten
thousand tons--or in the leaky yawl of scepticism?
II. Another reason
why men do not come into the kingdom of Christ is because they are of the
opinion that the present is of more importance than the future. I have noticed
that everything depends upon the standpoint you take when you look at
everything. We stand so deep down in the ¡§now¡¨ that we cannot see into the
great ¡§hereafter.¡¨ If we could stand between the two worlds
and look that way
and this way
then we might make a more intelligent comparison as to the value
of these two worlds--this and the next. In other words: the farthest on we can
get in this life--yea
the very last point of our earthly existence--will be
the best point in which to estimate the value of these two worlds. And so I
call upon all the dying population of Christendom
I call upon all the
thousands who are now departing this life and I ask them to give testimony in
this matter. They say: ¡§My head on this wet pillow
I look one way and I look
the other way. I see Time: I see Eternity. How brief the one: how long the
other. I never saw it so before. Hand-breadths against leagues. Seconds against
cycles. I put my wasted and trembling hand--my left hand--on the world that I
am leaving
and I put my wasted and trembling hand--my right hand--on the world
that I am entering
and for the first time I see how small is the one and how
vast is the other.¡¨
III. Another reason
why men do not accept the Lord Jesus Christ and become Christian
is because
they are of the opinion that the matters of the soul are not urgent
pressing
and imminent. They have their reception day. They say: ¡§Let Business enter.¡¨
Business enters
is interviewed
passes out. They say: ¡§Let Pleasure enter.¡¨
Pleasure enters
is interviewed
passes out. They say: ¡§Let Worldly Knowledge
enter.¡¨ Worldly Knowledge enters
is interviewed
passes out. After thirty or forty
years
they say: ¡§Let Religion enter¡¨ And they look; but religion has got tired
of waiting
and is gone. That queen of heaven
standing in the ante-chamber of
the heart
ought to have been received first. Her first tap on the door ought
to have brought the response
¡§Come in--come in.¡¨ (T. De Witt Talmage.)
The needlessness of man¡¦s
ruin
The question implies:
1. That man is made to act from reason.
2. That man is amenable to his Maker for the reasons that influence
him.
3. That notwithstanding man¡¦s rational and responsible nature
he is
pursuing a course of self-destruction.
I. The decrees of
God do not render your ruin necessary. But does not Paul teach that God makes
vessels for dishonour as well as vessels for honour? No. All that he avers is
that He could do so. And it is to the glory of God¡¦s benevolence to assert
that whilst He could make and organise creatures for misery
He has never done
so. Let the naturalist search through all the endless species of animal life
let him take the microscope
and let him find one single creature amongst the
smallest
and say
This little creature was evidently made to suffer
was
organised for misery--is a vessel built for dishonour. No
God could
but He
does not.
II. Your sinful
condition does not render your ruin necessary. Why is this? Because the Gospel
makes provision for you in your present state. There lies a man on the bed of
suffering. A malignant and painful disease has done its work on his
constitution; in a few hours
unless some remedy come
he must breathe his
last. A skilful physician enters the room; he has in his hand a little
medicine
which if taken will inevitably restore him. It is offered to him
pressed on him
and he has yet power to take it. Need that man die? If he
refuse the remedy he must die
but since the remedy is offered
and he has the
power to take it
his death is needless. It is thus with the sinner
he is
infected with the malady of sin
he is on the margin of death; but here is the
remedy
the Great Physician of Souls is at his side
offering an infallible
antidote.
III. The external
circumstances in which you are placed do not render your ruin necessary. Bad
thoughts may be conveyed to your mind
bad impressions made on your hearts
but
they need not harm you; you have a power to transmute them into spiritual
nourishment. Remember that some of the most eminent saints that ever lived have
been amongst most trying and tempting circumstances. Remember that the more
trying your circumstances may be
the more corrupt the society in which you
live
the more need there is for you to carry out noble principles.
IV. The condition
on which salvation is offered does not render your ruin necessary. ¡§He that
believeth shall be saved
¡¨--¡§He that believeth hath everlasting life.¡¨ Now
belief as an act is one of the most simple. It is as natural to believe an
evident truth as it is to see. Moreover
man has a strong propensity to
believe. His credulity is his curse. It is this that has given to the world
those monstrous systems of error under which it has been groaning for ages. But
what must we believe in order to be saved? If it be responded
The facts of the
Gospel
I ask
Are there any facts attested by clearer or more potent evidence?
Or
if it be said
The principles of the Gospel
then we declare that those
principles are moral axioms
and recommend themselves to the intuitions and
felt necessities of the human soul. Or
should it be replied
It is faith in
the Author of the Gospel--the living
loving
personal Christ--then we ask
What character is so adapted to enlist your faith and inspire your confidence?
(Homilist.)
Voluntary sin and
self-destruction
I. What death is
here intended?
