| Back to Home Page | Back to
Book Index |
Matthew Chapter
Fifteen
Matthew 15
Chapter 15 displays man and God
the moral contrast
between the doctrine of Christ and that of the Jews; and thus the Jewish system
is rejected morally by God. When I speak of the system
I speak of their whole
moral condition
systematised by the hypocrisy that sought to conceal iniquity
while increasing it in the sight of God
before whom they presented themselves.
They made use of His name in order to sink lower
under the pretence of piety
than the laws of natural conscience. It is thus that a religious system becomes
the great instrument of the power of the enemy
and more especially when that
of which it still bears the name
was instituted by God. But then man is
judged
for Judaism was man with God's law and God's culture.
The judgment which the Lord pronounces on this system of hypocrisy
while manifesting the consequent rejection of Israel
gives rise to instruction
that goes thus much farther; and which
searching the heart of man
and judging
man according to that which proceeds from it
proves the heart to be a spring
of all iniquity; and thus makes it evident that all true morality has its basis
in the conviction and confession of sin. For
without this
the heart is always
false and flatters itself in vain. Thus also Jesus goes to the root of
everything
and comes out of the special and temporary relations of the Jewish
nation
to enter on the true morality which belongs to all ages. The disciples
did not observe the traditions of the elders; about these the Lord did not
concern Himself. He avails Himself of the accusation
to lay it upon the
conscience of their accusers
that the judgment occasioned by the rejection of
the Son of God was authorised also on the ground of those relationships that
already existed between God and Israel. They made the commandment of God of
none effect through their traditions; and that in a most important point
and
one even on which all earthly blessings depended for the children of Israel. By
their own ordinances also Jesus exposes the consummate hypocrisy
the
selfishness and avarice
of those who pretended to guide the people
and to
form their heart to morality and to the worship of Jehovah. Isaiah had already
pronounced their judgment.
Afterwards He shews the multitude that it was a question
of what man was
of what proceeded from his heart
from within him; and points
out the sad streams that flow from that corrupt spring. But it was the simple
truth with respect to the heart of man
as known by God
which scandalised the
self-righteous men of the world
which was unintelligible even to the
disciples. Nothing so simple as the truth when it is known; nothing so
difficult
so obscure
when a judgment is to be formed respecting it by the
heart of man
who does not possess the truth; for he judges after his own
thoughts
and the truth is not in them. In short
Israel
and specially
religious Israel
and true morality are set in contrast: man is set in his
proper responsibility
and in his real colours before God.
Jesus searches the heart; but
acting in grace
He acts
according to the heart of God
and manifests it by coming out
both for the one
and for the other
of the conventional terms of God's relationship with Israel.
A divine Person
God
may walk in the covenant He has given
but cannot be
confined to it. And the unfaithfulness of His people to it is the occasion of
the revelation of Him passing out beyond that place. And note
here
the effect
of traditional religion in blinding moral judgment. What clearer or plainer than
that what came out of the mouth and heart defiled a man
not what he ate? But
the disciples through the vile influence of Pharisaic teaching
putting outside
forms for inward purity
could not understand it.
Christ now leaves the borders of Israel
and His disputes
with the learned men of Jerusalem
to visit those places which were farthest
off from Jewish privileges. He departs into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon
the
cities which He had Himself used as examples of that which was farthest from
repentance; see chapter 11
where He classes them with Sodom and Gomorrah as
more hardened than they. A woman comes out of these countries. She was one of
the accursed race
according to the principles that distinguished Israel. She
was a Canaanite. She comes to beg the interposition of Jesus on behalf of her
daughter
who was possessed by a devil.
In begging this favour
she addresses Jesus by the title
which faith
knew to be His connection with the Jews-"Son of David." This gives
rise to a full development of the Lord's position
and
at the same time
of
the conditions under which man might hope to share the effect of His goodness
yea
to the revelation of God Himself.
As the Son of David
He has nothing to do with a
Canaanite. He makes her no answer. The disciples desired to get rid of her by
granting her request
in order to have done with her importunity. The Lord
answers them
that He was not sent but to the lost sheep of the house of
Israel. This was indeed the truth. Whatever may have been the counsels of God
manifested on occasion of His rejection (see Isaiah 49)
He was the minister of
the circumcision for the truth of God
to fulfil His promises made to the
fathers.