1. It is not the dissolution of the body; that is not the death here
referred to
for how manifest it is that it is not subject to the will of man!
2. It is the ruin of the soul
or the inheritance of everlasting woe.
II. Impenitent men
die this death.
1. The Scriptures in the strongest manner assert that ¡§except a man
be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.¡¨
2. The Scriptures go further
and represent impenitent men as
determined upon this death. When the voice of Calvary speaks out in tenderness
and love
when that voice comes forth from every wound and is heard in every
groan of our dying Lord
calling on them
¡§Turn ye
turn ye
why will ye
die?¡¨--if the sinner still travels onward
and turns not at the voice of mercy
is there no wilfulness in it?
3. They form a character for perdition
knowing that none other than
a holy character can possibly fit them for heaven.
III. Upon what
principle do they act in thus conducting themselves?
1. It is not because God delights in the death of a sinner. Do you
think the father has any pleasure in the act by which he discards his
incorrigible son; the son with whom he has reasoned
and wept
and prayed; the
son before whom he has spread all the evils of his conduct
and the inevitable
ruin to which it must bring him?
2. It is not because of any difficulty on the part of God. There was
a difficulty
and there is a controversy now between you and God; but then that
controversy may be settled; and through the blood of Jesus Christ the
difficulty is removed out of the way to enable you to return.
3. It is not because there is any difficulty in the revelation of the
salvation of God
or in the atonement for sin. The Bible is represented as a
lamp to our feet; like the sun
it shines on our path
so that the guilty
sinner may
from the Word of God
from the fulness and completeness of the
revelation
see with perfect distinctness the way in which a sinner may again
be brought from his wanderings and received into the favour of God. Nor is
there any deficiency in the atonement.
4. It is not because sufficient pains have not been taken with man.
Were there no pains taken on the part of God to save men from going down to
perdition when He gave up His own Son to die for them? Again
has not the Son
of God taken pains
in leaving the glory which He had with the Father
and
coming down
down into the degradation of taking our nature upon Him? Did Jesus
Christ take no pains for your salvation?--He who
when on earth
was a Man of
sorrows and acquainted with grief. Then has the Holy Ghost taken no pains in
inspiring holy men to write this wonderful Book
in striving with you
in following
you up year after year
in meeting you in the house of God
in meeting you in
the way that you go and in your business
in striking solemn thoughts upon your
mind
and arresting your attention
and causing you to think of death
and of
judgment
and of eternity?
5. If you die this death it will not be because God¡¦s commands are
unreasonable. They are
Repent
believe in His Son
and live a holy life. Is it
unreasonable that God should call on the sinner to stop in a single moment;
that he should not take another step in the wrong way?
6. It is not because the will of the sinner is forced or constrained
that he therefore dies. Did you ever do anything in your life against your
will? Is it possible for you to do anything contrary to your own will? I do not
ask you whether you have done anything contrary to your feelings
anything
different from what you liked; but whether you have done what was contrary to
your own will? If the sinner then is not constrained
if we act according to
our own wishes
and make up our own minds
then how true is the position I have
taken
that men die this death
because they will die it! What would you say of
a man who should set out from London
saying he intended to go to Birmingham
and with a distinct knowledge of the geography of the country
should take his
seat on a coach that was going to Dover? And what
if when he was told by the
coachman again and again
¡§This road leads to Dover
and every mile brings us
nearer and nearer to Dover¡¨--what would you think of him if he said
¡§Well
I
hope before I arrive there
somehow or other
to be brought to Birmingham¡¨? You
would say that the man was not acting according to good sense
and you would
say right. Well
what is the condition of the sinner? What is his conduct? He
is travelling wilfully along a road which he knows will not lead him to heaven.
And this is the language which God addresses to him
¡§Why will ye die?¡¨ Why do
you go the wrong road?
Why will ye die
Imagine yourselves amidst
Alpine scenery. Yonder is a broad road which leads to the edge of a
precipice--the precipice overhangs a deep dark gulf. Out of the broad road
there is a path--a narrow path winding about among the rocks--difficult of
ascent
but terminating in a region of Eden-like beauty. A band of travellers
thoughtless and light-hearted
are pressing along the highway
and nearing the
edge of the abyss. There are barriers set up--there are beacons raised--there
are warnings given--there are guides close by earnestly advising them to turn
aside
and climb up the narrow footpath. But while a few are persuaded to do
so
the multitude
in spite of all which is done to prevent it
press onwards
and reach the edge
and fall over
one by one
into the yawning depth--and even
their ruin does not suffice to warn their followers. The rest rush to the awful
margin
and sink into that enormous grave! You say this is unparalleled folly.
No
not unparalleled. Folly equal--nay
greater--is commonly displayed by the
children of men.
I. The nature of
your ruin.