The woman
in more simple and direct language
the more
natural expression of her feelings
begs for the merciful interposition of Him
in whose power she trusted. The Lord answers her
that it is not meet to take
the children's bread and give it to dogs. We see here His true position
as
come to Israel; the promises were for the children of the kingdom. The Son of
David was the minister of these promises. Could He as such blot out the
distinction of the people of God?
But that faith which derives strength from necessity
and
which finds no resource but in the Lord Himself
accepts the humiliation of its
position
and deems that with Him there is bread for the hunger of those who
have no right to it. It perseveres
too
because there is a felt want
and
faith in the power of Him who is come in grace.
What had the Lord done by His apparent harshness? He had
brought the poor woman to the expression
to the sense
of her real place
before God
that is to say
to the truth as to herself. But
then
was it the
truth to say that God was less good than she believed
less rich in mercy
towards the destitute
whose only hope and trust was in that mercy? This would
have been to deny the character and the nature of God
of which He was the
expression
the truth
and the witness
on earth; it would have been to deny
Himself
and the object of His mission. He could not say
"God has not a
crumb for such." He answers
in fulness of heart
"O woman
great is
thy faith; be it unto thee even as thou wilt." God comes out of the narrow
limits of His covenant with the Jews
to act in His sovereign goodness
according to His own nature. He comes out to be God in goodness
and not merely
Jehovah in Israel.
But this goodness is exercised towards one who is
brought
in the presence of that goodness
to know that she has no right to it.
To this point the seeming harshness of the Lord had been leading her. She
received all from grace
while in herself unworthy of all. It is thus
and thus
only
that every soul obtains blessing. It is not merely the sense of need-the
woman had that from the beginning
it was that which brought her there. It is
not sufficient merely to own that the Lord Jesus can meet that need-the woman
came with that acknowledgment; we must be in the presence of the only source of
blessing
and be brought to feel that
although we are there
we have no right
to avail ourselves of it. And this is a terrible position. When it comes to
this
all is grace. God can then act according to His own goodness
and He
answers every desire which the heart can form for its happiness.
Thus we see Christ here as a minister of the circumcision
for the truth of God
to fulfil the promises made to the fathers
and that the
Gentiles also might glorify God for His mercy
as it is written. At the same
time this last truth makes manifest the real condition of man
and the full and
perfect grace of God. On this He acts
while still faithful to His promises;
and the wisdom of God is displayed in a manner that calls forth our admiration.
We see how much the introduction
in this place
of the
story of the Syro-Phenician woman develops and illustrates this part of our
Gospel. The beginning of the chapter shews forth the moral condition of the
Jews
the falseness of Pharisaic and sacerdotal religiousness; brings out the
real state of man as man
what the heart of man was the source of; and then
reveals the heart of God as manifested in Jesus. His dealings with this woman
display the faithfulness of God to His promises; and the blessing finally
granted exhibits the full grace of God
in connection with the manifestation of
the real condition of man
acknowledged by conscience-grace rising above the
curse which lay upon the object of this grace-rising above everything to make
itself a way to the need which faith presented to it.
The Lord now departs thence and goes into Galilee
the
place where He was in connection with the despised remnant of the Jews. It was
neither Zion
nor the temple
nor Jerusalem
but the poor of the flock
where
the people were sitting in gross darkness (Isa. 8
9). Thither His compassions
follow this poor remnant
and are again exercised in their behalf. He renews
the evidences
not only of His tender mercies
but of His presence who
satisfied the poor of His people with bread. Here however it is not in the
administrative power which He could bestow on His disciples
but according to
His own perfection and acting from Himself. He provides for the remnant of His
people. Accordingly it is the fulness of seven baskets of fragments that is
gathered up. He departs also without anything else taking place.
We have seen eternal morality
and truth in the inward
parts
substituted for the hypocrisy of forms
man's use of legal religion and
man's heart shewn to be a source of evil and nought else
God's heart fully
revealed that rises above all dispensation to shew full grace in Christ. Thus
dispensations are set aside though fully owned
and man and God fully shewn out
in doing so. It is a wonderful chapter as to what is everlasting in truth as to
God
and as to what the revelation of God shews man to be. And this
note
gives occasion to the revelation of the assembly in the next chapter
which is
not a dispensation but founded on what Christ is
Son of the living God. In
chapter 12 Christ was dispensationally rejected
and the kingdom of heaven
substituted in chapter 13. Here man is set aside and what he had made of law
and God acts in His own grace above all dispensations. Then come the assembly
and the kingdom in glory.