1. It is the death of pleasure--the end of all delight--the putting
out of the last taper of enjoyment
so that nothing is left but deep
dense
darkness--the quenching of all those vain joys (the only joys the ungodly can
ever know of) which are likened in Scripture to the crackling of thorns under
the pot.
2. It is the death of hope. Everlasting punishment! It cannot mean
that after a while the soul
cleansed by penal fires
shall recover its purity.
It cannot mean that out of the depths of hell it shall mount up to heaven.
3. It is the death of love. ¡§Hateful and hating one another
¡¨ are
words which will apply more emphatically to the future than the present state
of sinners--that is the most tremendous condition to which creatures can be
reduced. To that depth of wretchedness unsaved sinners will be hereafter
reduced.
4. It involves exclusion from heaven
from that world of which
Scripture gives us such bright and attractive visions: from ¡§our Father¡¦s
house¡¨; from ¡§the city of habitation¡¨; from ¡§the temple of God and the Lamb¡¨;
from ¡§paradise¡¨; from ¡§the tree
and from the fountain of life¡¨; from those
regions where ¡§there is no curse--neither shall there be any more pain.¡¨
5. It involves exclusion from the society of the really great and
good
God¡¦s true nobility
¡§the innumerable company of angels¡¨; the great cloud
of witnesses; ¡§the church of the first-born whose names are written in heaven¡¨;
¡§the spirits of the just made perfect¡¨; ¡§the glorious company
of the apostles
the goodly fellowship of the prophets
the noble army of martyrs.¡¨
6. It involves exclusion from the Father of an infinite Majesty¡¨;
¡§from His holy
true
and everlasting Son¡¨; ¡§the King of glory¡¨; ¡§also the Holy
Ghost the Comforter¡¨; ¡§Depart from Me.¡¨
II. The author of
your ruin. The fact of the sinner¡¦s self-destruction is apparent from--
1. The character of God. He is a God of truth and justice. Would this
be true if the final destruction of the sinner depended not on himself
but was
the result of an arbitrary and irresistible decree? if immortal souls were the
helpless and hapless victims of an iron-handed destiny? But God is merciful as
well as just. To suppose after this that any man¡¦s eternal destruction does not
lie at his own door--but is the consequence of the Divine will arbitrarily exercised
is monstrous.
2. The character of the Gospel. Look at the Babe of Bethlehem
and
the Man of Sorrows--at Him who wept over Jerusalem--at the agonised Sufferer in
the Garden--at the Crucified One.
3. The character of man. There is a conscience in man. Conscience
would have no meaning if man were not free
if his actions were not free
his
determinations free
his thoughts free.
4. The character of his future condition. That condition will be a
condition of punishment. What does punishment imply? Guilt. The righteous may
be oppressed
afflicted
persecuted
but they cannot be punished; only the
guilty can be punished. That which God calls punishment
which the Bible calls
punishment
must come as the fruit of sin
the offspring of guilt. Therefore
the sinner must incur it himself.
III. The reason of
your ruin. Most of you
in reply to the question of the text--Why will ye
die?--would have to say
Because we love the pleasures of the world more than
the joys of eternal life; because we desire the approbation of men more than
the honour that cometh from God; because we covet the possession of earth more
than the inheritance of heaven; because we are addicted to the ways of sin
and
are not disposed to break off our evil habits; because we have been living in impenitence
and unbelief
and have no mind to change our course. Thus you destroy
yourselves for the sake of the world
for the sake of sin. The guilt
folly
shame
and ignominy of the suicide belong to you. To destroy oneself is
considered so monstrous an act that the man who commits it is generally
pronounced insane. When not insane
when the case is brought in felo de se
the
miserable mortal is treated even in death as an outlaw
and his remains are
cast forth with every circumstance of dishonour and disgrace
as no longer
within the pale of humanity. In the great inquest of the Last Day
the finally
impenitent will come under a verdict of wilful insanity; will be regarded as
having acted the part of the madman
with all the culpability of the voluntary self-assassin
and will therefore be cast beyond the bounds of the holy city
flung into the
pit of Gehenna
to mingle with the refuse of the universe. (John Stoughton.)
Self-destruction
I. The nature of
eternal death.
1. A state of conscious existence.
2. A state of deprivation.
3. A state of hideousness.
II. The question
proposed.
1. There is no necessity for it in the nature of God.
2. There is no necessity in the will of man.
3. There is no necessity on account of our circumstances. (W. W.
Whythe.)
Why will ye die
I. What is this
word with which my text ends? for upon that the whole stress of the matter
evidently depends: ¡§Why will ye die?¡¨ You have bent over the dying
or over the
dead; you have watched that face
which used to speak to you with such meaning
gathering blankness and darkness; you have seen those eyes
which once sparkled
upon you with intelligence
become glazed
and dead
and fixed. That is death.
We all know what it is; but whose death is that? What are the first words they
speak when it is all over--when the blankness and nothingness have succeeded to
anxiety? ¡§He is gone!¡¨ Those are the words: ¡§He is gone!¡¨ Then it was not he
that died! It was something belonging to him which underwent a change; but it
was not the man that died. That affected the body; but it did not affect the
person. We do not say that when a brute dies beneath our eyes; we do not
attribute to a brute that sort of doubleness--that he should be in one place
and the carcass in another; and therefore
when this text says
¡§Why will ye
die?¡¨ it does not allude to the death of the body--it does not allude to that
of which I have just been speaking; but I have been speaking of that that I
might take it for an example--that I might take it for a guide to that more
mysterious and less well-known thing to which the text does allude. We have
already spoken of this person
this personality
this he
this I
this you
which does not die upon the bed of death
which is not crushed by the power of
the accident
which remains and exists on. Now what is this? We never consider
the brute creature
the poor dumb animal
as we express it
responsible; we do
not consider that he
or it
rather
can give an account; we do not consider
in any proper sense of the word
that it can do right
or can do wrong. But the
moment you get to a human body
whether that human body is man
woman
or
child
if that human body is only in possession of reason and of sense
you
cannot divest yourself of that idea of responsibility If he does right--I am not
saying now whether he is right or wrong in this which follows
but--there is a
certain sort of self-congratulation follows upon it
and he knows he has done
right. If he does wrong
supposing him to be an ordinary man
and not
absolutely
blinded by the power of habitual sin--if he does wrong in the
common and broad acceptation of the word
his conscience in some measure
accuses him.
II. Now
this may
lead us to know and to feel
as indeed all mankind of sound mind have known and
have felt
that this personality of which we speak is a lasting and enduring
thing
which shaft give an account. You cannot deny it. Well
then
let us go
back
if you please
to this bed of death
of which we spoke just now. Let us
carry onward that scene a little further. Let us pass--it is a remarkable
sentence of the greatest
of English preachers--¡§from the freshness and the
fulness of the cheeks of childhood to the horror and loathsomeness of a three
days burial.¡¨ And what do we see there? The body is broken up; it is become a
seething mass of foul and degraded and loathsome life--a life not its own--a
life which did not belong to its beautiful and harmonious construction. Its
parts are gone
or are going
each to their way; the solid to the dust of the
earth
the liquid to the mighty ocean. It is dispersed; it is passed away. ¡§It
is sown a corruptible body.¡¨ It is sown in shame and in contempt. Though it
was
perhaps
the dearest of things on earth to us a few days ago
we have put
it out of our way; we have buried our dead out of our sight. And that is the
death of the body. Now
is there not something very analogous to that--I mean
very like it
something which follows the same rules--in the death of man¡¦s
immortal spirit? But what is the death of the spirit? Can you not easily
conceive it? Is it not obvious to the simplest of our thoughts
that the spirit
of man may
and
alas! does
fall into disharmony with all these its powers
just like the beautiful organs of the body may fall out with one another; that
the spirit may present
in its way and in its condition
something like the
terrible and loathsome scene which we just now witnessed with regard to the
body after death? But then
notice all this remarkable difference. The body
as
I have said
falls asunder; God shall build it up again. For the present it
perishes; but there can be no cessation
there can be no syncope
in the life
of the spirit; the spirit must live on
in the midst of this death--must exist
on
perhaps I should rather say
and for this night keep the word ¡§living¡¨ and
the word ¡§life¡¨ to their glorious and more proper meaning. The spirit exists
on
then
divided against itself; miserable
and in discord; all its powers
wasted
all its energies spent in self-remorse.
III. Now comes
another most important point to our present consideration
and it is this--how
came about this death? What has it to do with man¡¦s will? Now
these at first
sight are very difficult questions
and they are questions with which it would
have been utterly impossible for us to deal had not the Holy Spirit been given
to us to enable us to deal with them. ¡§God created man upright.¡¨ He created him
to follow out the intention of his spirit gifted with judgment and the body; of
both of which we have been now speaking. But God did not bind him to his
liberty in this way
and to his joy
and to his ultimate end
of reaching after
and getting to glory hereafter. He left him free; and this is one of the
greatest dignities with which our nature was gifted of God--that it was not
made like any tribe of the brute creation
always to run in the same channel
to be incapable of advance or improvement; but it was made free to stand and
free to fall. What lay before it was an object of adoration
reverence
and
obedience; and with temptation before it
and God¡¦s grace ready to help
man
was then put into a state of trial
and man fell. Death came into the world by
sin. Sin shifted the centre of man¡¦s soul. Before
he could have gone on
revolving round that centre in beautiful obedience; after sin
he has become
in the technical sense of the word
eccentric. He now revolves no longer round
God
his proper centre
but he has sought an orbit of his own
and this leads
him into disarrangement and disagreement
and all those things of which we have
been speaking
as ending and issuing in the death of the soul. Well
then
you
will say to me
if this is the case
what has the will of God to do with it?