── John Darby《Synopsis of Matthew》
Matthew 15
Chapter Contents
Jesus discourses about human traditions. (1-9) He warns
against things which really defile. (10-20) He heals the daughter of a
Syrophenician woman. (21-28) Jesus heals the sick
and miraculously feeds four
thousand. (29-39)
Commentary on Matthew 15:1-9
(Read Matthew 15:1-9)
Additions to God's laws reflect upon his wisdom
as if he
had left out something which was needed
and which man could supply; in one way
or other they always lead men to disobey God. How thankful ought we to be for
the written word of God! Never let us think that the religion of the Bible can
be improved by any human addition
either in doctrine or practice. Our blessed
Lord spoke of their traditions as inventions of their own
and pointed out one
instance in which this was very clear
that of their transgressing the fifth
commandment. When a parent's wants called for assistance
they pleaded
that
they had devoted to the temple all they could spare
even though they did not
part with it
and therefore their parents must expect nothing from them. This
was making the command of God of no effect. The doom of hypocrites is put in a
little compass; "In vain do they worship me." It will neither please
God
nor profit themselves; they trust in vanity
and vanity will be their
recompence.
Commentary on Matthew 15:10-20
(Read Matthew 15:10-20)
Christ shows that the defilement they ought to fear
was
not from what entered their mouths as food
but from what came out of their
mouths
which showed the wickedness of their hearts. Nothing will last in the
soul but the regenerating graces of the Holy Spirit; and nothing should be
admitted into the church but what is from above; therefore
whoever is offended
by a plain
seasonable declaration of the truth
we should not be troubled at
it. The disciples ask to be better taught as to this matter. Where a weak head
doubts concerning any word of Christ
an upright heart and a willing mind seek
for instruction. It is the heart that is desperately wicked
Jeremiah 17:9
for there is no sin in word or
deed
which was not first in the heart. They all come out of the man
and are
fruits of that wickedness which is in the heart
and is wrought there. When
Christ teaches
he will show men the deceitfulness and wickedness of their own
hearts; he will teach them to humble themselves
and to seek to be cleansed in
the Fountain opened for sin and uncleanness.
Commentary on Matthew 15:21-28
(Read Matthew 15:21-28)
The dark corners of the country
the most remote
shall
share Christ's influences; afterwards the ends of the earth shall see his
salvation. The distress and trouble of her family brought a woman to Christ;
and though it is need that drives us to Christ
yet we shall not therefore be
driven from him. She did not limit Christ to any particular instance of mercy
but mercy
mercy
is what she begged for: she pleads not merit
but depends
upon mercy. It is the duty of parents to pray for their children
and to be
earnest in prayer for them
especially for their souls. Have you a son
a
daughter
grievously vexed with a proud devil
an unclean devil
a malicious
devil
led captive by him at his will? this is a case more deplorable than that
of bodily possession
and you must bring them by faith and prayer to Christ
who alone is able to heal them. Many methods of Christ's providence
especially
of his grace
in dealing with his people
which are dark and perplexing
may be
explained by this story
which teaches that there may be love in Christ's heart
while there are frowns in his face; and it encourages us
though he seems ready
to slay us
yet to trust in him. Those whom Christ intends most to honour
he
humbles to feel their own unworthiness. A proud
unhumbled heart would not have
borne this; but she turned it into an argument to support her request. The
state of this woman is an emblem of the state of a sinner
deeply conscious of
the misery of his soul. The least of Christ is precious to a believer
even the
very crumbs of the Bread of life. Of all graces
faith honours Christ most;
therefore of all graces Christ honours faith most. He cured her daughter. He
spake
and it was done. From hence let such as seek help from the Lord
and
receive no gracious answer
learn to turn even their unworthiness and
discouragements into pleas for mercy.
Commentary on Matthew 15:29-39
(Read Matthew 15:29-39)
Whatever our case is
the only way to find ease and
relief
is to lay it at Christ's feet
to submit it to him
and refer it to his
disposal. Those who would have spiritual healing from Christ
must be ruled as
he pleases. See what work sin has made; what various diseases human bodies are
subject to. Here were such diseases as fancy could neither guess the cause nor
the cure of
yet these were subject to the command of Christ. The spiritual
cures that Christ works are wonderful. When blind souls are made to see by
faith
the dumb to speak in prayer
the maimed and the lame to walk in holy
obedience
it is to be wondered at. His power was also shown to the multitude
in the plentiful provision he made for them: the manner is much the same as
before. All did eat
and were filled. Those whom Christ feeds
he fills. With
Christ there is bread enough
and to spare; supplies of grace for more than
seek it
and for those that seek for more. Christ sent away the people. Though
he had fed them twice
they must not look for miracles to find their daily
bread. Let them go home to their callings and their own tables. Lord
increase
our faith
and pardon our unbelief
teaching us to live upon thy fulness and
bounty
for all things pertaining to this life
and that which is to come.
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on Matthew》
Matthew 15
Verse 2
[2] Why
do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not
their hands when they eat bread.
The elders —
The chief doctors or
teachers among the Jews.
Verse 3
[3] But he answered and said unto them
Why do ye also transgress the
commandment of God by your tradition?
They wash not their hands when they eat bread — Food in general is termed bread in Hebrew; so that to eat bread is the
same as to make a meal.
Verse 4
[4] For
God commanded
saying
Honour thy father and mother: and
He that curseth
father or mother
let him die the death.
Honour thy father and mother — Which implies all such relief as they stand in need of. Exodus 20:12; 21:17.
Verse 5
[5] But
ye say
Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother
It is a gift
by
whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
It is a gift by whatsoever thou mightest have
been profited by me — That is
I have given
or at least
purpose to give to the treasury of the temple
what you might otherwise have
had from me.
Verse 7
[7] Ye hypocrites
well did Esaias prophesy of you
saying
Well did Isaiah prophesy of you
saying — That is
the description which Isaiah gave of your fathers
is exactly
applicable to you. The words therefore which were a description of them
are a
prophecy with regard to you.
Verse 8
[8] This
people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth
and honoureth me with their lips;
but their heart is far from me.
Their heart is far from me — And without this all outward worship is mere mockery of God. Isaiah 29:13.
Verse 9
[9] But
in vain they do worship me
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
Teaching the commandments of men — As equal with
nay
superior to
those of God. What can be a more
heinous sin?
Verse 13
[13] But
he answered and said
Every plant
which my heavenly Father hath not planted
shall be rooted up.
Every plant —
That is
every doctrine.
Verse 14
[14] Let
them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the
blind
both shall fall into the ditch.
Let them alone — If
they are indeed blind leaders of the blind; let them alone: concern not
yourselves about them: a plain direction how to behave with regard to all such.
Luke 6:39.
Verse 17
[17] Do
not ye yet understand
that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the
belly
and is cast out into the draught?
Are ye also yet without understanding — How fair and candid are the sacred historians? Never concealing or
excusing their own blemishes.
Verse 19
[19] For
out of the heart proceed evil thoughts
murders
adulteries
fornications
thefts
false witness
blasphemies:
First evil thoughts —
then murders - and the rest.
Railings —
The Greek word includes all reviling
backbiting
and evil speaking.
Verse 21
[21] Then
Jesus went thence
and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
Verse 22
[22] And
behold
a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts
and cried unto him
saying
Have mercy on me
O Lord
thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously
vexed with a devil.
A woman of Canaan —
Canaan was also called Syrophenicia
as lying between Syria properly so called
and Phenicia
by the sea side.
Cried to him —
From afar
Thou Son of David - So she had some knowledge of the promised
Messiah.
Verse 23
[23] But
he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him
saying
Send her away; for she crieth after us.
He answered her not a word — He sometimes tries our faith in like manner.
Verse 24
[24] But
he answered and said
I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of
Israel.
I am not sent —
Not primarily; not yet.
Verse 25
[25] Then
came she and worshipped him
saying
Lord
help me.
Then came she —
Into the house where he now was.
Verse 28
[28] Then
Jesus answered and said unto her
O woman
great is thy faith: be it unto thee
even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
Thy faith —
Thy reliance on the power and goodness of God.
Verse 29
[29] And
Jesus departed from thence
and came nigh unto the sea of Galilee; and went up
into a mountain
and sat down there.
The sea of Galilee —
The Jews gave the name of seas to all large lakes. This was a hundred furlongs
long
and forty broad. It was called also
the sea of Tiberias. It lay on the
borders of Galilee
and the city of Tiberias stood on its western shore. It was
likewise styled the lake of Gennesareth: perhaps a corruption of Cinnereth
the
name by which it was anciently called
Numbers 34:11; Mark 7:31.