How can this be said to us
and how can God plead with us in the text
¡§Why will
ye die?¡¨ If death came into the world by sin
if the death of the body is
the result of sin--a result which neither you nor I nor anyone can avoid--how
can it be said of the death of the soul
¡§Why will ye die?¡¨ Is not that a
necessary result of sin too? Now we are come to the point
you see
of these
words having been necessarily spoken
and the whole truth of this chapter
necessarily written to a people in covenant with God. God has provided a way
out of this death. It has pleased Him not to provide any way out of natural
corporeal
bodily death. ¡§If Christ be in you
¡¨ says the apostle
¡§the body is
dead because of sin
but the spirit is life
because of righteousness.¡¨ There
is just the distinction. God has bound upon us all death according to the
flesh; but He has not bound upon us all death according to the spirit
although
it is our own state by nature
out of which we must be helped
if we are to get
out of it at all
and that help He has graciously given us. Christ died that we
might live; He lives that we might live forever. He has become the head of our
nature; He has become to us the source of grace and of help
the help of the
Holy Spirit of God
to overcome our evil dispositions
to help us to regulate
our tempers
to glorify and adorn Him in our station in life
to be better men
better fathers
better husbands
better brothers and sisters
better citizens
better in everything than we were before.
IV. What is the
life of the spirit? Wherever you live in this world
and about whatever you are
employed in this world
there is a life put in the power of the spirit of this
kind; there is no situation in life that excludes from it. You must seek it
in
fact
in your ordinary occupations. There is the first thing. God will be found
of each one of us in the path of life that He marks out for us. He gives us
it
is most true--and blessed be His name for it!--He gives us such days as this
when we can assemble together to hear of these things; but He does not give us
the invitation to come
and draw near
and live on this day only. He gives us
again
times of sorrow
times of solemn thought
times of bereavement; and I
believe that when we get to the other side of the water
and look back upon the
map of our present course
we shall see that these were our green places
and
these were our still waters of comfort
and these were our recallings to Him.
But these are not the only times when He calls us. Every day
and all day long
He is calling us. The mechanic who lifts his arm to do his ordinary work--in
every lifting of that arm is God pleading
¡§Why wilt thou die?¡¨ The man who
goes forth to his daily labour by the light of His glorious sun - every beam
that is shed upon him pleads with him
Why wilt thou die?¡¨ The man who lies
down to sleep at night
wherever he be--his preservation in those hours of
slumber--the sweet rest that he obtains--is but another pleading with him
¡§Why
wilt thou die?¡¨ And so we might go on through all the common pathways of
ordinary life
grimed as they are with labour
looked down upon as mean
and
considered by some as having nothing to do with this matter
and we might show
you that they are all means of grace. Now
it needs very little reminding of
mine to go on with such considerations as these
and to say that this life of
your spirit consists
in the very first place
in the continual recognition of
God by you. God must be the centre round whom your spirits are to revolve in
the ordinary orbit of life. You must look at His will; that will must be a
guide to you. You must look at His word; that word must be a lamp to your feet
and a light to your paths. (Dean Alford.)
The Divine compassion for
sinners
The text is brief but
comprehensive
and most affecting; and the question which it contains is
strikingly illustrative of the tenderness and compassion of Him who condescends
in mercy to ask it. Surely there is in it something which ought to excite our
admiration of Divine condescension
and to call forth from our hearts songs of
grateful and adoring praise.
I. ¡§Why will ye
die?¡¨ Is it because you have concluded that God the Father is unwilling to save
you? Who is this lying in Gethsemane¡¦s garden prostrate on the ground
whose
sweat is
as it were
great drops of blood? It is the Son of God. And who is
that crucified on the heights of Calvary
¡§whose long reiterated cry bespeaks
His soul¡¦s deep agony¡¨? Who can the Sufferer be
when the sun refuses to behold
His dying torment
and the rocks are rent
and the graves give up their dead
and earth is convulsed to its inmost centre? It is the Son of God! What stronger
or more affecting pledge could He have given of His love to sinners
and of His
desire to rescue them from death and hell
than when
in order to deliver them
He poured the vials of His wrath on the head of His only
His beloved
His
eternal Son? Can you steel your hearts against such tenderness? Can you still
live without God
without hope
without prayer
without concern about your
souls
though they must very soon enter the world of spirits and
eternity--share either the bliss of that house with many mansions
or the
unutterable woe of the damned in hell? Can you any longer resist the Father¡¦s
merciful inquiry
¡§Why will ye die?¡¨
II. Is not Jesus an
almighty Saviour
the very Saviour whom you need? You have nothing to bring to
God as the procuring price of your forgiveness. If this were the case
we would
pronounce your condition hopeless. But the ground of pardon and acceptance is
the active and passive obedience
the doing and dying of the Son of God. He is
revealed to you as the very Saviour who can meet all the exigencies of your
case
who has a fulness of merit to justify and of grace to sanctify. Why
then
will ye die? The burden of your guilt may be very heavy
but it is not
too heavy for the hand of an Almighty Saviour to take it off
for He has an arm
that is full of strength. Your stains may be very dark and very deep
but not
too deep for the blood of the Lamb to remove them
and to make you whiter than
the snow. Your fetters may be very strong and very tightly bound
but not too
tightly to prevent Emmanuel from executing the very purpose of His mission and
death
in setting the lawful captive free. Your disease may be deeply seated
it may be very inveterate
but not too inveterate to yield to the healing
virtue of the Balm in Gilead
and the restoring skill of the Physician there.
III. Are ye not most
cordially invited to come to Christ and live? Is degrading vassalage a feature
of your natural state--are you naturally led captive of Satan at his will? Then
are you invited to take the remedy and live
for it is written
¡§Turn to the
stronghold
ye prisoners of hope
for even today do I declare that I will
render to you double.¡¨ Is pollution and depravity a feature in your case? Then
are you invited to take the remedy and live
for it is written
¡§I will
sprinkle clean water upon you
and ye shall be clean; from all your filthiness
and from all your idols will I cleanse you.¡¨ Is it a feature in your case that
you are burdened with a load of guilt
and ready to sink beneath its pressure
down to the lowest hell? Then are ye invited to take the remedy and live
for
it is written
¡§Come unto Me all ye that labour and are heavy laden
and I will
give you rest.¡¨ Are poverty
and nakedness
and blindness features in your
case? Then are ye invited to take the remedy and live
for again it is written
¡§I counsel thee to buy of Me gold tried in the fire
that thou mayest be rich;
and white raiment
that thou mayest be clothed
and that the shame of thy
nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eye-salve
that thou mayest
see.¡¨ Poor sinners! Is it a feature in your case that through grace you are
willing to be saved? Then are ye invited to take the remedy and live
for it is
written
¡§Whosoever will
let him take the water of life freely.¡¨ Why then will
ye die?
IV. Does not the
Spirit
by His common operations
strive with you to induce you to close with
the offered Saviour and live? Have you never had momentary convictions at least
that all was not right with you; that your religion was but a cold
heartless
dead profession
and that your hopes (if hopes you at all entertained)
instead
of being based on the immovable foundation laid in Zion
were like the spider¡¦s
web
at the mercy of every wind that blows? The Spirit was then striving with
you
although you grieved and quenched Him. Perhaps He is striving with you at
this moment. We implore you
resist not His operations--stifle not the
convictions He imparts--grieve Him not away
for each time that you quench the
Spirit is just a step in advance towards the commission of that sin which is
never forgiven.
V. Are ye
after
mature deliberation
finally and firmly resolved to reject all that can make
you happy and to court all that can make you miserable? Eternal Spirit! draw
nigh in preventing grace
touch and soften every heart
that all may listen to
the affecting question
Why will ye die? (A. Leslie.)
A Divine appeal
I. Why will ye
die?
1. For death is so awful; not the extinction of thought
feeling
memory. Rich man in hell (Luke 16:1-31). Loss of all happiness; hope. Exclusion from God and all that is
pure and holy; dwelling in the place prepared for the devil and his angels.
2. How life is provided (John 3:16; 1 John 5:11; John 10:10). Deliverance from condemnation; freedom from the power of sin;
holiness now
blessedness forever.
II. Why will ye
die?
1. For you are surrounded by Gospel privileges.
2. For your punishment will be the more severe (Matthew 11:21; Luke 12:47-48; Matthew 23:14).
III. Why will ye die
Whoever is lost wills it. If otherwise
God¡¦s character is tarnished. The
Gospel is a delusion. Man is incapable of guilt--remorse (John 5:40; Ezekiel 18:32; Deuteronomy 30:19).
IV. Why will ye
die?
1. Because they love their sins better than their souls.
2. Because they will not give time to the serious consideration of
these things.
3. Because they refuse to believe in any danger. (Homilist.)
Verse 32
I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth.
The mercy of God
I. The benevolence
of God¡¦s own character. He who is love
and who delights therefore only in
happiness
being at the same time a holy and just Governor
must no doubt
punish sin
and punish it severely; but never can He punish for the sake merely
of giving pain
nor can He ever find any pleasure in the death of him that
dieth
viewed in itself and apart from the reasons why it takes place.
II. The
arrangements He made with man in his original state of innocence. The native
immortality of man¡¦s first constitution
the high capacity of enjoyment with
which he was endued
the inexhaustible sources of entertainment presented to
him in a world every part of which was very good; and then the beautiful garden
itself
still more rich and highly decorated than the smiling world around it
and placed under man¡¦s care
that in keeping and dressing it he might be the
more happy; these
and other such arrangements
surely indicated anything but a
disposition to take pleasure in the death of him that dieth. Or
look at the
subsequent arrangements made with Adam
and in him with ourselves
who shall
say that the agreement was a hard one?