Verse 32
[32] Then
Jesus called his disciples unto him
and said
I have compassion on the
multitude
because they continue with me now three days
and have nothing to
eat: and I will not send them away fasting
lest they faint in the way.
They continue with me now three days — It was now the third day since they came. Mark 8:1.
Verse 36
[36] And
he took the seven loaves and the fishes
and gave thanks
and brake them
and
gave to his disciples
and the disciples to the multitude.
He gave thanks
or blessed the food — That is
he praised God for it
and prayed for a blessing upon it.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on
Matthew》
Chapter 15.
Men's Traditions
Honor Me with Their Lips
Far Away from Me Are Their Hearts
I. Point out the Source of Defilement
II. Begging of the Canaanite Woman
III. Feed Four Thousand
── Chih-Hsin Chang《An Outline of The New Testament》
The Danger With Traditions (15:1-9)
INTRODUCTION
1. As Jesus went about preaching and teaching
He often ran afoul of
the religious leaders over the matter of keeping traditions...
a. E.g.
plucking heads of grain on the Sabbath - Mt 12:1-8
b. E.g.
healing on the Sabbath - Mt 12:9-14
c. E.g.
eating with unwashed hands - Mt 15:1-9
2. In Mt 15:1-9
Jesus describes the danger of traditions at length...
a. How keeping them can make void the very commands of God
b. How keeping them can make our worship vain before God
3. Traditions are very important in some religions...
a. In the Roman Catholic church
tradition is place on par with
God's Word
1) "It is an article of faith from a decree of the Vatican
Council that Tradition is a source of theological teaching
distinct from Scripture
and that it is infallible. It is
therefore to be received with the same internal assent of
Scripture for it is the word of God." - Catholic Dictionary
p. 41-42
2) "Do you have to believe in Tradition? Yes
because it is the
Word of God and has equal authority with the Bible."
- Catholic Catechism For Adults
p. 11
b. Just about every Protestant church has its own traditions
1) It is often the accepted traditions that distinguish between
the denominations
2) To be a member of a particular denomination
one must accept
its traditions
4. In this study
we will address the following questions...
a. What are traditions?
b. Are traditions always wrong?
c. If not
when does a tradition become sinful?
[Let's begin with...]
I. THE MEANING OF TRADITION
A. THE WORD ITSELF...
1. The Greek word is "paradosis"
which means "giving over" or
"handing down"
2. It refers to teaching that is handed down either by word
(orally) or in writing
B. AS UNDERSTOOD BY THE JEWS...
1. It was often applied to the oral teachings of the elders
(distinguished elders from Moses on down)
2. These traditions were often divided into three classes...
a. Some oral laws supposedly given by Moses in addition to the
written laws
b. Decisions of various judges which became precedents in
judicial matters
c. Interpretations of highly respected rabbis which were held
in reverence along with the OT scriptures
-- Article on "Tradition"
ISBE
3. Prior to his conversion
Paul was a staunch supporter of
Jewish tradition - Ga 1:13-14
C. AS UNDERSTOOD BY ROMAN AND GREEK CATHOLICS...
1. Their views appear to be parallel to that of the Jews
2. What they consider "Tradition" is what they believe to be the
teachings:
a. Of Jesus or the apostles
persevered orally rather than
through writing
b. Of various councils which have left various decrees
c. Of various church leaders (such as the pope) considered to
be inspired with later revelations from God
3. Of course
one is expected to take their word for it that
these "traditions" were truly from God and have been
faithfully transmitted
D. AS FOUND IN THE SCRIPTURES...
1. The word "tradition" as such is not found in the Old Testament
2. It is found thirteen times in New Testament
a. Three times it refers to "apostolic teaching"
1) That which had been delivered by the apostles - 1 Co
11:2
2) Whether by word (in person) or epistle - 2 Th 2:15
3) Which Christians were expected to keep - 2 Th 3:6
b. Ten times it refers to "the tradition of the elders" or
"the traditions of men"
1) As in our text and parallel passages - Mt 15:2-6; Mk 7:
3-13
2) Of which Paul warned the Colossians - Co 2:8
3) From which Jewish Christians had been delivered
(including Paul) - 1 Pe 1:18; Ga 1:14
3. Jesus did not feel bound to abide by "the traditions of the
elders"
a. Some traditions He had no problem keeping
1) Such as going to a wedding feast - Jn 2:1-2
2) Or attending the Feast Of Dedication - Jn 10:22-23
b. But He just as easily had no problem with violating other
traditions
1) Plucking grain or healing on the Sabbath
2) Eating with unwashed hands
c. Evidently Jesus did not subscribe to the view of
"traditions" handed down orally
1) He never appealed to the traditions of the elders
2) He either appealed to the authority of the written Word
(the Law of Moses)
or to His own authority as the Son
of God
[Not all "traditions" are wrong. When they are teachings inspired of
God
given and "written" by men approved of God
they are to be heeded.