III. The utter
detestation in which Jehovah holds sin
the cause of death. Properly
this is
the one thing which He detests. Hence
it is described in His word as that
abominable thing which He hates. And among the reasons why He so abhors sin
this is one of the first--that it is the enemy of all happiness
the source of
all misery.
IV. The method of
recovering us from sin which God has adopted. You here find Him doing
everything to preserve men from death. But what is still more remarkable
after
they had disregarded all these precautions of Divine love
and fallen by their
iniquity
you next find Jehovah making arrangements for their recovery from death.
And then such arrangements!
V. The various and
suitable means employed to bring us to the acceptance of the Saviour thus
provided for us. First of all
He puts the Gospel on record
by the
instrumentality of men guided in doing so by His own Spirit. There we read of
our degradation and ruin by sin
that we may know our disease; and of the
eminent skill and qualifications of the Physician
that we may be induced to
make application to Him for the remedy of His blood and grace. And then
lest
all this should fail of taking our attention and impressing our conscience
we
are warned
in the most impressive manner of our approaching destruction; and
we are argued with--we are encouraged--we are invited--we are entreated--to
flee for refuge
to lay hold on the hope set before us.
VI. The work of
rendering all these means effectual He puts into the hands of His own Spirit.
Jehovah knew too well the obstinacy of the hearts He would have to deal with
to hope for the repentance of a single sinner without providing in this way for
the regeneration of his soul by a Divine operation. Such a change manifestly
requires an exertion of Divine power as truly as resurrection or creation can
do in their more common signification. Great
however
as this work is
its
accomplishment is every way secured by the appointment of the Holy Ghost to the
office. (P. Hannay.)
Divine sorrow over the impenitent
I. It is painful
to see such noble affections misplaced. The spirit that is in man was created
capable of loving its Creator
with all the subjects of His kingdom
His law
His Gospel
and His service. Now
can any suppose that the blessed God has
pleasure in seeing such noble affections misplaced? Is it not more in
accordance with all we know of the Father of the Spirits to infer that He would
rather fill capacities like these with His own immensity? and that He would
delight in making happy souls so originally great and holy?
II. Such great
expectations disappointed. The sinner on whom we have fixed our eye was born
perhaps
a child of promise. Over his very cradle his parents planned his
future course
and indulged the fondest hopes of his future distinction
usefulness
and piety. He was
it may be supposed
the child of many prayers
and of high expectations. Oh
how dreadful to see such hopes withered
such
reasonable expectations nipped and destroyed by the frost of the second death!
How can there be in such an object anything that can fill the heart of God with
pleasure? Were it the seat of malevolence instead of mercy
it could hardly
fail to weep over such costly ruins.
III. The fact will
more clearly appear
when we see in the lost sinner such useful talents wasted
and ruined. The theme is painful--and let us touch it tenderly. Think
then
of
some great man now in torment. While on earth he could exhibit amazing
enterprise. He could count the stars and measure the diameter and distance of
every planet. He could conceive noble schemes
and trace
by the force of his
intellect
every project to its final close. But like the infidels
Hume
Voltaire
Bolingbroke
Hobbes
and many others
he hated the Son of God. Ah! if
these men had been as good as they were great
how useful they might have been.
But their gigantic minds were their bane and curse. The greatness that might
have made them happy has made them miserable. What a loss to all heaven! If any
government should be under the necessity of imprisoning for life its loftiest
geniuses
would not the loss be an injury to the nation? Would it not be felt
and deplored by every loyal subject and true patriot? How then can we for a
moment suppose that the God of love and mercy can have any pleasure in the
death of him that dieth? Inferences--
1. God will not consign any to perdition who do not oblige Him to do
so. Judgment is His strange work.
2. We see hence why the blessed God bears so long with the
disobedient and wicked. He abhors the work of destruction
and would not that
any should perish
but that all should come to repentance.
3. There must be something very odious in sin
since even the Father
of mercies will not spare from death the guilty
though He is loath to destroy.
(D. A. Clark.)
The death of sinners not pleasing to God
I. What is here to
be understood by men¡¦s dying. Scripture mentions three kinds of death: temporal
death
spiritual death
and eternal death. Temporal death is the dissolution of
the connection between the soul and body. Spiritual death is the total
corruption or depravity of the heart. Eternal death is complete and endless
misery in a future state. Temporal death is a common calamity
which none can
escape. ¡§By one man sin entered into the world
and death by sin; and so death
passed upon all men
for that all have sinned.¡¨ Spiritual death is as universal
as temporal. By nature all men are dead in trespasses and sins
and under the
entire dominion of an evil heart. But eternal death is peculiar to the finally
impenitent. Neither temporal nor spiritual death is an adequate punishment for
sin; but eternal death
or everlasting misery
is a just and proper reward for
final impenitence and unbelief. And this is what God threatens.