But when they are doctrines or interpretations handed down by
uninspired men
then like the traditions of the Jews they are suspect.
As we return to our text (Mt 15:1-9)
Jesus points out...]
II. THE DANGER OF TRADITIONS OF MEN
A. THEY CAN MAKE VOID THE WORD OF GOD...
1. Jesus gave the example of honoring one's parents - Mt 15:3-6
a. The tradition of the elders taught giving to the temple
freed one from giving to his or her parents
b. Thus rendering the command of God of no effect
2. There are traditions of men today with similar affect
a. Such as the practice of sprinkling for baptism
a tradition
of man
b. When one keeps the tradition of sprinkling
they make the
command of God to be baptized (immersed) of no effect!
3. Through keeping such traditions
one is actually rejecting the
command of God! - cf. Mk 7:8-9
B. THEY CAN LEAD TO VAIN WORSHIP...
1. When traditions of men are taught on the same level as the
commands of God
it leads to vain worship - Mt 15:9
2. Such worship may appear to be impressive
but it in actually
"empty
worthless"
a. First
because God did not command it
b. Second
because it does not accomplish the good we really
need - cf. Co 2:20-23
C. THEY CAN LEAD TO HYPOCRITICAL WORSHIP...
1. Traditions of men tend toward ritualism (just look at the
rituals found in many religions that have no scriptural basis)
2. Such ritualism is often done repeatedly
with little thought
as to its origin and purpose
3. It is easy to go through such rituals
with the heart and mind
on other things
4. Worship without the heart (or mind) of man is hypocritical
worship! - Mt 15:7-8
CONCLUSION
1. What are traditions?
a. They are simply teachings that have been handed down
b. In the case of inspired men (like the apostles) given in person
or through their writings
such traditions are good and to be
followed
2. In the case of oral transmissions
given through a chain of
uninspired men
traditions are at best suspect...
a. Jesus did not hold the "traditions" orally transmitted through
the Jews on par with God's written word
b. Neither should we hold "traditions" orally transmitted through
Christians on par with God's written word
3. At worst
traditions of men can be vain and deadly...
a. When their observance leads one to not keep a command of God
b. When they are taught as doctrine
on par with God's word
c. When they lead to ritualism
done without engaging the heart and
mind of man
From Jesus' words
let us be aware of "The Danger With Traditions"
and
make sure that our faith and practice is based upon the written Word of
God
not the interpretations and teachings of uninspired men!
Blind Leaders Of The Blind (15:12-14)
INTRODUCTION
1. Who can you trust regarding religious matters today?
a. Many people trust their preacher
priest
or pastor
b. They assume that "a man of God" must be trustworthy
2. Yet the Bible does not always speak highly of religious leaders...
a. Paul warned about "savage wolves" not sparing the flock of God
- Ac 20:29-30
b. Peter wrote of "false teachers" bringing in destructive heresies
- 2 Pe 2:1-2
-- Such men would knowingly destroy the people of God
3. Not all those who mislead do so knowingly...
a. Jesus told His disciples about "blind leaders of the blind"
- Mt 15:12-14
b. Being "blind" themselves
they may not be aware of how they
mislead others
4. The end result is still the same
however...
a. Those misled still "fall into the ditch" and are destroyed - Mt
15:14; Isa 9:16
b. Whether led by a "false teacher"
or by a "blind leader"
5. That we ourselves might not blindly follow a blind leader...
a. What are some of the characteristics of a blind leader?
b. How can we be sure not to be misled by a blind leader?
-- These are the questions we hope to answer in this study
[While Peter had much to say about false teachers (cf. 2 Pe 2)
Jesus
had much to say about blind leaders...]
I. CHARACTERISTICS OF A BLIND LEADER
A. HOLDING TO THE TRADITIONS OF MEN...
1. This was the case of the Pharisees in Mt 15
2. They were willing to put their traditions above God's word
- Mt 15:3
6
9
3. Blind leaders today will do the same
a. Teaching as doctrine their traditions
b. Not knowing that what they teach comes from man
not God
B. MAKING DISTINCTIONS WHERE GOD HAS MADE NONE...
1. This was the case of the Pharisees in Mt 23
where they are
called "blind" five times
2. They made fine distinctions between the types of oaths one
could swear - Mt 23:16-22
3. Blind leaders will often do the same today
a. Making fine distinctions so that one need not keep God's
word
b. Saying some commands of God are essential to salvation
and
others not
C. LEAVING COMMANDS OF GOD UNDONE...
1. Again
the Pharisees were guilty of this
for which they were
called "blind guides"
2. They left undone the "weightier" matters of God's law - Mt 23:
23-24
a. They stressed tithing
but neglected justice
mercy
faith
b. Thus they would strain out a gnat
but swallow a camel
3. Blind leaders today often do the same
but in reverse...
a. They are quick to stress the "weightier" matters
and leave
what they consider the "lighter" things undone
b. But Jesus said we should do both
leaving neither undone!
D. FOCUSING ONLY ON THE OUTER MAN...
1. The "blind Pharisee" worked only on the outside - Mt 23:25-28
a. Concerned with keeping the traditions of ritual cleansing
b. Willing to put up with extortion
self-indulgence
hypocrisy and lawlessness
2. Today
blind leaders are happy with the appearance of
success...
a. Big buildings
large crowds
b. Accepting people into the church without challenging them
to true repentance
E. OTHER CHARACTERISTICS...
1. From this passage (Mt 23) in which Jesus assails the
Pharisees
we glean some other characteristics of those who
were blind leaders
2. Summarizing these quickly...
a. They say and do not
binding heavy burdens on others - Mt
23:1-4
b. They do their works to be seen of men - Mt 23:5
c. They love the attention and special treatment by others
- Mt 23:6-7
d. They wear religious titles
though Jesus condemned it - Mt
23:8-10
e. They fail to truly show the way to the kingdom of heaven
- Mt 23:13
f. They use their religion to make money and impress others
- Mt 23:14
g. They don't make people better
they make them worse! - Mt
23:15
h. They honor the men of God who went before them
but are
more like those who persecuted the people of God - Mt 23:
29-31
[Sadly
this sounds like many religious leaders today
especially some
on TV! If we are not careful
we can easily be led astray by them.
This leads to our next point...]
II. HOW NOT TO BE MISLED BY BLIND LEADERS
A. LISTEN TO THEM CAREFULLY...
1. We need to have the same attitude as the Bereans - Ac 17:11
a. When Paul came to town
they "received the word with all
readiness"
b. This describes how they listened to Paul - paying close
attention to the things he was teaching
2. We must first give all teachers a fair and careful hearing
a. Seek to understand exactly what they are saying
b. It requires that we be good listeners
-- Many are misled because they have never learned to listen
carefully to what is being taught them! (How well do you
listen?)
B. SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES DAILY...
1. This was another noble quality of the Bereans - Ac 17:11
a. Having listened carefully
they then went home and compared
what Paul said to the Scriptures
b. They did not simply accept whatever Paul said
2. Unfortunately
many today are Biblically illiterate...
a. They do not follow along in their Bibles when someone is
teaching or preaching
b. They do not read their Bibles daily
-- Failure to do these things leaves one in a blind condition
unable to discern what is the word of God
or some teaching
and tradition of man!
CONCLUSION
1. What will be the end of blind leaders
and those who follow them?
a. Like plants
they will be "uprooted" by the Heavenly Father - Mt
15:13
b. Together they will both "fall into a ditch" - Mt 15:14
c. Though very religious
thinking that they serve the Lord
Jesus
will tell them: "I never knew you; depart from Me
you who
practice lawlessness!" - cf. Mt 7:21-23
2. Who are to blame
if people are misled by blind leaders?
a. The blind leader will be held accountable
but not totally
a. If people are blind
it is only because they have closed their
own eyes - Mt 13:15
May the example of the Bereans remind us of what is necessary not to be
misled by blind leaders
and may we so see and hear that what Jesus
said will be true of us:
"But blessed are your eyes for they see
and your ears for they
hear; for assuredly
I say to you that many prophets and righteous
men desired to see what you see
and did not see it
and to hear
what you hear and did not hear it." (Mt 13:16-17)
--《Executable
Outlines》