II. God is really
unwilling that any of mankind should suffer eternal death. This appears--
1. From the plain and positive declarations concerning the final
state of impenitent sinners
which are everywhere to be found in His word.
2. By the pure
disinterested
and universal benevolence of His
nature.
III. God sincerely
desires that all should be saved.
1. If God be unwilling that any should die
then He must desire that
all may live. He cannot be altogether indifferent about the happiness or misery
of His rational add immortal creatures.
2. That God desires that all may escape misery and enjoy happiness in
a future state
clearly appears from His providing a Saviour for all.
3. It appears from the invitations which God makes to sinners in the
Gospel
that He desires all should be saved. These invitations are universal
and extend to all sinners of every age
character
and condition
who are
capable of understanding them.
4. It further appears that God sincerely desires the salvation of all
men
from His commanding all to embrace the Gospel and live. He never commands
anything but what is agreeable to Him in its own nature.
5. The patience and forbearance of God towards sinners is a very
clear and convincing evidence that He greatly desires that they should be saved
rather than destroyed.
Improvement--
1. If God be so far from being willing that any of mankind should be
lost that He sincerely desires that all should be saved
then He always did and
always will feel as much benevolence towards those who are lost as towards
those who are saved.
2. If God is so far from being willing that any of mankind should be
lost that He sincerely desires that all should be saved
then it is easy to see
how His love of benevolence towards them should be entirely consistent with His
hatred of them. The more holy He is
the more He must hate sin. The more
benevolent He is
the more He must hate selfishness. The more He loves the
happiness of sinners
the more He must hate them for destroying it. The more He
loves the good of their fellow men
the more He must hate them for opposing it.
And the more He loves His own great and amiable character
the more He must
hate His malignant and mortal enemies.
3. If God¡¦s benevolence to sinners is consistent with His hating
them
then it is consistent with His punishing them forever.
4. If God is so far from being willing that any of mankind should be
lost that He sincerely desires that all should be saved
then He will do as
much to save all as He can do
consistently with His benevolence. And with
respect to those whose future and eternal happiness the good of the universe
does not require
but forbids
they themselves will be fully convinced that God
did as much for them as He could consistently do
and that their own negligence
and obstinacy were the only faulty causes of their own ruin. They will have to
blame themselves
that when God put a price into their hands to get wisdom and
obtain life
they had no heart to do it
but chose death rather than life.
5. If God acts from the same benevolent motives in loving and in
punishing finally impenitent sinners
then saints will forever love and praise
Him for all His conduct towards those guilty and miserable objects.
6. It appears from what has been said about God¡¦s willingness and
desire that sinners might be saved
that they are extremely unwilling to be
saved. They had rather die than live; they choose eternal death rather than
eternal life.
7. We learn the astonishing grace of God in making any sinners
willing to be saved. Renewing grace is
in the strictest sense
special
irresistible grace. It demonstrates that God is infinitely more willing to save
sinners than they are to be saved. It is subduing their unwillingness
and
making them willing in the day of His power to be saved. (N. Emmons
D. D.)
Wherefore turn yourselves
and live ye.
What must and can persons do towards their own conversion
¡§Turn yourselves!¡¨ We may ask
Is this the Christian doctrine of
conversion? are we not taught to depend on a converting grace? Is not our
helplessness in default of grace a commonplace of theologians and preachers?
Well
is not that truth indicated by the Psalmist¡¦s language about ¡§the law of
the Lord
¡¨ or the Lord Himself as ¡§restoring the soul
¡¨ or by Elijah¡¦s prayer
on Carmel
¡§Hear me
that this people may know that Thou hast turned their
heart back again
¡¨ and yet more touchingly
perhaps
by the prayer which
Jeremiah puts into Ephraim¡¦s mouth
¡§Turn Thou me
and I shall be turned¡¨?
When
in the light of such words
we read Ezekiel¡¦s exhortation
we understand
that when a penitent turns himself to God
he is in fact responding to a
movement from God
and using a power which that movement has supplied. So it is
that two elements concur in conversion: a Saul replies duteously to the
remonstrance
¡§Why persecutest thou Me?¡¨ an Augustine
having ¡§taken up and
read¡¨ the Pauline summary of a Christian¡¦s moral obligations
surrenders his
will absolutely to the practical requirements of the creed which his mind had
become ready to accept. We all of us may hear
if we do not wilfully shut our
ears
the voice which would draw us to the Christ of apostles and all saints;
if we listen
we shall receive strength to obey. (Canon Bright.)
¢w¢w¡mThe Biblical Illustrator¡n